| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"David Smith" |
| Date: |
26 Nov 2003 08:31:29 AM |
| Object: |
REPUBLICANS ARE HYSTERICAL SNIVELING COWARDS |
Republicans especially are whining if gays marry it will degrade
their marriage and lead to their trailer trash marring animals.
Well cowards, if your marriage is so fragile that a few gays
getting married degrades your marriage and leads you to marring
animals, you should have gotten a divorce long ago. If your
marriage is only based on who can join the club, like some
exclusive country club, where blacks cannot marry whites or
a woman cannot marry a woman, on that basis it wasn't much of a
marriage in the first place. It was only a membership in a
elitist country club membership, just a prestige license to thumb
your nose at others. Bases on that, it is no wonder 50 percent of
these prestige so called marriages end in divorce.
If you base your marriage on other's lives not your love and
commitment to your wife or husband, you should not be married,
you should be out bar hopping. If two gays getting married effect
your marriage in anyway toward your love of your wife or your
commitment to each other, it wasn't much of a marriage in the
first place. It has been ever thus that when the hated group
wanted to join this elite status and special right, the sky
is falling has been the answer. There will be people marring
animals, children and all the women in town. And each time
this hated group was allowed to marry the sun did rise the next
day, the animals were safe in their dog houses, the town folk
women were still looking for the right man, and children
went off to school as per usual. Hysteria is the battle
cry of conservatives. If A happens, then B the sky is falling
is sure to happen. They'll be people marring their cars! !
If your marriage is so tenuous that a few gays getting
married effects your marriage in anyway, get a divorce, like
the other 50 percent do.
Yes, that "All Inclusive Party" is sure looking a lot like a
"All Are Welcomed" sign at a KKK rally.
.
|
|
| User: "The Frog" |
|
| Title: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa |
26 Nov 2003 04:59:33 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:31:29 GMT, David Smith <Smith@nospam.com>
wrote:
Republicans especially are whining if gays marry it will degrade
their marriage and lead to their trailer trash marring animals.
Well cowards, if your marriage is so fragile that a few gays
getting married degrades your marriage and leads you to marring
animals, you should have gotten a divorce long ago. If your
marriage is only based on who can join the club, like some
exclusive country club, where blacks cannot marry whites or
a woman cannot marry a woman, on that basis it wasn't much of a
marriage in the first place. It was only a membership in a
elitist country club membership, just a prestige license to thumb
your nose at others. Bases on that, it is no wonder 50 percent of
these prestige so called marriages end in divorce.
If you base your marriage on other's lives not your love and
commitment to your wife or husband, you should not be married,
you should be out bar hopping. If two gays getting married effect
your marriage in anyway toward your love of your wife or your
commitment to each other, it wasn't much of a marriage in the
first place. It has been ever thus that when the hated group
wanted to join this elite status and special right, the sky
is falling has been the answer. There will be people marring
animals, children and all the women in town. And each time
this hated group was allowed to marry the sun did rise the next
day, the animals were safe in their dog houses, the town folk
women were still looking for the right man, and children
went off to school as per usual. Hysteria is the battle
cry of conservatives. If A happens, then B the sky is falling
is sure to happen. They'll be people marring their cars! !
If your marriage is so tenuous that a few gays getting
married effects your marriage in anyway, get a divorce, like
the other 50 percent do.
Yes, that "All Inclusive Party" is sure looking a lot like a
"All Are Welcomed" sign at a KKK rally.
Ask any of the Democratic candidates that actually have a chance of
winning the party's nomination if they support samesex marriage.
Ask the party of "inclusion"
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"The multicultural project will never fully succeed if 'diversity'
is defined as one's own preferred ideologies and political groups."
--Richard E. Redding, "Grappling With Diverse Conceptions of Diversity,"
American Psychologist, April 2002, p. 301.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa |
26 Nov 2003 05:03:15 PM |
|
|
The Frog wrote:
Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa
The mental age of all conservatives.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa |
02 Dec 2003 08:48:31 AM |
|
|
On 26-Nov-2003, David Smith <Smith@nospam.com> wrote:
Message-ID: <3FC52F09.98F8522F@nospam.com>
From: David Smith <Smith@nospam.com>
Organization: .
