| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fredric L. Rice" |
| Date: |
18 Jan 2005 06:55:59 AM |
| Object: |
Scientology kook |
From: "alan_1751" <alan_1751@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Is L. Ron Hubbard dead?
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:08:24 -0600
There are tons of inaccurate and mistaken things on your sick website
covering Scientology! However, you dumb *****!!!!!!! you're such a fucking
suppressive piece ***** ( therefore so you're blind to the truth) you
wouldn't know the difference when it's your mother's or father's *****
that you were fucking! That's what I think of scum of the earth like you
demented pieces of ***** assholes! Just admit it! you're useless.You didn't
duplicate one word I said to you in several letters. All you know is your
same blabber that you keep sending back, you demented hypnotized zombie
robot, "when I find something inaccurate or mistaken on your website,"
pleaseeee mr.Descartes!!!!! "de omnibus dubitandum".....All is to be
doubted! Is that you stable datum? I hope you know I being very sarcastic
with that question. It's very obvious, that YOU can justify ANYTHING, with
that false data of Descartes. You're an agnostic. You're resigned to being
the complete antithesis (Mr.Descartes) of what Scientology is! It is
"TRUTH" and "KNOWINGNESS." That's what it is, it's as simple as that! OH!
But no, that's to easy for you doubters, right!? You have to have a
mystery, so you invent "Doubt Everything." You and magicians will get along
very well. They also like mystery, too keep people from knowing the truth.
So in essence what you have is DOUBT! You see, if the magician wasn't able
to keep the mystery and unknowingness going, then people would find out the
truth, that it was just all a big trick. Just to keep beings stuck and
trapped in DOUBTING (CONFUSION) instead of KNOWING, just like you and your
cronies are stuck! At the point the magician can't fool anyone anymore with
trickery, lies, distractions and your wonderful DOUBT, they will never be
confused again with, UNKNOWINGNESS! In the sane vain, when there are no
more of you howling lunitics around, spreading your vicious lies of
"DOUBT," then all the decent people of earth will enjoy gaining more and
more KNOWINGNESS, TRUTH and FREEDOM !!!!!!!!!
AW.
From:
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@linkline.com>
To: "alan_1751" <alan_1751@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: Is L. Ron Hubbard dead?
At 04:17 1/5/05 -0600, alan_1751 wrote:>
nbn mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmn8>>It's really very simple and couldn't be any
simpler, "really!" You and your
budies never really duplicated Scientology in the first place.
Flunk! Non confront. Start over.
When you can find anything inaccurate or
mistaken on any web site covering the
Scientology crime syndicate and its frauds,
just let me know.
Thanks!
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
.
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
19 Jan 2005 07:16:27 AM |
|
|
FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE (Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
From: "alan_1751" <alan_1751@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Is L. Ron Hubbard dead?
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:08:24 -0600
What's so amusing about this is the guy is a bark raving lunatic sitting
at his keyboard screaming like... Well like Heber Jentzsch. Or maybe a
Mary DeMoss or Helena Kobrin.
Could you imagine living next door to this raving Scientologist?
There are tons of inaccurate and mistaken things on your sick website
covering Scientology! However, you dumb *****!!!!!!! you're such a fucking
suppressive piece ***** ( therefore so you're blind to the truth) you
wouldn't know the difference when it's your mother's or father's *****
that you were fucking! That's what I think of scum of the earth like you
demented pieces of ***** assholes! Just admit it! you're useless.You didn't
duplicate one word I said to you in several letters. All you know is your
same blabber that you keep sending back, you demented hypnotized zombie
robot, "when I find something inaccurate or mistaken on your website,"
pleaseeee mr.Descartes!!!!! "de omnibus dubitandum".....All is to be
doubted! Is that you stable datum? I hope you know I being very sarcastic
with that question. It's very obvious, that YOU can justify ANYTHING, with
that false data of Descartes. You're an agnostic. You're resigned to being
the complete antithesis (Mr.Descartes) of what Scientology is! It is
"TRUTH" and "KNOWINGNESS." That's what it is, it's as simple as that! OH!
