| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"|-|erc" |
| Date: |
14 Jul 2004 11:35:54 PM |
| Object: |
Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
Who can travel to Australia and see the evidence and 10,000 witnesses so far.
Paranormal has been public knowledge for 3 years. The attitudes of regulars
on these newsgroups and the superiority complex condescending skeptic
organisations making money and not delivering has made a mockery of
paranormal investigation.
10,000 witnesses in public, dozens of usenet testimonies, is anyone seriously interested?
Herc
--
If you bury your head in the sand then don't open your mouth.
www.TopCounters.com
.
|
|
| User: "Brian OBlivion" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
17 Jul 2004 10:10:55 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote in
news:KQnJc.1741$K53.1694@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
Who can travel to Australia and see the evidence and 10,000
witnesses so far.
Paranormal has been public knowledge for 3 years. The
attitudes of regulars on these newsgroups and the
superiority complex condescending skeptic organisations
making money and not delivering has made a mockery of
paranormal investigation.
10,000 witnesses in public, dozens of usenet testimonies,
is anyone seriously interested?
Herc
--
If you bury your head in the sand then don't open your
mouth. www.TopCounters.com
What is it about skeptics/atheists that attracts all the
fruitcakes? What are we? Flypaper for freaks?
Paranormal investigation was "made a mockery of" by paranormal
investigators long before skeptics took any interest in it.
The skeptics won't let the credulous forget it is all. Now
all that skeptics ask is that extraordinary "powers" be proven
under STRICT scientific conditions. And when fruitcakes like
you fail yet again, you whine and snivel about how unfair the
test was. Grow up! or better yet, up your meds!
--
=====================================
"The television screen is the retina of the mind's eye.
Therefore, the television screen is part of the physical
structure of the brain. Therefore, whatever appears in the
television screen emerges as raw experience for those who
watch it. Therefore, television is reality, and reality is
less than television."
- Professor Brian O'Blivion
=====================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
17 Jul 2004 11:25:54 PM |
|
|
"Brian O'Blivion" <NOSPAM@NOSPAM.net> wrote >
Who can travel to Australia and see the evidence and 10,000
witnesses so far.
Paranormal has been public knowledge for 3 years. The
attitudes of regulars on these newsgroups and the
superiority complex condescending skeptic organisations
making money and not delivering has made a mockery of
paranormal investigation.
10,000 witnesses in public, dozens of usenet testimonies,
is anyone seriously interested?
Herc
--
If you bury your head in the sand then don't open your
mouth. www.TopCounters.com
What is it about skeptics/atheists that attracts all the
fruitcakes? What are we? Flypaper for freaks?
Paranormal investigation was "made a mockery of" by paranormal
investigators long before skeptics took any interest in it.
The skeptics won't let the credulous forget it is all. Now
all that skeptics ask is that extraordinary "powers" be proven
under STRICT scientific conditions. And when fruitcakes like
you fail yet again, you whine and snivel about how unfair the
test was. Grow up! or better yet, up your meds!
no, you offer prizemoney, complain when people apply and call that proof.
I can repeatedly demonstrate paranormal, makes no difference if you're
all talk no test.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian OBlivion" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
18 Jul 2004 11:39:25 AM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote in
news:mZmKc.5428$K53.4845@news-server.bigpond.net.au:
no, you offer prizemoney, complain when people apply and
call that proof. I can repeatedly demonstrate paranormal,
makes no difference if you're all talk no test.
Herc
Prizemoney is offered for one thing only... proof. Verifiable
proof. If your "powers" don't lend themselves to producing
verifiable proof even on a statistical level, then you
obviously can't provide proof.
BTW, I have amazing powers as well. I call it tactile
telekinesis. I can move objects with my mind, but I must be
touching them when I do it.
--
=====================================
"The television screen is the retina of the mind's eye.
Therefore, the television screen is part of the physical
structure of the brain. Therefore, whatever appears in the
television screen emerges as raw experience for those who
watch it. Therefore, television is reality, and reality is
less than television."
- Professor Brian O'Blivion
=====================================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
18 Jul 2004 03:39:28 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 04:25:54 GMT, "|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote:
"Brian O'Blivion" <NOSPAM@NOSPAM.net> wrote >
Who can travel to Australia and see the evidence and 10,000
witnesses so far.
