Science Disproves Evolution



 Religions > Atheism > Science Disproves Evolution

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Pahu"
Date: 06 Mar 2007 01:31:43 PM
Object: Science Disproves Evolution
Big Bang?
"Three years ago, observations of distant, exploding stars blew to
smithereens some of astronomers' most cherished ideas about the
universe {the big bang theory}. To piece together an updated theory
they're now thinking dark thoughts about what sort of mystery force
may be contorting the cosmos.
"According to the standard view of cosmology, the once infinitesimal
universe has ballooned in volume ever since its fiery birth in the Big
Bang, but the mutual gravitational tug of all the matter in the cosmos
has gradually slowed that expansion.
"In 1998, however, scientists reported that a group of distant
supernovas were dimmer, and therefore farther from Earth, than the
standard theory indicated. It was as if, in the billion or so years it
took for the light from these exploded stars to arrive at Earth, the
space between the stars and our planet had stretched out more than
expected. That would mean that cosmic expansion has somehow sped up,
not slowed down. Recent evidence has only firmed up that bizarre
result." Ron Cowen, "A Dark Force in the Universe," Science News, Vol.
159, 7 April 2001, p. 218.
"Not only don't we see the universe slowing down; we see it speeding
up." Adam Riess, as quoted by James Glanz, "Astronomers See a Cosmic
Antigravity Force at Work," Science, Vol. 279, 27 February 1998, p.
1298.
"In one of the great results of twentieth century science, NSF-funded
astronomers have shown both that the universe does not contain enough
matter in the universe to slow the expansion, and that the rate of
expansion actually increases with distance. Why? Nobody knows yet."
National Science Foundation Advertisement, "Astronomy: Fifty Years of
Astronomical Excellence," Discover, September 2000, p. 7.
Mark Sincell, "Farthest Supernova Yet Bolsters Dark Energy," Science,
Vol. 292, 6 April 2001, pp. 27-28.
http://www.creationscience.com/
.

User: "Geoff"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 02:15:10 PM
"Pahu" <pahu70@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1173209503.779065.69170@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

Big Bang?

"Three years ago, observations of distant, exploding stars blew to
smithereens some of astronomers' most cherished ideas about the
universe {the big bang theory}. To piece together an updated theory
they're now thinking dark thoughts about what sort of mystery force
may be contorting the cosmos.

This has nothing to do with evolution and isn't even fatal to theories on
the origins of the Universe.
Science is not dogma. I know it's hard for believeniks like you to
understand. But so long as you losers keep flipping the burgers, we'll build
the world for you.
cya!
.

User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 02:28:53 PM
"Pahu" <pahu70@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1173209503.779065.69170@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

Big Bang?

Which doesn't have a damn thing to do with evolution, you friggin' moron.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.

User: "Cary Kittrell"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 01:55:03 PM
In article <1173209503.779065.69170@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> "Pahu" <pahu70@yahoo.com> writes:

Big Bang?

"Three years ago, observations of distant, exploding stars blew to
smithereens some of astronomers' most cherished ideas about the
universe {the big bang theory}. To piece together an updated theory
they're now thinking dark thoughts about what sort of mystery force
may be contorting the cosmos.

"According to the standard view of cosmology, the once infinitesimal
universe has ballooned in volume ever since its fiery birth in the Big
Bang, but the mutual gravitational tug of all the matter in the cosmos
has gradually slowed that expansion.

"In 1998, however, scientists reported that a group of distant
supernovas were dimmer, and therefore farther from Earth, than the
standard theory indicated. It was as if, in the billion or so years it
took for the light from these exploded stars to arrive at Earth, the
space between the stars and our planet had stretched out more than
expected. That would mean that cosmic expansion has somehow sped up,
not slowed down. Recent evidence has only firmed up that bizarre
result." Ron Cowen, "A Dark Force in the Universe," Science News, Vol.
159, 7 April 2001, p. 218.

"Not only don't we see the universe slowing down; we see it speeding
up." Adam Riess, as quoted by James Glanz, "Astronomers See a Cosmic
Antigravity Force at Work," Science, Vol. 279, 27 February 1998, p.
1298.

"In one of the great results of twentieth century science, NSF-funded
astronomers have shown both that the universe does not contain enough
matter in the universe to slow the expansion, and that the rate of
expansion actually increases with distance. Why? Nobody knows yet."
National Science Foundation Advertisement, "Astronomy: Fifty Years of
Astronomical Excellence," Discover, September 2000, p. 7.