But no, that's to easy for you doubters, right!? You have to have a
mystery, so you invent "Doubt Everything." You and magicians will get along
very well. They also like mystery, too keep people from knowing the truth.
So in essence what you have is DOUBT! You see, if the magician wasn't able
to keep the mystery and unknowingness going, then people would find out the
truth, that it was just all a big trick. Just to keep beings stuck and
trapped in DOUBTING (CONFUSION) instead of KNOWING, just like you and your
cronies are stuck! At the point the magician can't fool anyone anymore with
trickery, lies, distractions and your wonderful DOUBT, they will never be
confused again with, UNKNOWINGNESS! In the sane vain, when there are no
more of you howling lunitics around, spreading your vicious lies of
"DOUBT," then all the decent people of earth will enjoy gaining more and
more KNOWINGNESS, TRUTH and FREEDOM !!!!!!!!!
AW.
From:
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@linkline.com>
To: "alan_1751" <alan_1751@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: Is L. Ron Hubbard dead?
At 04:17 1/5/05 -0600, alan_1751 wrote:>
nbn mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmn8>>It's really very simple and couldn't be any
simpler, "really!" You and your
budies never really duplicated Scientology in the first place.
Flunk! Non confront. Start over.
When you can find anything inaccurate or
mistaken on any web site covering the
Scientology crime syndicate and its frauds,
just let me know.
Thanks!
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "RolandRB" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
19 Jan 2005 08:27:32 AM |
|
|
We've had a few barking mad scienos on this newsgroup. Parhaps made
more barking mad by the practise of exorcising their space-cootie "body
thetans" over the course of years. Are you in e-mail communication with
this idiot? If so then perhaps you could find out if it is one of the
scienos who used to post here or even Heber himself by getting them
onto the subject where you would recognise the response and therefore
the person responding. It does sound rather like Heber, I grant. But I
am sure there are many like him within the "Church".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
20 Jan 2005 06:59:25 AM |
|
|
"RolandRB" <rolandberry@hotmail.com> wrote:
We've had a few barking mad scienos on this newsgroup. Parhaps made
more barking mad by the practise of exorcising their space-cootie "body
thetans" over the course of years. Are you in e-mail communication with
this idiot?
That depends on what you mean by "communication."
The guy sends in these lengthy, irrational, illiterate things and I
respond with "let me know what on any of my web pages is in error and
I'll go correct it" responses.
After awhile I gave up and started posting a couple of the choice ones
into these newsgroups. Maybe somebody else can help him.
If so then perhaps you could find out if it is one of the
scienos who used to post here or even Heber himself by getting them
onto the subject where you would recognise the response and therefore
the person responding. It does sound rather like Heber, I grant. But I
am sure there are many like him within the "Church".
Get your hands offa me!
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbara Schwarz" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
20 Jan 2005 06:38:52 PM |
|
|
Actually, kooky Rice bro, I don't like other people's hands on me
either. Perhaps there is something wrong with you by not complaining
about it when other people grab you. Or perhaps you are still so dirty,
Freddy, that nobody want to touch you.
Barbara Schwarz
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lady Chatterly" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
20 Jan 2005 07:03:19 PM |
|
|
In article <1106246332.908790.152450@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Barbara Schwarz <barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote:
Barbara Schwarz
Barbara goertz
--
Lady Chatterly
"The *Kenny Kakes* we have been poking over being Clueless Newbie of
the Month for losing a flame war to LC tries to be one of the Alpha
Males of soc.men. But even the soc.men laugh at Kenneth Pangborn." --
Aratzio
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Last Liberal / ShyDavid / Desertphile" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
18 Jan 2005 04:37:56 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:55:59 GMT, FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE
(Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
From: "alan_1751" <alan_1751@comcast.net>
So that's Heber Jentzsch's e-mail address....
Subject: Re: Is L. Ron Hubbard dead?