Paranormal has been public knowledge for 3 years. The
attitudes of regulars on these newsgroups and the
superiority complex condescending skeptic organisations
making money and not delivering has made a mockery of
paranormal investigation.
10,000 witnesses in public, dozens of usenet testimonies,
is anyone seriously interested?
Herc
--
If you bury your head in the sand then don't open your
mouth. www.TopCounters.com
What is it about skeptics/atheists that attracts all the
fruitcakes? What are we? Flypaper for freaks?
Paranormal investigation was "made a mockery of" by paranormal
investigators long before skeptics took any interest in it.
The skeptics won't let the credulous forget it is all. Now
all that skeptics ask is that extraordinary "powers" be proven
under STRICT scientific conditions. And when fruitcakes like
you fail yet again, you whine and snivel about how unfair the
test was. Grow up! or better yet, up your meds!
no, you offer prizemoney, complain when people apply and call that proof.
I can repeatedly demonstrate paranormal, makes no difference if you're
all talk no test.
You failed my test miserably. Take your meds.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
18 Jul 2004 03:47:12 AM |
|
|
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in >
"Brian O'Blivion" <NOSPAM@NOSPAM.net> wrote >
Who can travel to Australia and see the evidence and 10,000
witnesses so far.
Paranormal has been public knowledge for 3 years. The
attitudes of regulars on these newsgroups and the
superiority complex condescending skeptic organisations
making money and not delivering has made a mockery of
paranormal investigation.
10,000 witnesses in public, dozens of usenet testimonies,
is anyone seriously interested?
Herc
--
If you bury your head in the sand then don't open your
mouth. www.TopCounters.com
What is it about skeptics/atheists that attracts all the
fruitcakes? What are we? Flypaper for freaks?
Paranormal investigation was "made a mockery of" by paranormal
investigators long before skeptics took any interest in it.
The skeptics won't let the credulous forget it is all. Now
all that skeptics ask is that extraordinary "powers" be proven
under STRICT scientific conditions. And when fruitcakes like
you fail yet again, you whine and snivel about how unfair the
test was. Grow up! or better yet, up your meds!
no, you offer prizemoney, complain when people apply and call that proof.
I can repeatedly demonstrate paranormal, makes no difference if you're
all talk no test.
You failed my test miserably. Take your meds.
non sequitur
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
18 Jul 2004 07:41:24 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote in message
news:kOqKc.5745$K53.5007@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in >
"Brian O'Blivion" <NOSPAM@NOSPAM.net> wrote >
Who can travel to Australia and see the evidence and 10,000
witnesses so far.
Paranormal has been public knowledge for 3 years. The
attitudes of regulars on these newsgroups and the
superiority complex condescending skeptic organisations
making money and not delivering has made a mockery of
paranormal investigation.
10,000 witnesses in public, dozens of usenet testimonies,
is anyone seriously interested?
Herc
--
If you bury your head in the sand then don't open your
mouth. www.TopCounters.com
What is it about skeptics/atheists that attracts all the
fruitcakes? What are we? Flypaper for freaks?
Paranormal investigation was "made a mockery of" by paranormal
investigators long before skeptics took any interest in it.
The skeptics won't let the credulous forget it is all. Now
all that skeptics ask is that extraordinary "powers" be proven
under STRICT scientific conditions. And when fruitcakes like
you fail yet again, you whine and snivel about how unfair the
test was. Grow up! or better yet, up your meds!
no, you offer prizemoney, complain when people apply and call that
proof.
I can repeatedly demonstrate paranormal, makes no difference if you're
all talk no test.
You failed my test miserably. Take your meds.
non sequitur
Not so. An accurate summation. Herc, please, for yourself if not for anyone
else, take your meds, and go see your psychiatrist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
18 Jul 2004 08:21:36 PM |
|
|
"Wally Anglesea" <wanglese@spbigpondammersarevermin.net.au> wrote
You failed my test miserably. Take your meds.
non sequitur
Not so. An accurate summation. Herc, please, for yourself if not for anyone
else, take your meds, and go see your psychiatrist.
and you wrote this?
Besides, you claim paranormal powers, and you couldn't sense my presence,
nor predict I was there???
Basically, you put up a $1,000,000 prize and a $100,000 prize.
