Religions > Atheism > Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Chris H. Fleming" |
| Date: |
05 Nov 2007 08:50:23 AM |
| Object: |
Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
God bless you all.
.
|
|
| User: "TimK" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
09 Nov 2007 10:16:09 PM |
|
|
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194274223.009326.11740@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time,
No it most certainly does not.
Sorry skippy but you don't know what you're talking about.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
10 Nov 2007 02:25:03 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 23:16:09 -0500, "TimK" <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194274223.009326.11740@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time,
No it most certainly does not.
Sorry skippy but you don't know what you're talking about.
What are your qualifications for making that stupid bloody assertion?
I'll pit Fleming's against yours any day, you cretin.
And for what it's worth, he is correct.
.
|
|
|
| User: "TimK" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
10 Nov 2007 05:38:41 PM |
|
|
"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:vkqaj3dvm6bsc3i26076eoc0ijs8tf6756@4ax.com...
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 23:16:09 -0500, "TimK" <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194274223.009326.11740@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time,
No it most certainly does not.
Sorry skippy but you don't know what you're talking about.
What are your qualifications for making that stupid bloody assertion?
I'll pit Fleming's against yours any day, you cretin.
And for what it's worth, he is correct.
Closed what?
idiot
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "TimK" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
09 Nov 2007 10:18:04 PM |
|
|
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194274223.009326.11740@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
God bless you all.
heh - got me!
I shouldn't be so quick on the trigger and read;)
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
09 Nov 2007 11:39:52 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 23:18:04 -0500, "TimK" <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194274223.009326.11740@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
God bless you all.
heh - got me!
I shouldn't be so quick on the trigger and read;)
I imagine that by now Chris has enough Loki points to buy us all a
round at the Panda's Thumb. <G>
.
|
|
|
| User: "TimK" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
10 Nov 2007 05:38:02 PM |
|
|
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:jvgaj3duo49m2rce3blhigjdtpb26u09p0@4ax.com...
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 23:18:04 -0500, "TimK" <timkozz@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
"Chris H. Fleming" <chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194274223.009326.11740@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
God bless you all.
heh - got me!
I shouldn't be so quick on the trigger and read;)
I imagine that by now Chris has enough Loki points to buy us all a
round at the Panda's Thumb. <G>
You know it!
<still trying to get the hook out of my lip>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "TheLetterK" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific TreeTheory |
05 Nov 2007 09:39:06 PM |
|
|
Chris H. Fleming wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
God bless you all.
This argument seems to come up fairly regularly, and is equally invalid
with each attempt. Do theists simply refuse to learn?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian E. Clark" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 04:12:44 PM |
|
|
In article <1194274223.009326.11740@
19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>, Chris H. Fleming said...
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight.
And air. And of course, leprechaun pee. If it weren't
for this last ingredient, trees would grow, but their
leaves would not be green.
Such a transition would be an increase in order and
is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
But it's expressly permitted by the laws of the Sidhe.
This is not science.
Of course not. Science is downright unamerican.
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 10:41:12 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:12:44 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <1194274223.009326.11740@
19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>, Chris H. Fleming said...
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight.
And air. And of course, leprechaun pee. If it weren't
for this last ingredient, trees would grow, but their
leaves would not be green.
Such a transition would be an increase in order and
is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
But it's expressly permitted by the laws of the Sidhe.
This is not science.
Of course not. Science is downright unamerican.
Not to mention anti-Christian.
--
Al at Webdingers dot com
"I would use twisted logic and poorly masked bigotry ... eleven years is a long time to be living
a fake life ... I don't care what people believe ... My career as a media figurehead is over."
- Ann Coulter, "An Open Letter to Readers", October 5, 2007
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DuhIdiot" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 04:35:04 PM |
|
|
On Nov 5, 5:12 pm, Brian E. Clark <re...@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <1194274223.009326.11740@
19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>, Chris H. Fleming said...
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight.
And air. And of course, leprechaun pee. If it weren't
for this last ingredient, trees would grow, but their
leaves would not be green.
Faith and begorrah!
Evaporates slowly, does the urine of the little people. When it's all
gone, you get autumn.
