Religions > Atheism > Sex Differences Part II =?iso-8859-1?Q?=97?= Women and Radical Politics
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Kevin Alfred Strom" |
| Date: |
10 Nov 2003 08:26:38 PM |
| Object: |
Sex Differences Part II =?iso-8859-1?Q?=97?= Women and Radical Politics |
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3D1080
Sex Differences Part II =97 Women and Radical Politics
Opinion; Posted on: 2003-11-10 00:52:34 [ Printer friendly ]
=
by Michael J. Polignano (pictured) =
White Nationalist groups are almost exclusively men=92s clubs, and
most of the men are bachelors who complain that they cannot find
suitable women. Furthermore, those men who are married frequently
complain that their wives are indifferent or even hostile to their
views about race.
Men, it seems, are far more willing to espouse politically incorrect
views about race than women. After perusing various websites and
forums discussing this topic, I=92ve found that many men resent this
fact, construing it as some sort of moral failing on the part of
women. But it is not. It merely reflects the hard-wired biological
differences between the sexes.
Earlier I looked at the differential selection pressures sex places
on males and females. Eggs take more energy to produce than sperm,
and females alone have to bear a pregnancy. And in over 90% of
mammalian species, females provide substantial parental care while
males provide none whatsoever. Thus females make a much larger
parental investment in each offspring than do males. Parental
investment increases the reproductive success of the offspring
receiving it, while simultaneously decreasing the parent=92s future
reproductive success by consuming resources that could be spent on
additional offspring.
Differences in behavior between the sexes came about as a result of
these differing demands. A female=92s potential reproductive success
is relatively small, and is limited more by the number of eggs she
can produce (or pregnancies she can carry) than by the number of
males she can convince to mate with her. In contrast, a male=92s
potential reproductive success is relatively large, and is limited
more by the number of females he can convince to mate with him than
by the number of sperm he can produce. This difference in potential
reproductive success allows us to predict that males will compete
with each other for access to mates, while females will be selective
about with whom they mate. Sexually, males are adventurers and
risk-takers, while females are risk-avoiders.
These differences in reproductive strategies manifest themselves in
behavioral and physical differences that go beyond sex. The
competitiveness of males drives them to take risks more frequently,
not just when appealing to females, but also in day-to-day
decision-making. Car insurance rates are higher for teenage boys
than for girls for precisely this reason. Risk-taking =93raises the
stakes=94 of many decisions, increasing the potential rewards but also
increasing the consequences of failure.
"If women are inherently conservative, then why are they generally
more supportive of left-wing causes than men? In spite of the
leftist rhetoric about progress and radical change, the leftist
emphasis on social welfare, social planning, and anti-competitive
egalitarianism has an obvious appeal to risk-averse females."
This risk-taking makes evolutionary sense, because males are far
more expendable than females. If all women were killed except one,
the race would take many generations to return to its original size,
if ever. Yet if all the men were killed except one, the remaining
man would have his work cut out for him, but the race could
theoretically repopulate within a generation. Since males are not as
necessary for the maintenance of population size, males tend to take
more risks, be more aggressive, and tend to work towards
establishing themselves higher in social hierarchies than do women.
But if women are inherently conservative, then why are they
generally more supportive of left-wing causes than men? First of
all, in spite of the leftist rhetoric about progress and radical
change, the leftist emphasis on social welfare, social planning, and
anti-competitive egalitarianism has an obvious appeal to risk-averse
females. Furthermore, in spite of the leftist posture of always
being outsiders, the left now controls most of the authoritative
institutions of society: the educational system, the news and
entertainment media, the churches, etc. Leftist opinion is the
=93status quo.=94 Women are brainwashed to accept it and loath to
criticize it, for fear of the risks to their social standing, their
employment, and especially to the well-being of their children.
But more women support the White racialist movement now than in the
past. I know this from personal experience. I have been reading
racialist-oriented USENET newsgroups (and web-based bulletin boards,
once the technology was developed), ever since I first went =93online=94
back in 1994 or 1995. I posted a personals ad on Stormfront years
ago, shortly after the personals section was created. I didn=92t
receive any responses. I did the same thing just several months ago,
and was contacted by a number of women.
"For the same reason that women have been slow to take up the White
nationalist cause, women may eventually become its strongest and
most uncompromising supporters: their maternal instincts."