You get applications and respond "TELL US MORE"
Then you use your pychological investigator skills to diagnose the claimants,
you don't need to do any tests at all, just ask the law, the library, the
local university, the newspaper PARANORMAL IS IMPOSSIBLE RIGHT?
Then you use the the details from the formal applications (so professional)
to make public ridicule sites, please the masses and get more subscriptions.
If they complain, then quote the claim to the police and get an announcement
made they are mentally defective to believe such things.
you are the real suckers, because 10,000 poeple in public already know Adam is real,
and 10,000 more in government and media watching you right now.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
18 Jul 2004 09:37:37 PM |
|
|
In article <AmFKc.7033$K53.3191@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
gotch@beauty.com says...
"Wally Anglesea" <wanglese@spbigpondammersarevermin.net.au> wrote
You failed my test miserably. Take your meds.
non sequitur
Not so. An accurate summation. Herc, please, for yourself if not for anyone
else, take your meds, and go see your psychiatrist.
and you wrote this?
Besides, you claim paranormal powers, and you couldn't sense my presence,
nor predict I was there???
Basically, you put up a $1,000,000 prize and a $100,000 prize.
You get applications and respond "TELL US MORE"
Then you use your pychological investigator skills to diagnose the claimants,
you don't need to do any tests at all, just ask the law, the library, the
local university, the newspaper PARANORMAL IS IMPOSSIBLE RIGHT?
Then you use the the details from the formal applications (so professional)
to make public ridicule sites, please the masses and get more subscriptions.
If they complain, then quote the claim to the police and get an announcement
made they are mentally defective to believe such things.
you are the real suckers, because 10,000 poeple in public already know Adam is real,
and 10,000 more in government and media watching you right now.
Yet you can't find ONE who will corroborate your claim that you're
famous.
--
"Go forth, and be excellent to each other"
- Bill & Ted
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
18 Jul 2004 09:54:49 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:37:37 -0700 in episode
<MPG.1b64d3c9b2a1fbd6989955@news.west.cox.net> we saw our hero Enkidu
<enkidu@leaddogs.org>:
In article <AmFKc.7033$K53.3191@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
gotch@beauty.com says...
"Wally Anglesea" <wanglese@spbigpondammersarevermin.net.au> wrote
You failed my test miserably. Take your meds.
non sequitur
Not so. An accurate summation. Herc, please, for yourself if not for
anyone else, take your meds, and go see your psychiatrist.
and you wrote this?
Besides, you claim paranormal powers, and you couldn't sense my
presence, nor predict I was there???
Basically, you put up a $1,000,000 prize and a $100,000 prize. You get
applications and respond "TELL US MORE" Then you use your pychological
investigator skills to diagnose the claimants, you don't need to do any
tests at all, just ask the law, the library, the local university, the
newspaper PARANORMAL IS IMPOSSIBLE RIGHT? Then you use the the details
from the formal applications (so professional) to make public ridicule
sites, please the masses and get more subscriptions. If they complain,
then quote the claim to the police and get an announcement made they are
mentally defective to believe such things.
you are the real suckers, because 10,000 poeple in public already know
Adam is real, and 10,000 more in government and media watching you right
now.
Yet you can't find ONE who will corroborate your claim that you're famous.
Or at least not one anybody but he can see...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
--------------------------------------------------
There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
18 Jul 2004 10:20:00 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in
Yet you can't find ONE who will corroborate your claim that you're famous.
Or at least not one anybody but he can see...
you degraded me severely in front of Les Norton, he admitted it
several times before and called me Adam, and said he thinks I'm the Truman
and said all of Townsville (where he went) thinks I'm the truman.
I am Adam, I put up with 1000s of people like you abusing me, that
doesn't mean common people will.
Now is it possible you can do a call out for people in my vicinity to check the
claim or will you just assume Adam is the tooth fairy as you all put it.
Herc
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Chipeska" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 07:34:07 AM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote in message
news:KQnJc.1741$K53.1694@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Who can travel to Australia and see the evidence and 10,000 witnesses so
far.
Paranormal has been public knowledge for 3 years. The attitudes of
regulars
on these newsgroups and the superiority complex condescending skeptic
organisations making money and not delivering has made a mockery of
paranormal investigation.
10,000 witnesses in public, dozens of usenet testimonies, is anyone
seriously interested?
