| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Warnock" |
| Date: |
25 Jan 2004 11:41:24 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
"bluskie" <wildbluskies@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a9dd1b95.0401190918.35cf6cc@posting.google.com...
Matthew 4:17 From that time Jesus began to preach and to say,
Repent,
for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
The kingdom of heaven is at hand? Well, its been 2,000 years. I guess
you'll have to wait another 2,000 years. Where is this "kingdom of
heaven?"
At hand.
Robert B. Winn
Wanker.
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
--
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that no God
exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of having to comply
with God's Law!**
.
|
|
| User: "Marvin" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
25 Jan 2004 01:20:49 PM |
|
|
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in message
news:bv10me$2d3$22@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net...
"bluskie" <wildbluskies@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a9dd1b95.0401190918.35cf6cc@posting.google.com...
Matthew 4:17 From that time Jesus began to preach
and to say,
Repent,
for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
The kingdom of heaven is at hand? Well, its been 2,000
years. I guess
you'll have to wait another 2,000 years. Where is this
"kingdom of
heaven?"
At hand.
Robert B. Winn
Wanker.
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will
be shown the
truth!
--
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter
dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and
breath life into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
Utter dismay? Are you laboring under the impression that
those mad scientist stories are nonfiction? Can you cite a
verifiable instance of God's having done either of the things
you seem to believe scientists are attempting? (BTW, do you
mean breathe?)
** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced
that no God
exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of
having to comply
with God's Law!**
In which case God won't allow it. If He or She has an
absolute law, He or She surely doesn't need you to enforce it.
Why get so worked up about it?
--
Marvin
To reply, burn off fog.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bluskie" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
25 Jan 2004 05:01:29 PM |
|
|
"Marvin" <marvin2@fogstarband.net> wrote in message news:<HGUQb.21183$G36.1713724453@twister2.starband.net>...
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in message
news:bv10me$2d3$22@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net...
"bluskie" <wildbluskies@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a9dd1b95.0401190918.35cf6cc@posting.google.com...
Matthew 4:17 From that time Jesus began to preach
and to say,
Repent,
for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
The kingdom of heaven is at hand? Well, its been 2,000
years. I guess
you'll have to wait another 2,000 years. Where is this
"kingdom of
heaven?"
At hand.
Robert B. Winn
Wanker.
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will
be shown the
truth!
the truth is you're a fuckwit.
--
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter
dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and
breath life into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
fuckwit, the only thing that proves is that you're even more of a
idiot then I thought, no god has ever breathed life into a dead body,
or anything for that matter, not ever, you fuckwitted stupid imbecilic
moron.
Utter dismay? Are you laboring under the impression that
those mad scientist stories are nonfiction? Can you cite a
verifiable instance of God's having done either of the things
you seem to believe scientists are attempting? (BTW, do you
mean breathe?)
** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced
that no God
exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of
having to comply
with God's Law!**
In which case God won't allow it. If He or She has an
absolute law, He or She surely doesn't need you to enforce it.
Why get so worked up about it?
because there is no god ,the fucks just want to turn us all into
slaves, because it says so in the wholy babble.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
25 Jan 2004 09:01:21 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 19:20:49 GMT, "Marvin" <marvin2@fogstarband.net>
posted in alt.atheism:
In which case God won't allow it. If He or She has an
absolute law, He or She surely doesn't need you to enforce it.
Why get so worked up about it?
Their god is omnipotent, except when it comes to convincing others, in
which case he's impotent.
--
"Atheism is the world of reality, it is reason, it is freedom. Atheism is
human concern, and intellectual honesty to a degree that the religious mind
cannot begin to understand. And yet it is more than this. Atheism is not an
old religion, it is not a new and coming religion, in fact it is not, and
never has been, a religion at all. The definition of Atheism is magnificent in
its simplicity: Atheism is merely the bed-rock of sanity in a world of
madness."
[Atheism: An Affirmative View, by Emmett F. Fields]
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Will" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
25 Jan 2004 10:41:49 PM |
|
|
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in message news:<bv10me$2d3$22@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net>...
"bluskie" <wildbluskies@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a9dd1b95.0401190918.35cf6cc@posting.google.com...