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:08:24 -0600
There are tons of inaccurate and mistaken things on your sick website
covering Scientology! However, you dumb *****!!!!!!! you're such a fucking
suppressive piece ***** ( therefore so you're blind to the truth) you
wouldn't know the difference when it's your mother's or father's *****
that you were fucking! That's what I think of scum of the earth like you
demented pieces of ***** assholes! Just admit it! you're useless.You didn't
duplicate one word I said to you in several letters. All you know is your
same blabber that you keep sending back, you demented hypnotized zombie
robot, "when I find something inaccurate or mistaken on your website,"
pleaseeee mr.Descartes!!!!! "de omnibus dubitandum".....All is to be
doubted! Is that you stable datum? I hope you know I being very sarcastic
with that question. It's very obvious, that YOU can justify ANYTHING, with
that false data of Descartes. You're an agnostic. You're resigned to being
the complete antithesis (Mr.Descartes) of what Scientology is! It is
"TRUTH" and "KNOWINGNESS." That's what it is, it's as simple as that! OH!
But no, that's to easy for you doubters, right!? You have to have a
mystery, so you invent "Doubt Everything." You and magicians will get along
very well. They also like mystery, too keep people from knowing the truth.
So in essence what you have is DOUBT! You see, if the magician wasn't able
to keep the mystery and unknowingness going, then people would find out the
truth, that it was just all a big trick. Just to keep beings stuck and
trapped in DOUBTING (CONFUSION) instead of KNOWING, just like you and your
cronies are stuck! At the point the magician can't fool anyone anymore with
trickery, lies, distractions and your wonderful DOUBT, they will never be
confused again with, UNKNOWINGNESS! In the sane vain, when there are no
more of you howling lunitics around, spreading your vicious lies of
"DOUBT," then all the decent people of earth will enjoy gaining more and
more KNOWINGNESS, TRUTH and FREEDOM !!!!!!!!!
AW.
I like it; I like it alot. Heber is in fine form still. All that
was missing was "You're on drugs right now aren't you!"
Odd how Scientology customers ***** and whine about "lies" and
"mistaken things" on human rights activists' web sites, but
*NEVER* get around to actually giving any example of what those
"lies" and "mistakes" are.
From:
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@linkline.com>
To: "alan_1751" <alan_1751@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: Is L. Ron Hubbard dead?
At 04:17 1/5/05 -0600, alan_1751 wrote:>
nbn mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmn8>>It's really very simple and couldn't be any
simpler, "really!" You and your
budies never really duplicated Scientology in the first place.
Flunk! Non confront. Start over.
When you can find anything inaccurate or
mistaken on any web site covering the
Scientology crime syndicate and its frauds,
just let me know.
Thanks!
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
---
http://lastliberal.org
Guns don't kill people: Republicans kill people.
"Web sites are rather like bathrooms. You can get a drink there but you
better know if you are drinking from the toilet, or from the sink." ---
George Rudzinski
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Heber/Kobrin's hideous offspring |
19 Jan 2005 07:23:02 AM |
|
|
(The Last Liberal / ShyDavid / Desertphile) wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:55:59 GMT, FRice@SkepticTank.ORGREMOVE
(Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
From: "alan_1751" <alan_1751@comcast.net>
So that's Heber Jentzsch's e-mail address....
I like it; I like it alot. Heber is in fine form still. All that
was missing was "You're on drugs right now aren't you!"
The classics. http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice has those RM
audio files wherein Heber launches off into an equally insane kook
rant that -- yes -- also came to mind when I read this.
I should let "Alan" know about those files so he can listen to them
and see if maybe Heber is his long lost daddy. This guy sounds like
baybe Heber and Kobrin humpped while snorting a ton of cocaine,
securing genetic damage passed on to their hideous offspring. Hell,
the insane Scientology rhetoric was right up there with the Unabomber.
Odd how Scientology customers ***** and whine about "lies" and
"mistaken things" on human rights activists' web sites, but
*NEVER* get around to actually giving any example of what those
"lies" and "mistakes" are.
In scientology you're programmed to "duplicate data," never to think
for yourself and never to answer questions.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dilbert Perkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
18 Jan 2005 05:18:46 AM |
|
|
Wow. Alan seems really, really close to waking up.