Part of the reason may be that women are more comfortable expressing
politically incorrect ideas anonymously on the Internet, a far less
risky prospect than espousing the same views openly.
But surely that is not the main reason. For the same reason that
women have been slow to take up the White nationalist cause, women
may eventually become its strongest and most uncompromising
supporters: their maternal instincts. More women are joining the
White nationalist cause as it becomes increasingly evident that the
health and welfare of future generations of Whites is at stake.
Aside from the love and protection my own mother gave me (which
continues to this day), my first encounter with female maternal
instinct came when I was seven or eight years old. At a lake near my
old school, I observed a mallard duck leading her ducklings. Curious
boy that I was, I ran over to the ducklings and picked one up.
Although most adult ducks at the lake were apprehensive about
approaching humans even when they were sharing food, the mother
turned, came right up to me, and started quacking loudly. When I
knelt down, she proceeded to flog my arm with her wing until I
released the duckling. I was shocked at the length this mother would
go to protect her baby. She went from risk aversion to quite
possibly risking her life, but the underlying biological imperative
was the same.
I have the feeling that more White mothers will begin behaving like
that mother duck, once they can no longer ignore the fact that the
world their children will inherit will be worse than the one into
which they were born. In the meantime, more individuals need to
stick their necks out, especially young men. Future generations of
our race are counting on us.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=3D1080
The writings of Michael J. Polignano, a graduate of Emory
University, may be found at http://michaeljpolignano.com/ and are
published at NationalVanguard.org with the permission of the author.
=
Source: Author =
=
-- =
Kevin Alfred Strom.
News: http://www.nationalvanguard.org/
The Works of R. P. Oliver: http://www.revilo-oliver.com
Personal site: http://www.kevin-strom.com
.
|
|
| User: "the cutest atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II - Women and Radical Politics |
10 Nov 2003 10:32:49 PM |
|
|
1. you're a *****
2. 'whites' are not in danger
3. women are more attracted to men with different genetic characteristics
than herself - the more different, the better. that may be why they're less
racist <shrug>
4. white supremacists embrace these politics because they feel they have to
be better than somebody, and because they have no personal qualities with
which to feel in any way superior to people, they invoke this artificial
race divide
5. plonk
-Cutest, who likes people of all hues
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perfesser White" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II - Women and Radical Politics |
10 Nov 2003 10:41:28 PM |
|
|
In article <RDZrb.6175$aT.1257@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote:
1. you're a *****
2. 'whites' are not in danger
3. women are more attracted to men with different genetic characteristics
than herself - the more different, the better. that may be why they're less
racist <shrug>
4. white supremacists embrace these politics because they feel they have to
be better than somebody, and because they have no personal qualities with
which to feel in any way superior to people, they invoke this artificial
race divide
5. plonk
-Cutest, who likes people of all hues
Cutest, who shows her political and racial ignorance.
The Perfesser
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
.
|
|
|
| User: "the cutest atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II - Women and Radical Politics |
10 Nov 2003 10:49:46 PM |
|
|
"Perfesser White" <prof.white@whiteuniversity.org> wrote in message
news:prof.white-52919A.23420210112003@cosmos.uncensored-news.com...
In article <RDZrb.6175$aT.1257@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote:
1. you're a *****
2. 'whites' are not in danger
3. women are more attracted to men with different genetic
characteristics
than herself - the more different, the better. that may be why they're
less
racist <shrug>
4. white supremacists embrace these politics because they feel they have
to
be better than somebody, and because they have no personal qualities
with
which to feel in any way superior to people, they invoke this artificial
race divide
5. plonk
-Cutest, who likes people of all hues
Cutest, who shows her political and racial ignorance.
The Perfesser
love the use of evidence there, 'perfesser'
lol, 'racial ignorance'
-Cutest, an *actually* educated individual
oh, btw, join your idiot friend in my killfile
<plonk!>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perfesser White" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II - Women and Radical Politics |
10 Nov 2003 11:17:02 PM |
|
|
In article <KTZrb.6186$aT.970@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Perfesser White" <prof.white@whiteuniversity.org> wrote in message
news:prof.white-52919A.23420210112003@cosmos.uncensored-news.com...
