| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Master Control" |
| Date: |
14 Dec 2006 09:33:02 PM |
| Object: |
[R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
Remember, only a simple majority/51-49 vote is needed
to confirm any USSC nominee. With the Liberal-Democrat
filibuster, the *Nuclear Option* is back on the table.
Thus, either way, Bush's next moderate-to-conservative
USSC nominees will get rubber-stamped onto the highest
court in the land! You can bet that the Anti-Christian
Liberal Union [D]s are seeing the WRITING on The Wall! :-D
Happy Hanukkah, Merry Christmas & Io Saturnalia!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRYISipljD7YrHM/nEQJZJACfVNFmLoUau8NTC2Ozl3FPeK2WVLIAnRuB
wxFul2/idnHZTpX+h4vVUxfL
=CDjb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
14 Dec 2006 10:35:04 PM |
|
|
"Master Control" <nobody@4096.net> wrote in message
news:5231f7b4408a2c4d0a4ff2f7d21a0398@4096.net...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
It's really quite pathetic when the trolls resort to mocking the infirmed...
LC~ But when that pathetic troll roll is crazy Danny Min, it's really no
surprise.
"But the more firmly they believe in their delusions, the more they stand
in need of treatment."~ Epictetus
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff Strickland" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 11:49:29 AM |
|
|
"Master Control" <nobody@4096.net> wrote in message
news:5231f7b4408a2c4d0a4ff2f7d21a0398@4096.net...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
You're a bit premature on this. There is ample precedent for sick Senators
to hold office for many months, some for years, before dropping off of the
Senate roll call list.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 02:09:02 AM |
|
|
"Master Control" <nobody@4096.net> wrote in message
news:5231f7b4408a2c4d0a4ff2f7d21a0398@4096.net...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
Remember, only a simple majority/51-49 vote is needed
to confirm any USSC nominee. With the Liberal-Democrat
filibuster, the *Nuclear Option* is back on the table.
Thus, either way, Bush's next moderate-to-conservative
USSC nominees will get rubber-stamped onto the highest
court in the land! You can bet that the Anti-Christian
Liberal Union [D]s are seeing the WRITING on The Wall! :-D
Happy Hanukkah, Merry Christmas & Io Saturnalia!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
You really are quite the *****, aren't you, Minny Mouse?
Sen. Johnson was doing quite well, last I heard. He may
not even need another operation. And, he was able to hold
his wife's hand after the one operation he did have.
Hopefully, Sen. Johnson will just need recovery time and
then get back to work. There is precedent for this for both
sick or injured politicians from both parties.
You have no thought for a sick man, only furthering your
own political hopes. You are a monster in a human shell.
And, by the way. even if Senator Johnson does have to leave
the Senate and is replaced by a Republican, there are a lot of
Republican Senators who are totally disgusted with Bush and
his policies and who could very well vote with the Democrats.
Suck on that thought for awhile, monster.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 07:14:38 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:09:02 -0500, Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Master Control" <nobody@4096.net> wrote in message
news:5231f7b4408a2c4d0a4ff2f7d21a0398@4096.net...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
Remember, only a simple majority/51-49 vote is needed
to confirm any USSC nominee. With the Liberal-Democrat
filibuster, the *Nuclear Option* is back on the table.
Thus, either way, Bush's next moderate-to-conservative
USSC nominees will get rubber-stamped onto the highest
court in the land! You can bet that the Anti-Christian
Liberal Union [D]s are seeing the WRITING on The Wall! :-D
Happy Hanukkah, Merry Christmas & Io Saturnalia!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
You really are quite the *****, aren't you, Minny Mouse?
Sen. Johnson was doing quite well, last I heard. He may
not even need another operation. And, he was able to hold
his wife's hand after the one operation he did have.
Hopefully, Sen. Johnson will just need recovery time and
then get back to work. There is precedent for this for both
sick or injured politicians from both parties.
You have no thought for a sick man, only furthering your
own political hopes. You are a monster in a human shell.
And, by the way. even if Senator Johnson does have to leave
the Senate and is replaced by a Republican, there are a lot of
Republican Senators who are totally disgusted with Bush and
his policies and who could very well vote with the Democrats.
Suck on that thought for awhile, monster.
Especially if the House starts turning up ever so interesting facts in
their investigations.
I was absolutely stunned to find out that there hasn't been even trivial
oversight of the $8 billion per month being spent in Iraq. The Republicans
didn't even bother going through the motions.
