"thomas p." <tonyofbexar@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:1163497213.608422.162120@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...

Note the header:
"NO EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD".
I know and understand the evidence that convinces me of
the reality of God. But what I do _not_ know, is the nature
of the evidence that it would take to convince a secularist
of the existence
of a Deity. I believe it was a fair question in response to the
pontificated pronouncement.

Note Dan Wood once again refusing to see that his question has been
answered. His argument basically equals a child yelling: IS NOT! IS
NOT!

You pick and choose the parts of my post that you can twist into
something you can use to insult, abuse and defame me, all the while
pretending you are the one being insulted. And of course you ignore
most of my post the parts which you cannot deal with by distortion.

Chances are if we were to meet somewhere, in a theater or on
the street, I'll bet you would be a model of friendliness cordiality
hence an very cordial and very likable person.
But when you speak from anonymity you play to the crowd
of like minded individuals, the objective is to see who can be the
nastiest, most insulting and the most cruel to the Christers, then
glory in the recognition of being part of the cabal of those claiming
"we showed the bastards".

Dan

Chances are if we were to meet somewhere, in a theater or on
the street, I'll bet you would be a model of friendliness cordiality
hence an very cordial and very likable person.
But when you speak from anonymity you play to the crowd
of like minded individuals, the objective is to see who can be the
nastiest, most insulting and the most cruel to the Christers, then
glory in the recognition of being part of the cabal of those claiming
"we showed the bastards".

Dan