Matthew 4:17 From that time Jesus began to preach and to say,
Repent,
for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
The kingdom of heaven is at hand? Well, its been 2,000 years. I guess
you'll have to wait another 2,000 years. Where is this "kingdom of
heaven?"
At hand.
Robert B. Winn
Wanker.
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
UH, to answer your question, Jesus, were he alive today, would be
considered a far left pinko and, by Ann Coulter, a traitor. After all,
any who could use the phrase "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they
shall be called Children of God," has got to be subversive.
Will
.
|
|
|
| User: "Warnock" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
27 Jan 2004 08:20:27 AM |
|
|
"Will" <wryan@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:e6e41727.0401252041.3b2cea37@posting.google.com...
Matthew 4:17 From that time Jesus began to preach and to say,
Repent,
for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
The kingdom of heaven is at hand? Well, its been 2,000 years. I
guess
you'll have to wait another 2,000 years. Where is this "kingdom of
heaven?"
At hand.
Robert B. Winn
Wanker.
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
UH, to answer your question, Jesus, were he alive today, would be
considered a far left pinko and, by Ann Coulter, a traitor. After all,
any who could use the phrase "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they
shall be called Children of God," has got to be subversive.
Will
***** Mathew 5:
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will inherit the kingdom of God!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
26 Jan 2004 07:58:29 AM |
|
|
(Will) wrote in message news:<e6e41727.0401252041.3b2cea37@posting.google.com>...
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in message news:<bv10me$2d3$22@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net>...
"bluskie" <wildbluskies@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a9dd1b95.0401190918.35cf6cc@posting.google.com...
Matthew 4:17 From that time Jesus began to preach and to say,
Repent,
for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
The kingdom of heaven is at hand? Well, its been 2,000 years. I guess
you'll have to wait another 2,000 years. Where is this "kingdom of
heaven?"
At hand.
Robert B. Winn
Wanker.
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
UH, to answer your question, Jesus, were he alive today, would be
considered a far left pinko and, by Ann Coulter, a traitor. After all,
any who could use the phrase "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they
shall be called Children of God," has got to be subversive.
Will
Well, but you forgot one thing. Jesus loved little children and did not kill any.
Robert b. winn
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "bluskie" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
26 Jan 2004 09:15:18 AM |
|
|
(Will) wrote in message news:<e6e41727.0401252041.3b2cea37@posting.google.com>...
"Warnock" <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote in message news:<bv10me$2d3$22@ctb-nnrp2.saix.net>...
"bluskie" <wildbluskies@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a9dd1b95.0401190918.35cf6cc@posting.google.com...
Matthew 4:17 From that time Jesus began to preach and to say,
Repent,
for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
The kingdom of heaven is at hand? Well, its been 2,000 years. I guess
you'll have to wait another 2,000 years. Where is this "kingdom of
heaven?"
At hand.
Robert B. Winn
Wanker.
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
UH, to answer your question, Jesus, were he alive today, would be
considered a far left pinko and, by Ann Coulter, a traitor. After all,
any who could use the phrase "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they
shall be called Children of God," has got to be subversive.
Will
and submissive too, jesus was gay, all the apostles had a go at him at least once.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Warnock" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
27 Jan 2004 09:37:05 AM |
|
|
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1686c3b8.0401260819.1cb35b1d@posting.google.com...
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms exist, then
there must be someone better than you - get used to it!
** People who deny that there is a God, are not so convinced that no God
exists, but are using this denial as a crutch to get out of having to
comply
with God's Law!**
People who are convinced there is a God, are so convinced that a God
exists, that they feel it is their right to force their religion and
it's associated beliefs down everyone's throat, irregardless of how
may rights they infringe upon while doing it.
***** ***** Not forcing anything done your throat, however, you need to
consider the truth!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
28 Jan 2004 12:36:53 AM |
|
|
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms exist, then
there must be someone better than you -
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby, then
women must be better than you?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
28 Jan 2004 04:29:32 AM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms exist, then
there must be someone better than you -
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby, then
women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies. Are people who kill
babies better than me?
Robert b. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "the cutest atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
28 Jan 2004 05:13:01 AM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote in message
news:7943568.0401280229.44d5efb9@posting.google.com...