Contact Bruce Daniel Kettler. He lives in Firestone, Colorada, USA. He is a
very famous paranormal investigator and is greatly respected amongst his
peers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
16 Jul 2004 05:31:13 AM |
|
|
"Bob Chipeska" <bob_chipeska@spamsuckspissoff.com> wrote
Who can travel to Australia and see the evidence and 10,000 witnesses so
far.
Paranormal has been public knowledge for 3 years. The attitudes of
regulars
on these newsgroups and the superiority complex condescending skeptic
organisations making money and not delivering has made a mockery of
paranormal investigation.
10,000 witnesses in public, dozens of usenet testimonies, is anyone
seriously interested?
Contact Bruce Daniel Kettler. He lives in Firestone, Colorada, USA. He is a
very famous paranormal investigator and is greatly respected amongst his
peers.
does he have a home page, there's 3000 sites on him?
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Happy Dog" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
16 Jul 2004 07:07:51 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote in message
"Bob Chipeska" <bob_chipeska@spamsuckspissoff.com> wrote
Contact Bruce Daniel Kettler. He lives in Firestone, Colorada, USA. He
is a
very famous paranormal investigator and is greatly respected amongst his
peers.
does he have a home page, there's 3000 sites on him?
www.psicounsel.com
(Oh *please*, *please*...)
le moo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Chipeska" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
17 Jul 2004 10:33:14 PM |
|
|
"Happy Dog" <happydog@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:r5_Jc.45242$RD4.2129324@news20.bellglobal.com...
"|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote in message
"Bob Chipeska" <bob_chipeska@spamsuckspissoff.com> wrote
Contact Bruce Daniel Kettler. He lives in Firestone, Colorada, USA. He
is a
very famous paranormal investigator and is greatly respected amongst
his
peers.
does he have a home page, there's 3000 sites on him?
www.psicounsel.com
That's the one. Few paranormal psychics are as respected as Mr. Kettler.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Clayton Without A Cause" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 02:07:15 AM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote in message
news:KQnJc.1741$K53.1694@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Who can travel to Australia and see the evidence and 10,000 witnesses so
far.
I live in Australia and all I've seen is one fucking kook!!!
Makes me wish Ward 10b was still open to keep you from drooling on the
children!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "lanny budd" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 02:40:04 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote in message news:<KQnJc.1741$K53.1694@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
Who can travel to Australia and see the evidence and 10,000 witnesses so far.
Paranormal has been public knowledge for 3 years. The attitudes of regulars
on these newsgroups and the superiority complex condescending skeptic
organisations making money and not delivering has made a mockery of
paranormal investigation.
10,000 witnesses in public, dozens of usenet testimonies, is anyone seriously interested?
Herc
Barry also provides this news item about a correspondent who uses the
name "Herc Ules" (brilliant!) in his posts to me, which are virulent,
vague, and just plain weird. (So what else is new, Randi?) Judging
from this news, I may be spared some nasty stuff, at least for a
while. Says Barry:
I believe you also heard from this chap. He wouldn't be put off but
kept pestering us with incomprehensible claims. I tried to let him
down gently, but when he started making threats, I had to let the
police know and they took it very seriously and quickly tracked him
down. I doubt he would have carried out his threat, but you can't be
sure. How would I have felt if I had just shrugged him off and next
week heard of someone being poisoned after eating ***** Smith peanut
butter.
***** Smith, very well-known in Australia, is a leading supporter of
the skeptical (pardon me, sceptical!) movement there, and one of his
business interests is producing food products.
Australian Broadcasting News: A man charged with threatening to poison
food produced by ***** Smith has been refused bail in the Rockhampton
Magistrates Court in central Queensland. Graham Andrew Cooper, 30, is
charged with trying extort $100,000 from the Australian Sceptics
Association. Cooper appeared in court this morning charged with
stalking, extortion and sending threatening e-mails. The court was
told Cooper sent e-mails to Barry Williams from the Australian
Sceptics Association, which has offered $100,000 to anyone who can
prove psychic powers. The police prosecutor said Cooper claimed the
association refused to test him. It is alleged the e-mails said that
***** Smith owed him $100,000 and that he would put rat sack into as
much ***** Smith food as he could lay his hands on. The court was told
Cooper is a paranoid schizophrenic and police said the threats were
not carried out. Cooper will be held in custody until his next court
appearance in May.