Such a transition would be an increase in order and
is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
But it's expressly permitted by the laws of the Sidhe.
This is not science.
Of course not. Science is downright unamerican.
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 11:20:01 AM |
|
|
Morontheist Chris H. Fleming:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time
Attend school.
Moron.
*PLONK*
--
"To his friend a man a friend shall prove, and gifts with gifts requite;
But men shall mocking with mockery answer, and fraud with falsehood meet."
(The Poetic Edda)
Must have been written with fundies in mind...
My personal judgment of monotheism:
http://www.carcosa.de/nojebus
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chris H. Fleming" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 01:03:21 PM |
|
|
On Nov 5, 12:20 pm, "Thurisaz, Germanic barbarian"
<MAILTOsecret...@carcosa.de> wrote:
Morontheist Chris H. Fleming:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time
Attend school.
Moron.
*PLONK*
May God smite you with one of his tornadoes created through the
process of Intelligent Meteorology, as even tornado formation violates
the second law of thermodynamics and must therefore be a divine
creation of an all loving God so that he could smite people like you
that he hates so much.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
18 Nov 2007 01:29:53 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
God bless you all.
***** off, nitwit.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
18 Nov 2007 01:59:57 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 23:29:53 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
God bless you all.
***** off, nitwit.
I think it was a parody, by a really bored but real Quantum Physicist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
23 Nov 2007 10:23:33 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:29:57 +1030, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 23:29:53 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
God bless you all.
***** off, nitwit.
I think it was a parody, by a really bored but real Quantum Physicist.
Just after hitting 'send' I realized the error.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 11:33:24 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
God bless you all.
Sorry, that law said in a closed system. Localized decrease in entropy promotes
growth.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 09:08:57 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
Of course, it's your stupid lie.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
Don't be such in-everybody's-face, stupid liar.
God bless you all.
Who farted, moron?
.
|
|
|
| User: "GoDrex" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 02:50:37 PM |
|
|
"Christopher A.Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:tdcui3pcej5jgbeujb5uepp1pp5nhebd2t@4ax.com...
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
Of course, it's your stupid lie.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
Don't be such in-everybody's-face, stupid liar.
God bless you all.
Who farted, moron?
hehehe you need to relax - you're stuck in attack mode. I'm surprised you
didn't notice who wrote this and the style in which it was written.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 09:43:02 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:08:57 -0500, Christopher A.Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
Of course, it's your stupid lie.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
Don't be such in-everybody's-face, stupid liar.
God bless you all.
Who farted, moron?
If I remember rightly, the real Mr. Fleming is an atheist quantum
physicist.
I suspect that the above is a poor impersontaion, with evil intent.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific TreeTheory |
05 Nov 2007 02:06:57 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:08:57 -0500, Christopher A.Lee wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories about
the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow from
seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase in
order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics. This is
not science.
Of course, it's your stupid lie.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be presented
with equal time.
Don't be such in-everybody's-face, stupid liar.
God bless you all.
Who farted, moron?
I suspect you been punked...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“Every normal man must be tempted at times
to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and
begin to slit throats.”
- H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Silberstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 12:08:24 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:08:57 -0500, in alt.atheism , Christopher A.Lee
<calee@optonline.net> in <tdcui3pcej5jgbeujb5uepp1pp5nhebd2t@4ax.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
Of course, it's your stupid lie.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
Don't be such in-everybody's-face, stupid liar.
God bless you all.
Who farted, moron?
That whooshing sound was the point going over your head.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 01:49:55 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 13:08:24 -0500, Matt Silberstein
<RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:08:57 -0500, in alt.atheism , Christopher A.Lee
<calee@optonline.net> in <tdcui3pcej5jgbeujb5uepp1pp5nhebd2t@4ax.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_fleming@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
Of course, it's your stupid lie.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
Don't be such in-everybody's-face, stupid liar.
God bless you all.
Who farted, moron?
That whooshing sound was the point going over your head.
That seems to happen to Chris an awful lot these days...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 10:11:19 AM |
|
|
On Nov 5, 10:08 am, Christopher A.Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_flem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
Quite. They also never notice that even without life a planet is a
localized low entropy phenomenon.
