| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Wen-King Su" |
| Date: |
19 Aug 2003 01:30:37 PM |
| Object: |
Re: zero godz |
In a previous article "Bob White" <threeball@hotmail.com> writes:
;> I'm not a theist, "Vital".
:>
;> Jim07D3
:
;OK, "Jim07D3," then, if you have an absence of belief in the existence of
:gods, why would anybody have to convince you that there are no gods in
;evidence? If you are not theist, then you are already there, aren't you?
Isn't it obvious in what you wrote? He has an absence of belief in the
existence of gods. "There is none" is a belief in the existence of
gods. He require evidence to take on any such beliefs. Not
complicated at all.
.
|
|
| User: "Bob White" |
|
| Title: Re: zero godz |
19 Aug 2003 02:01:13 PM |
|
|
"Wen-King Su" <wen-king@myri.com> wrote in message
news:bhtqcd$lor@neptune.myri-local.com...
..."There is none" is a belief in the existence of gods. ...
You need some remedial instruction in how Engrish works, knucklehead. 8^)
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