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message
news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be
shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay,
yes, confusing to the scientists, that is
?????
can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath
life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
natural processes can do lots of things that human beings are not capable
of. you're too stupid and lazy to try to understand the complexity of life
and the mechanisms that have brought this about. so you get out your rubber
stamp that states 'goddidit' and you thump it down. case closed. the idiot's
brain is no longer in danger of being strained and he can go back to
watching tv
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms exist,
then
there must be someone better than you -
you presume a 'someone'. how would you then explain the someone's existence?
self-creation? that's theological rhetoric that doesn't mean anything - and
was nicked off the ancient egyptians and twisted - like so much of your book
of blood
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby, then
women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies. Are people who kill
babies better than me?
better at what?
btw, 'baby' is a very subjective term, and rather inadequate (in that it's
emotionally charged and means different things depending on the reader's
perspective). do you mean a born child or a foetus? in what trimester? when
does it cease being a pulpy bunch of cells in a woman's body that are
potentially offspring and become a 'baby'?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Warnock" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
30 Jan 2004 07:00:17 AM |
|
|
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1PMRb.32098$Wa.3062@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter
dismay,
yes, confusing to the scientists, that is
?????
***** Scientists are really worried, its the last great frontier!
can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and
breath
life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
natural processes can do lots of things that human beings are not capable
of. you're too stupid and lazy to try to understand the complexity of life
and the mechanisms that have brought this about. so you get out your
rubber
stamp that states 'goddidit' and you thump it down. case closed. the
idiot's
brain is no longer in danger of being strained and he can go back to
watching tv
***** So, I assume that God is the Higher intelligence, you just attribute
it to Nature. Either way it is greater than we are! Could well be that God =
Nature
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms
exist,
then
there must be someone better than you -
you presume a 'someone'. how would you then explain the someone's
existence?
self-creation? that's theological rhetoric that doesn't mean anything -
and
was nicked off the ancient egyptians and twisted - like so much of your
book
of blood
***** There are areas of knowledge which have not been opened up to us yet!
One is where or how God began, another is the extent of the universe and
space!
better at what?
btw, 'baby' is a very subjective term, and rather inadequate (in that it's
emotionally charged and means different things depending on the reader's
perspective). do you mean a born child or a foetus? in what trimester?
when
does it cease being a pulpy bunch of cells in a woman's body that are
potentially offspring and become a 'baby'?
***** At inception!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
28 Jan 2004 01:49:32 PM |
|
|
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<1PMRb.32098$Wa.3062@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote in message
news:7943568.0401280229.44d5efb9@posting.google.com...
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message
news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be
shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay,
yes, confusing to the scientists, that is
?????
can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath
life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
natural processes can do lots of things that human beings are not capable
of. you're too stupid and lazy to try to understand the complexity of life
and the mechanisms that have brought this about. so you get out your rubber
stamp that states 'goddidit' and you thump it down. case closed. the idiot's
brain is no longer in danger of being strained and he can go back to
watching tv
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms exist,
then
there must be someone better than you -
you presume a 'someone'. how would you then explain the someone's existence?
self-creation? that's theological rhetoric that doesn't mean anything - and
was nicked off the ancient egyptians and twisted - like so much of your book
of blood
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby, then
women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies. Are people who kill
babies better than me?
better at what?
btw, 'baby' is a very subjective term, and rather inadequate (in that it's
emotionally charged and means different things depending on the reader's
perspective). do you mean a born child or a foetus? in what trimester? when
does it cease being a pulpy bunch of cells in a woman's body that are
potentially offspring and become a 'baby'?
Well, I look at it the same way the prophet Isaiah did. He called
Jesus Christ a child in 700 B.C. That was 698 years before Jesus
Christ was a pulpy bunch of cells in a woman's body. Unto us a child
is born, unto us a son is given, and the government shall be upon his
shoulder, etc.
Then, of course we have this account of what Jesus Christ was shortly
before he was born. Luke 2:5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused
wife, being great with child.
So it seems that you have attempted to re-define the word child.
Good thing we had the Bible so that we would not get misled by your
misinformation, wasn't it?
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "the cutest atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
28 Jan 2004 07:27:17 PM |
|
|
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote in message
news:7943568.0401281149.4483009f@posting.google.com...
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<1PMRb.32098$Wa.3062@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote in message
news:7943568.0401280229.44d5efb9@posting.google.com...
