"Dave Thompson" <dav13795@wdmdx1.com> wrote in message
news:100jmcasgtuhmbc@corp.supernews.com...
"Uncle Samuel" <stars@bars> wrote in message
news:j6gj009r5g69lloqmh0pfsko19phnmcqov@4ax.com...
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 11:14:01 -0800, "Dave Thompson"
<dav13795@wdmdx1.com> wrote:
"Kingfish" <spam_trap_void@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Am4Ob.1$CE2.0@fe07.usenetserver.com...
"Anonymous Sender" <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote in message
news:4c005f55e6f6937178639e3f5794dad2@remailer.metacolo.com...
http://www.denverpost.com/
http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~155~1893776,00.html
what a bunch of *****.
saying the pledge isn't like praying that one would do in private -
quite
the opposite - it is making a public statement about one's
allegiance.
Why would I want to demonstrate my allegiance to anyone outside my
direct
actions, and why should I be required to or be judged by repeatedly
quoting
a meaningless oath? You can say the pledge and not mean it, so how is
that
demonstrating allegiance.
You can also be legally sworn and not mean it, that's called perjury.
You dodged the question. Please go back and try again. Saying the pledge
and
not meaning it is not perjury. If it were we'd be locking up most
gradeschool kids after the first time they said it.
Now, why should I have to demonstrate to you my allegiance to an object by
saying a meaningless oath?
Uncle Spammy never really thought about it, he's just another spineless
shiteating sycophant, desperate to try and "fit in" ...
.