Of course, it's your stupid lie.
No lie. Did you read carefully what he wrote? The theory that trees
grow from seeds through the incorporation of raw materials in the soil
and the absorption of UV radiation from sunlight is clearly an
unscientific violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The theory
is promulgated by atheist libural pinko-commie Hillary-loving secular
humanist fags who brainwash our school children so as to turn them
away from God. Next thing you know those Goddamned atheists will be
trying to present gravity as a purely impersonal phenomenon! This
country needs to return to its Christian roots.
The principle explained above applies not only to trees, but to all
living organisms. A naturalistic explanation of the phenomenon of
metabolism is clearly unscientific since it is incompatible with 2nd
law of thermo. The theory of Intelligent Metabolism needs to be
taught as an alternative to the leftist scientistic orthodoxy. Check
out the Answers in Genesis website for more details on this.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
Here! Here! All those who believe in materialistic theories of the
growth of trees are possessed by Satan and will surely be cast into
the lake of fire.
Don't be such in-everybody's-face, stupid liar.
God bless you all.
And to you also Chris H. Fleming, my dear brother-in-Christ, may God
shine his divine countenance upon you and bless you and all your kith
and kin.
Who farted, moron?
It can also be proved that the phenomenon of a fart cannot be
explained scientifically without invoking the phenomenon of Divine
Agency. You see, Christopher A. Lee, farts are the gas emitted by
intestinal bacteria whose metabolism contradicts the 2nd law of
thermo. Hence the need for the Intelligent Metabolism theory in order
to account for the phenomenon of Intelligent Farting.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 11:34:51 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:11:19 -0800, Mike <matmzc@hofstra.edu> wrote:
Here! Here! All those who believe in materialistic theories of the
growth of trees are possessed by Satan and will surely be cast into
the lake of fire.
Haahaahaahaa. The wacko atheists going crazy.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
05 Nov 2007 11:11:57 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:11:19 -0800, Mike <matmzc@hofstra.edu> wrote:
On Nov 5, 10:08 am, Christopher A.Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_flem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
Quite. They also never notice that even without life a planet is a
localized low entropy phenomenon.
Of course, it's your stupid lie.
No lie. Did you read carefully what he wrote? The theory that trees
grow from seeds through the incorporation of raw materials in the soil
and the absorption of UV radiation from sunlight is clearly an
unscientific violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The theory
is promulgated by atheist libural pinko-commie Hillary-loving secular
humanist fags who brainwash our school children so as to turn them
away from God. Next thing you know those Goddamned atheists will be
trying to present gravity as a purely impersonal phenomenon! This
country needs to return to its Christian roots.
The principle explained above applies not only to trees, but to all
living organisms. A naturalistic explanation of the phenomenon of
metabolism is clearly unscientific since it is incompatible with 2nd
law of thermo. The theory of Intelligent Metabolism needs to be
taught as an alternative to the leftist scientistic orthodoxy. Check
out the Answers in Genesis website for more details on this.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
Here! Here! All those who believe in materialistic theories of the
growth of trees are possessed by Satan and will surely be cast into
the lake of fire.
Don't be such in-everybody's-face, stupid liar.
God bless you all.
And to you also Chris H. Fleming, my dear brother-in-Christ, may God
shine his divine countenance upon you and bless you and all your kith
and kin.
Who farted, moron?
It can also be proved that the phenomenon of a fart cannot be
explained scientifically without invoking the phenomenon of Divine
Agency. You see, Christopher A. Lee, farts are the gas emitted by
intestinal bacteria whose metabolism contradicts the 2nd law of
thermo. Hence the need for the Intelligent Metabolism theory in order
to account for the phenomenon of Intelligent Farting.
Need a crowbar to remove that tongue from that cheek? Or is it so
firmly entrenched that you need dynamite? :)
--
Al at Webdingers dot com
"I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is
a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the
crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due
to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious
indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility
corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of
nature and of our own being."