And these are the people that sneered at Louisiana and yapped about the
need for oversight in the Katrina recovery money.
(Funny thing, Louisiana is a "red state" and the legislature is solidly
Republican. So maybe the Republicans at the federal level realized they
were handing money to their own and that's what worried them?)
--
Mark K. Bilbo
------------------------------------------------------------
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
16 Dec 2006 02:52:36 AM |
|
|
In article <-KmdnRSpp-YjAh_YnZ2dnUVZ_s7inZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:09:02 -0500, Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Master Control" <nobody@4096.net> wrote in message
news:5231f7b4408a2c4d0a4ff2f7d21a0398@4096.net...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
Remember, only a simple majority/51-49 vote is needed
to confirm any USSC nominee. With the Liberal-Democrat
filibuster, the *Nuclear Option* is back on the table.
Thus, either way, Bush's next moderate-to-conservative
USSC nominees will get rubber-stamped onto the highest
court in the land! You can bet that the Anti-Christian
Liberal Union [D]s are seeing the WRITING on The Wall! :-D
Happy Hanukkah, Merry Christmas & Io Saturnalia!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
You really are quite the *****, aren't you, Minny Mouse?
Sen. Johnson was doing quite well, last I heard. He may
not even need another operation. And, he was able to hold
his wife's hand after the one operation he did have.
Hopefully, Sen. Johnson will just need recovery time and
then get back to work. There is precedent for this for both
sick or injured politicians from both parties.
You have no thought for a sick man, only furthering your
own political hopes. You are a monster in a human shell.
And, by the way. even if Senator Johnson does have to leave
the Senate and is replaced by a Republican, there are a lot of
Republican Senators who are totally disgusted with Bush and
his policies and who could very well vote with the Democrats.
Suck on that thought for awhile, monster.
Especially if the House starts turning up ever so interesting facts in
their investigations.
I was absolutely stunned to find out that there hasn't been even trivial
oversight of the $8 billion per month being spent in Iraq. The Republicans
didn't even bother going through the motions.
And these are the people that sneered at Louisiana and yapped about the
need for oversight in the Katrina recovery money.
(Funny thing, Louisiana is a "red state" and the legislature is solidly
Republican. So maybe the Republicans at the federal level realized they
were handing money to their own and that's what worried them?)
The guy to keep an eye on during the next term is Henry Waxman:
http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2718789
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
16 Dec 2006 08:24:05 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:52:36 -0800, johac wrote:
In article <-KmdnRSpp-YjAh_YnZ2dnUVZ_s7inZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:09:02 -0500, Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Master Control" <nobody@4096.net> wrote in message
news:5231f7b4408a2c4d0a4ff2f7d21a0398@4096.net...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
Remember, only a simple majority/51-49 vote is needed
to confirm any USSC nominee. With the Liberal-Democrat
filibuster, the *Nuclear Option* is back on the table.
Thus, either way, Bush's next moderate-to-conservative
USSC nominees will get rubber-stamped onto the highest
court in the land! You can bet that the Anti-Christian
Liberal Union [D]s are seeing the WRITING on The Wall! :-D
Happy Hanukkah, Merry Christmas & Io Saturnalia!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
You really are quite the *****, aren't you, Minny Mouse?
Sen. Johnson was doing quite well, last I heard. He may
not even need another operation. And, he was able to hold
his wife's hand after the one operation he did have.
Hopefully, Sen. Johnson will just need recovery time and
then get back to work. There is precedent for this for both
sick or injured politicians from both parties.
You have no thought for a sick man, only furthering your
own political hopes. You are a monster in a human shell.
And, by the way. even if Senator Johnson does have to leave
the Senate and is replaced by a Republican, there are a lot of
Republican Senators who are totally disgusted with Bush and
his policies and who could very well vote with the Democrats.
Suck on that thought for awhile, monster.
Especially if the House starts turning up ever so interesting facts in
their investigations.
I was absolutely stunned to find out that there hasn't been even trivial
oversight of the $8 billion per month being spent in Iraq. The Republicans
didn't even bother going through the motions.
And these are the people that sneered at Louisiana and yapped about the
need for oversight in the Katrina recovery money.
(Funny thing, Louisiana is a "red state" and the legislature is solidly
Republican. So maybe the Republicans at the federal level realized they
were handing money to their own and that's what worried them?)