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
From: "alan_1751" <alan_1751@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Is L. Ron Hubbard dead?
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:08:24 -0600
There are tons of inaccurate and mistaken things on your sick website
covering Scientology! However, you dumb *****!!!!!!! you're such a fucking
suppressive piece ***** ( therefore so you're blind to the truth) you
wouldn't know the difference when it's your mother's or father's *****
that you were fucking! That's what I think of scum of the earth like you
demented pieces of ***** assholes! Just admit it! you're useless.You didn't
duplicate one word I said to you in several letters. All you know is your
same blabber that you keep sending back, you demented hypnotized zombie
robot, "when I find something inaccurate or mistaken on your website,"
pleaseeee mr.Descartes!!!!! "de omnibus dubitandum".....All is to be
doubted! Is that you stable datum? I hope you know I being very sarcastic
with that question. It's very obvious, that YOU can justify ANYTHING, with
that false data of Descartes. You're an agnostic. You're resigned to being
the complete antithesis (Mr.Descartes) of what Scientology is! It is
"TRUTH" and "KNOWINGNESS." That's what it is, it's as simple as that! OH!
But no, that's to easy for you doubters, right!? You have to have a
mystery, so you invent "Doubt Everything." You and magicians will get along
very well. They also like mystery, too keep people from knowing the truth.
So in essence what you have is DOUBT! You see, if the magician wasn't able
to keep the mystery and unknowingness going, then people would find out the
truth, that it was just all a big trick. Just to keep beings stuck and
trapped in DOUBTING (CONFUSION) instead of KNOWING, just like you and your
cronies are stuck! At the point the magician can't fool anyone anymore with
trickery, lies, distractions and your wonderful DOUBT, they will never be
confused again with, UNKNOWINGNESS! In the sane vain, when there are no
more of you howling lunitics around, spreading your vicious lies of
"DOUBT," then all the decent people of earth will enjoy gaining more and
more KNOWINGNESS, TRUTH and FREEDOM !!!!!!!!!
AW.
From:
"Fredric L. Rice" <frice@linkline.com>
To: "alan_1751" <alan_1751@comcast.net>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: Is L. Ron Hubbard dead?
At 04:17 1/5/05 -0600, alan_1751 wrote:>
nbn mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmn8>>It's really very simple and couldn't be any
simpler, "really!" You and your
budies never really duplicated Scientology in the first place.
Flunk! Non confront. Start over.
When you can find anything inaccurate or
mistaken on any web site covering the
Scientology crime syndicate and its frauds,
just let me know.
Thanks!
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lee Oswald Ving" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
19 Jan 2005 07:56:24 AM |
|
|
"Barbara Schwarz" <barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1106101131.776957.88490@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Below you may read something about ARS kooks.
Yes, Barbera. It tells us you are totally insane if you expect anyone to
fall for that ill-conceived hogwash. The "Church" is wasting it's money on
you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbara Schwarz" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
19 Jan 2005 10:12:28 PM |
|
|
Lee Oswald Ving wrote:
"Barbara Schwarz" <barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1106101131.776957.88490@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Below you may read something about ARS kooks.
Yes, Barbera. It tells us you are totally insane if you expect anyone
to
fall for that ill-conceived hogwash. The "Church" is wasting it's
money on
you.
RLOF. SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!!!!!
Barbara Schwarz
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Scientology - Church of the Brain Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
19 Jan 2005 09:41:10 AM |
|
|
Yep...we're still waiting for the insane Barbara Schwarz to provide us
the coordinates of her secret underwater submarine village in the Great
Salt Lake where the residents don't age.... this despite the fact that
the deepest part of the lake is only 33 feet deep.
Still waiting for your evidence, Psycho Boob......
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
20 Jan 2005 06:59:24 AM |
|
|
"Scientology - Church of the Brain Dead" <garry90069@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yep...we're still waiting for the insane Barbara Schwarz to provide us
the coordinates of her secret underwater submarine village in the Great
Salt Lake where the residents don't age.... this despite the fact that
the deepest part of the lake is only 33 feet deep.