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message
news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be
shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter
dismay,
yes, confusing to the scientists, that is
?????
can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and
breath
life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
natural processes can do lots of things that human beings are not
capable
of. you're too stupid and lazy to try to understand the complexity of
life
and the mechanisms that have brought this about. so you get out your
rubber
stamp that states 'goddidit' and you thump it down. case closed. the
idiot's
brain is no longer in danger of being strained and he can go back to
watching tv
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms
exist,
then
there must be someone better than you -
you presume a 'someone'. how would you then explain the someone's
existence?
self-creation? that's theological rhetoric that doesn't mean anything -
and
was nicked off the ancient egyptians and twisted - like so much of your
book
of blood
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby, then
women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies. Are people who kill
babies better than me?
better at what?
btw, 'baby' is a very subjective term, and rather inadequate (in that
it's
emotionally charged and means different things depending on the reader's
perspective). do you mean a born child or a foetus? in what trimester?
when
does it cease being a pulpy bunch of cells in a woman's body that are
potentially offspring and become a 'baby'?
Well, I look at it the same way the prophet Isaiah did. He called
Jesus Christ a child in 700 B.C. That was 698 years before Jesus
Christ was a pulpy bunch of cells in a woman's body. Unto us a child
is born, unto us a son is given, and the government shall be upon his
shoulder, etc.
Then, of course we have this account of what Jesus Christ was shortly
before he was born. Luke 2:5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused
wife, being great with child.
So it seems that you have attempted to re-define the word child.
Good thing we had the Bible so that we would not get misled by your
misinformation, wasn't it?
the bible is rubbish. if I were to refer to it as 'misinformation' that
would be an understatement of galactic proportions. so a baby is called such
700 years before its conception eh? I'll let the people at the IVF clinic
know right away.
btw, you're dealing with, amongst other things, a biologist here. oh, and
I've done a fuckload of biblical scholarship, too.
go run for governor and leave the thinking to those of us who are up to it.
kook
.
|
|
|
| User: "Warnock" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
30 Jan 2004 07:06:54 AM |
|
|
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:VjZRb.32732$Wa.31894@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
the bible is rubbish. if I were to refer to it as 'misinformation' that
would be an understatement of galactic proportions. so a baby is called
such
700 years before its conception eh? I'll let the people at the IVF clinic
know right away.
btw, you're dealing with, amongst other things, a biologist here. oh, and
I've done a fuckload of biblical scholarship, too.
go run for governor and leave the thinking to those of us who are up to
it.
kook
***** Well then that obviously lets you off the hook, Cutest!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
11 Feb 2004 01:09:50 PM |
|
|
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<VjZRb.32732$Wa.31894@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote in message
news:7943568.0401281149.4483009f@posting.google.com...
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<1PMRb.32098$Wa.3062@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote in message
news:7943568.0401280229.44d5efb9@posting.google.com...
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message
news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be
shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter
dismay,
yes, confusing to the scientists, that is
?????
can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and
breath
life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
natural processes can do lots of things that human beings are not
capable
of. you're too stupid and lazy to try to understand the complexity of
life
and the mechanisms that have brought this about. so you get out your
rubber
stamp that states 'goddidit' and you thump it down. case closed. the
idiot's
brain is no longer in danger of being strained and he can go back to
watching tv
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms
exist,
then
there must be someone better than you -
you presume a 'someone'. how would you then explain the someone's
existence?
self-creation? that's theological rhetoric that doesn't mean anything -
and
was nicked off the ancient egyptians and twisted - like so much of your
book
of blood
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby, then
women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies. Are people who kill
babies better than me?
better at what?
btw, 'baby' is a very subjective term, and rather inadequate (in that
it's
emotionally charged and means different things depending on the reader's
perspective). do you mean a born child or a foetus? in what trimester?
when
does it cease being a pulpy bunch of cells in a woman's body that are
potentially offspring and become a 'baby'?
Well, I look at it the same way the prophet Isaiah did. He called
Jesus Christ a child in 700 B.C. That was 698 years before Jesus
Christ was a pulpy bunch of cells in a woman's body. Unto us a child
is born, unto us a son is given, and the government shall be upon his
shoulder, etc.
