Religions > Atheism > Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR!
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"duke" |
| Date: |
01 Apr 2004 05:27:51 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:45:17 GMT, "Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
"Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
You mean like a chemical analysis? They didn't have
those in those days, wax.
Excuse me. I forgot about your reading difficulty. I
said, "you have failed to point out any WORDS which
say that the bread underwent any kind of change."
Swoosh - right over you head. When Jesus says it, I believe.
No. It is whatever your catechism says which you believe.
No, the bible says so. And the Catechism, which points out what the bible says,
said so also.
The authors of the gospels were writing to an audience who did
not have your catechism.
And St Paul celebrated the Holy Eucharist - 1Cor11:17-34.
The Greek reading audience would interrpret the words, "This is
my body" in the same way as any other Greek speaker at that time
would interpret them. The Greek thought at that time saw wine as
being the blood of Dionysis, and they saw bread (or rather the
grain) as being the body of Ceres (or Demeter). How could they
interpret it otherwise.
Whenever you eat bread, you are eating the body of Demeter.
Whenever you drink wine, you are drinking the blood of Dionysis.
That is the way the ancient Greeks looked at it.
You like myths don't you.
You said so yourself. In a post on the 25th you stated:
it remained under the visual, taste, and texture
of the substance of bread and wine.
If it still looked like bread, tasted like bread, and felt like
bread, then it must still be bread. The same for the wine.
And if God wants to change the substance from one to the other while maintaining
taste, texture, and visual, he can. And he did - his words.
Is it your contention that a chemical analysis would have
detected a change?
Not a chance. That's the whole point of your misunderstanding.
Christ said it - I believe it.
You are only believing the interpretation placed on it by your
catechism.
Nope, it's in the bible. The actual translation from one substance to the other
is from the lips of Christ himself. The word "trans-substance-ation" was
selected a few hundred years later.
The gospels merely put Jesus in the place of Thesbis.
God's work preceeded "t" by an eternity.
How could believing foolishness and falsehoods save anybody?.
You have to live a dangerous life to ignore it.
Finally you admit you don't know.
A bloodless sacrifice based on bread and wine rather than
animal blood.
You are a fool.
And now you know what a priest on the order of Melchizedek means.
How can you associate Melchizedek with a sacrifice?
Read the passage: Geneis 14:17-24. Nothing is said about a
sacrifice, bloodless or not. All that the text says it that
Melchizedek brought out bread and wine (Verse 14), that he
blessed Abram (verses 19-20), and that the food was eaten (verse
24.)
I already told you - the old covenant was one of unblemished animal sacrifice
following by consumption of the animal.
The new covenant is one based on the sacrifice of the new unblemished Lamb of
God following by a bloodless "bread and wine" consumption of the Body and Blood
of Christ.
You claim that I am ignorant because I reject the premise of
Pascal's wager? That's foolishness.
When the shoe fits.
You have failed to counter my objection to it: Namely that
Pascal see's only two possibilities. When Pascal says "God", he
means his god. But what of all the other religions and countless
possible religions?
What about them? Think "french connection".
Pascal sees God as rewarding people who believe in him only to be
on the safe side. That is dumb. Do you think that God is that
dumb?
That's not the PW.
First: Hebrews 8:7-13 has nothing to do with ether the
passover or the Eucharist.
Read it again - what do you think re the old covenant is
worn out and a new covenant started. Think Melchizedek.
Another non-response.
You'll figure it out.
Second: It has been pointed out to you that Hebrews
8:7-13 is a corrouption of Jeramiah 31.
No, it was pointed out to you the Heb 8:7-13
acknowledges the completion of the old covenant prophecy.
You pointed nothing out. You only made a claim. As usual you
were completely unable to back it up.
You only made a claim.
The promised Messiah of the OT came 2000 years ago,
not as a warrior, but a man of love.
That is from your catechism. Not from the Bible. Christianity
is not a covenant with the house of Israel and the house of
Judah.