- Albert Einstein to Guy H. Raner Jr., Sept. 28, 1949, from article by
Michael R. Gilmore in Skeptic magazine, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1997
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
18 Nov 2007 01:30:55 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:11:57 -0500, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:11:19 -0800, Mike <matmzc@hofstra.edu> wrote:
On Nov 5, 10:08 am, Christopher A.Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_flem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
Quite. They also never notice that even without life a planet is a
localized low entropy phenomenon.
Of course, it's your stupid lie.
No lie. Did you read carefully what he wrote? The theory that trees
grow from seeds through the incorporation of raw materials in the soil
and the absorption of UV radiation from sunlight is clearly an
unscientific violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The theory
is promulgated by atheist libural pinko-commie Hillary-loving secular
humanist fags who brainwash our school children so as to turn them
away from God. Next thing you know those Goddamned atheists will be
trying to present gravity as a purely impersonal phenomenon! This
country needs to return to its Christian roots.
The principle explained above applies not only to trees, but to all
living organisms. A naturalistic explanation of the phenomenon of
metabolism is clearly unscientific since it is incompatible with 2nd
law of thermo. The theory of Intelligent Metabolism needs to be
taught as an alternative to the leftist scientistic orthodoxy. Check
out the Answers in Genesis website for more details on this.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
Here! Here! All those who believe in materialistic theories of the
growth of trees are possessed by Satan and will surely be cast into
the lake of fire.
Don't be such in-everybody's-face, stupid liar.
God bless you all.
And to you also Chris H. Fleming, my dear brother-in-Christ, may God
shine his divine countenance upon you and bless you and all your kith
and kin.
Who farted, moron?
It can also be proved that the phenomenon of a fart cannot be
explained scientifically without invoking the phenomenon of Divine
Agency. You see, Christopher A. Lee, farts are the gas emitted by
intestinal bacteria whose metabolism contradicts the 2nd law of
thermo. Hence the need for the Intelligent Metabolism theory in order
to account for the phenomenon of Intelligent Farting.
Need a crowbar to remove that tongue from that cheek? Or is it so
firmly entrenched that you need dynamite? :)
Not strong enough.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific TreeTheory |
18 Nov 2007 02:25:29 AM |
|
|
On Nov 18, 1:30 am, stoney <sto...@the.net> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:11:57 -0500, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:11:19 -0800, Mike <mat...@hofstra.edu> wrote:
On Nov 5, 10:08 am, Christopher A.Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_flem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
Quite. They also never notice that even without life a planet is a
localized low entropy phenomenon.
Of course, it's your stupid lie.
No lie. Did you read carefully what he wrote? The theory that trees
grow from seeds through the incorporation of raw materials in the soil
and the absorption of UV radiation from sunlight is clearly an
unscientific violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The theory
is promulgated by atheist libural pinko-commie Hillary-loving secular
humanist fags who brainwash our school children so as to turn them
away from God. Next thing you know those Goddamned atheists will be
trying to present gravity as a purely impersonal phenomenon! This
country needs to return to its Christian roots.
The principle explained above applies not only to trees, but to all
living organisms. A naturalistic explanation of the phenomenon of
metabolism is clearly unscientific since it is incompatible with 2nd
law of thermo. The theory of Intelligent Metabolism needs to be
taught as an alternative to the leftist scientistic orthodoxy. Check
out the Answers in Genesis website for more details on this.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
Here! Here! All those who believe in materialistic theories of the
growth of trees are possessed by Satan and will surely be cast into
the lake of fire.
Don't be such in-everybody's-face, stupid liar.
God bless you all.
And to you also Chris H. Fleming, my dear brother-in-Christ, may God
shine his divine countenance upon you and bless you and all your kith
and kin.
Who farted, moron?
It can also be proved that the phenomenon of a fart cannot be
explained scientifically without invoking the phenomenon of Divine
Agency. You see, Christopher A. Lee, farts are the gas emitted by
intestinal bacteria whose metabolism contradicts the 2nd law of
thermo. Hence the need for the Intelligent Metabolism theory in order
to account for the phenomenon of Intelligent Farting.
Need a crowbar to remove that tongue from that cheek? Or is it so
firmly entrenched that you need dynamite? :)
Not strong enough.
You talking about the farts or the dynamite?!