In article <RDZrb.6175$aT.1257@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote:
1. you're a *****
2. 'whites' are not in danger
3. women are more attracted to men with different genetic
characteristics
than herself - the more different, the better. that may be why they're
less
racist <shrug>
4. white supremacists embrace these politics because they feel they have
to
be better than somebody, and because they have no personal qualities
with
which to feel in any way superior to people, they invoke this artificial
race divide
5. plonk
-Cutest, who likes people of all hues
Cutest, who shows her political and racial ignorance.
The Perfesser
love the use of evidence there, 'perfesser'
lol, 'racial ignorance'
-Cutest, an *actually* educated individual
Then debate with me about race rather than run away, 'kay? LOL
The Kindly Perfesser
oh, btw, join your idiot friend in my killfile
<plonk!>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ian" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II ? Women and Radical Politics |
11 Nov 2003 04:57:30 AM |
|
|
Kevin Alfred Strom <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com> wrote in message news:<3FB048DE.58FF65C7@revilo-oliver.com>...
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1080
Sex Differences Part II Women and Radical Politics
Opinion; Posted on: 2003-11-10 00:52:34 [ Printer friendly ]
by Michael J. Polignano (pictured)
White Nationalist groups are almost exclusively men s clubs, and
most of the men are bachelors who complain that they cannot find
suitable women. Furthermore, those men who are married frequently
complain that their wives are indifferent or even hostile to their
views about race.
Men, it seems, are far more willing to espouse politically incorrect
views about race than women. After perusing various websites and
forums discussing this topic, I ve found that many men resent this
fact, construing it as some sort of moral failing on the part of
women. But it is not. It merely reflects the hard-wired biological
differences between the sexes.
There's a reason for that, women don't sleep with black, white or
yellow men, they sleep with winners.
They don't care who is going to win the demographics battle, since
by definition they'll be the winners, and women don't sleep with
losers.
Women have fallen on their backs with the men who've killed their
husbands and sons since long before the Sabine.
.
|
|
|
| User: "merasmus" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II ? Women and Radical Politics |
11 Nov 2003 01:20:19 PM |
|
|
(Ian) wrote in message news:<d33ce629.0311110257.7c26962c@posting.google.com>...
Kevin Alfred Strom <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com> wrote in message news:<3FB048DE.58FF65C7@revilo-oliver.com>...
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1080
Sex Differences Part II Women and Radical Politics
Opinion; Posted on: 2003-11-10 00:52:34 [ Printer friendly ]
by Michael J. Polignano (pictured)
White Nationalist groups are almost exclusively men s clubs, and
most of the men are bachelors who complain that they cannot find
suitable women. Furthermore, those men who are married frequently
complain that their wives are indifferent or even hostile to their
views about race.
Men, it seems, are far more willing to espouse politically incorrect
views about race than women. After perusing various websites and
forums discussing this topic, I ve found that many men resent this
fact, construing it as some sort of moral failing on the part of
women. But it is not. It merely reflects the hard-wired biological
differences between the sexes.
There's a reason for that, women don't sleep with black, white or
yellow men, they sleep with winners.
They don't care who is going to win the demographics battle, since
by definition they'll be the winners, and women don't sleep with
losers.
Women have fallen on their backs with the men who've killed their
husbands and sons since long before the Sabine.
It is commonly called "rape" these days. Nothing like physical force,
eh? To the extent women have sexual choices, they *DO* make choices.
To attribute some sort of "higher being" to humans with vaginas is
flatly ignorant.
.
|
|
|
| User: "spammy" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II ? Women and Radical Politics |
11 Nov 2003 04:04:31 PM |
|
|
merasmus wrote:
drawnai@hotmail.com (Ian) wrote in message news:<d33ce629.0311110257.7c26962c@posting.google.com>...
Women have fallen on their backs with the men who've killed their
husbands and sons since long before the Sabine.
It is commonly called "rape" these days. Nothing like physical force, eh?
So I suppose those women who were freely fucking German soldiers in WWII
while their husbands and sons were dying *fighting* said soldiers
couldn't possibly have done it out of their own free will? How naive.