God said it was. Read the bible.
The Old Testament does not prophesy the coming of an incarnate
man/god. It clearly speaks of a king who will restore the
kingdom of Israel.
Or so the Hebrews thought it meant.
The Jews believe in the Old Testament. You believe in your
catechism. The New Testament misquotes the Old Testament, and
your catechism misquotes the New Testament.
Now you're just getting silly.
.
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
01 Apr 2004 07:23:07 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:bqtn60dosah8fhpuvdjrts089e9iad3un9@4ax.com...
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:45:17 GMT, "Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net>
wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
"Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
You mean like a chemical analysis? They didn't have
those in those days, wax.
Excuse me. I forgot about your reading difficulty. I
said, "you have failed to point out any WORDS which
say that the bread underwent any kind of change."
Swoosh - right over you head. When Jesus says it, I believe.
No. It is whatever your catechism says which you believe.
No, the bible says so. And the Catechism, which points out what the bible
says,
said so also.
Well, thats basically the point.
We DON'T BELIVE THE BIBLE.
So whenever you refer to it...well, we wonder......
'How can you belive that nonsense, in this, the 21st Century?'
--
Jez
"The condition of alienation, of being asleep, of being unconscious,
of being out of one's mind, is the condition of the normal man. Society
highly values its normal man.It educates children to lose themselves
and to become absurd,and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed
perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."
R.D. Laing
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
02 Apr 2004 05:13:16 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:23:07 +0100, "Jez" <iced_spear@AwaySPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
Well, thats basically the point.
We DON'T BELIVE THE BIBLE.
It's your funeral.
So whenever you refer to it...well, we wonder......
'How can you belive that nonsense, in this, the 21st Century?'
God's still there.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
02 Apr 2004 06:07:08 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1kiq60tmalva0ornqb25t0adkg9kv27n02@4ax.com...
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:23:07 +0100, "Jez"
<iced_spear@AwaySPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
Well, thats basically the point.
We DON'T BELIVE THE BIBLE.
It's your funeral.
So, I'll be dead.
So whenever you refer to it...well, we wonder......
'How can you belive that nonsense, in this, the 21st Century?'
God's still there.
Yeah like he's here.........now....
But *****....I can't see him.
--
Jez
"The condition of alienation, of being asleep, of being unconscious,
of being out of one's mind, is the condition of the normal man. Society
highly values its normal man.It educates children to lose themselves
and to become absurd,and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed
perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."
R.D. Laing
.
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THELIAR! |
02 Apr 2004 12:04:25 PM |
|
|
Jez wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1kiq60tmalva0ornqb25t0adkg9kv27n02@4ax.com...
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 14:23:07 +0100, "Jez"
<iced_spear@AwaySPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
Well, thats basically the point.
We DON'T BELIVE THE BIBLE.
It's your funeral.
So, I'll be dead.
So whenever you refer to it...well, we wonder......
'How can you belive that nonsense, in this, the 21st Century?'
God's still there.
Yeah like he's here.........now....
But *****....I can't see him.
===>Some Christians wish to have it both ways.
"God" is everywhere and everything, as the Pantheists
believe.
Yet "God" is an invisible "spirit", separate from the
filthy, sinful, material, Devil-controlled "world"
which he "created", living in a nowhere
place called "heaven".
If you don't believe what they preach, you go to
"hell", and, of course "God" is not there, either. -- L.
--
Jez
"The condition of alienation, of being asleep, of being unconscious,
of being out of one's mind, is the condition of the normal man. Society
highly values its normal man.It educates children to lose themselves
and to become absurd,and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed
perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."
R.D. Laing
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THELIAR! |
01 Apr 2004 10:46:12 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:45:17 GMT, "Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
"Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
You mean like a chemical analysis? They didn't have
those in those days, wax.
Excuse me. I forgot about your reading difficulty. I
said, "you have failed to point out any WORDS which
say that the bread underwent any kind of change."
