| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Christopher A. Lee" |
| Date: |
03 Dec 2003 10:19:47 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Why Must God be Caused? |
Sigh.
Because the bleaters using the first cause argument say
*e*v*e*r*y*t*h*i*n*g* has a cause.
.
|
|
| User: "Barry OGrady" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Must God be Caused? |
10 Dec 2003 08:55:29 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:19:47 +0000 (UTC), "Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
Sigh.
Because the bleaters using the first cause argument say
*e*v*e*r*y*t*h*i*n*g* has a cause.
It does appear as though everything needs a cause, yet that doesn't allow for
a beginning. The origin of everything is therefore outside our current knowledge.
-Barry
========
Web page: http://members.optusnet.com.au/~barry.og
Atheist, radio scanner, LIPD information.
.
|
|
|
| User: "AngryJohn" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Must God be Caused? |
10 Dec 2003 08:03:28 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:55:29 +0000 (UTC), Barry OGrady
<god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:19:47 +0000 (UTC), "Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
Sigh.
Because the bleaters using the first cause argument say
*e*v*e*r*y*t*h*i*n*g* has a cause.
It does appear as though everything needs a cause, yet that doesn't allow for
a beginning. The origin of everything is therefore outside our current knowledge.
Being outside our knowledge does not in any way imply a "god" either.
------------------------------
aa#2106
Remove Belief to reply
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