.
|
|
|
| User: "the cutest atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II ? Women and Radical Politics |
11 Nov 2003 08:13:56 PM |
|
|
"spammy" <spammy@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:O1dsb.1960$X7.1167@news.randori.com...
merasmus wrote:
drawnai@hotmail.com (Ian) wrote in message
news:<d33ce629.0311110257.7c26962c@posting.google.com>...
Women have fallen on their backs with the men who've killed their
husbands and sons since long before the Sabine.
It is commonly called "rape" these days. Nothing like physical force,
eh?
So I suppose those women who were freely fucking German soldiers in WWII
while their husbands and sons were dying *fighting* said soldiers
couldn't possibly have done it out of their own free will? How naive.
despite the reputations WWII german soldiers had for gentleness....
lol. get over it, seriously, men and women aren't that different, but maybe
that's why you hate them so much eh?
plonk!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "merasmus" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II ? Women and Radical Politics |
14 Nov 2003 10:37:01 AM |
|
|
spammy <spammy@nospam.invalid> wrote in message news:<O1dsb.1960$X7.1167@news.randori.com>...
merasmus wrote:
drawnai@hotmail.com (Ian) wrote in message news:<d33ce629.0311110257.7c26962c@posting.google.com>...
Women have fallen on their backs with the men who've killed their
husbands and sons since long before the Sabine.
It is commonly called "rape" these days. Nothing like physical force, eh?
So I suppose those women who were freely fucking German soldiers in WWII
while their husbands and sons were dying *fighting* said soldiers
couldn't possibly have done it out of their own free will? How naive.
Not what I said. Probably most did ***** of their own free will. But
certainly not all. If they made the *WRONG* choice from the German's
point of view, (sound like american men being free to choose the
"right" way?? It should.) then a tad bit of force would change that
choice. Whatever force was sufficient.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Laura" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II ? Women and Radical Politics |
11 Nov 2003 02:36:07 PM |
|
|
Has anyone elver noticed that this 'Ian' spends ALL DAY obsessively posting
his angry little outbursts against the female species? I mean, it's one
thing to read one male chauvinist's viewpoint, but quite another to witness
such a disturbing contribution from someone who has NO OTHER THOUGHTS - or
at least so it would seem. I could understand if he was getting paid for his
efforts, but no - this is sadly a moron whose sole purpose in life is to
live under the delusion that his postings on Google are an important and
worthwhile reason for living. This forum gives some meaning to his
obviously empty life and thus serves as a sort of life support mecchanism.
Check out the times of his postings. Clearly a guy with no life. Clearly a
guy whose ego never recovered from the woman who dumped him many years ago
and has now become addicted to searching the net, day in day out, for every
little scrap of verbal diarrhoea that insults women. That's the only way he
can convince himself that the only reason he got dumped was because every
woman is an evil *****. It helps shield him from the reality that he is a
loser, that this woman saw what a loser he was, and she understandably
dumped him.
So carry on trawling the net and posting your 100 important snippets of
'data' every day and if it comforts you, let me assure you that we all read
them and find them very original and important. We wouldn't want to remove
your sole reason for living.
You sad little man.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Always Right" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II ? Women and Radical Politics |
14 Nov 2003 09:46:57 PM |
|
|
"Laura" <laura@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:borh8c$1hsmsc$1@ID-162957.news.uni-berlin.de...
Has anyone elver noticed that this 'Ian' spends ALL DAY obsessively
posting
his angry little outbursts against the female species? I mean, it's one
thing to read one male chauvinist's viewpoint, but quite another to
witness
such a disturbing contribution from someone who has NO OTHER THOUGHTS - or
at least so it would seem. I could understand if he was getting paid for
his
efforts, but no - this is sadly a moron whose sole purpose in life is to
live under the delusion that his postings on Google are an important and
worthwhile reason for living. This forum gives some meaning to his
obviously empty life and thus serves as a sort of life support mecchanism.
Check out the times of his postings. Clearly a guy with no life. Clearly
a
guy whose ego never recovered from the woman who dumped him many years ago
and has now become addicted to searching the net, day in day out, for
every
little scrap of verbal diarrhoea that insults women. That's the only way
he
can convince himself that the only reason he got dumped was because every
woman is an evil *****. It helps shield him from the reality that he is a
loser, that this woman saw what a loser he was, and she understandably
dumped him.