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.society.liberalism,alt.politics.bush,talk.politics.misc,alt.atheism,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.religion.christian,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.democrats.d
Subject: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa
References: <3684F16D.AFA2C962@nospam.com>
<kvbasvcq30f48n89ipscnmmjsjt36djhib@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 10
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:03:15 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.148.31.34
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net 1069887795 65.148.31.34 (Wed, 26
Nov 2003 15:03:15 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:03:15 PST
Path:
News.100ProofNews.com!in.100proofnews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!elnk-pas-nf1!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!c1ea97d8!not-for-mail
Xref: OS30 alt.politics.homosexuality:1834 alt.society.liberalism:3051
alt.politics.bush:11928 talk.politics.misc:4548 alt.atheism:6938
alt.politics.usa.republican:4221 alt.religion.christian:4056
soc.culture.usa:3696 alt.politics.democrats.d:4534
The Frog wrote:
Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa
The mental age of all conservatives.
And that's being charitable.
John M.
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x-- Access to over 800 Gigs/Day - $8.95/Month
x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Starrett" |
|
| Title: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa |
02 Dec 2003 10:19:31 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On 26-Nov-2003, David Smith <Smith@nospam.com> wrote:
<snip>
The Frog wrote:
Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa
The mental age of all conservatives.
And that's being charitable.
John M.
<snip>
Please note that these people are not conservatives. Froggy and his ilk
have hijacked a political label. Real conservatives do not believe in
big intrusive government, communist style propaganda, colonialization,
and rampant prokbarrel spending.
John Starrett
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa |
05 Dec 2003 08:12:37 PM |
|
|
On 2-Dec-2003, John Starrett <jstarret@nmt.edu> wrote:
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 09:19:31 -0700
From: John Starrett <jstarret@nmt.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013
Thunderbird/0.3
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups:
alt.atheism,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.religion.christian,soc.culture.usa,talk.politics.misc,alt.society.liberalism
Subject: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa
References: <3684F16D.AFA2C962@nospam.com>
<kvbasvcq30f48n89ipscnmmjsjt36djhib@4ax.com>
<3FC52F09.98F8522F@nospam.com> <3fcca51e_10@Opticon.100ProofNews.com>
In-Reply-To: <3fcca51e_10@Opticon.100ProofNews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.155.42.138
Message-ID: <3fccb71c$1@news.zianet.com>
X-Original-Trace: 2 Dec 2003 09:00:28 -0600, 209.155.42.138
Lines: 24
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.197.39.6
X-Trace: 1070381950 457 208.197.39.6
Path:
News.100ProofNews.com!in.100proofnews.com!newsfeed.stueberl.de!news-stoc.telia.net!news-stoa.telia.net!telia.net!nntp.inet.fi!inet.fi!ash.uu.net!spool.news.uu.net!not-for-mail
Xref: OS30 alt.atheism:12806 alt.politics.bush:22031
alt.politics.democrats.d:8616 alt.politics.homosexuality:3500
alt.politics.usa.republican:7272 alt.religion.christian:6626
soc.culture.usa:7722 talk.politics.misc:10235 alt.society.liberalism:5205
johnmanyjars@eatshit.com wrote:
On 26-Nov-2003, David Smith <Smith@nospam.com> wrote:
<snip>
The Frog wrote:
Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa
The mental age of all conservatives.
And that's being charitable.
John M.
<snip>
Please note that these people are not conservatives. Froggy and his ilk
have hijacked a political label. Real conservatives do not believe in
big intrusive government, communist style propaganda, colonialization,
and rampant prokbarrel spending.
John Starrett
I quite agree. It's a shame they've lost sight of what's real.
John M.