Mark Sincell, "Farthest Supernova Yet Bolsters Dark Energy," Science,
Vol. 292, 6 April 2001, pp. 27-28.

http://www.creationscience.com/

Well, since nothing in the above threatens the Big Bang theory --
not to mention that the cosmological Big Bang has nothing whatsoever to
do with the biological Theory of Evolution -- then I find your
Subject: line a bit puzzling.
-- cary
.

User: "johac"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 06:50:04 PM
In article <1173209503.779065.69170@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
"Pahu" <pahu70@yahoo.com> wrote:

Big Bang?

And how does these new findings disprove evolution?
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.

User: "raven1"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 07 Mar 2007 12:58:38 AM
On 6 Mar 2007 11:31:43 -0800, "Pahu" <pahu70@yahoo.com> wrote:
I'd be interested in knowing just what the hell you think this has to
do with biological evolution...

Big Bang?

"Three years ago, observations of distant, exploding stars blew to
smithereens some of astronomers' most cherished ideas about the
universe {the big bang theory}. To piece together an updated theory
they're now thinking dark thoughts about what sort of mystery force
may be contorting the cosmos.

"According to the standard view of cosmology, the once infinitesimal
universe has ballooned in volume ever since its fiery birth in the Big
Bang, but the mutual gravitational tug of all the matter in the cosmos
has gradually slowed that expansion.

"In 1998, however, scientists reported that a group of distant
supernovas were dimmer, and therefore farther from Earth, than the
standard theory indicated. It was as if, in the billion or so years it
took for the light from these exploded stars to arrive at Earth, the
space between the stars and our planet had stretched out more than
expected. That would mean that cosmic expansion has somehow sped up,
not slowed down. Recent evidence has only firmed up that bizarre
result." Ron Cowen, "A Dark Force in the Universe," Science News, Vol.
159, 7 April 2001, p. 218.

"Not only don't we see the universe slowing down; we see it speeding
up." Adam Riess, as quoted by James Glanz, "Astronomers See a Cosmic
Antigravity Force at Work," Science, Vol. 279, 27 February 1998, p.
1298.

"In one of the great results of twentieth century science, NSF-funded
astronomers have shown both that the universe does not contain enough
matter in the universe to slow the expansion, and that the rate of
expansion actually increases with distance. Why? Nobody knows yet."
National Science Foundation Advertisement, "Astronomy: Fifty Years of
Astronomical Excellence," Discover, September 2000, p. 7.

Mark Sincell, "Farthest Supernova Yet Bolsters Dark Energy," Science,
Vol. 292, 6 April 2001, pp. 27-28.

http://www.creationscience.com/

--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.

User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 05:19:54 PM
On 6 Mar 2007 11:31:43 -0800, "Pahu" <pahu70@yahoo.com> wrote:
Jabbers proves he doesn't have a clue.
.

User: "Christopher A.Lee"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 02:05:47 PM
On 6 Mar 2007 11:31:43 -0800, "Pahu" <pahu70@yahoo.com> wrote:
No it doesn't, liar.

Big Bang?

"Three years ago, observations of distant, exploding stars blew to
smithereens some of astronomers' most cherished ideas about the
universe {the big bang theory}. To piece together an updated theory
they're now thinking dark thoughts about what sort of mystery force
may be contorting the cosmos.

That is cosmologu not evolution, moron.

"According to the standard view of cosmology, the once infinitesimal
universe has ballooned in volume ever since its fiery birth in the Big
Bang, but the mutual gravitational tug of all the matter in the cosmos
has gradually slowed that expansion.

What is the seventh word in that paragraph, moron. Hint: it's not
"Evolution".

"In 1998, however, scientists reported that a group of distant
supernovas were dimmer, and therefore farther from Earth, than the
standard theory indicated. It was as if, in the billion or so years it
took for the light from these exploded stars to arrive at Earth, the
space between the stars and our planet had stretched out more than
expected. That would mean that cosmic expansion has somehow sped up,
not slowed down. Recent evidence has only firmed up that bizarre
result." Ron Cowen, "A Dark Force in the Universe," Science News, Vol.
159, 7 April 2001, p. 218.

So what? That's an example of how science progresses.
[rest of your dishonesty deleted]
.

User: "Free Lunch"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 02:11:41 PM
On 6 Mar 2007 11:31:43 -0800, in alt.atheism
"Pahu" <pahu70@yahoo.com> wrote in
<1173209503.779065.69170@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>:

Big Bang?

