Science Disproves Evolution



 Religions > Atheism > Science Disproves Evolution

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 03 Jan 2008 02:52:43 PM
Object: Science Disproves Evolution
Crater Creep
A tall pile of tar will slowly flow downhill, ultimately spreading
into a nearly horizontal sheet of tar. Most material, under pressure,
"creeps" in this way, although rocks deform very, very slowly.
Calculations show that the growing upward bulges of large crater
floors on the Moon should occur to their current extent in only 10,000
to 10,000,000 years (a). Large, steep-walled craters exist even on
Venus and Mercury, where gravity is greater, and temperatures are hot
enough to melt lead. Therefore, creep rates on those planets should be
even greater. Most large craters on the Moon, Venus, and Mercury are
thought to have formed more than 4,000,000,000 years ago. Because
these craters show no sign of "creep," these bodies seem to be
relatively young.
a. Glenn R. Morton, Harold S. Slusher, and Richard E. Mandock, "The
Age of Lunar Craters," Creation Research Society Quarterly, Vol. 20,
September 1983, pp. 105-108.
The above study drew upon the work of Z. F. Danes, which was described
as follows:
"The history of a circular crater in a highly viscous medium is
derived from the hydrodynamic equations of motion by Z. F. Danes. The
variation in shape of the crater in the course of time is expressed as
a function of a time constant, T, that involves viscosity and density
of the medium, acceleration of gravity, and radius of the crater lip.
Correspondence between theoretical crater shapes and the observed ones
is good. However the time constant, T, is surprisingly short if
commonly accepted viscosity values are used." Geological Survey
Professional Paper 550-A (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing
Office, 1966), p. A 127.
Since Danes work was published, rocks from the Moon have been
returned to Earth and their viscosity has been measured. Their values
fall in the range of 10^21 to 10^22 poises. According to the
Geological Survey paper just quoted, "If viscosities of lunar rocks
were around 10^21 to 10^22 poises, the ages of large craters would
have to be only 10^4 to 10^7 years."
Most Scientific Dating Techniques Indicate That the Earth, Solar
System, and Universe Are Young.
For the last 150 years, the age of the Earth, as assumed by
evolutionists, has been doubling at roughly a rate of once every 15
years. In fact, since 1900 this age has multiplied by a factor of
100!
Evolution requires an old Earth, an old solar system, and an old
universe. Nearly all informed evolutionists will admit that without
billions of years their theory is dead. Yet, hiding the "origins
question" behind a vast veil of time makes the unsolvable problems of
evolution difficult for scientists to see and laymen to imagine. Our
media and textbooks have implied for over a century that these almost
unimaginable ages are correct. Rarely do people examine the shaky
assumptions and growing body of contrary evidence. Therefore, most
people today almost instinctively believe that the Earth and universe
are billions of years old. Sometimes, these people are disturbed, at
least initially, when they see the evidence.
Actually, most dating techniques indicate that the Earth and solar
system are young--possibly less than 10,000 years old.
http://www.creationscience.com/
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 04 Jan 2008 08:08:08 AM
On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:52:43 -0800, Pahu78 wrote:

Crater Creep

Fondled your asteroids did he?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"When your doctrine forces you to claim that God's reactions
are identical to those of a universe without God, you have
nothing left to defend." -- Free Lunch
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 04 Jan 2008 10:27:18 AM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:87r155-g1c.ln1@eac.exists.not...

On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:52:43 -0800, Pahu78 wrote:

Crater Creep


Fondled your asteroids did he?

Dang it all to heck - gotta paper towel?
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 04 Jan 2008 10:32:50 AM
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:27:18 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:

"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:87r155-g1c.ln1@eac.exists.not...

On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:52:43 -0800, Pahu78 wrote:

Crater Creep


Fondled your asteroids did he?


Dang it all to heck - gotta paper towel?

Yes! Five dollars a sheet!
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“It is one of the Christian delusions that Christianity
brought charity into the world. It did no such thing.
There were plenty of agencies for taking care of the
poor and helpless long before Christianity was heard
of, and even before Judaism. Both Christianity and
Judaism have converted charity into a sort of pious racket.”
- H. L. Mencken
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 04 Jan 2008 11:12:12 AM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:im3255-ttd.ln1@eac.exists.not...

On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:27:18 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:

"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:87r155-g1c.ln1@eac.exists.not...

On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:52:43 -0800, Pahu78 wrote:

Crater Creep


Fondled your asteroids did he?


Dang it all to heck - gotta paper towel?


Yes! Five dollars a sheet!

Kiss my patootie!
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 04 Jan 2008 05:50:40 PM
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:12:12 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:

"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:im3255-ttd.ln1@eac.exists.not...

On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:27:18 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:

"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:87r155-g1c.ln1@eac.exists.not...

On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:52:43 -0800, Pahu78 wrote:

Crater Creep


Fondled your asteroids did he?


Dang it all to heck - gotta paper towel?


Yes! Five dollars a sheet!


Kiss my patootie!

Okay, now that's gonna cost more.
(Have to subcontract)
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“The most dangerous man to any government is the
man who is able to think things out... without regard
to the prevailing superstitions and taboos.
Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the
government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.”
- H. L. Mencken
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 05 Jan 2008 05:55:00 AM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:gbt255-aig.ln1@eac.exists.not...

On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:12:12 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:

"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:im3255-ttd.ln1@eac.exists.not...

On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:27:18 -0500, Robibnikoff wrote:

"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:87r155-g1c.ln1@eac.exists.not...

On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:52:43 -0800, Pahu78 wrote:

Crater Creep


Fondled your asteroids did he?


Dang it all to heck - gotta paper towel?


Yes! Five dollars a sheet!


Kiss my patootie!


Okay, now that's gonna cost more.

What?!?


(Have to subcontract)

Oh pooh, you're no fun!
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.






User: "Ben Kaufman"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 03 Jan 2008 11:24:41 PM
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:52:43 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
<SNIP>

Actually, most dating techniques indicate that the Earth and solar
system are young--possibly less than 10,000 years old.

http://www.creationscience.com/

Liar. Most dating techniques indicate that Earth is BILLIONS of years old.
"...The best age for the Earth comes not from dating individual rocks but by
considering the Earth and meteorites as part of the same evolving system in
which the isotopic composition of lead, specifically the ratio of lead-207 to
lead-206 changes over time owing to the decay of radioactive uranium-235 and
uranium-238, respectively. Scientists have used this approach to determine the
time required for the isotopes in the Earth's oldest lead ores, of which there
are only a few, to evolve from its primordial composition, as measured in
uranium-free phases of iron meteorites, to its compositions at the time these
lead ores separated from their mantle reservoirs. These calculations result in
an age for the Earth and meteorites, and hence the Solar System, of 4.54 billion
years with an uncertainty of less than 1 percent. ...."
http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/age.html
.

User: "Uncle Vic"

Title: Re: Science Disproves Evolution 03 Jan 2008 10:16:51 PM
One fine day in alt.atheism,
bloodied us up with this:



<plonk>
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Convicted by Earthquack.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER