On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:55:29 +0000 (UTC), Barry OGrady
<god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> posted in alt.atheism:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:19:47 +0000 (UTC), "Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
Sigh.
Because the bleaters using the first cause argument say
*e*v*e*r*y*t*h*i*n*g* has a cause.
It does appear as though everything needs a cause, yet that doesn't allow for
a beginning. The origin of everything is therefore outside our current knowledge.
Or not everything needs to be caused. Since we KNOW that this is
true, it's a lot more reasonable to presume that the Big Bang is
uncaused than that some uncaused thing was needed to cause the BB.
--
"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, but
not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and actions of human beings."
-A. Einstein (1929 -- Einstein Archive 33-272)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