The guy to keep an eye on during the next term is Henry Waxman:
http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2718789
He's the one that has a little list eh?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
------------------------------------------------------------
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace
alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing
it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
-H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
17 Dec 2006 12:23:26 AM |
|
|
In article <q4qdnXUJcqIYnBnYnZ2dnUVZ_tjinZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 00:52:36 -0800, johac wrote:
In article <-KmdnRSpp-YjAh_YnZ2dnUVZ_s7inZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:09:02 -0500, Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Master Control" <nobody@4096.net> wrote in message
news:5231f7b4408a2c4d0a4ff2f7d21a0398@4096.net...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
Remember, only a simple majority/51-49 vote is needed
to confirm any USSC nominee. With the Liberal-Democrat
filibuster, the *Nuclear Option* is back on the table.
Thus, either way, Bush's next moderate-to-conservative
USSC nominees will get rubber-stamped onto the highest
court in the land! You can bet that the Anti-Christian
Liberal Union [D]s are seeing the WRITING on The Wall! :-D
Happy Hanukkah, Merry Christmas & Io Saturnalia!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
You really are quite the *****, aren't you, Minny Mouse?
Sen. Johnson was doing quite well, last I heard. He may
not even need another operation. And, he was able to hold
his wife's hand after the one operation he did have.
Hopefully, Sen. Johnson will just need recovery time and
then get back to work. There is precedent for this for both
sick or injured politicians from both parties.
You have no thought for a sick man, only furthering your
own political hopes. You are a monster in a human shell.
And, by the way. even if Senator Johnson does have to leave
the Senate and is replaced by a Republican, there are a lot of
Republican Senators who are totally disgusted with Bush and
his policies and who could very well vote with the Democrats.
Suck on that thought for awhile, monster.
Especially if the House starts turning up ever so interesting facts in
their investigations.
I was absolutely stunned to find out that there hasn't been even trivial
oversight of the $8 billion per month being spent in Iraq. The Republicans
didn't even bother going through the motions.
And these are the people that sneered at Louisiana and yapped about the
need for oversight in the Katrina recovery money.
(Funny thing, Louisiana is a "red state" and the legislature is solidly
Republican. So maybe the Republicans at the federal level realized they
were handing money to their own and that's what worried them?)
The guy to keep an eye on during the next term is Henry Waxman:
http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2718789
He's the one that has a little list eh?
Yep.
"He's got 'em on the list — he's got 'em on the list;
And they'll none of 'em be missed — they'll none of 'em be missed."
(Apologies to G&S)
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 11:37:20 AM |
|
|
Master Control wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
Remember, only a simple majority/51-49 vote is needed
to confirm any USSC nominee. With the Liberal-Democrat
filibuster, the *Nuclear Option* is back on the table.
Thus, either way, Bush's next moderate-to-conservative
USSC nominees will get rubber-stamped onto the highest
court in the land! You can bet that the Anti-Christian
Liberal Union [D]s are seeing the WRITING on The Wall! :-D
Happy Hanukkah, Merry Christmas & Io Saturnalia!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
Well, without addressing the obvious lies, distortions, and references
to non-existant groups present in the report, what the person is
forgetting is that the STATE that he is from can appoint a Senator to
represent that state until the next general election. This is
especially true when such happens so soon after an election. The
appointed Senator will serve 2 years, and the one elected in two years
will likely only serve 4 years to make up the time until the seat is
normally up for reelection. And chances are good that the state will
appoint a Democrat, thus keeping the majority where it belongs.
And by the way, the majority STAYS with the Democrats in any case, even
without an appointment, since the split is 50-49. VP Cheney cannot
cast a vote unless there is a tie. And in this case, his vote would
CAUSE a tie, not break one. That is why it was so important for the
Democrats to get 51 seats, so the Republicans were properly "declawed".
