| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Supercombuster" |
| Date: |
29 Dec 2007 03:55:03 PM |
| Object: |
Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
.
|
|
| User: "Columbus Steel" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 05:19:00 PM |
|
|
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science from
Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to be the
case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can have?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Seon Ferguson" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 09:25:55 PM |
|
|
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:EBAdj.32889$JD.24360@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science from
Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to be the
case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can have?
I used to be a Ron Paul supporter but now I'm begining to question if I
should support such an ignorant Zealout.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peder B. Pels" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
31 Dec 2007 04:11:03 AM |
|
|
Seon Ferguson <seongf@gmail.com> wrote:
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:EBAdj.32889$JD.24360@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science from
Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to be the
case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can have?
I used to be a Ron Paul supporter but now I'm begining to question if I
should support such an ignorant Zealout.
If the face value of *one fucking quote* is all it takes to shake you
from supporting the best candidate with anything approaching mainstream
publicity, for US presidency the USA has seen for 50 years, then you
fucking deserve to get another Bush or Clinton, and you deserve to get
them good and hard till your rectum bleeds like the fucking Niagra with
water substituted for arterial blood.
--
regards , Peter B. P. http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
Washington D.C.: District of Criminals
"I dont drink anymore... of course, i don't drink any less, either!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Dukenfield" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 10:30:23 PM |
|
|
Seon Ferguson wrote:
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:EBAdj.32889$JD.24360@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science from
Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to be the
case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can have?
I used to be a Ron Paul supporter but now I'm begining to question if I
should support such an ignorant Zealout.
I'd like to ask him how we will live when all government functions,
except national defense, are eliminated.
JAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Seon Ferguson" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
30 Dec 2007 05:38:47 PM |
|
|
"Bill Dukenfield" <BillDukenfield@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:47771EF9.EF878A02@nospam.net...
Seon Ferguson wrote:
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:EBAdj.32889$JD.24360@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science
from
Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to be the
case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can have?
I used to be a Ron Paul supporter but now I'm begining to question if I
should support such an ignorant Zealout.
I'd like to ask him how we will live when all government functions,
except national defense, are eliminated.
JAM
In peace and harmony?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
31 Dec 2007 04:02:06 PM |
|
|
Seon Ferguson wrote:
"Bill Dukenfield" <BillDukenfield@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:47771EF9.EF878A02@nospam.net...
Seon Ferguson wrote:
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:EBAdj.32889$JD.24360@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is
bunkum, or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors
claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their
science from
Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to
be the case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I
can have?
I used to be a Ron Paul supporter but now I'm begining to question
if I should support such an ignorant Zealout.
I'd like to ask him how we will live when all government functions,
except national defense, are eliminated.
JAM
In peace and harmony?
Recall that the Department of Defense used to be the Department of War.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Seon Ferguson" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
01 Jan 2008 03:02:33 AM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:pbWdnW-gydZB--TanZ2dnUVZ_tuonZ2d@giganews.com...
Seon Ferguson wrote:
"Bill Dukenfield" <BillDukenfield@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:47771EF9.EF878A02@nospam.net...
Seon Ferguson wrote:
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:EBAdj.32889$JD.24360@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is
bunkum, or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors
claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their
science from
Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to
be the case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I
can have?
I used to be a Ron Paul supporter but now I'm begining to question
if I should support such an ignorant Zealout.
I'd like to ask him how we will live when all government functions,
except national defense, are eliminated.
JAM
In peace and harmony?
Recall that the Department of Defense used to be the Department of War.
Exactly.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peder B. Pels" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
31 Dec 2007 04:11:03 AM |
|
|
Bill Dukenfield <BillDukenfield@nospam.net> wrote:
Seon Ferguson wrote:
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:EBAdj.32889$JD.24360@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science from
Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to be the
case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can have?
I used to be a Ron Paul supporter but now I'm begining to question if I
should support such an ignorant Zealout.
I'd like to ask him how we will live when all government functions,
except national defense, are eliminated.
JAM
Oh yes, because without the BATF you just can't live a normal life, can
you?
Jeez.
--
regards , Peter B. P. http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
Washington D.C.: District of Criminals
"I dont drink anymore... of course, i don't drink any less, either!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Dukenfield" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
31 Dec 2007 12:22:08 PM |
|
|
"Peder B. Pels" wrote:
Bill Dukenfield <BillDukenfield@nospam.net> wrote:
Seon Ferguson wrote:
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:EBAdj.32889$JD.24360@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science from
Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to be the
case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can have?
