In article <0qd1u0dhapi53gd3j1ii52eb9sviogotv3@4ax.com>, h.c
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

But of course even draconian Singapore has an upside. Fundamentalist
Christianity/Islam are illegal on the pain getting their ***** caned.
This almost makes up for the fact that oral sex is illegal there.

Good thing you qualified that with "almost!"

On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 20:55:26 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

WSJ and the Heritage Foundation ranked Luxemberg, Hong Kong, and
Singapore as the most "economically free" countries.

Left in the fine print is the fact that Hong Kong is now a colony of
China that has little political say, Singapore is run be a bunch of
benign dictators, and the king has veto power in Luxemburg.

Or the fact that over 75% of the people in Singapore live in public
housing. Hmm, maybe if the US government start building houses for
everyone we'd be just as "economically free".

But of course even draconian Singapore has an upside. Fundamentalist
Christianity/Islam are illegal on the pain getting their ***** caned.
This almost makes up for the fact that oral sex is illegal there.

I know I should be interested in the really serious part of your post,
unfortunately I've never managed to raise myself out of the gutter and am
fascinated about the oral sex thing. I thought about Singapore as a place to
work because they also ban chewing gum there, a law which I very much approve
of. I didn't realise there were other things that you couldn't put in your
mouth.