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anonyma" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 02:46:23 PM |
|
|
For the real story behind the Anti-Christian Liberal Union, see :
http://www.aclj.org
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=dangerous+OR+liberal+OR+atheist+OR+socialist+OR+communist+OR+%22anti-christian%22+OR+%22anti-christ%22+%22aclu%22+-%22aclu.org%22+-%22mediamatters.org%22+-%22atheist.tamu%22+-%22liberalavenger%22+-%22atheism.about%22&adult_done=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fsearch&adult_cancel=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fweb%2Fadvanced&_adv_prop=web&ei=UTF-8&vst=0&vf=all&vm=i&fl=0&n=100
http://www.stoptheaclu.com/
http://www.boycottliberalism.com/
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote:
Well, without addressing the obvious lies, distortions, and references
You are an Atheist. The ACLU only defends your religion in government:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=sebree@infionline.net&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=15&as_maxm=12&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 04:23:47 PM |
|
|
Anonyma wrote:
For the real story behind the Anti-Christian Liberal Union, see :
There is no such thing, to my knowledge. While I found a number of
articles from people that obviously do not have the wherewithal to find
out that the "ACLU" stands for the "American Civil Liberties Union", I
could not find a single instance of there being an "Anti-Christian
Liberal Union". Perhaps you can post a link to that website, so that
you can show that you are not lying about them existing.
http://www.aclj.org
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=dangerous+OR+liberal+OR+atheist+OR+socialist+OR+communist+OR+%22anti-christian%22+OR+%22anti-christ%22+%22aclu%22+-%22aclu.org%22+-%22mediamatters.org%22+-%22atheist.tamu%22+-%22liberalavenger%22+-%22atheism.about%22&adult_done=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fsearch&adult_cancel=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fweb%2Fadvanced&_adv_prop=web&ei=UTF-8&vst=0&vf=all&vm=i&fl=0&n=100
You need to narrow this search down significantly. You have many, many
"OR" parameters. This results in all the results from each individual
parameter being unioned together, resulting in a great many "false
positives". After all, I am sure that you are not looking for reviews
of the Left Behind series, or articles on bungee jumping.
http://www.stoptheaclu.com/
http://www.boycottliberalism.com/
I prefer to check the ACLU website, rather than websites that are known
to lie about them. There is a lot of cases that show that they have
backed Christians. But then, you might not be interested in the truth.
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote:
Well, without addressing the obvious lies, distortions, and references
You are an Atheist.
And your evidence for this is?
The ACLU only defends your religion in government:
Nope. They defend all religions. Including Christian, Muslim, Wiccan,
Shamanism, Hindu, Buddhist, Agnostics, Atheism, as well as every other
one.
http://www.aclu.org/religion/
http://www.aclu.org/religion/schools/27673prs20061212.html
"ACLU of New Jersey Applauds Ruling in Favor of Student's Right to Sing
"Awesome God" (12/12/2006)
"NEWARK, NJ - The American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey today
praised a decision by U.S. District Court Judge Freda L. Wolfson
protecting the religious expression rights of students. The court held
that a Frenchtown Elementary School student had the right to sing the
song "Awesome God" at a school talent show. The ACLU of New Jersey
submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the student."
Gee, the ACLU defended a CHRISTIAN'S right to sing a religious hymn in
a school talent show. That does not sound "anti-christian" to me.
http://www.aclu.org/religion/discrim/26970prs20060929.html
"Veterans Denied Right to Post Religious Symbol on Headstones, ACLU
Charges (9/29/2006)"
"The American Civil Liberties Union today filed a lawsuit to protect
the right of veterans and their families to choose religious symbols to
engrave on headstones in federal cemeteries. The lawsuit was filed on
behalf of two churches and three individuals to compel the government
to approve a long-pending application for use of a Wiccan symbol on the
headstones of service members."
And here, they are defending Wiccans' religious freedom.
http://www.aclu.org/religion/discrim/26470prs20060809.html
ACLU and Orange County Buddhists Challenge Discriminatory City
Ordinance (8/9/2006)
And in this case, they are defending Buddhists that want to expand
their building and congregation.
http://www.aclu.org/religion/govtfunding/26526res20060824.html
The ACLU of Virginia (2004) interceded with local authorities on behalf
of Baptist preachers who were refused permission to perform baptisms in
the river in Falmouth Waterside Park in Stafford County.
www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A16839-2004Jun4?language=printer
www.aclu.org/ReligiousLiberty/ReligiousLiberty.cfm?ID=15897&c=141
The Indiana Civil Liberties Union (2004) filed suit against the city of
Scottsburg for its repeated threats of arrest and/or citation against
members of the Old Paths Baptist Church who held demonstrations
regarding various subjects dealing with their religious beliefs.
www.aclu.org/freespeech/protest/11484prs20040716.html
Or perhaps you don't think that Baptists are Christians.
http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/16040prs20020417.html
In Win for Rev. Falwell (and the ACLU), Judge Rules VA Must Allow
Churches to Incorporate (4/17/2002)
"A federal judge has struck down a provision of the Virginia
Constitution that bans religious organizations from incorporating, in a
challenge filed by the Rev. Jerry Falwell and joined by the American
Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, the group announced today. "
And now you are claiming that Jerry Falwell is an atheist, I suppose?