Swoosh - right over you head. When Jesus says it, I believe.
No. It is whatever your catechism says which you believe.
No, the bible says so. And the Catechism, which points out what the bible says,
said so also.
The authors of the gospels were writing to an audience who did
not have your catechism.
And St Paul celebrated the Holy Eucharist - 1Cor11:17-34.
===>He INVENTED it, copying a Pagan idea,
and the Gospel writers copied it from him.
Eating human flesh and drinking blood of ANY sort,
even symbolically,
was an abomination to Jesus and other Jews!
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
02 Apr 2004 05:14:18 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:46:12 -0700, Libertarius
<Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote:
And St Paul celebrated the Holy Eucharist - 1Cor11:17-34.
===>He INVENTED it, copying a Pagan idea,
and the Gospel writers copied it from him.
Eating human flesh and drinking blood of ANY sort,
even symbolically,
was an abomination to Jesus and other Jews!
Think Melchizedek. Have you looked it up yet?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THELIAR! |
02 Apr 2004 11:56:43 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:46:12 -0700, Libertarius
<Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote:
And St Paul celebrated the Holy Eucharist - 1Cor11:17-34.
===>He INVENTED it, copying a Pagan idea,
and the Gospel writers copied it from him.
Eating human flesh and drinking blood of ANY sort,
even symbolically,
was an abomination to Jesus and other Jews!
Think Melchizedek. Have you looked it up yet?
===>You're NUTS!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Weatherwax" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
02 Apr 2004 03:42:56 PM |
|
|
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote in
message news:406DA95B.C3EFEEEA@Nothing_But_The.Truth...
duke wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:46:12 -0700, Libertarius
<Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote:
And St Paul celebrated the Holy Eucharist - 1Cor11:17-34.
===>He INVENTED it, copying a Pagan idea,
and the Gospel writers copied it from him.
Eating human flesh and drinking blood of ANY sort,
even symbolically,
was an abomination to Jesus and other Jews!
Think Melchizedek. Have you looked it up yet?
===>You're NUTS!
Duke told me that "Melchizedek" referred to "A bloodless
sacrifice based on bread and wine rather than animal blood."
Duke got that from his catechism, but he did not look it up.
There is no Old Testament reference to Melchizedek performing a
sacrifice. He did serve bread and wine to Abram and his
followers, but there is no mention of a sacrifice.
--
Wax
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
03 Apr 2004 06:42:46 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 21:42:56 GMT, "Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
===>He INVENTED it, copying a Pagan idea,
and the Gospel writers copied it from him.
Eating human flesh and drinking blood of ANY sort,
even symbolically,
was an abomination to Jesus and other Jews!
Think Melchizedek. Have you looked it up yet?
===>You're NUTS!
Duke told me that "Melchizedek" referred to "A bloodless
sacrifice based on bread and wine rather than animal blood."
Duke got that from his catechism, but he did not look it up.
There is no Old Testament reference to Melchizedek performing a
sacrifice. He did serve bread and wine to Abram and his
followers, but there is no mention of a sacrifice.
Jesus is the sacrifice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Weatherwax" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
03 Apr 2004 05:04:25 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:m7ct601kkpc84s1onlbb1ld0kj9d2i2nag@4ax.com...
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 21:42:56 GMT, "Weatherwax"
<weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
===>He INVENTED it, copying a Pagan idea,
and the Gospel writers copied it from him.
Eating human flesh and drinking blood of ANY sort,
even symbolically,
was an abomination to Jesus and other Jews!
Think Melchizedek. Have you looked it up yet?
===>You're NUTS!
Duke told me that "Melchizedek" referred to "A bloodless
sacrifice based on bread and wine rather than animal blood."
Duke got that from his catechism, but he did not look it up.
There is no Old Testament reference to Melchizedek
performing a sacrifice. He did serve bread and wine
to Abram and his followers, but there is no mention of
a sacrifice.
Jesus is the sacrifice.