Then, of course we have this account of what Jesus Christ was shortly
before he was born. Luke 2:5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused
wife, being great with child.
So it seems that you have attempted to re-define the word child.
Good thing we had the Bible so that we would not get misled by your
misinformation, wasn't it?
the bible is rubbish. if I were to refer to it as 'misinformation' that
would be an understatement of galactic proportions. so a baby is called such
700 years before its conception eh? I'll let the people at the IVF clinic
know right away.
btw, you're dealing with, amongst other things, a biologist here. oh, and
I've done a fuckload of biblical scholarship, too.
go run for governor and leave the thinking to those of us who are up to it.
kook
14:10 All they shall speak and say unto thee, Art thou also become
weak as we? art thou become like unto us?
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob SD" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
28 Jan 2004 02:51:49 PM |
|
|
(Robert B. Winn) wrote in
news:7943568.0401281149.4483009f@posting.google.com:
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<1PMRb.32098$Wa.3062@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
"Robert B. Winn" < > wrote in message
news:7943568.0401280229.44d5efb9@posting.google.com...
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message
news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will
be
shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter
dismay,
yes, confusing to the scientists, that is
?????
can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and
breath
life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
natural processes can do lots of things that human beings are not
capable of. you're too stupid and lazy to try to understand the
complexity of life and the mechanisms that have brought this about.
so you get out your rubber stamp that states 'goddidit' and you thump
it down. case closed. the idiot's brain is no longer in danger of
being strained and he can go back to watching tv
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms
exist,
then
there must be someone better than you -
you presume a 'someone'. how would you then explain the someone's
existence? self-creation? that's theological rhetoric that doesn't
mean anything - and was nicked off the ancient egyptians and twisted
- like so much of your book of blood
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby,
then women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies. Are people who
kill babies better than me?
better at what?
btw, 'baby' is a very subjective term, and rather inadequate (in that
it's emotionally charged and means different things depending on the
reader's perspective). do you mean a born child or a foetus? in what
trimester? when does it cease being a pulpy bunch of cells in a
woman's body that are potentially offspring and become a 'baby'?
Well, I look at it the same way the prophet Isaiah did. He called
Jesus Christ a child in 700 B.C.
Goes to show you what a nutcase your friend isaiah must have been back in
those days, looney toon. He may have been the "looney toon" of his times.
That was 698 years before Jesus
Christ was a pulpy bunch of cells in a woman's body.
And how do you think that pulpy bunch of cells you call jesus christ got
into hat woman's body, looney toon?
Unto us a child
is born, unto us a son is given, and the government shall be upon his
shoulder, etc.
Must have had big shoulders, huh?
Then, of course we have this account of what Jesus Christ was shortly
before he was born. Luke 2:5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused
wife, being great with child.
Would the taxes have been less if mary had had an abortion?
So it seems that you have attempted to re-define the word child.
No, you have.
Good thing we had the Bible so that we would not get misled by your
misinformation, wasn't it?
Yeah, it might come in handy if we happen to run out of toilet paper.
Kinda like a Sears catalog.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
28 Jan 2004 09:21:16 PM |
|
|
Bob <SD> wrote in message news:<Xns947E82C98E5E3SD@153.80.109.11>...
rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in
news:7943568.0401281149.4483009f@posting.google.com:
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<1PMRb.32098$Wa.3062@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote in message
news:7943568.0401280229.44d5efb9@posting.google.com...
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message
news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will
be
shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter
dismay,
yes, confusing to the scientists, that is
?????
can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and
breath
life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
natural processes can do lots of things that human beings are not
capable of. you're too stupid and lazy to try to understand the
complexity of life and the mechanisms that have brought this about.
so you get out your rubber stamp that states 'goddidit' and you thump
it down. case closed. the idiot's brain is no longer in danger of
being strained and he can go back to watching tv
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms
exist,
then
there must be someone better than you -
you presume a 'someone'. how would you then explain the someone's
existence? self-creation? that's theological rhetoric that doesn't
mean anything - and was nicked off the ancient egyptians and twisted
- like so much of your book of blood
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby,
then women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies. Are people who
kill babies better than me?
better at what?
btw, 'baby' is a very subjective term, and rather inadequate (in that
it's emotionally charged and means different things depending on the
reader's perspective). do you mean a born child or a foetus? in what
trimester? when does it cease being a pulpy bunch of cells in a
woman's body that are potentially offspring and become a 'baby'?