Why did you say this had something to do with evolution? When people
speak of evolution without a qualifier, they are speaking of biological
evolution.

"Three years ago, observations of distant, exploding stars blew to
smithereens some of astronomers' most cherished ideas about the
universe {the big bang theory}. To piece together an updated theory
they're now thinking dark thoughts about what sort of mystery force
may be contorting the cosmos.

"According to the standard view of cosmology, the once infinitesimal
universe has ballooned in volume ever since its fiery birth in the Big
Bang, but the mutual gravitational tug of all the matter in the cosmos
has gradually slowed that expansion.

"In 1998, however, scientists reported that a group of distant
supernovas were dimmer, and therefore farther from Earth, than the
standard theory indicated. It was as if, in the billion or so years it
took for the light from these exploded stars to arrive at Earth, the
space between the stars and our planet had stretched out more than
expected. That would mean that cosmic expansion has somehow sped up,
not slowed down. Recent evidence has only firmed up that bizarre
result." Ron Cowen, "A Dark Force in the Universe," Science News, Vol.
159, 7 April 2001, p. 218.

"Not only don't we see the universe slowing down; we see it speeding
up." Adam Riess, as quoted by James Glanz, "Astronomers See a Cosmic
Antigravity Force at Work," Science, Vol. 279, 27 February 1998, p.
1298.

"In one of the great results of twentieth century science, NSF-funded
astronomers have shown both that the universe does not contain enough
matter in the universe to slow the expansion, and that the rate of
expansion actually increases with distance. Why? Nobody knows yet."
National Science Foundation Advertisement, "Astronomy: Fifty Years of
Astronomical Excellence," Discover, September 2000, p. 7.

Mark Sincell, "Farthest Supernova Yet Bolsters Dark Energy," Science,
Vol. 292, 6 April 2001, pp. 27-28.

http://www.creationscience.com/

This neither disproves the Big Bang nor affects evolution. It
demonstrates quite clearly that the anti-science religious zealots are
profoundly ignorant of science.
.

User: "Conspiracy of Doves"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 02:42:48 PM
On Mar 6, 2:31 pm, "Pahu" <pah...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Big Bang?

"Three years ago, observations of distant, exploding stars blew to
smithereens some of astronomers' most cherished ideas about the
universe {the big bang theory}. To piece together an updated theory
they're now thinking dark thoughts about what sort of mystery force
may be contorting the cosmos.

"According to the standard view of cosmology, the once infinitesimal
universe has ballooned in volume ever since its fiery birth in the Big
Bang, but the mutual gravitational tug of all the matter in the cosmos
has gradually slowed that expansion.

"In 1998, however, scientists reported that a group of distant
supernovas were dimmer, and therefore farther from Earth, than the
standard theory indicated. It was as if, in the billion or so years it
took for the light from these exploded stars to arrive at Earth, the
space between the stars and our planet had stretched out more than
expected. That would mean that cosmic expansion has somehow sped up,
not slowed down. Recent evidence has only firmed up that bizarre
result." Ron Cowen, "A Dark Force in the Universe," Science News, Vol.
159, 7 April 2001, p. 218.

"Not only don't we see the universe slowing down; we see it speeding
up." Adam Riess, as quoted by James Glanz, "Astronomers See a Cosmic
Antigravity Force at Work," Science, Vol. 279, 27 February 1998, p.
1298.

"In one of the great results of twentieth century science, NSF-funded
astronomers have shown both that the universe does not contain enough
matter in the universe to slow the expansion, and that the rate of
expansion actually increases with distance. Why? Nobody knows yet."
National Science Foundation Advertisement, "Astronomy: Fifty Years of
Astronomical Excellence," Discover, September 2000, p. 7.

Mark Sincell, "Farthest Supernova Yet Bolsters Dark Energy," Science,
Vol. 292, 6 April 2001, pp. 27-28.

http://www.creationscience.com/

How does any of this have anything to do with evolution?
.

User: "Pastor Kutchie, ordained atheist minister"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 03:01:00 PM
On Mar 6, 7:31 pm, "Pahu" <pah...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Big Bang?

I'll have large fries with that. No onions and easy on the ketchup.
Oh! and can I go large on the coffee. Thanks, I'm sure I will, you
too.
.
User: "Cary Kittrell"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 03:07:17 PM
In article <1173214860.360512.154490@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> "Pastor Kutchie, ordained atheist minister" <user13@heathens.org.uk> writes:

On Mar 6, 7:31 pm, "Pahu" <pah...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Big Bang?


I'll have large fries with that. No onions and easy on the ketchup.
Oh! and can I go large on the coffee. Thanks, I'm sure I will, you
too.

Oh, and Super-Inflate it, if you please.
-- cary
.

User: "Bob"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 04:31:13 PM
On 6 Mar 2007 13:01:00 -0800, "Pastor Kutchie, ordained atheist
minister" <user13@heathens.org.uk> wrote:

On Mar 6, 7:31 pm, "Pahu" <pah...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Big Bang?


I'll have large fries with that. No onions and easy on the ketchup.
Oh! and can I go large on the coffee. Thanks, I'm sure I will, you
too.

No onions?!? Freakin heathen.
.
User: "No 33 Secretary"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 05:09:43 PM
Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote in
news:gs1su298p0rpmrqtint737kkrcjd94ikpl@4ax.com:

On 6 Mar 2007 13:01:00 -0800, "Pastor Kutchie, ordained atheist
minister" <user13@heathens.org.uk> wrote:

On Mar 6, 7:31 pm, "Pahu" <pah...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Big Bang?


I'll have large fries with that. No onions and easy on the ketchup.
Oh! and can I go large on the coffee. Thanks, I'm sure I will, you
too.


No onions?!? Freakin heathen.

Cooked onions are not fit for human consumption.
--
"What is the first law?"
"To Protect."
"And the second?"
"Ourselves."
Terry Austin
.
User: "Lisbeth Andersson"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 07 Mar 2007 12:45:52 PM
No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns98EB9A3C35926taustingmail@216.168.3.64:

Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote in
news:gs1su298p0rpmrqtint737kkrcjd94ikpl@4ax.com:

On 6 Mar 2007 13:01:00 -0800, "Pastor Kutchie, ordained atheist
minister" <user13@heathens.org.uk> wrote:

On Mar 6, 7:31 pm, "Pahu" <pah...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Big Bang?


I'll have large fries with that. No onions and easy on the
ketchup. Oh! and can I go large on the coffee. Thanks, I'm sure
I will, you too.


No onions?!? Freakin heathen.


Cooked onions are not fit for human consumption.

"In onion there is strength."
(From: http://www.cybertown.com/bloopers.html)
(Thanks again jcon)
Lisbeth.
----
The day I don't learn anything new is the day I die.
*What we know is not nearly as interesting as *how we know it.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.

User: "aversiveness"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 07 Mar 2007 01:09:22 AM
On Mar 6, 6:09 pm, No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote innews:gs1su298p0rpmrqtint737kkrcjd94ikpl@4ax.com:

On 6 Mar 2007 13:01:00 -0800, "Pastor Kutchie, ordained atheist
minister" <use...@heathens.org.uk> wrote:


On Mar 6, 7:31 pm, "Pahu" <pah...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Big Bang?


I'll have large fries with that. No onions and easy on the ketchup.
Oh! and can I go large on the coffee. Thanks, I'm sure I will, you
too.


No onions?!? Freakin heathen.


Cooked onions are not fit for human consumption.

Compelled.. must ... disagree ....
Carmelized onions are sacred and holy. No cook can be called a cook
without using them.
For your blasphemy against the holy onion, commence thee to the sacred
fountain (nearest bar) and wash thy blasphemous mouth out with 3 shots
of holy water (scotch).
.
User: "No 33 Secretary"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 07 Mar 2007 10:54:49 AM
"aversiveness" <aversiveness@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1173251361.944064.202500@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

On Mar 6, 6:09 pm, No 33 Secretary
<terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote:

Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote
innews:gs1su298p0rpmrqtint737kkrcjd94ikpl@4ax.com:

On 6 Mar 2007 13:01:00 -0800, "Pastor Kutchie, ordained
atheist minister" <use...@heathens.org.uk> wrote:


On Mar 6, 7:31 pm, "Pahu" <pah...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Big Bang?


I'll have large fries with that. No onions and easy on the
ketchup. Oh! and can I go large on the coffee. Thanks, I'm
sure I will, you too.


No onions?!? Freakin heathen.


Cooked onions are not fit for human consumption.


Compelled.. must ... disagree ....

I'll take that as evidence that you're not entirely human.


Carmelized onions are sacred and holy. No cook can be called a
cook without using them.

Blech.


For your blasphemy against the holy onion, commence thee to the
sacred fountain (nearest bar) and wash thy blasphemous mouth out
with 3 shots of holy water (scotch).

