Religions > Atheism > Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason)
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
| Date: |
11 Dec 2005 01:14:20 AM |
| Object: |
Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
February 2003. After Secretary of State Colin Powell made his case for
war at the United Nations, most other leading Democrats applauded.
Senator Joe Biden called Powell's case "very powerful and, I think,
irrefutable." Senator John Kerry called it "compelling." Only Dean
dissented. "I heard little today that leads me to believe that there
is an imminent threat warranting unilateral military action by the
United States against Iraq," he said.
Later that month, Dean warned that the Bush administration was
preparing to invade Iraq unilaterally. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay
charged that Dean "either doesn't know what he's talking about ... or
he's seriously uninformed, or he's just misleading the American people
and his party."
April 2003. Senator Joe Lieberman declared that the capture of Baghdad
and the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime vindicated his support for the
invasion. "The vindication that I feel is the confidence that with
Saddam gone, America's going to be a lot safer than it otherwise would
have been," Lieberman said. House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt
said that "it's a continuation of a historic, long-term trend that we
stand on the right side." Once again the dissenter, Dean said, "All
these folks who are crowing about their vote and the outcome are going
to learn that the occupation will be very difficult." He added, "I'm
not a pacifist. We've removed a horrible dictator, but the price we're
going to pay is down the road."
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2134 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
.
|
|
| User: "E.E.Bud Keith" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 02:16:32 AM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:arjnp1d062hm8c2hqu8u8flmea6higkqju@4ax.com...
So where's that WMD again, *****?
Answer he question yourself idiot all you know is they have never been found
you can not prove that they do not exist.
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
February 2003. After Secretary of State Colin Powell made his case for
war at the United Nations, most other leading Democrats applauded.
Senator Joe Biden called Powell's case "very powerful and, I think,
irrefutable." Senator John Kerry called it "compelling." Only Dean
dissented. "I heard little today that leads me to believe that there
is an imminent threat warranting unilateral military action by the
United States against Iraq," he said.
Later that month, Dean warned that the Bush administration was
preparing to invade Iraq unilaterally. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay
charged that Dean "either doesn't know what he's talking about ... or
he's seriously uninformed, or he's just misleading the American people
and his party."
April 2003. Senator Joe Lieberman declared that the capture of Baghdad
and the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime vindicated his support for the
invasion. "The vindication that I feel is the confidence that with
Saddam gone, America's going to be a lot safer than it otherwise would
have been," Lieberman said. House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt
said that "it's a continuation of a historic, long-term trend that we
stand on the right side." Once again the dissenter, Dean said, "All
these folks who are crowing about their vote and the outcome are going
to learn that the occupation will be very difficult." He added, "I'm
not a pacifist. We've removed a horrible dictator, but the price we're
going to pay is down the road."
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka
Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and
counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2134 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 02:25:00 AM |
|
|
"E.E.Bud Keith" <budk101@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Y8udnVkVW41GQgbenZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@comcast.com...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:arjnp1d062hm8c2hqu8u8flmea6higkqju@4ax.com...
So where's that WMD again, *****?
Answer he question yourself idiot all you know is they have never been
found you can not prove that they do not exist.
Ah yes, classic example of shifting the burden of proof.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "W.Henry" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 07:51:50 AM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <> wrote in message
news:dKudnW7bSovEfwbenZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@io.com...
:
: "E.E.Bud Keith" <budk101@comcast.net> wrote in message
: news:Y8udnVkVW41GQgbenZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@comcast.com...
: >
: > "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
: > <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
: > news:arjnp1d062hm8c2hqu8u8flmea6higkqju@4ax.com...
: >> So where's that WMD again, *****?
: >
: > Answer he question yourself idiot all you know is they have never been
: > found you can not prove that they do not exist.
:
: Ah yes, classic example of shifting the burden of proof.
He's just taking a classic move from the DNC playbook.
:
:
: --
: Denis Loubet
:
: http://www.io.com/~dloubet
: http://www.ashenempires.com
:
:
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 10:39:34 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:51:50 -0500, "W.Henry"
<whenry21214@nospamyahoo.com> wrote:
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message
news:dKudnW7bSovEfwbenZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@io.com...
:
: "E.E.Bud Keith" <budk101@comcast.net> wrote in message
: news:Y8udnVkVW41GQgbenZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@comcast.com...
: >
: > "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
: > <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
: > news:arjnp1d062hm8c2hqu8u8flmea6higkqju@4ax.com...
: >> So where's that WMD again, *****?
: >
: > Answer he question yourself idiot all you know is they have never been
: > found you can not prove that they do not exist.