Well, I look at it the same way the prophet Isaiah did. He called
Jesus Christ a child in 700 B.C.
Goes to show you what a nutcase your friend isaiah must have been back in
those days, looney toon. He may have been the "looney toon" of his times.
That was 698 years before Jesus
Christ was a pulpy bunch of cells in a woman's body.
And how do you think that pulpy bunch of cells you call jesus christ got
into hat woman's body, looney toon?
Unto us a child
is born, unto us a son is given, and the government shall be upon his
shoulder, etc.
Must have had big shoulders, huh?
Then, of course we have this account of what Jesus Christ was shortly
before he was born. Luke 2:5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused
wife, being great with child.
Would the taxes have been less if mary had had an abortion?
So it seems that you have attempted to re-define the word child.
No, you have.
Good thing we had the Bible so that we would not get misled by your
misinformation, wasn't it?
Yeah, it might come in handy if we happen to run out of toilet paper.
Kinda like a Sears catalog.
Robert B. Winn
Yes, Isaiah was considered the looney toon of his time. It is a great
honor to be compared with Isaiah.
11:14 But they shall fly upon the shoulders of the Phillistines
toward the west; they shall spoil them of the east together: they
shall lay their hand upon Edom and Moab; and the children of Ammon
shall obey them.
Robert b. winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
28 Jan 2004 09:58:02 PM |
|
|
(Robert B. Winn) wrote in
news:7943568.0401281921.48e87846@posting.google.com:
Bob <SD> wrote in message news:<Xns947E82C98E5E3SD@153.80.109.11>...
(Robert B. Winn) wrote in
news:7943568.0401281149.4483009f@posting.google.com:
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:<1PMRb.32098$Wa.3062@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
"Robert B. Winn" < > wrote in message
news:7943568.0401280229.44d5efb9@posting.google.com...
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message
news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you
will be
shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their
utter dismay,
yes, confusing to the scientists, that is
?????
can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal
and breath
life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
natural processes can do lots of things that human beings are not
capable of. you're too stupid and lazy to try to understand the
complexity of life and the mechanisms that have brought this
about. so you get out your rubber stamp that states 'goddidit' and
you thump it down. case closed. the idiot's brain is no longer in
danger of being strained and he can go back to watching tv
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life
forms exist,
then
there must be someone better than you -
you presume a 'someone'. how would you then explain the someone's
existence? self-creation? that's theological rhetoric that doesn't
mean anything - and was nicked off the ancient egyptians and
twisted - like so much of your book of blood
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a
baby, then women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies. Are people who
kill babies better than me?
better at what?
btw, 'baby' is a very subjective term, and rather inadequate (in
that it's emotionally charged and means different things depending
on the reader's perspective). do you mean a born child or a
foetus? in what trimester? when does it cease being a pulpy bunch
of cells in a woman's body that are potentially offspring and
become a 'baby'?
Well, I look at it the same way the prophet Isaiah did. He called
Jesus Christ a child in 700 B.C.
Goes to show you what a nutcase your friend isaiah must have been
back in those days, looney toon. He may have been the "looney toon"
of his times.
That was 698 years before Jesus
Christ was a pulpy bunch of cells in a woman's body.
And how do you think that pulpy bunch of cells you call jesus christ
got into hat woman's body, looney toon?
Unto us a child
is born, unto us a son is given, and the government shall be upon
his shoulder, etc.
Must have had big shoulders, huh?
Then, of course we have this account of what Jesus Christ was
shortly before he was born. Luke 2:5 To be taxed with Mary his
espoused wife, being great with child.
Would the taxes have been less if mary had had an abortion?
So it seems that you have attempted to re-define the word child.
No, you have.
Good thing we had the Bible so that we would not get misled by your
misinformation, wasn't it?
Yeah, it might come in handy if we happen to run out of toilet paper.
Kinda like a Sears catalog.
Robert B. Winn
Yes, Isaiah was considered the looney toon of his time. It is a great
honor to be compared with Isaiah.
11:14 But they shall fly upon the shoulders of the Phillistines
toward the west; they shall spoil them of the east together: they
shall lay their hand upon Edom and Moab; and the children of Ammon
shall obey them.
