| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
11 Dec 2007 12:43:18 AM |
| Object: |
Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
For once, think of the children. They deserve to have this bill passed
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6510097.html?display=Breaking+News&referral=SUPP&nid=2228
Stevens Urges Senate to Pass Indecency Bill
Protecting Children from Indecency Programming Act Would Give FCC Authority
to Fine Fleeting Profanities and Nudity
By John Eggerton -- Broadcasting & Cable, 12/6/2007 11:56:00 AM
As the opportunities for passing legislation this year dwindle down to a
precious few, Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), vice chairman of the Senate
Commerce Committee, called on his colleagues to approve a bill that would
give the Federal Communications Commission express authority to fine
fleeting profanities and nudity, although it would not direct the agency to
do so.
The bill, the Protecting Children from Indecency Programming Act (S. 1780),
was introduced by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W. Va.) after a Federal Appeals
Court found that the FCC had not justified its decision to crack down on
fleeting profanities, specifically in a case involving swearing by Cher and
Nicole Ritchie on a Fox awards-show broadcast.
The FCC appealed that decision to the Supreme Court, arguing that it did
justify it. The agency said the decision essentially ties its hands when it
comes to policing the airwaves for profanities. FCC chairman Kevin Martin
even joked about his decision.
The bill passed in the Senate Commerce Committee but never got a floor vote.
It was only filed yesterday, a procedure that signals the committee is
seeking a floor vote, though the majority leader controls the calendar.
"I urge the Senate to take up this important legislation," Stevens said in a
statement Thursday. "Radio and broadcast TV are still the way most Americans
get their news and entertainment. Whether sitting in a car with your
children or in front of the TV, the American public should be able to expect
that they will not be barraged with unexpected indecent material, whether it
is through an image or a word."
--
J Young
jyoungvisions@aol.com
.
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 08:15:57 PM |
|
|
"J Young" <jyoungvisions@aol.com> wrote in
news:1fi1ak.m0d.19.1@news.alt.net:
For once, think of the children. They deserve to have this bill passed
No.
We need a "Make whiny fundies grow the ***** up" bill.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6510097.html?display=Breakin
g+News&referral=SUPP&nid=2228
Stevens Urges Senate to Pass Indecency Bill
Protecting Children from Indecency Programming Act Would Give FCC
Authority to Fine Fleeting Profanities and Nudity
....because, for *****'s sake, we can't have fundies getting bones over a
tit or a tat.
Grow up, you fucking infant.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices.
--Edward R. Murrow
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Curt" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 02:38:45 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <jyoungvisions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1fi1ak.m0d.19.1@news.alt.net...
For once, think of the children. They deserve to have this bill passed
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6510097.html?display=Breaking+News&referral=SUPP&nid=2228
Stevens Urges Senate to Pass Indecency Bill
Protecting Children from Indecency Programming Act Would Give FCC
Authority
to Fine Fleeting Profanities
What would it cost me?
Curt
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bokonon" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:41:00 AM |
|
|
"J Young" <jyoungvisions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1fi1ak.m0d.19.1@news.alt.net...
For once, think of the children.
For once, think of America instead of being such an ignorant, big-government
loving, nanny-state worshipping, Constitution-hating ***** who expects the
government to do his parenting for him.
--
"History! Read it and weep!"
-Bokonon
_______________________________________________
When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Prof. Cal Meacham" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:36:45 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:41:00 -0800, "Bokonon"
<seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> mumbled:
Message-ID: <1113435099.9a3de1702d550b80de22c33aaf8706b8@meganetnews2>
Just knowing I have a better job, a better place to live, and a better
looking wife to ***** than you is all the information I'm volunteering at
this point.
-Jeff
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "LC" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 10:04:58 AM |
|
|
Admitted pedophile "J Young" <jyoungvisions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1fi1ak.m0d.19.1@news.alt.net...
For once, think of the children.
Which is what "J Young" spends much of his waking hours doing.
Just not in the way one would like:
"Instead of funding wars overseas; why not fund us people who want to
spread a little love.NAMBLA is all about togetherness and comforting
our young people with guidance from an older generation Please help
us. I know the folks in these NG's can identify with our plight. We
are just very misunderstood; we get bad press, but we stand for love"
"J 'lil loose' Young"
~ Newsgroups:
alt.support.boy-lovers,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.politics.usa.republican,soc.culture.african.american
Subject: Federal funds for NAMBLA
Date: 10 Mar 2004 09:44:11 -0800
Message-ID: <5a858a1e.0403100944.676efbd7@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.12.116.202
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Un Saved" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill (J YOUNG) |
11 Dec 2007 02:41:55 PM |
|
|
DUH!!! Then dont let YOUR kids watch anything "indecent"
"IF YOU WANT A NATION RULED BY RELIGON MOVE TO IRAN"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "cor" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 01:19:12 PM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
For once, think of the children. They deserve to have this bill passed
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6510097.html?display=Breaking+News&referral=SUPP&nid=2228
Stevens Urges Senate to Pass Indecency Bill
Protecting Children from Indecency Programming Act Would Give FCC Authority
to Fine Fleeting Profanities and Nudity
Like the nun in the news yesterday?