:
: Ah yes, classic example of shifting the burden of proof.
He's just taking a classic move from the DNC playbook.
Actually, he's just taking a page from the GOP treason manual.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2141 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 08:07:51 AM |
|
|
Denis Loubet wrote:
"E.E.Bud Keith" <budk101@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Y8udnVkVW41GQgbenZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@comcast.com...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:arjnp1d062hm8c2hqu8u8flmea6higkqju@4ax.com...
So where's that WMD again, *****?
Answer he question yourself idiot all you know is they have never been
found you can not prove that they do not exist.
Ah yes, classic example of shifting the burden of proof.
And now that shifting the burden might actually be helpful (Iran
and evidence that they are after nuclear weapons), they have
no credibility.
Chickenhawk little lied twice about Afghanistand and Iraq,
and is surprised that nobody believes him.
Bob Dog
Atheist #153 = 1^3 + 5^3 + 3^3
EAC's chief cook and brainwasher
-----
"Sooner or later the despairing Churches will try to get
a world-alliance with something like Fascist tyranny to
check the growth of Atheism. It is their one hope."
- Joseph McCabe
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 10:39:02 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:16:32 -0600, "E.E.Bud Keith"
<budk101@comcast.net> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:arjnp1d062hm8c2hqu8u8flmea6higkqju@4ax.com...
So where's that WMD again, *****?
Answer he question yourself idiot all you know is they have never been found
you can not prove that they do not exist.
Prove yor mom is not a man.
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
February 2003. After Secretary of State Colin Powell made his case for
war at the United Nations, most other leading Democrats applauded.
Senator Joe Biden called Powell's case "very powerful and, I think,
irrefutable." Senator John Kerry called it "compelling." Only Dean
dissented. "I heard little today that leads me to believe that there
is an imminent threat warranting unilateral military action by the
United States against Iraq," he said.
Later that month, Dean warned that the Bush administration was
preparing to invade Iraq unilaterally. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay
charged that Dean "either doesn't know what he's talking about ... or
he's seriously uninformed, or he's just misleading the American people
and his party."
April 2003. Senator Joe Lieberman declared that the capture of Baghdad
and the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime vindicated his support for the
invasion. "The vindication that I feel is the confidence that with
Saddam gone, America's going to be a lot safer than it otherwise would
have been," Lieberman said. House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt
said that "it's a continuation of a historic, long-term trend that we
stand on the right side." Once again the dissenter, Dean said, "All
these folks who are crowing about their vote and the outcome are going
to learn that the occupation will be very difficult." He added, "I'm
not a pacifist. We've removed a horrible dictator, but the price we're
going to pay is down the road."
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka
Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and
counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2134 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2141 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 02:03:03 AM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP,The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 09:21:22 AM |
|
|
Bill Baker wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
I'm sure that given the chance, Osama would be honored to pin it on him.
Whenever the treasonous ***** opens his yap to belch forth another
comparison to 'Nam he isn't simply making an observation. He is
knowingly trying to create the conditions that led to that sad defeat.
Ho Dean isn't merely one of the useful idiots that Lenin spoke of, he is
a malicious ***** for whom political opportunism swamps any regard he
has for the national security or welfare of the US. He differs from
most of his fellow libs only in that he has been less successful at
accumulating the power he covets.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP,The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 12:20:51 PM |
|
|
Fester <not@home.com> wrote:
Bill Baker wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
I'm sure that given the chance, Osama would be honored to pin it on him.
Nah. Bush is the one who's let Osama go free, not Dean.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 09:47:14 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:21:22 +0000, Fester <not@home.com> wrote in message
news:<StXmf.2802$eD5.735904@twister.southeast.rr.com>...
Bill Baker wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
I'm sure that given the chance, Osama would be honored to pin it on him.
Actually, Osama would be more likely to pin it on Bush, since he's the one
that has made it possible for Osama to be free for the last four years.
Oh, but I forgot. 9/11 was caused by Saddam Hussein according to
Republicans, right?
Republicans hate the truth and anyone who dares to tell it, like Howard
Dean.
--
Thurgood Lie #2:
"Most homosexuals fantasize about children."
news:1107585362.333321.111210@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
news:1108018234.267337.155670@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 09:52:16 AM |
|
|
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.12.11.15.47.12.123390@postini.spamcon.org...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:21:22 +0000, Fester <not@home.com> wrote in message
news:<StXmf.2802$eD5.735904@twister.southeast.rr.com>...
Bill Baker wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
I'm sure that given the chance, Osama would be honored to pin it on him.
Actually, Osama would be more likely to pin it on Bush, since he's the one
that has made it possible for Osama to be free for the last four years.