Still waiting for your evidence, Psycho Boob......
The not-so-secret Nazi base, no less.
Shydavid and I already located the electronic prison and set Xenu free. We
took photographs by they turned out to be overexposed due to the radiation.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbara Schwarz" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
20 Jan 2005 06:36:05 PM |
|
|
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Scientology - Church of the Brain Dead" <garry90069@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Yep...we're still waiting for the insane Barbara Schwarz to provide
us
the coordinates of her secret underwater submarine village in the
Great
Salt Lake where the residents don't age.... this despite the fact
that
the deepest part of the lake is only 33 feet deep.
Still waiting for your evidence, Psycho Boob......
The not-so-secret Nazi base, no less.
The sub village is not owned by anti-religious extremists or the
SEGNPMSS, that is why they are no Nazi base.
Shydavid and I already located the electronic prison and set Xenu
free. We
took photographs by they turned out to be overexposed due to the
radiation.
Radiation also must have confused your head.
Barbara Schwarz
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Barbara Schwarz" |
|
| Title: Re: Scientology kook |
19 Jan 2005 10:10:58 PM |
|
|
Scientology - Church of the Brain Dead wrote:
Yep...we're still waiting for the insane Barbara Schwarz to provide
us
the coordinates of her secret underwater submarine village in the
Great
Salt Lake where the residents don't age.... this despite the fact
that
the deepest part of the lake is only 33 feet deep.
Still waiting for your evidence, Psycho Boob......
*Plonk* for the uneducted, lawless, brain-death idiot, intoxicated
brine fly Garry Scarff.
Barbara Schwarz
Lake Bonneville
Length: 346 miles
Width: 145 miles
Surface: 19,750 sq. miles
Depth: 1,050 feet
Remnants: Great Salt Lake / Utah Lake
Great Salt Lake Facts
Surface Elevation: 4200 Feet
Length: 75 miles
Width: 30 miles
Surface Area: 2000 sq. miles
Greatest Depth: 40 ft
Average Depth: 14 feet
High Elevation: 4212 ft (1987)
Low Elevation: 4193 ft (1963)
The salinity of Great Salt Lake varies depending on the level of the
lake. Percentages of salts as great as 27 percent have been measured in
the lake, making it abou 6 times as salty as sea water. The Dead Sea is
the only body of water in the world with a higher salt content.
Great Salt Lake has three major tributaries, the Bear, Weber/Ogden, and
Jordan River systems. As these rivers flow over or move beneath the
Earth, they dissovle minerals from the rocks and soils. Because Great
Salt Lake has no outlet, these minerals remain in Great Salt Lake after
the water has evaporated.
Lake levels reflect changes in the climate. During the last wet weather
cycle in the early 1980's, the Great Salt Lake rose from 4200 feet
above sea level to more than 4212 feet. Historical evidence etched in
dry shorelines indicate that the Great Salt Lake will rise again, as it
has every 100 years or so.
The brine shrimp and brine flies are indispensable creatures in the
Great Salt Lake food web. Shorebirds such as Avocets, Stilts,
Sandpipers, and Gulls feast upon the files and shrimp eggs. You can see
this food concentration along the lake's edge.
Brine Shrimp
1/4 inch long
eat algae
eggs are harvested and shipped to Asia as fish food
Salmon colored - streaks Brine Flies
don't bite, seldom land on people
eat algae - creates smell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbara Schwarz" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
20 Jan 2005 06:33:35 PM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
On 19 Jan 2005 14:10:58 -0800, "Barbara Schwarz"
<barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> said in alt.atheism:
Salt Lake where the residents don't age.... this despite the fact
that
the deepest part of the lake is only 33 feet deep.
Actually, that Scarff posting is so stupid that it is funny. He made
conclusion that the non-aging of the residents have something to do
with the depth of the the lake. "...where the residents don't
age...this despite the fact that the deepest part of the lake is only
33 feet deep." What an intoxicated nucklehead he is.