The ACLU defends MANY religious and MANY denominations. Part of their
mission is to PREVENT religious organizations and denominations from
using the laws and people in power to push their religious beliefs onto
those that do not practice their particular brand of religious belief.
YOU might be comfortable with being forced to practice Buddhism or
Shintoism just because your boss or principle does, but most people are
not. The USA is a secular nation, and religion has no place in the
formal working of this nation or any part of it. Religion is kept out
of public life and public decisions, and it is left to the individual
where it belongs. Remember, if you think that you can force others to
abide by your beliefs, then you are also saying that others can force
you to abide by their beliefs, even if those beliefs contradict your
own.
There is no actual evidence that shows that the ACLU is
"anti-Christian". The evidence shows that the ACLU supports people's
freedom to worship in any manner that they wish, and opposes government
actions that seek to discriminate against certain religions, or that
favor one religion over another. They are neutral with respect to
religious beliefs, and will defend any person of any religion if they
think that the person has a case.
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=sebree@infionline.net&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=15&as_maxm=12&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
And what is this supposed to prove? All you have done is to provide a
link to all the articles and posts that I have written. There is
nothing that supports your claims in such a list. You need to provide
specific articles that support your claim. Nobody is going to go
through 3000 posts looking for what you imagine to exist. All you have
done is show how many articles I have written, nothing more.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anonyma" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 05:33:20 PM |
|
|
For the real story behind the Anti-Christian Liberal Union, see :
http://www.aclj.org
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=dangerous+OR+liberal+OR+atheist+OR+socialist+OR+communist+OR+%22anti-christian%22+OR+%22anti-christ%22+%22aclu%22+-%22aclu.org%22+-%22mediamatters.org%22+-%22atheist.tamu%22+-%22liberalavenger%22+-%22atheism.about%22&adult_done=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fsearch&adult_cancel=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fweb%2Fadvanced&_adv_prop=web&ei=UTF-8&vst=0&vf=all&vm=i&fl=0&n=100
http://www.stoptheaclu.com/
http://www.boycottliberalism.com/
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote:
Nope. They defend all religions. Including Christian, Muslim, Wiccan,
Shamanism, Hindu, Buddhist, Agnostics, Atheism, as well as every other
one.
You are an Atheist. But at least your are honest enough to admit
that Atheism is a religion. The ACLU only defends your religion in government,
otherwise they would allow teaching ID, and prayer in schools. They would
have the commandments in view. They would abolish abortion, and raced based
discrimination. They would no longer give special rights to criminals, and
they would bring back the death penalty for the really bad ones. They
would abolish Atheism as the government religion. They would do a lot things
that they have not done. Why? Because the ACLU only defends your religion,
Atheism, in government, and the religion they hate most is Christianity :
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=sebree@infionline.net&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=15&as_maxm=12&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 11:03:12 PM |
|
|
Anonyma wrote:
For the real story behind the Anti-Christian Liberal Union, see :
No such organization exists. The websites listed specialize in lying
about the American Civil Liberties Union, and thus should not be
trusted. Therefore, your sources of lies has been snipped out.
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote:
Nope. They defend all religions. Including Christian, Muslim, Wiccan,
Shamanism, Hindu, Buddhist, Agnostics, Atheism, as well as every other
one.
You are an Atheist.
Nope. You have no evidence that I am an Atheist. You actually have no
idea what my religious beliefs are. You were asked to supply the proof
that I am an atheist as you claim, and you have provided none. You
have also been caught lying after being shown the proof that your
statements were incorrect.
But at least your are honest enough to admit
that Atheism is a religion.
No, it is not. Atheism is the lack of religious beliefs. It is only
considered a religion in the context of religious rights.
What's more, I am far more honest and knowledgeable than you are about
the subject.
The ACLU only defends your religion in government,
Because that is the only place that the right to not believe in or
follow any religion is needed.
And as I just showed in my last post, and which you cut out, the ACLU
defends ALL religions in the government. By the looks of it, you could
not stomach the truth, so you continue to lie about the facts.
otherwise they would allow teaching ID, and prayer in schools.