How many successful attacks against the U.S. by Osama since 9/11?
How many of the top ranking people in Al Queda have we captured or killed?
Oh, but I forgot. 9/11 was caused by Saddam Hussein according to
Republicans, right?
Wrong
Republicans hate the truth and anyone who dares to tell it, like Howard
Dean.
Why are you lying?
Are you pro-life?
--
Thurgood Lie #2:
"Most homosexuals fantasize about children."
news:1107585362.333321.111210@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com
news:1108018234.267337.155670@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 10:16:26 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:52:16 -0500, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
in message news:<Y6adnesQVuOE1gHenZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@comcast.com>...
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.12.11.15.47.12.123390@postini.spamcon.org...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:21:22 +0000, Fester <not@home.com> wrote in message
news:<StXmf.2802$eD5.735904@twister.southeast.rr.com>...
Bill Baker wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
I'm sure that given the chance, Osama would be honored to pin it on him.
Actually, Osama would be more likely to pin it on Bush, since he's the one
that has made it possible for Osama to be free for the last four years.
How many successful attacks against the U.S. by Osama since 9/11?
How many before? How long before?
How many of the top ranking people in Al Queda have we captured or killed?
Osama should have been the target, not Saddam Hussein. We captured the
dictator of a sovereign nation with an army to protect him for chrissakes.
Shouldn't we be able to capture some guy with a relatively low network of
supporters if we tried?
Oh, but I forgot. 9/11 was caused by Saddam Hussein according to
Republicans, right?
Wrong
Well, some sure act like it.
Republicans hate the truth and anyone who dares to tell it, like Howard
Dean.
Why are you lying?
Are you pro-life?
How else would you explain Fester's comments? Howard Dean turned out to
be right whenever he seemed to be going out on a limb.
--
Lurlean Lie #28:
"All lesbians hate men."
news:1dcee589.0409101912.335472c7@posting.google.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 10:29:44 AM |
|
|
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.12.11.16.16.23.622638@postini.spamcon.org...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:52:16 -0500, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
in message news:<Y6adnesQVuOE1gHenZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@comcast.com>...
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.12.11.15.47.12.123390@postini.spamcon.org...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:21:22 +0000, Fester <not@home.com> wrote in
message
news:<StXmf.2802$eD5.735904@twister.southeast.rr.com>...
Bill Baker wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
I'm sure that given the chance, Osama would be honored to pin it on
him.
Actually, Osama would be more likely to pin it on Bush, since he's the
one
that has made it possible for Osama to be free for the last four years.
How many successful attacks against the U.S. by Osama since 9/11?
How many before? How long before?
So you answer my question. The answer is..ZERO
Before Bush he had more than one successful attack against the U.S.
1993 World Trade Center
U.S.S. Cole
Embassy Bombings
With Bush
9/11
and now..
ZERO
How many of the top ranking people in Al Queda have we captured or
killed?
Osama should have been the target, not Saddam Hussein.
So your thinking is...get Osama and that ends the war on terror.
We captured the
dictator of a sovereign nation with an army to protect him for chrissakes.
Who killed how many hundreds of thousands of people.
Ignored how many U.N. Resolutions
Shot at how many U.S. planes
Shown the world that he has had WMD before and would use them
How many more millions would you want us to spend monitoring him as he and
the U.N. stole millions for the oil for food program?
Shouldn't we be able to capture some guy with a relatively low network of
supporters if we tried?
Oh, but I forgot. 9/11 was caused by Saddam Hussein according to
Republicans, right?
Wrong
Well, some sure act like it.
Republicans hate the truth and anyone who dares to tell it, like Howard
Dean.
Why are you lying?
Are you pro-life?
How else would you explain Fester's comments? Howard Dean turned out to
be right whenever he seemed to be going out on a limb.
Are you pro-life?
--
Lurlean Lie #28:
"All lesbians hate men."
news:1dcee589.0409101912.335472c7@posting.google.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "MikeC" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 10:33:37 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:taOdnfZ2GIhCzgHeRVn-rA@comcast.com...
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.12.11.16.16.23.622638@postini.spamcon.org...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:52:16 -0500, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote
in message news:<Y6adnesQVuOE1gHenZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@comcast.com>...
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.12.11.15.47.12.123390@postini.spamcon.org...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:21:22 +0000, Fester <not@home.com> wrote in
message
news:<StXmf.2802$eD5.735904@twister.southeast.rr.com>...
Bill Baker wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
I'm sure that given the chance, Osama would be honored to pin it on
him.
