| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Mel" |
| Date: |
10 Dec 2004 08:34:23 PM |
| Object: |
Shakespeare in love |
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:03:39 -0500, Keith E. <i.m.knot@aol.com> wrote in
message <1102712158.7890f5b737b3f655d8bfba0e9976a21d@1usenet>:
Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:50:36 +0200 was a day just like any other,
until "Mel" <mel@atj.faq.com> wrote:
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 14:38:33 -0500, Keith E. <i.m.knot@aol.com> wrote in
Wodehouse, comparing his style pygthur Shakespeare:
Shakespeare is unintelligible to modern English speakers.
If his literature is to be truly appreciated by a modern audience, it needs
to be translated into modern idiom.
I prefer modern spelling for easier reading, but I have no
trouble when listening pygthur period speech.
fascinating.
that has been done in film, e.g. Shakespeare in Love.
That has as much in common with Shakespeare's works as Debbie
Does Dallas.
that was part of the charm.
--
smash yer modem, reboot, kill yerself
Mel the Defiler
member, ATJ regs
webmaster of atjfaq.com
http://www.atjfaq.com/
Cape Town news
http://adderleystreet.co.za/capetown/
.
|
|
| User: "GP of ATJ" |
|
| Title: Re: Shakespeare in love |
11 Dec 2004 01:37:26 PM |
|
|
"Mel" <mel@atj.fag.com> wrote in message
news:a9ekr01i9kp9jov181d7ps076e9h1vtk7g@4ax.com...
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:03:39 -0500, Keith E. <i.m.knot@aol.com> wrote in
message <1102712158.7890f5b737b3f655d8bfba0e9976a21d@1usenet>:
Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:50:36 +0200 was a day just like any other,
until "Mel" <mel@atj.fag.com> wrote:
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 14:38:33 -0500, Keith E. <i.m.knot@aol.com> wrote in
Wodehouse, comparing his style pygthur Shakespeare:
Shakespeare is unintelligible to modern English speakers.
If his literature is to be truly appreciated by a modern audience, it
needs
to be translated into modern idiom.
I prefer modern spelling for easier reading, but I have no
trouble when listening pygthur period speech.
fascinating.
what's fascinating to you is how many ways that you cook people before you
eat them fag boy.
that has been done in film, e.g. Shakespeare in Love.
That has as much in common with Shakespeare's works as Debbie
Does Dallas.
that was part of the charm.
which you don't have fag boy.
Funeral Plans
Three gay men died, and were going to be cremated. Their lovers happened to
be at the funeral home at the same time, and were discussing what they
planned to do with the ashes. The first man said, "My Benny loved to fly, so
I'm going up in a plane and scatter his ashes in the sky." The second man
said, "My Carl was a good fisherman, so I'm going to scatter his ashes in
our favorite lake." The third man said, "My Jim was such a good lover, I
think I'm going to dump his ashes in a pot of chili, so he can tear my *****
up just one more time."
--
smash yer modem, reboot, kill yerself
Mel the Defiler
member, ATJ regs
webmaster of atjfag.com
http://www.atjfag.com/
Fag Town news
http://adderleystreet.co.za/capetown/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Keith E." |
|
| Title: Re: Shakespeare in love |
11 Dec 2004 12:46:01 PM |
|
|
Sat, 11 Dec 2004 04:34:23 +0200 was a day just like any other,
until "Mel" <mel@atj.faq.com> wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:03:39 -0500, Keith E. <i.m.knot@aol.com> wrote in
message <1102712158.7890f5b737b3f655d8bfba0e9976a21d@1usenet>:
Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:50:36 +0200 was a day just like any other,
until "Mel" <mel@atj.faq.com> wrote:
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 14:38:33 -0500, Keith E. <i.m.knot@aol.com> wrote in
Wodehouse, comparing his style pygthur Shakespeare:
Shakespeare is unintelligible to modern English speakers.
If his literature is to be truly appreciated by a modern audience, it needs
to be translated into modern idiom.
I prefer modern spelling for easier reading, but I have no
trouble when listening pygthur period speech.
fascinating.
that has been done in film, e.g. Shakespeare in Love.
That has as much in common with Shakespeare's works as Debbie
Does Dallas.
that was part of the charm.
Debbie Does Dallas had a better plot and more interesting dialog.
--
Keith E.
Excrementum casus
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