I used to be a Ron Paul supporter but now I'm begining to question if I
should support such an ignorant Zealout.
I'd like to ask him how we will live when all government functions,
except national defense, are eliminated.
JAM
Oh yes, because without the BATF you just can't live a normal life, can
you?
Jeez.
--
regards , Peter B. P. http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
Washington D.C.: District of Criminals
"I dont drink anymore... of course, i don't drink any less, either!
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store
not a government agency.
JAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "Atlas Bugged" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
31 Dec 2007 09:47:52 PM |
|
|
"Bill Dukenfield" <BillDukenfield@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:4779336B.41A6E23C@nospam.net...
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store
not a government agency.
Correctomundo!
Reminds of the George Carlin joke of days of old.
He's crossing into Canada, and the guard says "Do you have any firearms or
drugs in the car?"
Stoned Carlin responds, "Well, what do you need?"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mitchell Holman" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
31 Dec 2007 07:27:17 PM |
|
|
Bill Dukenfield <BillDukenfield@nospam.net> wrote in
news:4779336B.41A6E23C@nospam.net:
"Peder B. Pels" wrote:
Bill Dukenfield <BillDukenfield@nospam.net> wrote:
Seon Ferguson wrote:
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:EBAdj.32889$JD.24360@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net...
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups
.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is
bunkum, or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his
detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their
science from Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If
that's going to be the case, where's my slaves and extra wives
the Bible says I can have?
I used to be a Ron Paul supporter but now I'm begining to question
if I should support such an ignorant Zealout.
I'd like to ask him how we will live when all government functions,
except national defense, are eliminated.
JAM
Oh yes, because without the BATF you just can't live a normal life, can
you?
Jeez.
--
regards , Peter B. P. http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
Washington D.C.: District of Criminals
"I dont drink anymore... of course, i don't drink any less, either!
Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a convenience store
not a government agency.
That's what the B is for, in these parts.
Barbeque, Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.
One stop shopping, bring the whole family.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ichange the Subject" |
|
| Title: Roma, Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a stable" |
31 Dec 2007 03:42:28 PM |
|
|
Don't change horsemen in midstream
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Simpson" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 05:20:50 PM |
|
|
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science from
Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to be the
case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can have?
If those laws prevailed, you would be someone else's slave and someone
else's wife.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Columbus Steel" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 05:26:03 PM |
|
|
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:mDAdj.33102$lD6.27630@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science
from Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to be
the case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can have?
If those laws prevailed, you would be someone else's slave and someone
else's wife.
Not a chance, I have money.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Simpson" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 05:27:49 PM |
|
|
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:mDAdj.33102$lD6.27630@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science
from Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to be
the case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can have?
If those laws prevailed, you would be someone else's slave and someone
else's wife.
Not a chance, I have money.
Not if those laws prevailed, you wouldn't.
Your husband would have it all.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Columbus Steel" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 05:29:47 PM |
|
|
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:VJAdj.33104$lD6.8193@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:mDAdj.33102$lD6.27630@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science
from Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to
be the case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can
have?
If those laws prevailed, you would be someone else's slave and someone
else's wife.
Not a chance, I have money.
Not if those laws prevailed, you wouldn't.
Your husband would have it all.
My wife will get it all when I die...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Simpson" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 05:31:40 PM |
|
|
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:VJAdj.33104$lD6.8193@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:mDAdj.33102$lD6.27630@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science
from Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to
be the case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can
have?
If those laws prevailed, you would be someone else's slave and someone
else's wife.
Not a chance, I have money.
Not if those laws prevailed, you wouldn't.
Your husband would have it all.
My wife will get it all when I die...
Not if those laws prevailed.
Your wife would be a slave, too.
Or robbed, beaten and cast out without a rag.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Columbus Steel" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 05:36:57 PM |
|
|
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:wNAdj.33105$lD6.3546@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:VJAdj.33104$lD6.8193@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:mDAdj.33102$lD6.27630@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is
bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science
from Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to
be the case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can
have?
If those laws prevailed, you would be someone else's slave and someone
else's wife.
Not a chance, I have money.
Not if those laws prevailed, you wouldn't.
Your husband would have it all.
My wife will get it all when I die...
Not if those laws prevailed.
Your wife would be a slave, too.
Or robbed, beaten and cast out without a rag.