So carry on trawling the net and posting your 100 important snippets of
'data' every day and if it comforts you, let me assure you that we all
read
them and find them very original and important. We wouldn't want to
remove
your sole reason for living.
You sad little man.
Damn!!!!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "hank" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II ? Women and Radical Politics |
11 Nov 2003 08:08:45 PM |
|
|
"Laura" <laura@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:<borh8c$1hsmsc$1@ID-162957.news.uni-berlin.de>...
Has anyone elver noticed that this 'Ian' spends ALL DAY obsessively posting
his angry little outbursts against the female species? I mean, it's one
thing to read one male chauvinist's viewpoint, but quite another to witness
such a disturbing contribution from someone who has NO OTHER THOUGHTS - or
at least so it would seem. I could understand if he was getting paid for his
efforts, but no - this is sadly a moron whose sole purpose in life is to
live under the delusion that his postings on Google are an important and
worthwhile reason for living. This forum gives some meaning to his
obviously empty life and thus serves as a sort of life support mecchanism.
Check out the times of his postings. Clearly a guy with no life. Clearly a
guy whose ego never recovered from the woman who dumped him many years ago
and has now become addicted to searching the net, day in day out, for every
little scrap of verbal diarrhoea that insults women. That's the only way he
can convince himself that the only reason he got dumped was because every
woman is an evil *****. It helps shield him from the reality that he is a
loser, that this woman saw what a loser he was, and she understandably
dumped him.
So carry on trawling the net and posting your 100 important snippets of
'data' every day and if it comforts you, let me assure you that we all read
them and find them very original and important. We wouldn't want to remove
your sole reason for living.
You sad little man.
..............
You just made his point.....*****...
Hank
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "z" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II ? Women and Radical Politics |
11 Nov 2003 09:37:08 AM |
|
|
Kevin Alfred Strom <kevin.strom@revilo-oliver.com> wrote in message news:<3FB048DE.58FF65C7@revilo-oliver.com>...
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1080
Sex Differences Part II Women and Radical Politics
Opinion; Posted on: 2003-11-10 00:52:34 [ Printer friendly ]
by Michael J. Polignano (pictured)
White Nationalist groups are almost exclusively men's clubs, and
most of the men are bachelors who complain that they cannot find
suitable women. Furthermore, those men who are married frequently
complain that their wives are indifferent or even hostile to their
views about race.
And yet, they get so upset when you suggest that they should just
embrace their obvious homosexuality instead of fighting it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II =?windows-1252?Q?=97_Women_and_?==?windows-1252?Q?Radical_Politics?= |
11 Nov 2003 10:27:09 AM |
|
|
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
White Nationalist groups are almost exclusively men’s clubs, and
most of the men are bachelors who complain that they cannot find
suitable women. Furthermore, those men who are married frequently
complain that their wives are indifferent or even hostile to their
views about race.
For most of a century the KKK had a women's division that was often
larger than the men's division. Can anyone say Susan B. Anthony?
So much for the misandrist crap of Michael J. Polignano.
Bob
.
|
|
|
| User: "the cutest atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II — Women and Radical Politics |
11 Nov 2003 08:18:31 PM |
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FB10DDD.30405@hotmail.com...
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
White Nationalist groups are almost exclusively men’s clubs, and
most of the men are bachelors who complain that they cannot find
suitable women. Furthermore, those men who are married frequently
complain that their wives are indifferent or even hostile to their
views about race.
For most of a century the KKK had a women's division that was often
larger than the men's division. Can anyone say Susan B. Anthony?
and I thought church bakesales would be scary...
So much for the misandrist crap of Michael J. Polignano.
his gf prolly left him for a black guy
cheer up, some men and women are monogamous, while some are not. if they're
not, it's no reflection on their partners.
Cutest, community service done for the day ;)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rainbow522" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II - Women and Radical Politics |
14 Nov 2003 09:34:02 PM |
|
|
Prejudice and bigotry come from fear and misunderstanding.
So now I guess that makes me some stupid idiot in your eyes, simply because
I didn't say "oh, you are 100% correct about everything you said"?
It's a no-win battle. Some minds are just too narrow to contemplate that
just maybe they could be a teeny weeny bit wrong, or perhaps an itty bitty
bit disallusioned.
It's a sad, unfortunate fact of the human condition.