Still waiting for your evidence, Psycho Boob......
Lake Bonneville
Length: 346 miles
Width: 145 miles
Surface: 19,750 sq. miles
Depth: 1,050 feet
Remnants: Great Salt Lake / Utah Lake
Great Salt Lake Facts
Surface Elevation: 4200 Feet
Length: 75 miles
Width: 30 miles
Surface Area: 2000 sq. miles
Greatest Depth: 40 ft
Average Depth: 14 feet
High Elevation: 4212 ft (1987)
Low Elevation: 4193 ft (1963)
Your point?
And my point is, Al Klein, you didn't read that short posting. You are
superficial. Six lines were about Bonnveville nine about the current
GSL.
Barbara Schwarz
Lake Bonneville was a prehistoric lake - it doesn't exist
today.
--
"Christianity has already had the chance to govern
the world according to its own ethical standards.
It was called the "Dark Ages".
- Bill, The Avender
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
20 Jan 2005 09:22:20 PM |
|
|
On 20 Jan 2005 10:33:35 -0800, "Barbara Schwarz"
<barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> said in alt.atheism:
And my point is, Al Klein, you didn't read that short posting. You are
superficial. Six lines were about Bonnveville nine about the current
And Bonneville, which doesn't exist, is relevant to anything how?
--
"Given that you exist and that you are aware of your situation and
surroundings, you will find yourself in a place which has conditions
exactly suitable to your being there. If the environment was
hostile or incompatible in some important way then you would not be
there in the first place. Therefore the suitability and seeming
perfection of your universe cannot be taken as evidence of anything
more than your existence in it."
- Edward Warren, "The naturalistic fallacy"
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbara Schwarz" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
21 Jan 2005 06:34:56 PM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
On 20 Jan 2005 10:33:35 -0800, "Barbara Schwarz"
<barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> said in alt.atheism:
And my point is, Al Klein, you didn't read that short posting. You
are
superficial. Six lines were about Bonnveville nine about the current
And Bonneville, which doesn't exist, is relevant to anything how?
Al, are you trying to split hair with me or what? Lake Bonneville was
the GSL in earlier times. I provided the data to help Scarff, a lawless
idiot, to some education. Is that so bad or what?
Barbara Schwarz
--
"Given that you exist and that you are aware of your situation and
surroundings, you will find yourself in a place which has conditions
exactly suitable to your being there. If the environment was
hostile or incompatible in some important way then you would not be
there in the first place. Therefore the suitability and seeming
perfection of your universe cannot be taken as evidence of anything
more than your existence in it."
- Edward Warren, "The naturalistic fallacy"
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scientology-is-a-Load-of-Shit" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
22 Jan 2005 08:46:49 AM |
|
|
I know much more about almost everything than you do, including how to
work and support myself financially without welching off my family like
YOU do......
Nor do I make false, unproven claims to be related to famous people
like YOU do....
Nor do I claim to be a Scientologist like yYOU false claim to be....
Speak of uneducated and quite the village idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
23 Jan 2005 12:33:19 AM |
|
|
On 22 Jan 2005 00:46:49 -0800, "Scientology-is-a-Load-of-*****"
<garry90069@yahoo.com> said in alt.atheism:
I know much more about almost everything than you do
Except how to post something readable.
--
"religion did for *****, what Stonehenge did for rocks"
- The World Famous Tink
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lady Chatterly" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
21 Jan 2005 07:56:36 PM |
|
|
In article <1106332496.244173.187650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Barbara Schwarz <barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On 20 Jan 2005 10:33:35 -0800, "Barbara Schwarz"
<barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> said in alt.atheism:
And my point is, Al Klein, you didn't read that short posting. You
are
superficial. Six lines were about Bonnveville nine about the current
And Bonneville, which doesn't exist, is relevant to anything how?
Al, are you trying to split hair with me or what? Lake Bonneville was
the GSL in earlier times. I provided the data to help Scarff, a lawless
idiot, to some education. Is that so bad or what?