Your missing the whole point of the post...the Bible thumpers want to pick
and choose which parts they want to believe in.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Simpson" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 05:39:37 PM |
|
|
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:wNAdj.33105$lD6.3546@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:VJAdj.33104$lD6.8193@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:mDAdj.33102$lD6.27630@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is
bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their science
from Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If that's going to
be the case, where's my slaves and extra wives the Bible says I can
have?
If those laws prevailed, you would be someone else's slave and someone
else's wife.
Not a chance, I have money.
Not if those laws prevailed, you wouldn't.
Your husband would have it all.
My wife will get it all when I die...
Not if those laws prevailed.
Your wife would be a slave, too.
Or robbed, beaten and cast out without a rag.
Your missing the whole point of the post...the Bible thumpers want to pick
and choose which parts they want to believe in.
Don't we all?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Columbus Steel" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 05:42:54 PM |
|
|
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:ZUAdj.33107$lD6.31643@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:wNAdj.33105$lD6.3546@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:VJAdj.33104$lD6.8193@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:mDAdj.33102$lD6.27630@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of Reason
himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution is
bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their
science from Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If
that's going to be the case, where's my slaves and extra wives the
Bible says I can have?
If those laws prevailed, you would be someone else's slave and
someone else's wife.
Not a chance, I have money.
Not if those laws prevailed, you wouldn't.
Your husband would have it all.
My wife will get it all when I die...
Not if those laws prevailed.
Your wife would be a slave, too.
Or robbed, beaten and cast out without a rag.
Your missing the whole point of the post...the Bible thumpers want to
pick and choose which parts they want to believe in.
Don't we all?
Sure we do, but science should be taught by teachers, not theologists
.
|
|
|
| User: "CozmicDebris isheforreal" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 06:18:20 PM |
|
|
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:WXAdj.2180$se5.858@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:ZUAdj.33107$lD6.31643@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:wNAdj.33105$lD6.3546@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:VJAdj.33104$lD6.8193@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
news:mDAdj.33102$lD6.27630@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:521ad2c1-27cd-424b-ae1f-08f062b50f70
@i12g2000prf.googlegro
ups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of
Reason himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution
is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors
claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their
science from Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If
that's going to be the case, where's my slaves and extra wives
the Bible says I can have?
If those laws prevailed, you would be someone else's slave and
someone else's wife.
Not a chance, I have money.
Not if those laws prevailed, you wouldn't.
Your husband would have it all.
My wife will get it all when I die...
Not if those laws prevailed.
Your wife would be a slave, too.
Or robbed, beaten and cast out without a rag.
Your missing the whole point of the post...the Bible thumpers want
to pick and choose which parts they want to believe in.
Don't we all?
Sure we do, but science should be taught by teachers, not theologists
Why? So the teachers can have sex with the kids?
The teaching profession and educational institution are not what they
used to be, and is more to blame than religion for the inevitable
downfall of this society.
.
|
|
|
| User: "RT" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
30 Dec 2007 08:57:27 PM |
|
|
CozmicDebris wrote:
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of
Reason himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that evolution
is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors
claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take their
science from Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus. If
that's going to be the case, where's my slaves and extra wives
the Bible says I can have?
If those laws prevailed, you would be someone else's slave and
someone else's wife.
Not a chance, I have money.
Not if those laws prevailed, you wouldn't.
Your husband would have it all.
My wife will get it all when I die...
Not if those laws prevailed.
Your wife would be a slave, too.
Or robbed, beaten and cast out without a rag.
Your missing the whole point of the post...the Bible thumpers want
to pick and choose which parts they want to believe in.
Don't we all?
Sure we do, but science should be taught by teachers, not theologists
Why? So the teachers can have sex with the kids?
The teaching profession and educational institution are not what they
used to be, and is more to blame than religion for the inevitable
downfall of this society.
What about all those priests porking kids?
.
|
|
|
| User: "CozmicDebris isheforreal" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
30 Dec 2007 09:05:33 PM |
|
|
RT <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in news:47785A97.D273B238
@hotmMOVEail.com:
CozmicDebris wrote:
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of
Reason himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution
thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that
evolution
is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors
claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take
their
science from Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus.
If
that's going to be the case, where's my slaves and extra
wives
the Bible says I can have?
If those laws prevailed, you would be someone else's slave
and
someone else's wife.
Not a chance, I have money.
Not if those laws prevailed, you wouldn't.
Your husband would have it all.