Robert b. winn
Birds of feather, so to speak. You have heard of the looney birds, haven't
you looney toon? You and your invisible friends isaiah and jesus would fit
right in.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
29 Jan 2004 11:04:56 AM |
|
|
Bob <sd@sd.net> wrote in message news:<Xns947ECB1B75452SD@68.6.19.6>...
rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in
news:7943568.0401281921.48e87846@posting.google.com:
Bob <SD> wrote in message news:<Xns947E82C98E5E3SD@153.80.109.11>...
rbwinn47@mybluelight.com (Robert B. Winn) wrote in
news:7943568.0401281149.4483009f@posting.google.com:
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:<1PMRb.32098$Wa.3062@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
"Robert B. Winn" <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote in message
news:7943568.0401280229.44d5efb9@posting.google.com...
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message
news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you
will be
shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their
utter dismay,
yes, confusing to the scientists, that is
?????
can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal
and breath
life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
natural processes can do lots of things that human beings are not
capable of. you're too stupid and lazy to try to understand the
complexity of life and the mechanisms that have brought this
about. so you get out your rubber stamp that states 'goddidit' and
you thump it down. case closed. the idiot's brain is no longer in
danger of being strained and he can go back to watching tv
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life
forms exist,
then
there must be someone better than you -
you presume a 'someone'. how would you then explain the someone's
existence? self-creation? that's theological rhetoric that doesn't
mean anything - and was nicked off the ancient egyptians and
twisted - like so much of your book of blood
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a
baby, then women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies. Are people who
kill babies better than me?
better at what?
btw, 'baby' is a very subjective term, and rather inadequate (in
that it's emotionally charged and means different things depending
on the reader's perspective). do you mean a born child or a
foetus? in what trimester? when does it cease being a pulpy bunch
of cells in a woman's body that are potentially offspring and
become a 'baby'?
Well, I look at it the same way the prophet Isaiah did. He called
Jesus Christ a child in 700 B.C.
Goes to show you what a nutcase your friend isaiah must have been
back in those days, looney toon. He may have been the "looney toon"
of his times.
That was 698 years before Jesus
Christ was a pulpy bunch of cells in a woman's body.
And how do you think that pulpy bunch of cells you call jesus christ
got into hat woman's body, looney toon?
Unto us a child
is born, unto us a son is given, and the government shall be upon
his shoulder, etc.
Must have had big shoulders, huh?
Then, of course we have this account of what Jesus Christ was
shortly before he was born. Luke 2:5 To be taxed with Mary his
espoused wife, being great with child.
Would the taxes have been less if mary had had an abortion?
So it seems that you have attempted to re-define the word child.
No, you have.
Good thing we had the Bible so that we would not get misled by your
misinformation, wasn't it?
Yeah, it might come in handy if we happen to run out of toilet paper.
Kinda like a Sears catalog.
Robert B. Winn
Yes, Isaiah was considered the looney toon of his time. It is a great
honor to be compared with Isaiah.
11:14 But they shall fly upon the shoulders of the Phillistines
toward the west; they shall spoil them of the east together: they
shall lay their hand upon Edom and Moab; and the children of Ammon
shall obey them.
Robert b. winn
Birds of feather, so to speak. You have heard of the looney birds, haven't
you looney toon? You and your invisible friends isaiah and jesus would fit
right in.
As long as we do not have to fit into the pro-abortion faction, I
think we can live with that.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
28 Jan 2004 08:59:39 PM |
|
|
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms exist, then
there must be someone better than you -
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby, then
women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies.
You are confused again. There is nothing above about killing anything.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
30 Jan 2004 08:48:03 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bv9suq$64r$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms exist, then
there must be someone better than you -
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby, then
women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies.
You are confused again. There is nothing above about killing anything.
So you are saying that you think it was a secret?
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
30 Jan 2004 10:31:19 PM |
|
|
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bv9suq$64r$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms exist, then
there must be someone better than you -
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby, then
women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies.
You are confused again. There is nothing above about killing anything.
So you are saying that you think it was a secret?
I repeat: You are confused again.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
31 Jan 2004 10:10:44 AM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bvfb2m$kou$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bv9suq$64r$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms exist, then
there must be someone better than you -
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby, then
women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies.