That would be a sacrifice of human blood and flesh, not bread and
wine.
And you still have not shown me any passage connecting
Melchizedek with a sacrifice of bread and wine. Did you make
that up, or is it in your catechism?
--
Wax
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
04 Apr 2004 09:26:24 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:04:25 GMT, "Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
Jesus is the sacrifice.
That would be a sacrifice of human blood and flesh, not bread and
wine.
That's right, the sacrifice is one of Jesus' human blood and flesh on the cross.
But instead of comsuming the flesh of the unblemished lamb and spreading it's
blood on the doorsill to ward off the angel of physical death, we consume the
consecrated "Body and Blood of Jesus" (think Melchizedek), his blood is shed on
the cross (think doorstill), and his Blood wards off the angel of spiritual
death.
An old covenant written on stones and based on the blood sacrifice of an
unblemished lamb is completed and a new covenant is begun based on the sacrifice
of the new unblemished Lamb of God, and written on the hearts of man.
For Jesus said: "I bring you a new commandment - that you love one another as
God/I love you."
You're almost there, wax.
And you still have not shown me any passage connecting
Melchizedek with a sacrifice of bread and wine. Did you make
that up, or is it in your catechism?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Weatherwax" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
04 Apr 2004 05:12:52 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:986070hblgq5qa1p6es43lps9ossgvivb8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:04:25 GMT, "Weatherwax"
<weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
Jesus is the sacrifice.
That would be a sacrifice of human blood and flesh,
not bread and wine.
That's right, the sacrifice is one of Jesus' human blood and
flesh on the cross. But instead of comsuming the flesh of
the unblemished lamb and spreading it's blood on the
doorsill to ward off the angel of physical death, we
consume the consecrated "Body and Blood of Jesus"
(think Melchizedek), his blood is shed on the cross (think
doorstill), and his Blood wards off the angel of spiritual
death.
An old covenant written on stones and based on the blood
sacrifice of an unblemished lamb is completed and a new
covenant is begun based on the sacrifice of the new
unblemished Lamb of God, and written on the hearts of
man.
For Jesus said: "I bring you a new commandment - that
you love one another as God/I love you."
You're almost there, wax.
And you still have not shown me any passage connecting
Melchizedek with a sacrifice of bread and wine. Did you
make that up, or is it in your catechism?
You are good at quoting dogma from your catechism, but when it
comes to supporting that dogma, then your ignorance is exposed.
You are still identifying Jesus with the sacrificed lamb in
Exodus 12, although that is unsurported. You still insist that
Jesus was executed on Passover, although John's gospel says it
was "the day of preparation" (i.e. the day before passover.) And
you still have not shown me any passage connecting Melchizedek
with a sacrifice of bread and wine.
In fact you never answered the question I asked about Luke 24:46
where a resurrected Jesus is supposed to have said,
Thus it stands written that the Messiah would suffer
and would rise from the dead on the third day,
If Jesus says it is written, then it must have been written. But
where is it written?
--
Wax
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ash" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THELIAR! |
04 Apr 2004 12:46:06 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:04:25 GMT, "Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
Jesus is the sacrifice.
That would be a sacrifice of human blood and flesh, not bread and
wine.
That's right, the sacrifice is one of Jesus' human blood and flesh on the cross.
But instead of comsuming the flesh of the unblemished lamb and spreading it's
blood on the doorsill to ward off the angel of physical death, we consume the
consecrated "Body and Blood of Jesus" (think Melchizedek), his blood is shed on
the cross (think doorstill), and his Blood wards off the angel of spiritual
death.
An old covenant written on stones and based on the blood sacrifice of an
unblemished lamb is completed and a new covenant is begun based on the sacrifice
of the new unblemished Lamb of God, and written on the hearts of man.
For Jesus said: "I bring you a new commandment - that you love one another as
God/I love you."