My wife will get it all when I die...
Not if those laws prevailed.
Your wife would be a slave, too.
Or robbed, beaten and cast out without a rag.
Your missing the whole point of the post...the Bible thumpers
want
to pick and choose which parts they want to believe in.
Don't we all?
Sure we do, but science should be taught by teachers, not
theologists
Why? So the teachers can have sex with the kids?
The teaching profession and educational institution are not what they
used to be, and is more to blame than religion for the inevitable
downfall of this society.
What about all those priests porking kids?
All those priests? The proportion is small when compared to the
profession of teaching. Don't believe me? Read the news for a couple
of months and tell me which vocation is more frequently mentioned in
recent incidents.
Now, having said that, I need to also say that I do not condone the
actions of those priests, and I find it to be absolutely disgusting.
.
|
|
|
| User: "RT" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
30 Dec 2007 09:27:30 PM |
|
|
CozmicDebris wrote:
RT <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in news:47785A97.D273B238
@hotmMOVEail.com:
CozmicDebris wrote:
"Columbus Steel" <chuck.amato@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Simpson" <2part@epoxy.com> wrote in message
Columbus Steel wrote:
"Supercombuster" <paulfraud@gmail.com> wrote in message
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JyvkjSKMLw
Well, well, well... the Ayn Rand hero and Mr. Champion of
Reason himself, Dr. Ron Paul, rejects evolution
thoroughly.
Is the world is awakening to the realization that
evolution
is bunkum,
or is Dr. Ron Paul an inconsistent kook as his detractors
claim?
Just who we need running our country...idjits that take
their
science from Genesis and their social laws from Leviticus.
If
that's going to be the case, where's my slaves and extra
wives
the Bible says I can have?
If those laws prevailed, you would be someone else's slave
and
someone else's wife.
Not a chance, I have money.
Not if those laws prevailed, you wouldn't.
Your husband would have it all.
My wife will get it all when I die...
Not if those laws prevailed.
Your wife would be a slave, too.
Or robbed, beaten and cast out without a rag.
Your missing the whole point of the post...the Bible thumpers
want
to pick and choose which parts they want to believe in.
Don't we all?
Sure we do, but science should be taught by teachers, not
theologists
Why? So the teachers can have sex with the kids?
The teaching profession and educational institution are not what they
used to be, and is more to blame than religion for the inevitable
downfall of this society.
What about all those priests porking kids?
All those priests? The proportion is small when compared to the
profession of teaching. Don't believe me? Read the news for a couple
of months and tell me which vocation is more frequently mentioned in
recent incidents.
Priests. Some rather sizable settlements.
Now, having said that, I need to also say that I do not condone the
actions of those priests, and I find it to be absolutely disgusting.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "kT" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 06:32:10 PM |
|
|
CozmicDebris wrote:
The teaching profession and educational institution are not what they
used to be, and is more to blame than religion for the inevitable
downfall of this society.
No, educational institutions are for the most part public, and are
subject to the same religious incompetence that has plagued all of our
public scientific institution since the Reagan years, which is directly
attributable to the conservative movement. Those of us old enough and
lucky enough to have gotten a thorough and first rate post sputnik
secondary education can see right through your lame arguments, whereas
you are not able to point out your own flaws of logic for the very same
reasons. You need to read up on why you are stupid and unskilled, and
why you are unable to identify your shortcomings in the modern world :
http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf
You even dicked with the headers for no reason.
.
|
|
|
| User: "CozmicDebris isheforreal" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 07:03:41 PM |
|
|
kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote in news:pFBdj.145$G72.141@newsfe05.lga:
CozmicDebris wrote:
The teaching profession and educational institution are not what they
used to be, and is more to blame than religion for the inevitable
downfall of this society.
No, educational institutions are for the most part public, and are
subject to the same religious incompetence that has plagued all of our
public scientific institution since the Reagan years, which is
directly
attributable to the conservative movement.
No- they focus on a Big Brother mentality of enforcing politically
correct rules over teaching. They are more concerned with the abiulity
of students to perform on canned tests than they are in teaching the
details.
Those of us old enough and
lucky enough to have gotten a thorough and first rate post sputnik
secondary education
That would be me, Skippy. Learned more mathematics through junior high
school than my kids will see in high school. Learned how to use a
slidrule in Physics.
can see right through your lame arguments,
What arguments? I made a statement and you descended into a diatribe
that has nothing to do with the statement.
whereas
you are not able to point out your own flaws of logic for the very
same
reasons.