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
23 Nov 2007 10:22:06 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 00:25:29 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
<budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
On Nov 18, 1:30 am, stoney <sto...@the.net> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:11:57 -0500, Al Klein <ruk...@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:11:19 -0800, Mike <mat...@hofstra.edu> wrote:
On Nov 5, 10:08 am, Christopher A.Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_flem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that all systems grow
more disorganized with time, disproves modern scientific theories
about the origins of trees. So-called botanists claim that trees grow
from seeds, dirt, and sunlight. Such a transition would be an increase
in order and is expressly forbidden by the laws of thermodynamics.
This is not science.
Quite. They also never notice that even without life a planet is a
localized low entropy phenomenon.
Of course, it's your stupid lie.
No lie. Did you read carefully what he wrote? The theory that trees
grow from seeds through the incorporation of raw materials in the soil
and the absorption of UV radiation from sunlight is clearly an
unscientific violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The theory
is promulgated by atheist libural pinko-commie Hillary-loving secular
humanist fags who brainwash our school children so as to turn them
away from God. Next thing you know those Goddamned atheists will be
trying to present gravity as a purely impersonal phenomenon! This
country needs to return to its Christian roots.
The principle explained above applies not only to trees, but to all
living organisms. A naturalistic explanation of the phenomenon of
metabolism is clearly unscientific since it is incompatible with 2nd
law of thermo. The theory of Intelligent Metabolism needs to be
taught as an alternative to the leftist scientistic orthodoxy. Check
out the Answers in Genesis website for more details on this.
This controversy must be brought forward and taught in the class room.
Alternative theories, such as Intelligent Gardening, should be
presented with equal time.
Here! Here! All those who believe in materialistic theories of the
growth of trees are possessed by Satan and will surely be cast into
the lake of fire.
Don't be such in-everybody's-face, stupid liar.
God bless you all.
And to you also Chris H. Fleming, my dear brother-in-Christ, may God
shine his divine countenance upon you and bless you and all your kith
and kin.
Who farted, moron?
It can also be proved that the phenomenon of a fart cannot be
explained scientifically without invoking the phenomenon of Divine
Agency. You see, Christopher A. Lee, farts are the gas emitted by
intestinal bacteria whose metabolism contradicts the 2nd law of
thermo. Hence the need for the Intelligent Metabolism theory in order
to account for the phenomenon of Intelligent Farting.
Need a crowbar to remove that tongue from that cheek? Or is it so
firmly entrenched that you need dynamite? :)
Not strong enough.
You talking about the farts or the dynamite?!
Intelligent Grappling, of course......
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lorentz" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific TreeTheory |
21 Nov 2007 06:10:59 PM |
|
|
On Nov 5, 11:11 am, Mike <mat...@hofstra.edu> wrote:
On Nov 5, 10:08 am, Christopher A.Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_flem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You see, Christopher A. Lee, farts are the gas emitted by
intestinal bacteria whose metabolism contradicts the 2nd law of
thermo. Hence the need for the Intelligent Metabolism theory in order
to account for the phenomenon of Intelligent Farting.
Hmmm, the planet Jupiter is composed almost entirely of methane
gas and water. Just like flatulence. This can't be an accident. You
don't suppose -- NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Second Law of Thermodynamics Disproves Modern Scientific Tree Theory |
24 Nov 2007 06:36:16 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:10:59 -0800 (PST), Lorentz
<drosen0000@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 11:11 am, Mike <mat...@hofstra.edu> wrote:
On Nov 5, 10:08 am, Christopher A.Lee <ca...@optonline.net> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 06:50:23 -0800, "Chris H. Fleming"
<chris_h_flem...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You see, Christopher A. Lee, farts are the gas emitted by
intestinal bacteria whose metabolism contradicts the 2nd law of
thermo. Hence the need for the Intelligent Metabolism theory in order
to account for the phenomenon of Intelligent Farting.
Hmmm, the planet Jupiter is composed almost entirely of methane
gas and water. Just like flatulence. This can't be an accident. You
don't suppose -- NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yep. Yessiree. That's what happens when you've got too many sheep,
cows, and theists.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