Pity that wasn't realy a new commandment
--
#1636
Not BAAWA
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
04 Apr 2004 02:07:07 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 18:46:06 +0100, Ash <Ashamanic@winterfell73.fsnet.co.uk>
wrote:
Pity that wasn't realy a new commandment
Of course it is:
1. Jesus said so. I bring you a new commandment.
2. You can't find another one of it's equal.
And my answer to your response to #2 is already prepared, ash.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THELIAR! |
06 Apr 2004 11:31:21 AM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:04:25 GMT, "Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
Jesus is the sacrifice.
That would be a sacrifice of human blood and flesh, not bread and
wine.
That's right, the sacrifice is one of Jesus' human blood and flesh on the cross.
But instead of comsuming the flesh of the unblemished lamb and spreading it's
blood on the doorsill to ward off the angel of physical death, we consume the
consecrated "Body and Blood of Jesus" (think Melchizedek), his blood is shed on
the cross (think doorstill), and his Blood wards off the angel of spiritual
death.
An old covenant written on stones and based on the blood sacrifice of an
unblemished lamb is completed and a new covenant is begun based on the sacrifice
of the new unblemished Lamb of God, and written on the hearts of man.
For Jesus said: "I bring you a new commandment - that you love one another as
God/I love you."
You're almost there, wax.
And you still have not shown me any passage connecting
Melchizedek with a sacrifice of bread and wine. Did you make
that up, or is it in your catechism?
duke wrote:
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:04:25 GMT, "Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
Jesus is the sacrifice.
That would be a sacrifice of human blood and flesh, not bread and
wine.
That's right, the sacrifice is one of Jesus' human blood and flesh on the cross.
But instead of comsuming the flesh of the unblemished lamb and spreading it's
blood on the doorsill to ward off the angel of physical death, we consume the
consecrated "Body and Blood of Jesus" (think Melchizedek), his blood is shed on
the cross (think doorstill), and his Blood wards off the angel of spiritual
death.
An old covenant written on stones and based on the blood sacrifice of an
unblemished lamb is completed and a new covenant is begun based on the sacrifice
of the new unblemished Lamb of God, and written on the hearts of man.
For Jesus said: "I bring you a new commandment - that you love one another as
God/I love you."
You're almost there, wax.
And you still have not shown me any passage connecting
Melchizedek with a sacrifice of bread and wine. Did you make
that up, or is it in your catechism?
===>What an IDIOT!
The mythical "Melchizedek" is first mentioned in connection with
the mythical "Abeam".
Nothing about any "sacrifice", nothing about any lamb chops or blood.
Only bread and wine.
Nor is it true that he was a priest.
It says he was the KING OF SALEM!
That is the kind of confused ignorance you get out of memorizing the
Catechism.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THELIAR! |
03 Apr 2004 05:12:04 PM |
|
|
Weatherwax wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:m7ct601kkpc84s1onlbb1ld0kj9d2i2nag@4ax.com...
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 21:42:56 GMT, "Weatherwax"
<weatherwax@worldnet.net> wrote:
===>He INVENTED it, copying a Pagan idea,
and the Gospel writers copied it from him.
Eating human flesh and drinking blood of ANY sort,
even symbolically,
was an abomination to Jesus and other Jews!
Think Melchizedek. Have you looked it up yet?
===>You're NUTS!
Duke told me that "Melchizedek" referred to "A bloodless
sacrifice based on bread and wine rather than animal blood."
Duke got that from his catechism, but he did not look it up.
There is no Old Testament reference to Melchizedek
performing a sacrifice. He did serve bread and wine
to Abram and his followers, but there is no mention of
a sacrifice.
Jesus is the sacrifice.
That would be a sacrifice of human blood and flesh, not bread and
wine.
And you still have not shown me any passage connecting
Melchizedek with a sacrifice of bread and wine. Did you make
that up, or is it in your catechism?