You are confused again. There is nothing above about killing anything.
So you are saying that you think it was a secret?
I repeat: You are confused again.
What do you think I am confused about?
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
31 Jan 2004 07:24:42 PM |
|
|
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bvfb2m$kou$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bv9suq$64r$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms exist, then
there must be someone better than you -
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby, then
women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies.
You are confused again. There is nothing above about killing anything.
So you are saying that you think it was a secret?
I repeat: You are confused again.
What do you think I am confused about?
Pretty much everything. You certainly cannot keep track of any
ongoing discussion.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
06 Feb 2004 07:20:59 AM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bvhkgp$afr$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bvfb2m$kou$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bv9suq$64r$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Robert B. Winn <rbwinn47@mybluelight.com> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote in message news:<bv7la4$u27$1@bolt.sonic.net>...
Warnock <warnnock@pop.co.za> wrote:
"pr0r3p" <pr0r3p@hotmail.com> wrote in message
***** You can wank all you please, sooner or later you will be shown the
truth!
To quote Jack Nicholson, "You can't handle the truth".
**** The fact that the greatest scientists, to their utter dismay, can't
breath life into a dead body or create a perfect animal and breath life
into
it - is PROOF of a higher intelligence! ****
You have a strange definiton of "proof".
***** ***** Well if you can't create a life form, and life forms exist, then
there must be someone better than you -
Why?
Does that mean that if babies exist, and you can't make a baby, then
women must be better than you?
Well, but we were talking about killing babies.
You are confused again. There is nothing above about killing anything.
So you are saying that you think it was a secret?
I repeat: You are confused again.
What do you think I am confused about?
Pretty much everything. You certainly cannot keep track of any
ongoing discussion.
We were discussing the killing of children by abortion.
Robert B. Winn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
08 Feb 2004 01:25:27 AM |
|
|
On 6 Feb 2004 05:20:59 -0800, (Robert B.
Winn) posted in alt.atheism:
We were discussing the killing of children by abortion.
No, you were. We were discussing abortions, which don't usually
involve children.
--
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says is never accurate because he
unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
-- Bertrand Russell.
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
08 Feb 2004 07:00:19 PM |
|
|
In talk.abortion, Al Klein
<rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote
on Sun, 08 Feb 2004 07:25:27 GMT
<02pb205mv5chcfj1ev8mcriilkojj30v1d@Pern.rk>:
On 6 Feb 2004 05:20:59 -0800, (Robert B.
Winn) posted in alt.atheism:
We were discussing the killing of children by abortion.
No, you were. We were discussing abortions, which don't usually
involve children.
Unless they're underage teenage mothers. :-)
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
08 Feb 2004 10:53:23 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 01:00:19 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
<ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> posted in alt.atheism:
In talk.abortion, Al Klein
<rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote
on Sun, 08 Feb 2004 07:25:27 GMT
<02pb205mv5chcfj1ev8mcriilkojj30v1d@Pern.rk>:
On 6 Feb 2004 05:20:59 -0800, (Robert B.
Winn) posted in alt.atheism:
We were discussing the killing of children by abortion.
No, you were. We were discussing abortions, which don't usually
involve children.
Unless they're underage teenage mothers. :-)
Those are the only ones I can think of too.
--
"To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains
premature today."
- Isaac Asimov
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert B. Winn" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Jesus a Leftist? |
10 Feb 2004 07:44:34 PM |
|
|
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message news:<3h4e20djvgvtm7lapd3vjq6p4thp6h77o0@Pern.rk>...
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 01:00:19 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
<ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> posted in alt.atheism:
In talk.abortion, Al Klein
<rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote
on Sun, 08 Feb 2004 07:25:27 GMT
<02pb205mv5chcfj1ev8mcriilkojj30v1d@Pern.rk>:
On 6 Feb 2004 05:20:59 -0800, (Robert B.
Winn) posted in alt.atheism:
We were discussing the killing of children by abortion.
No, you were. We were discussing abortions, which don't usually
involve children.
Unless they're underage teenage mothers. :-)
Those are the only ones I can think of too.
The ones I think of are like the child in this scripture from the
Bible. Luke 2:5 To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great
with child.
Robert b. Winn
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
