<Matt Osborn> wrote in message news:5dubi11nua1r1dtsimv15ka8mejmdortpi@4ax.com...
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 06:25:40 GMT, "The Tutor" <Tutors@aol.com> wrote:
What? Two 9-ounce bottles of water and MRE's? I thought you said:
"The survivors are surviving; they wouldn't be angry if they were dead.
Aside from drowning's, it is the ill and diseased that are dying; MREs
and bottled water won't help them, only evacuation offers hope."
Yes, the survivors are surviving, that's why they call them survivors
and no, they wouldn't be angry if they were dead. Both points taken!
The "Aside from drownings" in a flood, might distort the numbers,
don't you think? Or maybe you didn't think.
And finally, why do you suppose they're wasting bottled water and
MRE's when that won't help, "only evacuation offers hope."
To help you make sense of all this, tonights lesson will be, look up
rescue and then look up recovery.
You definitely have a comprehension problem, young man.
-- msosborn at msosborn dot com
A non response similar to, but not quite as bad and inane as, check your meds.
Can't defend your ridiculous statements but in order to give the appearance that
you're not running away, you reply with a mild rebuke that does nothing to address
the subject.
Yes Matt, I do have a problem comprehending you. You don't make sense and
frequently contradict yourself.
What next? The dreaded PLONK!
.