===>If Baby Dukie tells you it is not his Catechism, it is the Bible,
you can be sure it is his Catechism.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
03 Apr 2004 08:16:08 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:m7ct601kkpc84s1onlbb1ld0kj9d2i2nag@4ax.com...
On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 21:42:56 GMT, "Weatherwax" <weatherwax@worldnet.net>
wrote:
===>He INVENTED it, copying a Pagan idea,
and the Gospel writers copied it from him.
Eating human flesh and drinking blood of ANY sort,
even symbolically,
was an abomination to Jesus and other Jews!
Think Melchizedek. Have you looked it up yet?
===>You're NUTS!
Duke told me that "Melchizedek" referred to "A bloodless
sacrifice based on bread and wine rather than animal blood."
Duke got that from his catechism, but he did not look it up.
There is no Old Testament reference to Melchizedek performing a
sacrifice. He did serve bread and wine to Abram and his
followers, but there is no mention of a sacrifice.
Jesus is the sacrifice.
Only to deluded fools who still belive in ancient myths
and convoluted crap in their 'Readers Digest version of Christian
texts'..the Bible.
My cat has more fucking brains.
--
Jez
"The condition of alienation, of being asleep, of being unconscious,
of being out of one's mind, is the condition of the normal man. Society
highly values its normal man.It educates children to lose themselves
and to become absurd,and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed
perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."
R.D. Laing
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
03 Apr 2004 09:19:31 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 15:16:08 +0100, "Jez" <iced_spear@AwaySPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
Duke told me that "Melchizedek" referred to "A bloodless
sacrifice based on bread and wine rather than animal blood."
Duke got that from his catechism, but he did not look it up.
There is no Old Testament reference to Melchizedek performing a
sacrifice. He did serve bread and wine to Abram and his
followers, but there is no mention of a sacrifice.
Jesus is the sacrifice.
Only to deluded fools who still belive in ancient myths
and convoluted crap in their 'Readers Digest version of Christian
texts'..the Bible.
Hey, it's your funeral jez. Your reward for the rejection of almighty God is
yours to bear, not mine.
My cat has more fucking brains.
Then why don't you let him instruct you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
03 Apr 2004 09:49:11 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:hdlt60d2r8mb6jcilg4ko5d1fkb1ojd518@4ax.com...
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 15:16:08 +0100, "Jez"
<iced_spear@AwaySPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
Duke told me that "Melchizedek" referred to "A bloodless
sacrifice based on bread and wine rather than animal blood."
Duke got that from his catechism, but he did not look it up.
There is no Old Testament reference to Melchizedek performing a
sacrifice. He did serve bread and wine to Abram and his
followers, but there is no mention of a sacrifice.
Jesus is the sacrifice.
Only to deluded fools who still belive in ancient myths
and convoluted crap in their 'Readers Digest version of Christian
texts'..the Bible.
Hey, it's your funeral jez.
Indeed.
Your reward for the rejection of almighty God is
yours to bear, not mine.
You can't reject that which is not there.
My cat has more fucking brains.
Then why don't you let him instruct you.
In what ? Mouse mastication ?
--
Jez
"The condition of alienation, of being asleep, of being unconscious,
of being out of one's mind, is the condition of the normal man. Society
highly values its normal man.It educates children to lose themselves
and to become absurd,and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed
perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."
R.D. Laing
.
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THELIAR! |
03 Apr 2004 01:39:08 PM |
|
|
Jez wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:hdlt60d2r8mb6jcilg4ko5d1fkb1ojd518@4ax.com...
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 15:16:08 +0100, "Jez"
<iced_spear@AwaySPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
Duke told me that "Melchizedek" referred to "A bloodless
sacrifice based on bread and wine rather than animal blood."
Duke got that from his catechism, but he did not look it up.
There is no Old Testament reference to Melchizedek performing a
sacrifice. He did serve bread and wine to Abram and his
followers, but there is no mention of a sacrifice.
Jesus is the sacrifice.
Only to deluded fools who still belive in ancient myths
and convoluted crap in their 'Readers Digest version of Christian
texts'..the Bible.