*sigh*
.
|
|
|
| User: "the cutest atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II - Women and Radical Politics |
14 Nov 2003 10:30:40 PM |
|
|
"Rainbow522" <rainbow522@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:c-WdnSggldU6ASiiRVn-vA@comcast.com...
Prejudice and bigotry come from fear and misunderstanding.
So now I guess that makes me some stupid idiot in your eyes, simply
because
I didn't say "oh, you are 100% correct about everything you said"?
It's a no-win battle. Some minds are just too narrow to contemplate that
just maybe they could be a teeny weeny bit wrong, or perhaps an itty bitty
bit disallusioned.
It's a sad, unfortunate fact of the human condition.
*sigh*
are you addressing me?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Always Right" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II - Women and Radical Politics |
16 Nov 2003 02:04:18 PM |
|
|
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:QZhtb.11441$aT.1442@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Rainbow522" <rainbow522@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:c-WdnSggldU6ASiiRVn-vA@comcast.com...
Prejudice and bigotry come from fear and misunderstanding.
So now I guess that makes me some stupid idiot in your eyes, simply
because
I didn't say "oh, you are 100% correct about everything you said"?
It's a no-win battle. Some minds are just too narrow to contemplate
that
just maybe they could be a teeny weeny bit wrong, or perhaps an itty
bitty
bit disallusioned.
It's a sad, unfortunate fact of the human condition.
*sigh*
are you addressing me?
No...cutest..."Prejudice and bigotry come from fear and
misunderstanding"...the poster
is addressing the person he/she sees as a racist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "the cutest atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II - Women and Radical Politics |
18 Nov 2003 02:09:41 AM |
|
|
"Always Right" <right@right.com> wrote in message
news:WLQtb.20271$Q64.18078@fed1read03...
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:QZhtb.11441$aT.1442@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Rainbow522" <rainbow522@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:c-WdnSggldU6ASiiRVn-vA@comcast.com...
Prejudice and bigotry come from fear and misunderstanding.
So now I guess that makes me some stupid idiot in your eyes, simply
because
I didn't say "oh, you are 100% correct about everything you said"?
It's a no-win battle. Some minds are just too narrow to contemplate
that
just maybe they could be a teeny weeny bit wrong, or perhaps an itty
bitty
bit disallusioned.
It's a sad, unfortunate fact of the human condition.
*sigh*
are you addressing me?
No...cutest..."Prejudice and bigotry come from fear and
misunderstanding"...the poster
is addressing the person he/she sees as a racist.
sweet. it's hard to tell if you don't know the person (ie they're not in
your group) or they snip the previous poster's name and/or comments
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "AngryJohn" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II - Women and Radical Politics |
15 Nov 2003 01:27:25 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:34:02 -0800, "Rainbow522"
<rainbow522@comcast.net> wrote:
Prejudice and bigotry come from fear and misunderstanding.
So now I guess that makes me some stupid idiot in your eyes, simply because
I didn't say "oh, you are 100% correct about everything you said"?
It's a no-win battle. Some minds are just too narrow to contemplate that
just maybe they could be a teeny weeny bit wrong, or perhaps an itty bitty
bit disallusioned.
It's a sad, unfortunate fact of the human condition.
*sigh*
Yet science is the field where arrors or mistakes are corrected
through experiment and the analysis of the result. Christianity is
where evidence is ignored and conclusions are pre-determined.
aa#2106
Remove Belief to reply
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II =?windows-1252?Q?=97_Women_and_?==?windows-1252?Q?Radical_Politics?= |
11 Nov 2003 12:47:04 AM |
|
|
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1080
Men, it seems, are far more willing to espouse politically incorrect
views about race than women. After perusing various websites and
forums discussing this topic, I’ve found that many men resent this
fact, construing it as some sort of moral failing on the part of
women. But it is not. It merely reflects the hard-wired biological
differences between the sexes.
There is nothing "hard wired" about racism. Women have always been at
least as racist as men. As in other areas of life, women tend to use
front men to carry out their racist desires.
Bob
.
|
|
|
| User: "the cutest atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II — Women and Radical Politics |
11 Nov 2003 01:09:26 AM |
|
|
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FB085E8.1080701@hotmail.com...