A list of profanity and photos of nudity that is not allowed should be
published?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 05:29:29 AM |
|
|
J Young wrote:
For once, think of the children. They deserve to have this bill passed
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6510097.html?display=Breaking+News&referral=SUPP&nid=2228
Stevens Urges Senate to Pass Indecency Bill
Protecting Children from Indecency Programming Act Would Give FCC Authority
to Fine Fleeting Profanities and Nudity
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone saying
'*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok with seeing
mutilation and mayhem?
It's all backwards to the rest of the world, in other places there is
much more worry about kids seeing violence rather than worrying about a
nipple which you can see on any beech in the world.
Anyways, there is always parenting - if you don't want your kids to see
it, turn the frigging TV off and try talking to the little dears.
.
|
|
|
| User: "droll yankee" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 12:09:19 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:29:29 +0000, Martin <usenet1@etiqa.co.uk>
mumbled:
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone saying
'*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok with seeing
mutilation and mayhem?
Why is either acceptable?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bokonon" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:41:53 AM |
|
|
"droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message
news:agktl3hju7r6bfc6cp52b5v1b43bnjamef@4ax.com...
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone saying
'*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok with seeing
mutilation and mayhem?
Why is either acceptable?
Why wouldn't either be?
--
"History! Read it and weep!"
-Bokonon
_______________________________________________
When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Prof. Cal Meacham" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:36:45 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:41:53 -0800, "Bokonon"
<seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> mumbled:
Message-ID: <1113435099.9a3de1702d550b80de22c33aaf8706b8@meganetnews2>
Just knowing I have a better job, a better place to live, and a better
looking wife to ***** than you is all the information I'm volunteering at
this point.
-Jeff
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jenny6833A" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 01:13:06 PM |
|
|
On Dec 11, 11:09=EF=BF=BDam, droll yankee <s...@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:29:29 +0000, Martin <usen...@etiqa.co.uk>
mumbled:
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone saying
'*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok with seeing
mutilation and mayhem?
Why is either acceptable?
Why do you oppose the public use of certain words? Why is saying
'*****' indecent but saying 'defacate' or 'bowel movement' is OK?
Why are some patches of skin taboo to you yet others aren't?
Inquiring minds want to know how people like you reason -- if that's
the word.
:-)
Jenny
.
|
|
|
| User: "droll yankee" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 01:59:53 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:13:06 -0800 (PST), Jenny6833A
<Jenny6833A@aol.com> mumbled:
On Dec 11, 11:09?am, droll yankee <s...@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:29:29 +0000, Martin <usen...@etiqa.co.uk>
mumbled:
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone saying
'*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok with seeing
mutilation and mayhem?
Why is either acceptable?
Why do you oppose the public use of certain words? Why is saying
'*****' indecent but saying 'defacate' or 'bowel movement' is OK?
Context.
Why are some patches of skin taboo to you yet others aren't?
Accepted norms.
Inquiring minds want to know how people like you reason -- if that's
the word.
:-)
Jenny
And how people like YOU are so intolerant of others' feelings...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bokonon" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:43:40 AM |
|
|
"droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message
news:3uqtl3lgmd024c98eu1qc9lbsbd7lh1fj5@4ax.com...
Why are some patches of skin taboo to you yet others aren't?
Accepted norms.
Cite, please.
At any rate - why should your "norms" define what others should or should
not be able to view?
Why do you hate America?
--
"History! Read it and weep!"
-Bokonon
_______________________________________________
When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Prof. Cal Meacham" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:36:46 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:43:40 -0800, "Bokonon"
<seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> mumbled:
Why do you hate America?
<1110261564.95e417967d9a56637c0c29a8c6ace4c7@meganetnews2>
Jesus taught that we were to love one another as well. I really dig
that about Jesus....
I'm sure I have a better house than you, a better job than you, a
better family than you, and a better looking wife to *****. Being me
isn't such a bad thing....
In what way am I "hypocritical"?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 08:17:54 PM |
|
|
droll yankee <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in
news:3uqtl3lgmd024c98eu1qc9lbsbd7lh1fj5@4ax.com:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:13:06 -0800 (PST), Jenny6833A
<Jenny6833A@aol.com> mumbled:
On Dec 11, 11:09?am, droll yankee <s...@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:29:29 +0000, Martin <usen...@etiqa.co.uk>
mumbled:
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone
saying '*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok
with seeing mutilation and mayhem?
Why is either acceptable?
Why do you oppose the public use of certain words? Why is saying
'*****' indecent but saying 'defacate' or 'bowel movement' is OK?
Context.
Why are some patches of skin taboo to you yet others aren't?
Accepted norms.
Inquiring minds want to know how people like you reason -- if that's
the word.
And how people like YOU are so intolerant of others' feelings...
She's not intolerant. You're just childish.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices.
--Edward R. Murrow
.
|
|
|
| User: "droll yankee" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 11:01:29 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:17:54 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> mumbled:
droll yankee <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in
news:3uqtl3lgmd024c98eu1qc9lbsbd7lh1fj5@4ax.com:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:13:06 -0800 (PST), Jenny6833A
<Jenny6833A@aol.com> mumbled:
On Dec 11, 11:09?am, droll yankee <s...@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:29:29 +0000, Martin <usen...@etiqa.co.uk>
mumbled:
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone
saying '*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok
with seeing mutilation and mayhem?
Why is either acceptable?
Why do you oppose the public use of certain words? Why is saying
'*****' indecent but saying 'defacate' or 'bowel movement' is OK?
Context.
Why are some patches of skin taboo to you yet others aren't?
Accepted norms.
Inquiring minds want to know how people like you reason -- if that's
the word.
And how people like YOU are so intolerant of others' feelings...
She's not intolerant. You're just childish.
DROP DAMNED DEAD!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bokonon" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:44:16 AM |
|
|
"droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message
news:nnqul35363rlmubenj7p8o0r7rvgcko5fj@4ax.com...
DROP DAMNED DEAD!
Aw, Spammy - did they let you out again?
Plonk.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Prof. Cal Meacham" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:36:46 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:44:16 -0800, "Bokonon"
<seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> mumbled:
Plonk.
<1110261564.95e417967d9a56637c0c29a8c6ace4c7@meganetnews2>
Jesus taught that we were to love one another as well. I really dig
that about Jesus....
I'm sure I have a better house than you, a better job than you, a
better family than you, and a better looking wife to *****. Being me
isn't such a bad thing....
In what way am I "hypocritical"?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc Smartass" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
12 Dec 2007 08:55:06 PM |
|
|
droll yankee <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in
news:nnqul35363rlmubenj7p8o0r7rvgcko5fj@4ax.com:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:17:54 GMT, Doc Smartass
<gekido@astroskivviesboymail.com> mumbled:
droll yankee <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in
news:3uqtl3lgmd024c98eu1qc9lbsbd7lh1fj5@4ax.com:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:13:06 -0800 (PST), Jenny6833A
<Jenny6833A@aol.com> mumbled:
On Dec 11, 11:09?am, droll yankee <s...@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:29:29 +0000, Martin <usen...@etiqa.co.uk>
mumbled:
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone
saying '*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok
with seeing mutilation and mayhem?
Why is either acceptable?
Why do you oppose the public use of certain words? Why is saying
'*****' indecent but saying 'defacate' or 'bowel movement' is OK?
Context.
Why are some patches of skin taboo to you yet others aren't?
Accepted norms.
Inquiring minds want to know how people like you reason -- if that's
the word.
And how people like YOU are so intolerant of others' feelings...
She's not intolerant. You're just childish.
DROP DAMNED DEAD!
You first, DamnSpankee.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
No one can terrorize a whole nation, unless we are all his accomplices.
--Edward R. Murrow
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Don Homuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 01:15:42 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:09:19 GMT, droll yankee <stur@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:29:29 +0000, Martin <usenet1@etiqa.co.uk>
mumbled:
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone saying
'*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok with seeing
mutilation and mayhem?
Why is either acceptable?
Why is either unacceptable, to the point where You demand it be taken
away so No One can determine whether it's acceptable or not?
Who put You in charge?
.
|
|
|
| User: "droll yankee" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 02:00:45 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:15:42 -0800, Don Homuth
<dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:09:19 GMT, droll yankee <stur@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:29:29 +0000, Martin <usenet1@etiqa.co.uk>
mumbled:
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone saying
'*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok with seeing
mutilation and mayhem?