What flaws? The only thing you seem capable of doing is resorting to a
long-winded response totally devoid of any meat.
You need to read up on why you are stupid and unskilled, and
why you are unable to identify your shortcomings in the modern world :
Looking in the mirror again, Skippy?
http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf
You even dicked with the headers for no reason.
I didn't touch headers, you moron. On top of not being very bright, you
obviously don't know how to use a computer. Let me guess- public school
product?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 07:16:50 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:03:41 -0600, in alt.atheism
CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
<Xns9A15B812BFCFisheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote in news:pFBdj.145$G72.141@newsfe05.lga:
CozmicDebris wrote:
The teaching profession and educational institution are not what they
used to be, and is more to blame than religion for the inevitable
downfall of this society.
No, educational institutions are for the most part public, and are
subject to the same religious incompetence that has plagued all of our
public scientific institution since the Reagan years, which is
directly
attributable to the conservative movement.
No- they focus on a Big Brother mentality of enforcing politically
correct rules over teaching. They are more concerned with the abiulity
of students to perform on canned tests than they are in teaching the
details.
The 'political correctness' you describe appears to be a conservative or
reactionary one.
Those of us old enough and
lucky enough to have gotten a thorough and first rate post sputnik
secondary education
That would be me, Skippy. Learned more mathematics through junior high
school than my kids will see in high school.
Sorry to hear that. My son is taking Calc II this year at his public
high school. I am sorry that you are sending your children to inferior
schools. Maybe that is a result of NCLB -- another way to shovel money
from the government to private sector.
Learned how to use a
slidrule in Physics.
So did I, but who cares any more?
can see right through your lame arguments,
What arguments? I made a statement and you descended into a diatribe
that has nothing to do with the statement.
whereas you are not able to point out your own flaws of logic for the
very same reasons.
What flaws? The only thing you seem capable of doing is resorting to a
long-winded response totally devoid of any meat.
You need to read up on why you are stupid and unskilled, and
why you are unable to identify your shortcomings in the modern world :
Looking in the mirror again, Skippy?
http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf
You even dicked with the headers for no reason.
I didn't touch headers, you moron. On top of not being very bright, you
obviously don't know how to use a computer. Let me guess- public school
product?
.
|
|
|
| User: "CozmicDebris isheforreal" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 07:25:38 PM |
|
|
Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in
news:n3sdn39o3pjc82h0v8qgutr385rqj76do0@4ax.com:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:03:41 -0600, in alt.atheism
CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
<Xns9A15B812BFCFisheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote in news:pFBdj.145$G72.141@newsfe05.lga:
CozmicDebris wrote:
The teaching profession and educational institution are not what
they
used to be, and is more to blame than religion for the inevitable
downfall of this society.
No, educational institutions are for the most part public, and are
subject to the same religious incompetence that has plagued all of
our
public scientific institution since the Reagan years, which is
directly
attributable to the conservative movement.
No- they focus on a Big Brother mentality of enforcing politically
correct rules over teaching. They are more concerned with the
abiulity
of students to perform on canned tests than they are in teaching the
details.
The 'political correctness' you describe appears to be a conservative
or
reactionary one.
Really? Actually,'political correctness' is a product of the liberal
point of view. See the ACLU as a prime example. Please show me any
publically available document that charges the public education system
with the teaching of completely arbitrary morals.
Those of us old enough and
lucky enough to have gotten a thorough and first rate post sputnik
secondary education
That would be me, Skippy. Learned more mathematics through junior
high
school than my kids will see in high school.
Sorry to hear that. My son is taking Calc II this year at his public
high school. I am sorry that you are sending your children to inferior
schools. Maybe that is a result of NCLB -- another way to shovel money
from the government to private sector.
Inferior schools? Hardly. In a ditrict with a natioanlly recognized
Blue Ribbon school, the educational standards are not subject to debate.
The teaching methods and quality of the information provided is. Calc
II does him know good if he gets the Cliffnotes version, which is how
the system teaches these days.
Learned how to use a
slidrule in Physics.
So did I, but who cares any more?
can see right through your lame arguments,
What arguments? I made a statement and you descended into a diatribe
that has nothing to do with the statement.
whereas you are not able to point out your own flaws of logic for
the
very same reasons.
What flaws? The only thing you seem capable of doing is resorting to
a
long-winded response totally devoid of any meat.