Both of which are bad things. They should not be forcing children to
pray in any manner and to any deity or according to any belief system
that is not their own. And they should not be teaching mythology as
science, especially since that mythology does not have any factual
evidence to support it. Your ignorance is no reason that children
should be lied to.
They would
have the commandments in view.
Which is also a good thing that it cannot be displayed. Why should
only one version of something from one religious belief system be
displayed, and all other beliefs be ignored? What would Shamans,
Hindi, Buddhists, or Muslims care about the Ten Commandments? Why
should ANY religious texts be forced onto students in public schools in
any case, since those texts are probably not what their parents are
trying to teach them about their religions? That is rather blatant
favoritism on the part of the government, and illegal under the First
Amendment.
They would abolish abortion,
That is something that cannot actually be done, and would be very
harmful to a great many women as well. The women would be forced to
result to illegal abortions at great risk to themselves, and the number
of pregnancy related deaths and complications would increase greatly.
But then, you might not care what happens to women, just so long as
they are made to suffer for your oppressive beliefs.
and raced based discrimination.
Something that is rightly been stomped out. (mostly).
They would no longer give special rights to criminals,
And what "special rights" are you talking about? The right to a FAIR
trial? The right to an appeal? The right to have new evidence that
could clear them heard?
and
they would bring back the death penalty for the really bad ones.
The death penalty is already in place in many states. The problem is
that the death penalty is very final, and you cannot say "sorry" if the
person turns out to be innocent. And given that there have been quite
a few people found to have been wrongly convicted on death row, there
is a reason why people are concerned.
They
would abolish Atheism as the government religion.
Atheism is not a government religion. There is no government religion
in the USA, because the government is supposed to keeps its hands out
of religious matters and not show favoritism towards any one set of
religious beliefs.
They would do a lot things
that they have not done. Why?
Because that would involve favoritism in the government towards a
single set of religious beliefs, in contravention of the First
Amendment of the Constitution, among others. Such actions would be
illegal, and many of them would be harmful as well.
Because the ACLU only defends your religion,
So you insist on continuing to lie after you were shown the proof that
your are wrong.
Atheism, in government, and the religion they hate most is Christianity :
Wrong on all counts. They defend ALL religions, and their staff
includes many religious people, including at least one Baptist
minister. Why would a Baptist minister hate his own religion? And I
showed you in the previous post that defend many different religions,
including Christianity. Apparently, you either cannot read, or you
prefer to lie even when caught in the lie and shown that your
statements are lies.
You have made a LOT of accusations. Perhaps you can support your
accusations. After all, I have already proven you wrong once, in the
post that you are responding to.
Again, here is the post, which I assume that you read since you are
replying to it, which shows you that you are lying about the American
Civil Liberties Union.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.abortion/msg/ec4a37b785332531
Perhaps you can explain why others should be forced to follow your
ignorance and oppressive beliefs, since that is what you seem to want.
And perhaps you can explain why, by the same token, others cannot force
you to follow their beliefs since you seem to want to force yours onto
them?
You should really stop lying so blatantly.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 05:47:32 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:33:20 -0500 (EST), in alt.atheism
Anonyma <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> wrote in
<79bc0b3b204e1c16d5a0d5f77fe40367@deuxpi.ca>:
For the real story behind the Anti-Christian Liberal Union, see :
http://www.aclj.org
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=dangerous+OR+liberal+OR+atheist+OR+socialist+OR+communist+OR+%22anti-christian%22+OR+%22anti-christ%22+%22aclu%22+-%22aclu.org%22+-%22mediamatters.org%22+-%22atheist.tamu%22+-%22liberalavenger%22+-%22atheism.about%22&adult_done=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fsearch&adult_cancel=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fweb%2Fadvanced&_adv_prop=web&ei=UTF-8&vst=0&vf=all&vm=i&fl=0&n=100
http://www.stoptheaclu.com/
http://www.boycottliberalism.com/
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote:
Nope. They defend all religions. Including Christian, Muslim, Wiccan,
Shamanism, Hindu, Buddhist, Agnostics, Atheism, as well as every other
one.