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1080
Men, it seems, are far more willing to espouse politically incorrect
views about race than women. After perusing various websites and
forums discussing this topic, I’ve found that many men resent this
fact, construing it as some sort of moral failing on the part of
women. But it is not. It merely reflects the hard-wired biological
differences between the sexes.
There is nothing "hard wired" about racism. Women have always been at
least as racist as men.
but not for the same reasons, when they were. I doubt it was such an
obsession in the female mind
As in other areas of life, women tend to use
front men to carry out their racist desires.
riiiiiight. those evil women, skulking at the kitchen sink, how crafty they
are, pretending to be oppressed, pulling the puppet strings.
I'm plonking your bitter arse, you old useless sack of misappropriated
organic matter
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II ? Women and Radical Politics |
11 Nov 2003 07:39:07 AM |
|
|
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<GW%rb.6349$aT.4007@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FB085E8.1080701@hotmail.com...
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1080
Men, it seems, are far more willing to espouse politically incorrect
views about race than women. After perusing various websites and
forums discussing this topic, I?ve found that many men resent this
fact, construing it as some sort of moral failing on the part of
women. But it is not. It merely reflects the hard-wired biological
differences between the sexes.
There is nothing "hard wired" about racism. Women have always been at
least as racist as men.
but not for the same reasons, when they were. I doubt it was such an
obsession in the female mind
As in other areas of life, women tend to use
front men to carry out their racist desires.
riiiiiight. those evil women, skulking at the kitchen sink, how crafty they
are, pretending to be oppressed, pulling the puppet strings.
I'm plonking your bitter arse, you old useless sack of misappropriated
organic matter
Female thought processes are pressured from "controllers" operating
from their spinal columns and vaginas.
Larry
"If it was not for their pussies we would have hunting seasons on the
ladies"
Theodore Roosevelt, 1901
.
|
|
|
| User: "the cutest atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II ? Women and Radical Politics |
11 Nov 2003 08:10:03 PM |
|
|
"Larry" <Malton1961@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8084555.0311110539.2e2ba2eb@posting.google.com...
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<GW%rb.6349$aT.4007@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FB085E8.1080701@hotmail.com...
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1080
Men, it seems, are far more willing to espouse politically incorrect
views about race than women. After perusing various websites and
forums discussing this topic, I?ve found that many men resent this
fact, construing it as some sort of moral failing on the part of
women. But it is not. It merely reflects the hard-wired biological
differences between the sexes.
There is nothing "hard wired" about racism. Women have always been at
least as racist as men.
but not for the same reasons, when they were. I doubt it was such an
obsession in the female mind
As in other areas of life, women tend to use
front men to carry out their racist desires.
riiiiiight. those evil women, skulking at the kitchen sink, how crafty
they
are, pretending to be oppressed, pulling the puppet strings.
I'm plonking your bitter arse, you old useless sack of misappropriated
organic matter
Female thought processes are pressured from "controllers" operating
from their spinal columns and vaginas.
funny, I've never come across that in any medical journals. I wonder why
Larry
"If it was not for their pussies we would have hunting seasons on the
ladies"
Theodore Roosevelt, 1901
oh, btw, plonk!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Perfesser White" |
|
| Title: Re: Sex Differences Part II — Women and Radical Politics |
11 Nov 2003 01:53:32 AM |
|
|
In article <GW%rb.6349$aT.4007@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
"the cutest atheist" <herdofnerd(remove)@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Bob" <boby23456@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3FB085E8.1080701@hotmail.com...
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1080
Men, it seems, are far more willing to espouse politically incorrect
views about race than women. After perusing various websites and
forums discussing this topic, I’ve found that many men resent this
fact, construing it as some sort of moral failing on the part of
women. But it is not. It merely reflects the hard-wired biological
differences between the sexes.
There is nothing "hard wired" about racism. Women have always been at
least as racist as men.
but not for the same reasons, when they were. I doubt it was such an
obsession in the female mind
As in other areas of life, women tend to use
front men to carry out their racist desires.
riiiiiight. those evil women, skulking at the kitchen sink, how crafty they
are, pretending to be oppressed, pulling the puppet strings.
I'm plonking your bitter arse, you old useless sack of misappropriated
organic matter
How typical of the weaker sex, plonking those she can't debate with.
The Kindly Perfesser
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