Why is either acceptable?
Why is either unacceptable, to the point where You demand it be taken
away so No One can determine whether it's acceptable or not?
Accepted social norms.
Who put You in charge?
The FCC.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bokonon" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:42:26 AM |
|
|
"droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message
news:j0rtl3prlfq2qs8sj3rfcvbg5qmsjf89lp@4ax.com...
Why is either unacceptable, to the point where You demand it be taken
away so No One can determine whether it's acceptable or not?
Accepted social norms.
Meaning what?
Who put You in charge?
The FCC.
So you believe that the government put you in charge, then?
--
"History! Read it and weep!"
-Bokonon
_______________________________________________
When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Prof. Cal Meacham" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:36:45 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:42:26 -0800, "Bokonon"
<seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> mumbled:
Message-ID: <1113435099.9a3de1702d550b80de22c33aaf8706b8@meganetnews2>
Just knowing I have a better job, a better place to live, and a better
looking wife to ***** than you is all the information I'm volunteering at
this point.
-Jeff
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Don Homuth" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 02:06:48 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:00:45 GMT, droll yankee <stur@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:15:42 -0800, Don Homuth
<dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:09:19 GMT, droll yankee <stur@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:29:29 +0000, Martin <usenet1@etiqa.co.uk>
mumbled:
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone saying
'*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok with seeing
mutilation and mayhem?
Why is either acceptable?
Why is either unacceptable, to the point where You demand it be taken
away so No One can determine whether it's acceptable or not?
Accepted social norms.
Yours -- not everyone's.
Who put You in charge?
The FCC.
Heh! In your Dreams, child.
.
|
|
|
| User: "droll yankee" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
11 Dec 2007 02:35:44 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:06:48 -0800, Don Homuth
<dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:00:45 GMT, droll yankee <stur@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:15:42 -0800, Don Homuth
<dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:09:19 GMT, droll yankee <stur@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:29:29 +0000, Martin <usenet1@etiqa.co.uk>
mumbled:
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone saying
'*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok with seeing
mutilation and mayhem?
Why is either acceptable?
Why is either unacceptable, to the point where You demand it be taken
away so No One can determine whether it's acceptable or not?
Accepted social norms.
Yours -- not everyone's.
MOST peoples'...
Who put You in charge?
The FCC.
Heh! In your Dreams, child.
Who rules on broadcast indecency?
Eh?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bokonon" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:42:58 AM |
|
|
"droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message
news:r1ttl315bleelmj7ro3i73l0mj8ejqmh5c@4ax.com...
Accepted social norms.
Yours -- not everyone's.
MOST peoples'...
Cite, please.
--
"History! Read it and weep!"
-Bokonon
_______________________________________________
When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Prof. Cal Meacham" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:36:46 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:42:58 -0800, "Bokonon"
<seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> mumbled:
Cite, please.
<1110261564.95e417967d9a56637c0c29a8c6ace4c7@meganetnews2>
Jesus taught that we were to love one another as well. I really dig
that about Jesus....
I'm sure I have a better house than you, a better job than you, a
better family than you, and a better looking wife to *****. Being me
isn't such a bad thing....
In what way am I "hypocritical"?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Prof. Cal Meacham" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
13 Dec 2007 12:36:46 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:42:58 -0800, "Bokonon"
<seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> mumbled:
Cite, please.
Message-ID: <1113435099.9a3de1702d550b80de22c33aaf8706b8@meganetnews2>
Just knowing I have a better job, a better place to live, and a better
looking wife to ***** than you is all the information I'm volunteering at
this point.
-Jeff
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "SMITH29" |
|
| Title: Re: Senate Urged to Pass Indecency Bill |
14 Dec 2007 07:55:37 PM |
|
|
droll yankee wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:06:48 -0800, Don Homuth
<dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:00:45 GMT, droll yankee <stur@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:15:42 -0800, Don Homuth
<dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:09:19 GMT, droll yankee <stur@bridge.ma> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:29:29 +0000, Martin <usenet1@etiqa.co.uk>
mumbled:
Why are you guys so prudish that you get into a flap over someone saying
'*****' on the TV or flashing a nipple while being quite ok with seeing
mutilation and mayhem?
Why is either acceptable?
Why is either unacceptable, to the point where You demand it be taken
away so No One can determine whether it's acceptable or not?
Accepted social norms.
Yours -- not everyone's.
MOST peoples'...
Who put You in charge?
The FCC.
Heh! In your Dreams, child.
Who rules on broadcast indecency?
Eh?
xxxx
Nice one!
29
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