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x-- Access to over 800 Gigs/Day - $8.95/Month
x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa |
06 Dec 2003 12:34:00 AM |
|
|
<johnmanyjars@eatshit.com> wrote in message
news:3fd13b24_2@Opticon2.100ProofNews.com...
On 2-Dec-2003, John Starrett <jstarret@nmt.edu> wrote:
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 09:19:31 -0700
From: John Starrett <jstarret@nmt.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.5)
Gecko/20031013
Thunderbird/0.3
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups:
alt.atheism,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.democrats.d,alt.politics.homosexu
ality,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.religion.christian,soc.culture.usa,tal
k.politics.misc,alt.society.liberalism
Subject: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa
References: <3684F16D.AFA2C962@nospam.com>
<kvbasvcq30f48n89ipscnmmjsjt36djhib@4ax.com>
<3FC52F09.98F8522F@nospam.com> <3fcca51e_10@Opticon.100ProofNews.com>
In-Reply-To: <3fcca51e_10@Opticon.100ProofNews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.155.42.138
Message-ID: <3fccb71c$1@news.zianet.com>
X-Original-Trace: 2 Dec 2003 09:00:28 -0600, 209.155.42.138
Lines: 24
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.197.39.6
X-Trace: 1070381950 457 208.197.39.6
Path:
News.100ProofNews.com!in.100proofnews.com!newsfeed.stueberl.de!news-stoc.tel
ia.net!news-stoa.telia.net!telia.net!nntp.inet.fi!inet.fi!ash.uu.net!spool.n
ews.uu.net!not-for-mail
Xref: OS30 alt.atheism:12806 alt.politics.bush:22031
alt.politics.democrats.d:8616 alt.politics.homosexuality:3500
alt.politics.usa.republican:7272 alt.religion.christian:6626
soc.culture.usa:7722 talk.politics.misc:10235
alt.society.liberalism:5205
johnmanyjars@eatshit.com wrote:
On 26-Nov-2003, David Smith <Smith@nospam.com> wrote:
<snip>
The Frog wrote:
Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa
The mental age of all conservatives.
And that's being charitable.
John M.
<snip>
Please note that these people are not conservatives. Froggy and his ilk
have hijacked a political label. Real conservatives do not believe in
big intrusive government, communist style propaganda, colonialization,
and rampant prokbarrel spending.
John Starrett
I quite agree. It's a shame they've lost sight of what's real.
John M.
You know... I've always thought that to be the case. That republicans didn't
support "big intrusive government, communist style propaganda,
colonialization, and rampant prokbarrel spending." But, then, y'all voted
Bush into office. Seems like a contradiction in terms to me. But... hey, I'm
a liberal, so what do I know.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Starrett" |
|
| Title: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa |
06 Dec 2003 11:46:55 AM |
|
|
JoettaB wrote:
<johnmanyjars@eatshit.com> wrote in message
news:3fd13b24_2@Opticon2.100ProofNews.com...
On 2-Dec-2003, John Starrett <jstarret@nmt.edu> wrote:
<snip>
Please note that these people are not conservatives. Froggy and his ilk
have hijacked a political label. Real conservatives do not believe in
big intrusive government, communist style propaganda, colonialization,
and rampant prokbarrel spending.
John Starrett
I quite agree. It's a shame they've lost sight of what's real.
John M.
You know... I've always thought that to be the case. That republicans didn't
support "big intrusive government, communist style propaganda,
colonialization, and rampant prokbarrel spending." But, then, y'all voted
Bush into office. Seems like a contradiction in terms to me. But... hey, I'm
a liberal, so what do I know.
It's a shame. The last Republican president I voted for was Big Bush,
even though I knew he was dirty from the Reagan scandals. I thought that
because of his tenure at the CIA and his slyness he might be a clever
choice. Aside from his criminal activities, I didn't think he was too
bad a president, except when he went against his word and raised taxes.
The current president and the vocal right wing of the Republican party
are breathtakingly anti American in their values and actions. If someone
had made a true to life movie about the Bush president and showed it in
the mid 90s it would have been laughed out of the theaters as totally
unbelievable.
