"Rev. 11D Meow!" <Jimmy@Crack.Corn> wrote:
"Fredric L. Rice" <REMOVEFRice@SkepticTank.ORG> wrote in message
news:10df6akd60b8d16@corp.supernews.com...
Martin W. Smith <no.email@this.time> wrote:
jazzerciser@hotmail.com (-) wrote:
Rev. 11D Meow! wrote:
name one thing.
steve <steve@nevernowut.org.nz> wrote:
Confirmed yet again that he doesn't exist.
Martin W. Smith <no.email@this.time> wrote:
How did you confirm it?
jazzerciser@hotmail.com (-) wrote:
Confirmed by the fact that you did not realize it could not be
confirmed.
Martin W. Smith <no.email@this.time> wrote:
So you didn't confirm it at all then.
Correct. You did any of the confirming and not-confirming.
Confirming and not confirming are equally meaningless
Only when it comes to the non-existant. Confirmation for the extant
has meaning. Ergo vampires, picies, fairies, werewoles, gods et al.
are all the same.
prove it, mon.
Prove _what_ specifically? That the non-existant exhibit all the
properties of gods, goddesses, vampires, pixies, werewolves et al?
---
Where to find Fahrenheit 9/11: http://www.f911tix.com/
"There's nothing innocent about the Arabs, dumbass." - Creosote 216.67.201.248
.