You need to read up on why you are stupid and unskilled, and
why you are unable to identify your shortcomings in the modern world
:
Looking in the mirror again, Skippy?
http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf
You even dicked with the headers for no reason.
I didn't touch headers, you moron. On top of not being very bright,
you
obviously don't know how to use a computer. Let me guess- public
school
product?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Dukenfield" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 10:20:46 PM |
|
|
CozmicDebris wrote:
Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in
news:n3sdn39o3pjc82h0v8qgutr385rqj76do0@4ax.com:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:03:41 -0600, in alt.atheism
CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
<Xns9A15B812BFCFisheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote in news:pFBdj.145$G72.141@newsfe05.lga:
CozmicDebris wrote:
The teaching profession and educational institution are not what
they
used to be, and is more to blame than religion for the inevitable
downfall of this society.
No, educational institutions are for the most part public, and are
subject to the same religious incompetence that has plagued all of
our
public scientific institution since the Reagan years, which is
directly
attributable to the conservative movement.
No- they focus on a Big Brother mentality of enforcing politically
correct rules over teaching. They are more concerned with the
abiulity
of students to perform on canned tests than they are in teaching the
details.
The 'political correctness' you describe appears to be a conservative
or
reactionary one.
Really? Actually,'political correctness' is a product of the liberal
point of view. See the ACLU as a prime example. Please show me any
publically available document that charges the public education system
with the teaching of completely arbitrary morals.
Those of us old enough and
lucky enough to have gotten a thorough and first rate post sputnik
secondary education
That would be me, Skippy. Learned more mathematics through junior
high
school than my kids will see in high school.
Sorry to hear that. My son is taking Calc II this year at his public
high school. I am sorry that you are sending your children to inferior
schools. Maybe that is a result of NCLB -- another way to shovel money
from the government to private sector.
Inferior schools? Hardly. In a ditrict with a natioanlly recognized
Blue Ribbon school, the educational standards are not subject to debate.
The teaching methods and quality of the information provided is. Calc
II does him know good if he gets the Cliffnotes version, which is how
the system teaches these days.
Do you have any facts to backup that statement?
JAM
.
|
|
|
| User: "CozmicDebris isheforreal" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul: "I don't accept [evolution] as a theory" |
29 Dec 2007 10:27:19 PM |
|
|
Bill Dukenfield <BillDukenfield@nospam.net> wrote in
news:47771CB8.ABF11FEA@nospam.net:
CozmicDebris wrote:
Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote in
news:n3sdn39o3pjc82h0v8qgutr385rqj76do0@4ax.com:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:03:41 -0600, in alt.atheism
CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
<Xns9A15B812BFCFisheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
kT <cosmic@lifeform.org> wrote in news:pFBdj.145$G72.141
@newsfe05.lga:
CozmicDebris wrote:
The teaching profession and educational institution are not what
they
used to be, and is more to blame than religion for the
inevitable
downfall of this society.
No, educational institutions are for the most part public, and
are
subject to the same religious incompetence that has plagued all
of
our
public scientific institution since the Reagan years, which is
directly
attributable to the conservative movement.
No- they focus on a Big Brother mentality of enforcing politically
correct rules over teaching. They are more concerned with the
abiulity
of students to perform on canned tests than they are in teaching
the
details.
The 'political correctness' you describe appears to be a
conservative
or
reactionary one.
Really? Actually,'political correctness' is a product of the liberal
point of view. See the ACLU as a prime example. Please show me any
publically available document that charges the public education
system
with the teaching of completely arbitrary morals.
Those of us old enough and
lucky enough to have gotten a thorough and first rate post
sputnik
secondary education
That would be me, Skippy. Learned more mathematics through junior
high
school than my kids will see in high school.
Sorry to hear that. My son is taking Calc II this year at his
public
high school. I am sorry that you are sending your children to
inferior
schools. Maybe that is a result of NCLB -- another way to shovel
money
from the government to private sector.
Inferior schools? Hardly. In a ditrict with a natioanlly recognized
Blue Ribbon school, the educational standards are not subject to
debate.
The teaching methods and quality of the information provided is.
Calc
II does him know good if he gets the Cliffnotes version, which is how
the system teaches these days.
Do you have any facts to backup that statement?
Why are you asking for facts? Nobody else in this thread seems to be
eager to contribute any. I wouldn't want to ruin the streak.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|