The term "rat sack" refers to rat poison. These colorful Aussie
expressions....!
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 06:42:00 PM |
|
|
"lanny budd" <lannybudd@my-deja.com> wrote
police know and they took it very seriously and quickly tracked him
down. I doubt he would have carried out his threat, but you can't be
the police "tracked me down" from the name and address on the application.
Dear Sir,
this is a polite extortion threat, you HAVE to pass my claim to the commitee
because its part of your public contractual obligation.
xxx xxx
4 macintosh st
Milton
Qld 4008
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "jwk" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 08:35:52 AM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote in message news:<KQnJc.1741$K53.1694@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
Who can travel to Australia and see the evidence and 10,000 witnesses so far.
Paranormal has been public knowledge for 3 years. The attitudes of regulars
on these newsgroups and the superiority complex condescending skeptic
organisations making money and not delivering has made a mockery of
paranormal investigation.
10,000 witnesses in public, dozens of usenet testimonies, is anyone seriously interested?
Herc
To do what? You never said. Is that supposed to be the test? If the
guy for the job is really psychic (you never said, but I'm guessing
you want a psychic) then he should *know what you want him for. Is
that it? Clever.
jwk
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "nobody" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 05:38:11 AM |
|
|
I am seeking a wealthy fool too. Can you let me know when you find
yours? Thanks.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 07:24:59 AM |
|
|
"nobody" <nobody@here.com> wrote in
I am seeking a wealthy fool too. Can you let me know when you find
yours? Thanks.
Paranormal is the tip of the iceberg that you will find if you travel to Townsville Australia,
The Strand.
When tourists see me in shops they say "You're not big overseas yet".
The last visitor to The Strand who's on usenet posted this:
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
Mathematically, and conservatively, I'd say the odds of you fluking those
answers would be, say, 1/100 * 1/3 * 1/1 * 1/100 which is a 1 in 30,000
Anyhow, not scientific proof, but a bloody good effort anyway.
BTW, when I was in The Strand last weekend, I didn't hear your broadcast per
se. Well, at least I thought I didn't. Again, who knows? LOL.
Anyhow, you think your the Truman. So WTF, I think you're the Truman too.
"Therefore 100,000 Townsville residents and 1 Melbourne tourist can't be
wrong".
This is the type of post people from Townsville all post. They torture me on the Truman
Show, they mock me for an hour at job interviews. I haven't bought underwear in
4 years, I use a phone book for toilet paper, I eat chinese once a month because
I can't cook vegetables. I'm God and US military fucking hates me.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 08:16:43 AM |
|
|
In article <vIuJc.2281$K53.729@news-server.bigpond.net.au>, |-|erc says...
snip
This is the type of post people from Townsville all post. They torture me on the Truman
Show, they mock me for an hour at job interviews. I haven't bought underwear in
4 years, I use a phone book for toilet paper, I eat chinese once a month because
I can't cook vegetables. I'm God and US military fucking hates me.
Say WHAT? It looks like the king of kookdom has arrived ;)
--------------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 09:00:46 AM |
|
|
In article <%svJc.54$L4.301@www.newsranger.com>,
says...
In article <vIuJc.2281$K53.729@news-server.bigpond.net.au>, |-|erc says...
snip
This is the type of post people from Townsville all post. They torture me on the Truman
Show, they mock me for an hour at job interviews. I haven't bought underwear in
4 years, I use a phone book for toilet paper, I eat chinese once a month because
I can't cook vegetables. I'm God and US military fucking hates me.
Say WHAT? It looks like the king of kookdom has arrived ;)
Indeed. Search Google for his past posts. He has some "paranormal"
ability to do something about identifying the author's nyn of a usenet
post. I just look at the header, myself.
--
Enkidu - AA# 2165
EAC Plant Psychologist
http://www.livejournal.com/users/atheist_enkidu/
"We must question the story logic of having an all-knowing
all-powerful God, who creates faulty Humans, and then blames
them for his own mistakes."
Gene Roddenberry
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 01:39:31 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:24:59 GMT, "|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@here.com> wrote in
I am seeking a wealthy fool too. Can you let me know when you find
yours? Thanks.
Paranormal is the tip of the iceberg that you will find if you travel to Townsville Australia,
The Strand.
When tourists see me in shops they say "You're not big overseas yet".