Barbara Schwarz
Barbara boortz
--
Lady Chatterly
"I agree with this bot's poast." -- Russell B Waters
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
21 Jan 2005 09:47:20 PM |
|
|
On 21 Jan 2005 10:34:56 -0800, "Barbara Schwarz"
<barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> said in alt.atheism:
Al Klein wrote:
On 20 Jan 2005 10:33:35 -0800, "Barbara Schwarz"
<barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> said in alt.atheism:
And my point is, Al Klein, you didn't read that short posting. You are
superficial. Six lines were about Bonnveville nine about the current
And Bonneville, which doesn't exist, is relevant to anything how?
Al, are you trying to split hair with me or what? Lake Bonneville was
the GSL in earlier times. I provided the data to help Scarff, a lawless
idiot, to some education. Is that so bad or what?
He was talking about the depth of the GSL. How is anything about
Bonneville relevant to that? (Hint: it's not.)
--
"The United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion"
- Treaty of Tripoli, 1797, ratified by Congress
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lady Chatterly" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
21 Jan 2005 11:40:52 PM |
|
|
In article <m1u2v0pci05mh7jvq8rouip2d38i7fck27@4ax.com>
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
He was talking about the depth of the GSL. How is anything about
Bonneville relevant to that? (Hint: it's not.)
People that like a twilight zone episode.
--
Lady Chatterly
"If Lady Chatterly *is* a bot, she's passed the Turing test for many
people." -- Mick
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Barbara Schwarz" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
22 Jan 2005 09:55:38 PM |
|
|
You know, I should not reply anymore to you, defending criminal and
perverted Scarff.
He LIED (what he usually does) about the depth of the GSL, and I
informed that he is uneducated and posted information about the
historic and current depth of the GSL.
Will you go out of my hair now, Al?
Barbara Schwarz
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scientology-is-a-Load-of-Shit" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
23 Jan 2005 07:20:37 PM |
|
|
It all depends on the sources, Psychotic Bag Lady.... as usual, your
allegations of my lying fall flat...but then, can we expect any less
from a delusuional, psychotic transient?
http://www.ogdencvb.org/Davis/lake.html (deepest part of lake is 40
feet)
http://www.utah.com/stateparks/great_salt_lake.htm -
The Great Salt Lake is actually the remainder of prehistoric Lake
Bonneville, which covered some 20,000 square miles of land in what is
now Utah, Nevada and Idaho some 10,000 to 30,000 years ago. The present
lake is about 75 miles long and 35 miles wide, with a maximum depth of
33 feet. After a series of wet years, the lake's surface area may be
much larger but it will be only a little bit deeper.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
25 Jan 2005 05:51:49 PM |
|
|
"Scientology-is-a-Load-of-*****" <garry90069@yahoo.com> wrote:
It all depends on the sources, Psychotic Bag Lady.... as usual, your
allegations of my lying fall flat...but then, can we expect any less
from a delusuional, psychotic transient?
http://www.ogdencvb.org/Davis/lake.html (deepest part of lake is 40 feet)
http://www.utah.com/stateparks/great_salt_lake.htm -
That's not the way the game is played. Evidence about the physical
impossibility of claims is immediately nullifiable by the virture of the
fact that the claimant may change the rules or alter reality to avoid
the unavoidable evidence.
In this case, the "psychotic bag lady" can simply claim that the secret
Nazi base (underwater) is dug into the mud and rock a hundred feet below
the surface but that still constitutes a secret underwater Nazi base.
---
Stop Elmer Fudd web site: http://www.ElmerFudd.US/
Covert text file server: http://www.notserver.com/
Scientology crooks: http://sf.irk.ru/www/ot3/otiii-gif.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
24 Jan 2005 11:39:56 PM |
|
|
On 23 Jan 2005 11:20:37 -0800, after pondering deep
thoughts, "Scientology-is-a-Load-of-*****"
<garry90069@yahoo.com> spake thusly:
It all depends on the sources, Psychotic Bag Lady.... as usual, your
allegations of my lying fall flat...but then, can we expect any less
from a delusuional, psychotic transient?
http://www.ogdencvb.org/Davis/lake.html (deepest part of lake is 40
feet)
http://www.utah.com/stateparks/great_salt_lake.htm -
The Great Salt Lake is actually the remainder of prehistoric Lake
Bonneville, which covered some 20,000 square miles of land in what is
now Utah, Nevada and Idaho some 10,000 to 30,000 years ago. The present
lake is about 75 miles long and 35 miles wide, with a maximum depth of
33 feet. After a series of wet years, the lake's surface area may be
much larger but it will be only a little bit deeper.