You are an Atheist. But at least your are honest enough to admit
that Atheism is a religion. The ACLU only defends your religion in government,
otherwise they would allow teaching ID, and prayer in schools. They would
have the commandments in view. They would abolish abortion, and raced based
discrimination. They would no longer give special rights to criminals, and
they would bring back the death penalty for the really bad ones. They
would abolish Atheism as the government religion. They would do a lot things
that they have not done. Why? Because the ACLU only defends your religion,
Atheism, in government, and the religion they hate most is Christianity :
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=sebree@infionline.net&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=15&as_maxm=12&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
Atheism matters in the context of freedom of religion, but that doesn't
make it a religion itself. Of course, you know you are lying when you
mendaciously claim that athiesm is the state religion. Why bother with
such an absurd and transparently dishonest claim?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anonyma" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 07:04:46 PM |
|
|
For the real story behind the Anti-Christian Liberal Union, see :
http://www.aclj.org
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=dangerous+OR+liberal+OR+atheist+OR+socialist+OR+communist+OR+%22anti-christian%22+OR+%22anti-christ%22+%22aclu%22+-%22aclu.org%22+-%22mediamatters.org%22+-%22atheist.tamu%22+-%22liberalavenger%22+-%22atheism.about%22&adult_done=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fsearch&adult_cancel=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fweb%2Fadvanced&_adv_prop=web&ei=UTF-8&vst=0&vf=all&vm=i&fl=0&n=100
http://www.stoptheaclu.com/
http://www.boycottliberalism.com/
Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
Atheism matters in the context of freedom of religion, but that doesn't
make it a religion itself. Of course, you know you are lying when you
mendaciously claim that athiesm is the state religion. Why bother with
such an absurd and transparently dishonest claim?
You are an Atheist. The ACLU only defends your religion in government :
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=lunch@nofreelunch.us&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=15&as_maxm=12&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
.
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 08:52:32 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:04:46 -0500 (EST), in alt.atheism
Anonyma <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> wrote in
<a4a1cf0bb2d356bd6f02608ec8b690e5@deuxpi.ca>:
For the real story behind the Anti-Christian Liberal Union, see :
http://www.aclj.org
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=dangerous+OR+liberal+OR+atheist+OR+socialist+OR+communist+OR+%22anti-christian%22+OR+%22anti-christ%22+%22aclu%22+-%22aclu.org%22+-%22mediamatters.org%22+-%22atheist.tamu%22+-%22liberalavenger%22+-%22atheism.about%22&adult_done=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fsearch&adult_cancel=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fweb%2Fadvanced&_adv_prop=web&ei=UTF-8&vst=0&vf=all&vm=i&fl=0&n=100
http://www.stoptheaclu.com/
http://www.boycottliberalism.com/
Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
Atheism matters in the context of freedom of religion, but that doesn't
make it a religion itself. Of course, you know you are lying when you
mendaciously claim that athiesm is the state religion. Why bother with
such an absurd and transparently dishonest claim?
You are an Atheist. The ACLU only defends your religion in government :
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=lunch@nofreelunch.us&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=15&as_maxm=12&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
Keep telling your lies. I suppose that you gain some consolation from
telling them, but I have no idea what it would be.
Could you tell me why you need to lie?
--
"Now, it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel
to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy
Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics; and we should
take all means to prevent such an embarrassing situation, in
which people show up vast ignorance in a Christian and laugh
it to scorn." -- Augustine, The Literal Meaning of Genesis
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 07:17:09 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:46:23 -0500, Anonyma wrote:
You are an Atheist. The ACLU only defends your religion in government:
We don't religion. Sorry.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
------------------------------------------------------------
"...otherwise, we're looking at the potential of this kind
of world:.... a world in which oil reserves are controlled
by radicals in order to extract blackmail from the West..."
-George Bush
Wait... oil reserves?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anonyma" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 08:20:39 PM |
|
|
For the real story behind the Anti-Christian Liberal Union, see :
http://www.aclj.org
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=dangerous+OR+liberal+OR+atheist+OR+socialist+OR+communist+OR+%22anti-christian%22+OR+%22anti-christ%22+%22aclu%22+-%22aclu.org%22+-%22mediamatters.org%22+-%22atheist.tamu%22+-%22liberalavenger%22+-%22atheism.about%22&adult_done=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fsearch&adult_cancel=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.yahoo.com%2Fweb%2Fadvanced&_adv_prop=web&ei=UTF-8&vst=0&vf=all&vm=i&fl=0&n=100
http://www.stoptheaclu.com/
http://www.boycottliberalism.com/
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
We don't religion. Sorry.
You are an Atheist. The ACLU only defends your religion in government :
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=gmail@com.mkbilbo&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=15&as_maxm=12&as_maxy=2006&safe=off
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
16 Dec 2006 08:01:10 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:20:39 -0500, Anonyma wrote:
You are an Atheist. The ACLU only defends your religion in government :
I have no religion.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
------------------------------------------------------------
"As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned
and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and
the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong
its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until
all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic
is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety than ever
before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions
may prove groundless." -Abraham Lincoln
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Anonyma" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 02:00:55 PM |
|
|
http://www.altavista.com/news/results?q=senate+critical+condition+cheney+tie&nc=0&nr=0&nd=2
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Sebree" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 04:38:24 PM |
|
|
Anonyma wrote:
http://www.altavista.com/news/results?q=senate+critical+condition+cheney+tie&nc=0&nr=0&nd=2
Here is a more up to date article. You really need to start
referencing specific articles instead of long lists of them.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/12/15/johnson.ap/index.html
Hopefully, if the SD governor does have to appoint a new Senator, which
I hope that he does not, I hope that he does the right and honorable
thing and appoints a Democrat, just as his constituents originally
elected. Then perhaps we can start fixing the harm that the
Republicans have done to this country and our freedoms.
Mark Sebree
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 02:10:48 PM |
|
|
In article <8d5952f19219bff6b1570cbdd749c050@deuxpi.ca> Anonyma <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> writes:
http://www.altavista.com/news/results?q=senate+critical+condition+cheney+tie&nc=0&nr=0&nd=2
Is this another of your celebrated tele-diagnoses, Doctor Frist?
(incidentally, the ACLU no longer chits bricks, they now accept only
cash on the barrel-head for all construction supplies)
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 07:10:38 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:33:02 +0000, Master Control wrote:
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
He's not dead. In fact, he's listed as being in stable condition.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
------------------------------------------------------------
"There is something feeble and a little contemptible about
a man who cannot face the perils of life without the help of
comfortable myths. Almost inevitably some part of him is
aware that they are myths and that he believes them only
because they are comforting. But he dare not face this
thought! Moreover, since he is aware, however dimly, that his
opinions are not rational, he becomes furious when they are
disputed." -Bertrand Russell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 11:14:00 AM |
|
|
Mark K. Bilbo <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:33:02 +0000, Master Control wrote:
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
He's not dead. In fact, he's listed as being in stable condition.
It's revealing that these right-wing nutters want people to die so that
they can gain power.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 02:22:50 PM |
|
|
On 15 Dec 2006 17:14:00 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Mark K. Bilbo <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:33:02 +0000, Master Control wrote:
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
He's not dead. In fact, he's listed as being in stable condition.
It's revealing that these right-wing nutters want people to die so that
they can gain power.
Why did Bush get us into Iraq? To gain power.
Why did his father get us into Iraq? To gain power.
Why did Reagan get us into Grenada? To gain power.
Etc., ad infinitum.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by
bolts of lightning."
- Calvin & Hobbes
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 02:21:14 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:10:38 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:33:02 +0000, Master Control wrote:
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
He's not dead. In fact, he's listed as being in stable condition.
Minimum Dan, on the other hand, has been dead from the neck up for
many years.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"What has 'theology' ever said that is of the smallest use to anybody? When
has 'theology' ever said anything that is demonstrably true and is not
obvious? What makes you think that 'theology' is a subject at all?"
- Richard Dawkins
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 10:52:53 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:10:38 -0600, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:33:02 +0000, Master Control wrote:
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss of former Sen. Tim
Johnson [D], Vice-President ***** Cheney will now be able to cast the
deciding vote...
He's not dead. In fact, he's listed as being in stable condition.
Flashback to "Monty Python and the Holy Grail"!!
"He says he's not dead!"
--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Samuel W. Heywood" |
|
| Title: Re: [R]s *KEEP* U.S. Senate! (A.C.L.U. chitting bricks!) |
15 Dec 2006 07:40:03 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 03:33:02 +0000, Master Control wrote:
With the Liberal-Atheist-controlled Democrats' loss
of former Sen. Tim Johnson [D], Vice-President *****
Cheney will now be able to cast the deciding vote...
He's not dead. In fact, he's listed as being in stable condition.
I have heard just now on NPR news that he is doing quite well.
I hope he has a happy recovery and also I hope that his physicians
advise him to retire from politics so that he may better enjoy his
convalescence and recovery. I wish the very best for him that he
shall very soon be looking forward to a very happy retirement.
Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