The last visitor to The Strand who's on usenet posted this:
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
Mathematically, and conservatively, I'd say the odds of you fluking those
answers would be, say, 1/100 * 1/3 * 1/1 * 1/100 which is a 1 in 30,000
That's funny. When you responded to my test a few months ago, you got
one answer partially right, and the other nine were completely wrong.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sara Brum" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 02:17:17 PM |
|
|
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:27kdf01mdcib4la58gh5i44qfnrrs5tt87@4ax.com...
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:24:59 GMT, "|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@here.com> wrote in
I am seeking a wealthy fool too. Can you let me know when you find
yours? Thanks.
Paranormal is the tip of the iceberg that you will find if you travel to
Townsville Australia,
The Strand.
When tourists see me in shops they say "You're not big overseas yet".
The last visitor to The Strand who's on usenet posted this:
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
Mathematically, and conservatively, I'd say the odds of you fluking those
answers would be, say, 1/100 * 1/3 * 1/1 * 1/100 which is a 1 in 30,000
That's funny. When you responded to my test a few months ago, you got
one answer partially right, and the other nine were completely wrong.
Silly... how is he supposed to support his delusion if you insist that he
accept *all* the results, instead of discarding the inconvenient ones?
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 06:39:04 PM |
|
|
"Sara Brum" <sarabrum@medulla.com> wrote in
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:24:59 GMT, "|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@here.com> wrote in
I am seeking a wealthy fool too. Can you let me know when you find
yours? Thanks.
Paranormal is the tip of the iceberg that you will find if you travel to
Townsville Australia,
The Strand.
When tourists see me in shops they say "You're not big overseas yet".
The last visitor to The Strand who's on usenet posted this:
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
Mathematically, and conservatively, I'd say the odds of you fluking those
answers would be, say, 1/100 * 1/3 * 1/1 * 1/100 which is a 1 in 30,000
That's funny. When you responded to my test a few months ago, you got
one answer partially right, and the other nine were completely wrong.
Silly... how is he supposed to support his delusion if you insist that he
accept *all* the results, instead of discarding the inconvenient ones?
You were on a teacher training course, I channeled "teaching" and got 0 for that.
Who was marking again?
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 07:25:56 PM |
|
|
In article <sAEJc.2908$K53.2101@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
gotch@beauty.com says...
"Sara Brum" <sarabrum@medulla.com> wrote in
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:24:59 GMT, "|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@here.com> wrote in
I am seeking a wealthy fool too. Can you let me know when you find
yours? Thanks.
Paranormal is the tip of the iceberg that you will find if you travel to
Townsville Australia,
The Strand.
When tourists see me in shops they say "You're not big overseas yet".
The last visitor to The Strand who's on usenet posted this:
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
Mathematically, and conservatively, I'd say the odds of you fluking those
answers would be, say, 1/100 * 1/3 * 1/1 * 1/100 which is a 1 in 30,000
That's funny. When you responded to my test a few months ago, you got
one answer partially right, and the other nine were completely wrong.
Silly... how is he supposed to support his delusion if you insist that he
accept *all* the results, instead of discarding the inconvenient ones?
You were on a teacher training course, I channeled "teaching" and got 0 for that.
Who was marking again?
Herc
No, Herc. That was me.
--
"Go forth, and be excellent to each other"
- Bill & Ted
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 07:53:02 PM |
|
|
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in
"Sara Brum" <sarabrum@medulla.com> wrote in
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:24:59 GMT, "|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@here.com> wrote in
I am seeking a wealthy fool too. Can you let me know when you find
yours? Thanks.
Paranormal is the tip of the iceberg that you will find if you travel to
Townsville Australia,
The Strand.
When tourists see me in shops they say "You're not big overseas yet".
The last visitor to The Strand who's on usenet posted this:
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
Mathematically, and conservatively, I'd say the odds of you fluking those
answers would be, say, 1/100 * 1/3 * 1/1 * 1/100 which is a 1 in 30,000
That's funny. When you responded to my test a few months ago, you got
one answer partially right, and the other nine were completely wrong.
Silly... how is he supposed to support his delusion if you insist that he
accept *all* the results, instead of discarding the inconvenient ones?
You were on a teacher training course, I channeled "teaching" and got 0 for that.
Who was marking again?