"Big spending, colonialist, big government Republicans promote perpetual
war, unilateral international warfare by whim and endless debt, and the
public doesn't hang them? Come on!!! And the endless propaganda and
calling half the nation traitors for not being Republicans! Who in the
world would ever believe that?"
It seems so normal now.
What a uniter W is.
--
John Starrett
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoettaB" |
|
| Title: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa |
06 Dec 2003 06:00:36 PM |
|
|
"John Starrett" <jstarret@nmt.edu> wrote in message
news:3fd21164@news.zianet.com...
JoettaB wrote:
<johnmanyjars@eatshit.com> wrote in message
news:3fd13b24_2@Opticon2.100ProofNews.com...
On 2-Dec-2003, John Starrett <jstarret@nmt.edu> wrote:
<snip>
Please note that these people are not conservatives. Froggy and his ilk
have hijacked a political label. Real conservatives do not believe in
big intrusive government, communist style propaganda, colonialization,
and rampant prokbarrel spending.
John Starrett
I quite agree. It's a shame they've lost sight of what's real.
John M.
You know... I've always thought that to be the case. That republicans
didn't
support "big intrusive government, communist style propaganda,
colonialization, and rampant prokbarrel spending." But, then, y'all
voted
Bush into office. Seems like a contradiction in terms to me. But... hey,
I'm
a liberal, so what do I know.
It's a shame. The last Republican president I voted for was Big Bush,
even though I knew he was dirty from the Reagan scandals. I thought that
because of his tenure at the CIA and his slyness he might be a clever
choice. Aside from his criminal activities, I didn't think he was too
bad a president, except when he went against his word and raised taxes.
The current president and the vocal right wing of the Republican party
are breathtakingly anti American in their values and actions. If someone
had made a true to life movie about the Bush president and showed it in
the mid 90s it would have been laughed out of the theaters as totally
unbelievable.
"Big spending, colonialist, big government Republicans promote perpetual
war, unilateral international warfare by whim and endless debt, and the
public doesn't hang them? Come on!!! And the endless propaganda and
calling half the nation traitors for not being Republicans! Who in the
world would ever believe that?"
It seems so normal now.
What a uniter W is.
--
John Starrett
I hope you consider Dean. He's more assuredly a moderate Democrat. In fact,
he may rate as an old school Republican. But... hey... even I would consider
him more worthy than Dumb-ya. Or... you might want to think about Clark.
After all, he was a formerly Republican.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Starrett" |
|
| Title: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa |
06 Dec 2003 07:14:41 PM |
|
|
JoettaB wrote:
"John Starrett" <jstarret@nmt.edu> wrote in message
<snip>
"Big spending, colonialist, big government Republicans promote perpetual
war, unilateral international warfare by whim and endless debt, and the
public doesn't hang them? Come on!!! And the endless propaganda and
calling half the nation traitors for not being Republicans! Who in the
world would ever believe that?"
It seems so normal now.
What a uniter W is.
--
John Starrett
I hope you consider Dean. He's more assuredly a moderate Democrat. In fact,
he may rate as an old school Republican. But... hey... even I would consider
him more worthy than Dumb-ya. Or... you might want to think about Clark.
After all, he was a formerly Republican.
I am leaning toward Clark.
--
John Starrett
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Waaaaaaa..........Waaaaaaaaa........Waaaaaaaaaaa |
26 Nov 2003 06:18:40 PM |
|
|
how the same sex marriage topic is shaping-up in the newsgroups
_________________________________________________________
[01] bit.listserv.gaynet
[02] alt.politics.homosexuality
[03] soc.motss
[04] misc.activism.progressive
[05] nz.soc.queer
[06] can.motss
[07] alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater
[08] alt.gossip.celebrities
[09] alt.homosexual
[10] alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox
[11] alt.atheism
[12] nz.soc.religion
[13] alt.politics.bush
[14] alt.radio.talk.dr-laura
[15] alt.religion.christian.episcopal
[16] soc.men
[17] tor.general
_________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