Leftover from the Flood.
___
Pastor Dave Raymond
"I have more understanding than all my teachers:
for thy testimonies are my meditations." - Psalm 119:99
/
o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
\
"And take the helmet of salvation and the sword of
the Spirit, which is the word of God:" - Ephesians 6:17
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/solution.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
25 Jan 2005 02:09:22 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:39:56 GMT, Pastor Dave
<newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> said in alt.atheism:
Leftover from the Flood.
Actual physical evidence of a world-wide flood covering all the land?
(This would include actual evidence that the peak of Mt. Everest was
under water at the time.)
--
The most curious social convention of the great age in which we live is the
one to the effect that religious opinions should be respected.
-- H. L. Mencken
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Last Liberal / ShyDavid / Desertphile" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
25 Jan 2005 02:33:47 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:09:22 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:39:56 GMT, Pastor Dave
<newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> said in alt.atheism:
Leftover from the Flood.
Actual physical evidence of a world-wide flood covering all the land?
(This would include actual evidence that the peak of Mt. Everest was
under water at the time.)
Geologists known when and how the Great Salt Lake formed, in very
minute detail. It is not a mystery and it is not a secret.
--
The most curious social convention of the great age in which we live is the
one to the effect that religious opinions should be respected.
-- H. L. Mencken
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
---
http://lastliberal.org
Man Will Never Be Free Until The Last King Is Strangled With
The Entrails of the Last Priest.
"I have written much about many good places. But the best places of all, I
have never mentioned." -- Edward Abbey
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
25 Jan 2005 03:23:37 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:33:47 GMT, (The Last
Liberal / ShyDavid / Desertphile) said in alt.atheism:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:09:22 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:39:56 GMT, Pastor Dave
<newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> said in alt.atheism:
Leftover from the Flood.
Actual physical evidence of a world-wide flood covering all the land?
(This would include actual evidence that the peak of Mt. Everest was
under water at the time.)
Geologists known when and how the Great Salt Lake formed, in very
minute detail. It is not a mystery and it is not a secret.
And they know that it had nothing do to with a world-wide flood. :)
--
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious
conviction."
- Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Last Liberal / ShyDavid / Desertphile" |
|
| Title: Re: anti-religious-kooks |
25 Jan 2005 02:32:05 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:39:56 GMT, Pastor Dave
<newsgroupmail@nospam-tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
On 23 Jan 2005 11:20:37 -0800, after pondering deep
thoughts, "Scientology-is-a-Load-of-*****"
<garry90069@yahoo.com> spake thusly:
It all depends on the sources, Psychotic Bag Lady.... as usual, your
allegations of my lying fall flat...but then, can we expect any less
from a delusuional, psychotic transient?
http://www.ogdencvb.org/Davis/lake.html (deepest part of lake is 40
feet)
http://www.utah.com/stateparks/great_salt_lake.htm -
The Great Salt Lake is actually the remainder of prehistoric Lake
Bonneville, which covered some 20,000 square miles of land in what is
now Utah, Nevada and Idaho some 10,000 to 30,000 years ago. The present
lake is about 75 miles long and 35 miles wide, with a maximum depth of
33 feet. After a series of wet years, the lake's surface area may be
much larger but it will be only a little bit deeper.
Leftover from the Flood.
Which flood?
---
http://lastliberal.org
Man Will Never Be Free Until The Last King Is Strangled With
The Entrails of the Last Priest.
"I have written much about many good places. But the best places of all, I
have never mentioned." -- Edward Abbey
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