Herc
No, Herc. That was me.
no, this is another demo what an idiot you are. why don't you quote the WHOLE
AGREEMENT to the test before you all come up with these false negatives.
I demo different tests, no one will do any of the tests I designed, I do good to ok
on other tests. Anyone could abuse that sceneraio.
None of you have proven a single thing.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 08:30:03 PM |
|
|
In article <OFFJc.2965$K53.63@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
gotch@beauty.com says...
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in
"Sara Brum" <sarabrum@medulla.com> wrote in
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:24:59 GMT, "|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@here.com> wrote in
I am seeking a wealthy fool too. Can you let me know when you find
yours? Thanks.
Paranormal is the tip of the iceberg that you will find if you travel to
Townsville Australia,
The Strand.
When tourists see me in shops they say "You're not big overseas yet".
The last visitor to The Strand who's on usenet posted this:
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
Mathematically, and conservatively, I'd say the odds of you fluking those
answers would be, say, 1/100 * 1/3 * 1/1 * 1/100 which is a 1 in 30,000
That's funny. When you responded to my test a few months ago, you got
one answer partially right, and the other nine were completely wrong.
Silly... how is he supposed to support his delusion if you insist that he
accept *all* the results, instead of discarding the inconvenient ones?
You were on a teacher training course, I channeled "teaching" and got 0 for that.
Who was marking again?
Herc
No, Herc. That was me.
no, this is another demo what an idiot you are. why don't you quote the WHOLE
AGREEMENT to the test before you all come up with these false negatives.
I demo different tests, no one will do any of the tests I designed, I do good to ok
on other tests. Anyone could abuse that sceneraio.
None of you have proven a single thing.
It's up to you to prove your claim, Herc. You can't do that unless you
can clearly explain what you do, and then do it under close observation
in a manner which excludes and non-paranormal (that would be normal).
You have never clearly stated exactly what your talent is so it can be
tested. And if you do, and a test does not exclude all possibility of
cheating or error, then it proves nothing. You don't need to cheat to
invalidate a test. The possibility that you might have cheated is what
invalidates a test. Proof on a paranormal claim requires that NO OTHER
EXPLAINATION IS POSSIBLE, THEREFORE THE PARANORMAL EXPLAINATION MUST BE
CORRECT.
Remember, that there is an natural explanation is always the assumption
until it is disproven. It's not about you, Herc, that's just how it is.
In medicine, the assumption is that the new medicine is worthless until
that assumption is disproven.
--
"Go forth, and be excellent to each other"
- Bill & Ted
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 08:56:14 PM |
|
|
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in
It's up to you to prove your claim, Herc. You can't do that unless you
can clearly explain what you do, and then do it under close observation
DON'T GO ROUND IN CIRCLES YOU LIAR.
GET PROVEN WRONG THEN YOU CITE RELEVANCE
MY SIG IS FOR THAT BOGUS FUCKING IDIOT ARGUMENT
--
If you bury your head in the sand then don't open your mouth.
www.TopCounters.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Seeking wealthy Paranormal Investigator |
15 Jul 2004 08:22:06 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:53:02 GMT, "|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote:
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in
"Sara Brum" <sarabrum@medulla.com> wrote in
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:24:59 GMT, "|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote:
"nobody" <nobody@here.com> wrote in
I am seeking a wealthy fool too. Can you let me know when you find
yours? Thanks.
Paranormal is the tip of the iceberg that you will find if you travel to
Townsville Australia,
The Strand.
When tourists see me in shops they say "You're not big overseas yet".
The last visitor to The Strand who's on usenet posted this:
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
Mathematically, and conservatively, I'd say the odds of you fluking those
answers would be, say, 1/100 * 1/3 * 1/1 * 1/100 which is a 1 in 30,000
That's funny. When you responded to my test a few months ago, you got
one answer partially right, and the other nine were completely wrong.
Silly... how is he supposed to support his delusion if you insist that he
accept *all* the results, instead of discarding the inconvenient ones?
You were on a teacher training course, I channeled "teaching" and got 0 for that.
Who was marking again?
Herc
No, Herc. That was me.
no, this is another demo what an idiot you are. why don't you quote the WHOLE
AGREEMENT to the test before you all come up with these false negatives.
I demo different tests, no one will do any of the tests I designed, I do good to ok
on other tests.
Being partially right on one question out of ten on my test is not
"good to ok" by any standard.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