Alcohol is also unfit for human consumption. This is the final
proof of your non-human physiology.
--
"What is the first law?"
"To Protect."
"And the second?"
"Ourselves."
Terry Austin
.


User: "Uncle Vic"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 07 Mar 2007 01:37:06 AM
One fine day in alt.atheism, No 33 Secretary
<terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> bloodied us up with this:

Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote in
news:gs1su298p0rpmrqtint737kkrcjd94ikpl@4ax.com:

On 6 Mar 2007 13:01:00 -0800, "Pastor Kutchie, ordained atheist
minister" <user13@heathens.org.uk> wrote:

On Mar 6, 7:31 pm, "Pahu" <pah...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Big Bang?


I'll have large fries with that. No onions and easy on the ketchup.
Oh! and can I go large on the coffee. Thanks, I'm sure I will, you
too.


No onions?!? Freakin heathen.


Cooked onions are not fit for human consumption.

Neither is the ***** from a bull, but 85% of Americans consume it anyway.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Convicted by Earthquack. Plonked by Fester.
Member Duke Spanking Club.
.


User: "Cary Kittrell"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 05:19:46 PM
In article <Xns98EB9A3C35926taustingmailˇ.168.3.64> No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> writes:

Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote in
news:gs1su298p0rpmrqtint737kkrcjd94ikpl@4ax.com:

On 6 Mar 2007 13:01:00 -0800, "Pastor Kutchie, ordained atheist
minister" <user13@heathens.org.uk> wrote:

On Mar 6, 7:31 pm, "Pahu" <pah...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Big Bang?


I'll have large fries with that. No onions and easy on the ketchup.
Oh! and can I go large on the coffee. Thanks, I'm sure I will, you
too.


No onions?!? Freakin heathen.


Cooked onions are not fit for human consumption.

Um, if you're not going to eat that?.....
-- cary
.



User: "MarkA"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 09:03:02 PM
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:31:43 -0800, Pahu wrote:

Big Bang?

"Three years ago, observations of distant, exploding stars blew to
smithereens some of astronomers' most cherished ideas about the universe
{the big bang theory}. To piece together an updated theory they're now
thinking dark thoughts about what sort of mystery force may be contorting
the cosmos.

"According to the standard view of cosmology, the once infinitesimal
universe has ballooned in volume ever since its fiery birth in the Big
Bang, but the mutual gravitational tug of all the matter in the cosmos has
gradually slowed that expansion.

"In 1998, however, scientists reported that a group of distant supernovas
were dimmer, and therefore farther from Earth, than the standard theory
indicated. It was as if, in the billion or so years it took for the light
from these exploded stars to arrive at Earth, the space between the stars
and our planet had stretched out more than expected. That would mean that
cosmic expansion has somehow sped up, not slowed down. Recent evidence has
only firmed up that bizarre result." Ron Cowen, "A Dark Force in the
Universe," Science News, Vol. 159, 7 April 2001, p. 218.

"Not only don't we see the universe slowing down; we see it speeding up."
Adam Riess, as quoted by James Glanz, "Astronomers See a Cosmic
Antigravity Force at Work," Science, Vol. 279, 27 February 1998, p. 1298.

"In one of the great results of twentieth century science, NSF-funded
astronomers have shown both that the universe does not contain enough
matter in the universe to slow the expansion, and that the rate of
expansion actually increases with distance. Why? Nobody knows yet."
National Science Foundation Advertisement, "Astronomy: Fifty Years of
Astronomical Excellence," Discover, September 2000, p. 7.

Mark Sincell, "Farthest Supernova Yet Bolsters Dark Energy," Science, Vol.
292, 6 April 2001, pp. 27-28.

http://www.creationscience.com/

OK, what does dark energy have to do with evolution?
What does the bible have to say about dark matter, dark energy, and the
expansion of the Universe?
--
MarkA
(this space accidentally filled in)
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 07:01:58 PM
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:31:43 -0800, Pahu wrote:

Science Disproves Evolution

Wrong.
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace
alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing
it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
- H. L. Mencken
.

User: "Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 06 Mar 2007 10:18:13 PM
moron:

Big Bang?

Braindead much?
--
"To his friend a man a friend shall prove, and gifts with gifts requite;
But men shall mocking with mockery answer, and fraud with falsehood meet."
(The Poetic Edda)
Must have been written with fundies in mind...
My personal judgment of monotheism:
http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER