Star Births? Stellar Evolution? 4
Poor logic is involved in arguing for stellar evolution, which is
assumed in estimating the age of stars. These ages are then used to
establish a framework for stellar evolution. That is circular
reasoning (g).
In summary, there is no evidence that stars evolve, there is much
evidence that stars did not evolve, and there are no experimentally
verifiable explanations for how they could evolve and seemingly defy
the laws of physics (h).
g. Steidl, pp. 134-136.
h. "Nobody really understands how star formation proceeds. It's really
remarkable." Rogier A. Windhorst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell, "A
Matter of Timing," Scientific American, Vol. 267, October 1992, p. 30.
"If stars did not exist, it would be easy to prove that this is what
we expect." Geoffrey R. Burbidge, as quoted by R. L. Sears and Robert
R. Brownlee in Stellar Structure, editors Lawrence H. Aller and Dean
McLaughlin (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965), p. 577.
"We don't understand how a single star forms, yet we want to
understand how 10 billion stars form." Carlos Frenk, as quoted by
Robert Irion, "Surveys Scour the Cosmic Deep," Science, Vol. 303, 19
March 2004, p. 1750.
Theories for the Evolution of the Solar System and Universe Are
Unscientific and Hopelessly Inadequate
http://www.creationscience.com/
.
|