Hey, it's your funeral jez.
Indeed.
Your reward for the rejection of almighty God is
yours to bear, not mine.
You can't reject that which is not there.
===>He means his Catechism.
If you reject it, you are "sinning"!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
03 Apr 2004 08:33:08 PM |
|
|
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote in message
news:406F12DC.2C7D8DA0@Nothing_But_The.Truth...
Jez wrote:
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:hdlt60d2r8mb6jcilg4ko5d1fkb1ojd518@4ax.com...
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 15:16:08 +0100, "Jez"
<iced_spear@AwaySPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
Duke told me that "Melchizedek" referred to "A bloodless
sacrifice based on bread and wine rather than animal blood."
Duke got that from his catechism, but he did not look it up.
There is no Old Testament reference to Melchizedek performing a
sacrifice. He did serve bread and wine to Abram and his
followers, but there is no mention of a sacrifice.
Jesus is the sacrifice.
Only to deluded fools who still belive in ancient myths
and convoluted crap in their 'Readers Digest version of Christian
texts'..the Bible.
Hey, it's your funeral jez.
Indeed.
Your reward for the rejection of almighty God is
yours to bear, not mine.
You can't reject that which is not there.
===>He means his Catechism.
If you reject it, you are "sinning"!
Well, if you belive in his 'God' you are.
Silly sod.
--
Jez
"The condition of alienation, of being asleep, of being unconscious,
of being out of one's mind, is the condition of the normal man. Society
highly values its normal man.It educates children to lose themselves
and to become absurd,and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed
perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."
R.D. Laing
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
04 Apr 2004 08:34:53 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 16:49:11 +0100, "Jez" <iced_spear@AwaySPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
Hey, it's your funeral jez.
Indeed.
Your reward for the rejection of almighty God is
yours to bear, not mine.
You can't reject that which is not there.
But God is there, jez, he is there. And you and I will stand in judgement
before him one moment after we die.
My cat has more fucking brains.
Then why don't you let him instruct you.
In what ? Mouse mastication ?
If it fits.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
04 Apr 2004 09:33:53 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:al3070pdirf188b1u1srtshgfhs2g44otv@4ax.com...
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 16:49:11 +0100, "Jez"
<iced_spear@AwaySPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
Hey, it's your funeral jez.
Indeed.
Your reward for the rejection of almighty God is
yours to bear, not mine.
You can't reject that which is not there.
But God is there, jez, he is there.
But thats just your belief. It is not mine.
And you and I will stand in judgement
before him one moment after we die.
What makes you think I am so important to warrant any 'judgement' ?
I mean, it seems to me to be really arrogant to belive that some
'All knowing, all powerful creator' would notice our entire solar system,
let alone each and every person living on this lump of fire.
What makes you think we're so important ??
--
Jez
"The condition of alienation, of being asleep, of being unconscious,
of being out of one's mind, is the condition of the normal man. Society
highly values its normal man.It educates children to lose themselves
and to become absurd,and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed
perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."
R.D. Laing
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
04 Apr 2004 02:04:27 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 15:33:53 +0100, "Jez" <iced_spear@AwaySPAMdsl.pipex.com>
wrote:
And you and I will stand in judgement
before him one moment after we die.
What makes you think I am so important to warrant any 'judgement' ?
God knows you and I individually. That's not a hard thing for God to do.
I mean, it seems to me to be really arrogant to belive that some
'All knowing, all powerful creator' would notice our entire solar system,
let alone each and every person living on this lump of fire.
Yep, he's got his eye on you and I.
What makes you think we're so important ??
Only God can answer that one.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
04 Apr 2004 05:05:14 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:6vm070d5agh5qnd7li210vor6nshrrhrg9@4ax.com...
What makes you think we're so important ??
Only God can answer that one.
Earl has now said two things that are correct.
Only a god could tell us why the sad little masochist *thinks* he is
important.
That is not likely to happen.
But Earl, the man who is afraid to tell us his real name, where he lives or
even where he went to school will continue to think he is important.
Years ago I had the idea for a poster.
An ant on the top of a steaming pile of dog *****, thinking he was king of
the mountain.
(Insert here a one liner from Earl that he thinks is clever.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Rev Optional" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
04 Apr 2004 05:22:42 PM |
|
|
But Earl, the man who is afraid to tell us his real name, where he lives or
even where he went to school will continue to think he is important.
Are you an idiot? No one in their right mind would post their info on
usenet. Idiots like you and the rest of the posters here would exploit
it. I have received threats here. You're an idiot.
Years ago I had the idea for a poster.
An ant on the top of a steaming pile of dog *****, thinking he was king of
the mountain.
Projecting again?
(Insert here a one liner from Earl that he thinks is clever.)
***** off.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
04 Apr 2004 08:10:55 PM |
|
|
"The Rev Optional" <optional@optional.com> wrote in message
news:4f26a687ece1197fc9c01e7e1e9c78a3@news.teranews.com...
But Earl, the man who is afraid to tell us his real name, where he lives
or
even where he went to school will continue to think he is important.
Are you an idiot? No one in their right mind would post their info on
usenet. Idiots like you and the rest of the posters here would exploit
it. I have received threats here. You're an idiot.
Another coward heard from.
Years ago I had the idea for a poster.
An ant on the top of a steaming pile of dog *****, thinking he was king of
the mountain.
Projecting again?
(Insert here a one liner from Earl that he thinks is clever.)
***** off.
Must be spring break.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tony E" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
06 Apr 2004 07:25:41 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 01:10:55 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net>
wrote:
"The Rev Optional" <optional@optional.com> wrote in message
news:4f26a687ece1197fc9c01e7e1e9c78a3@news.teranews.com...
But Earl, the man who is afraid to tell us his real name, where he lives
or
even where he went to school will continue to think he is important.
Are you an idiot? No one in their right mind would post their info on
usenet. Idiots like you and the rest of the posters here would exploit
it. I have received threats here. You're an idiot.
Another coward heard from.
Defending ones self from twits like you is being a coward?
Years ago I had the idea for a poster.
An ant on the top of a steaming pile of dog *****, thinking he was king of
the mountain.
Projecting again?
(Insert here a one liner from Earl that he thinks is clever.)
***** off.
Must be spring break.
That's old..Please try again
.
|
|
|
| User: "PB" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
06 Apr 2004 06:43:29 PM |
|
|
How is this fishing related?
Plonk
"Tony E" <nomail@thisaddress.com> wrote in message
news:qa8570lb4rrtn31ghg6rao6irn5cljhr9i@4ax.com...
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 01:10:55 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net>
wrote:
"The Rev Optional" <optional@optional.com> wrote in message
news:4f26a687ece1197fc9c01e7e1e9c78a3@news.teranews.com...
But Earl, the man who is afraid to tell us his real name, where he
lives
or
even where he went to school will continue to think he is important.
Are you an idiot? No one in their right mind would post their info on
usenet. Idiots like you and the rest of the posters here would exploit
it. I have received threats here. You're an idiot.
Another coward heard from.
Defending ones self from twits like you is being a coward?
Years ago I had the idea for a poster.
An ant on the top of a steaming pile of dog *****, thinking he was king
of
the mountain.
Projecting again?
(Insert here a one liner from Earl that he thinks is clever.)
***** off.
Must be spring break.
That's old..Please try again
.
|
|
|
| User: "L.S.L" |
|
| Title: Re: Will jesus ever come back? -- NEVER. HE'S DEAD. BABY DUKIE, THE LIAR! |
06 Apr 2004 03:58:17 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 16:43:29 -0700, "PB" <stickyis@sympatrico.ca>
wrote:
How is this fishing related?
Plonk
It's not ya fucking coward.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