Actually, Osama would be more likely to pin it on Bush, since he's the
one
that has made it possible for Osama to be free for the last four years.
How many successful attacks against the U.S. by Osama since 9/11?
How many before? How long before?
So you answer my question. The answer is..ZERO
Before Bush he had more than one successful attack against the U.S.
1993 World Trade Center
U.S.S. Cole
Embassy Bombings
So you're including attacks on American interests and forces overseas? Those
are now occurring every single day.
With Bush
9/11
and now..
ZERO
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP,The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 01:59:28 PM |
|
|
MikeC wrote:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:taOdnfZ2GIhCzgHeRVn-rA@comcast.com...
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.12.11.16.16.23.622638@postini.spamcon.org...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:52:16 -0500, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote
in message news:<Y6adnesQVuOE1gHenZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@comcast.com>...
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.12.11.15.47.12.123390@postini.spamcon.org...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:21:22 +0000, Fester <not@home.com> wrote in
message
news:<StXmf.2802$eD5.735904@twister.southeast.rr.com>...
Bill Baker wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
I'm sure that given the chance, Osama would be honored to pin it on
him.
Actually, Osama would be more likely to pin it on Bush, since he's the
one
that has made it possible for Osama to be free for the last four years.
How many successful attacks against the U.S. by Osama since 9/11?
How many before? How long before?
So you answer my question. The answer is..ZERO
Before Bush he had more than one successful attack against the U.S.
1993 World Trade Center
U.S.S. Cole
Embassy Bombings
So you're including attacks on American interests and forces overseas? Those
are now occurring every single day.
With Bush
9/11
and now..
ZERO
You have to understand that you're talking to lying coward bobby
heishman posting as "osprey"; usenet's most known and "proven" liar who
says ***** like this:
"One last note: I am very surprised at your reaction especially after
just a few short months ago I provided a copy of my DD214 Right in
box 18...1st line it says... SERVED 2 AUG 90 TO 1 OCT 94 IN SUPPORT
OF OPERATION DESERT SHIELD/STORM and in box 13 NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE
MEDAL Funny how you have selective memory, why? Yes, I served in combat
during Desert Storm."
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.abortion/msg/38f5de5691243868?dmode=source&hl=en
"Fine, if you want to play on words...no I was not in actual "combat" "
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/db12fe6b6ec66a35?dmode=source&hl=en
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 05:53:00 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 11:29:44 -0500, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
in message news:<taOdnfZ2GIhCzgHeRVn-rA@comcast.com>...
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.12.11.16.16.23.622638@postini.spamcon.org...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:52:16 -0500, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
in message news:<Y6adnesQVuOE1gHenZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@comcast.com>...
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.12.11.15.47.12.123390@postini.spamcon.org...
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:21:22 +0000, Fester <not@home.com> wrote in
message
news:<StXmf.2802$eD5.735904@twister.southeast.rr.com>...
Bill Baker wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
I'm sure that given the chance, Osama would be honored to pin it on
him.
Actually, Osama would be more likely to pin it on Bush, since he's the
one
that has made it possible for Osama to be free for the last four years.
How many successful attacks against the U.S. by Osama since 9/11?
How many before? How long before?
So you answer my question. The answer is..ZERO
Before Bush he had more than one successful attack against the U.S.
1993 World Trade Center
U.S.S. Cole
Embassy Bombings
With Bush
9/11
and now..
ZERO
So before 9/11 he had three successful attacks that killed a relatively
small number of people and were spaced years apart and you actually think
that OBL is afraid to attack us now because of president Bush? Haven't
you ever heard of biding one's time and waiting until the enemy has their
guard down? You can't be *that* much of a Bush apologist, can you?
How many of the top ranking people in Al Queda have we captured or
killed?
Osama should have been the target, not Saddam Hussein.
So your thinking is...get Osama and that ends the war on terror.
Does that mean that you think we should let OBL go just because capturing
him would not end the war on terror?
We captured the dictator of a sovereign nation with an army to protect
him for chrissakes.
Who killed how many hundreds of thousands of people. Ignored how many
U.N. Resolutions
Shot at how many U.S. planes
Shown the world that he has had WMD before and would use them
How many more millions would you want us to spend monitoring him as he
and the U.N. stole millions for the oil for food program?
Did I say that it was a bad thing that Saddam Hussein was removed from
power? My point was contained in the next sentence:
Shouldn't we be able to capture some guy with a relatively low network
of supporters if we tried?
Well, shouldn't we?
Oh, but I forgot. 9/11 was caused by Saddam Hussein according to
Republicans, right?
Wrong
Well, some sure act like it.
Republicans hate the truth and anyone who dares to tell it, like
Howard Dean.
Why are you lying?
Are you pro-life?
How else would you explain Fester's comments? Howard Dean turned out
to be right whenever he seemed to be going out on a limb.
Are you pro-life?
What in the world does that have to do with this discussion?
--
Thurgood lie #8:
"The uncircumcised are uncontrollably lustful. Their filthy foreskins
overstimulate them into a sexual frenzy."
news:1122433880.655973.9650@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 12:22:17 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Bill Baker" <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote in message
Fester <not@home.com> wrote in message
Bill Baker wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
I'm sure that given the chance, Osama would be honored to pin it on him.
Actually, Osama would be more likely to pin it on Bush, since he's the one
that has made it possible for Osama to be free for the last four years.
How many successful attacks against the U.S. by Osama since 9/11?
Almost as many Americans have died because of Bush as have died
because of Osama.
And Bush has cost the US about 100 times as much money.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matty" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
04 Jan 2006 01:06:46 AM |
|
|
On 2005-12-12 04:47:14 +1300, Bill Baker <wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> said:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:21:22 +0000, Fester <not@home.com> wrote in message
news:<StXmf.2802$eD5.735904@twister.southeast.rr.com>...
Bill Baker wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
I'm sure that given the chance, Osama would be honored to pin it on him.
Actually, Osama would be more likely to pin it on Bush, since he's the one
that has made it possible for Osama to be free for the last four years.
Oh, but I forgot. 9/11 was caused by Saddam Hussein according to
Republicans, right?
Republicans hate the truth and anyone who dares to tell it, like Howard
Dean.
Actually, you can blame Reagan and his unwillingness to make
Afghanistan stable with help from the Soviets after they withdrew.
Gorbatrov saw the nightmare before the yanks did, had it been
stablised, there would have been no 9/11, there would have been no 'war
on terror' and there would be none of the problems we currently see
right now.
So yeah, you can blame the Reagan Administration, more importantly,
those who worked behind the scenes then are now working behind the
scenes now with Bush and Co.
Matt
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 10:38:11 AM |
|
|
On 11 Dec 2005 00:03:03 -0800, "Bill Baker"
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
GOP only gives traitors and corrupt offcials medals.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -2141 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
"Now, did I want to go? Hell no."
-duke (duckgumbo32@cox.net), aka PedophilEarl J Weber, 63
year old mateless, heirless biological failure
of Afton Oaks Apartment, Baton Rouge, on why
a Neocon chickenhawk like him pussied out of
the Vietnam War.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Party of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 07:12:54 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:38:11 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's
Cocaine Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:<0flop1leooql7jh6fj6bt6nk9ieubct3vn@4ax.com>...
On 11 Dec 2005 00:03:03 -0800, "Bill Baker"
<wbaker@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
Howard Dean should be given a medal.
GOP only gives traitors and corrupt offcials medals.
But the GOP won't be in power forever.
--
Lurlean Lie #24:
"he goes to orgy's all over the country"
news:1dcee589.0408290928.1985ece@posting.google.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Rememeber When Howard Dean is Right About Iraq... In 2003? (GOP, The Oarty of Treason) |
11 Dec 2005 08:14:51 AM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So where's that WMD again, *****?
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=Vff%2BA3onh%2FX7dvdZiZxXBG%3D%3D
February 2003. After Secretary of State Colin Powell made his case for
war at the United Nations, most other leading Democrats applauded.
Senator Joe Biden called Powell's case "very powerful and, I think,
irrefutable." Senator John Kerry called it "compelling." Only Dean
dissented. "I heard little today that leads me to believe that there
is an imminent threat warranting unilateral military action by the
United States against Iraq," he said.
<snip>
Once again the dissenter, Dean said, "All
these folks who are crowing about their vote and the outcome are going
to learn that the occupation will be very difficult." He added, "I'm
not a pacifist. We've removed a horrible dictator, but the price we're
going to pay is down the road."
If Dean is in any way smarter, it would be that he recognized that the
facts would eventually come out. I don't give him that much credit. I
think he took that side just to stand out from the crowd.
Still, the fact that chose to align with the evidence and not
expedience
speaks well for him. If the Shrub junta's crimes continue to be shown,
there may be nobody in either party who isn' t tainted by being "Yes"
men (and women) except for Dean in 2008.
Bob Dog
Atheist #153 = 1^3 + 5^3 + 3^3
EAC's chief cook and brainwasher
-----
"Sooner or later the despairing Churches will try to get
a world-alliance with something like Fascist tyranny to
check the growth of Atheism. It is their one hope."
- Joseph McCabe
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
