Re: Why Naturalism Cannot Have The Final Say



 Religions > Atheism > Re: Why Naturalism Cannot Have The Final Say

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "*nemo*"
Date: 20 Aug 2005 04:24:56 AM
Object: Re: Why Naturalism Cannot Have The Final Say
In article <430688E9.6E1A@spfd.com>,
Ian Chesterton <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote:

Here are four ideas that were put forward by theists in the past:

1. In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.

Which is wrong.

2. God created man as a unique creature, different from all other forms
of life because he was made in God's image.

Which is totally wrong.

3. Man's evil brought about God's judgement in the form of a worldwide
flood that fully explains the existence of the geologic column.

Which is pathetically and totally wrong.

4. The universe and the life within it were created less than 10,000
years ago.

So this is why you think that it's a good idea to pervert science and
send humanity into a new Dark Age? How fucking stupid are you? I mean,
it sure looks like you are not even intelligent enough to sit in front
of a TV without drooling all over yourself, but the fact that you are
using a computer seems to show that you're capable of so much more. It's
tragic, seeing people who appear willing and eager to cut off every
wonder that science has given us, in favor of a bunch of myths dreamed
up 4000 years ago.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.

 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER