| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"maff" |
| Date: |
12 Jun 2005 02:01:04 PM |
| Object: |
Shaping China's Future Power |
Shaping China's Future Power
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/12/weekinreview/12cohen.html
http://forums.delphiforums.com/atheistrefuge/messages?msg=1786.8493
By ROGER COHEN
It seems unlikely that China can be dissuaded from the notion that its
future involves a great-power destiny.
Losing the War of Opinion
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/10/AR2005061001708.html
http://forums.delphiforums.com/atheistrefuge/messages?msg=1791.6487
By Jim Hoagland, Page B09
The Bush administration risks having more Americans ask, "What are we
doing in Iraq and Afghanistan?" than, "How are we doing in Iraq and
Afghanistan?"
The Road to Riches
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/5ba95f4634dec9cd
and thread
The Road to Riches
http://tinyurl.com/55nzo
China
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/d3294ecc38a6a57d
China / Meiguo
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/772524fe8bf033d4
Is the wakening giant a monster?
http://tinyurl.com/iws6
A Blueprint for the Future
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/59c28cd6dfe6f60f
.
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: Cathars (was Re: Shaping China's Future Power) |
14 Jun 2005 04:19:51 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 06:41:47 -0000 in alt.atheism, Josh Hayes (Josh
Hayes <joshno@spamblarg.net>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism
John Wilkins <j.wilkins1@uq.edu.au> wrote in
news:d8lf69$2aem$1@bunyip2.cc.uq.edu.au:
My favorite case of Catholic/Christian barbarity is the extermination
of the Albigensians (Cathars) in southern France. They didn't threaten
anyone militarily - they just wanted to live a pure life in peace. But
the Church wanted that territory for themselves.
I'm not so sure about this; didn't they also represent their "heresy" as
their explicit belief? It seems to me that their belief set flew in the
face of the Catholic hierarchy, and no doubt, had it spread, would have
put a major crimp in the flow of goodies to the Church. I don't think
it's a "territory" issue, unless you mean in the organized crime sense.
Since I am myself in the way of a mystic (I'm a Quaker), I've been
interested in heresy pretty much from the get-go.
A useful and, as far as I know, accurate,
And there's the rub, the problem being "how can we know" - there's
very little, if any, in the way of original Cathari source material
existent, and most of what we "know" about them is derived from the
reports of those who exterminated them, rather in the way that Julius
Caesar's account of the Gaelic Wars is the only proximate source
material regarding the Druids (contemporary Druidism being a Victorian
revival, rather as most of what's generally regarded as Wicca
originated in the 1940s/50s)..
page on the Albigensian heresy
is here:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01267e.htm
Well, I think this kind of partial source need to be read critically,
rather in the way one might read an account of Stalin's
collectivisation of farms that was written by a card carrying
Stalinist, or Nazi attitudes towards Jews as written by a Nazi.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Komin" |
|
| Title: Re: Cathars (was Re: Shaping China's Future Power) |
14 Jun 2005 09:32:08 AM |
|
|
Simon de Montfort was he a Normand ?
the Normand of
Normandy [ Hauteville ] expansion into the South of Italy , and
the Normand of
Britain [ Count of Liecester ] expanded into the Toulouse regions .
these were the Normand expansion .
How about the Nestorians who preached the 3 separate different
Christian Gods , God the father ,
God the son ,
and God the Holy Ghost ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Cathars (was Re: Shaping China's Future Power) |
14 Jun 2005 03:21:57 PM |
|
|
Simon de Montfort was he a Normand ?
the Normand of
Normandy [ Hauteville ] expansion into the South of Italy , and
the Normand of
Britain [ Count of Liecester ] expanded into the Toulouse regions .
these were the Normand expansion .
Has anyone ever figured out what the hell this guy is talking about?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul J Gans" |
|
| Title: Re: Cathars (was Re: Shaping China's Future Power) |
14 Jun 2005 08:09:03 AM |
|
|
In talk.origins Josh Hayes <joshno@spamblarg.net> wrote:
John Wilkins <j.wilkins1@uq.edu.au> wrote in
news:d8lf69$2aem$1@bunyip2.cc.uq.edu.au:
My favorite case of Catholic/Christian barbarity is the extermination
of the Albigensians (Cathars) in southern France. They didn't threaten
anyone militarily - they just wanted to live a pure life in peace. But
the Church wanted that territory for themselves.
I'm not so sure about this; didn't they also represent their "heresy" as
their explicit belief? It seems to me that their belief set flew in the
face of the Catholic hierarchy, and no doubt, had it spread, would have
put a major crimp in the flow of goodies to the Church. I don't think
it's a "territory" issue, unless you mean in the organized crime sense.
Since I am myself in the way of a mystic (I'm a Quaker), I've been
interested in heresy pretty much from the get-go.
A useful and, as far as I know, accurate, page on the Albigensian heresy
is here:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01267e.htm
I don't think you are wrong, but I'd look a bit more widely.
That site has, after all, a strongly pro-Catholic point of
view. They are hardly likely to paint the Cathars as a
benign group.
By the way, their views were more widespread. Check out
"Bogomils".
---- Paul J. Gans
.
|
|
|
| User: "Josh Hayes" |
|
| Title: Re: Cathars (was Re: Shaping China's Future Power) |
14 Jun 2005 12:44:29 PM |
|
|
Paul J Gans <gans@panix.com> wrote in news:d8mktf$5he$7
@reader1.panix.com:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01267e.htm
I don't think you are wrong, but I'd look a bit more widely.
That site has, after all, a strongly pro-Catholic point of
view. They are hardly likely to paint the Cathars as a
benign group.
By the way, their views were more widespread. Check out
"Bogomils".
Well, that's why I CHOSE this site: I thought it would represent the
best description of why the Church so disliked the Cathars -- you want
to know what a tyrant was thinking when he acted tyrannical, ask him.
But of course you're right that it's hardly "fair", and another poster
is right to note that there's really no original "Cathar" writings on
which to base a description, in the same way that Caribs could be
described as ignorant savages, because they're all dead and can't argue
the point.
-JAH
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert J. Kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: Cathars (was Re: Shaping China's Future Power) |
14 Jun 2005 03:55:46 AM |
|
|
Josh Hayes wrote:
A useful and, as far as I know, accurate, page on the Albigensian heresy
is here:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01267e.htm
The most useful lemma we derive from the resolution of the Albigensian
Heresy is :
Kill them all, God will know his own.
From which we derive the corolary: Kill then all and let God sort out
the bodies, one of my favorite sentiments.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Wilkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Cathars (was Re: Shaping China's Future Power) |
14 Jun 2005 02:02:40 AM |
|
|
Josh Hayes wrote:
John Wilkins <j.wilkins1@uq.edu.au> wrote in
news:d8lf69$2aem$1@bunyip2.cc.uq.edu.au:
My favorite case of Catholic/Christian barbarity is the extermination
of the Albigensians (Cathars) in southern France. They didn't threaten
anyone militarily - they just wanted to live a pure life in peace. But
the Church wanted that territory for themselves.
I'm not so sure about this; didn't they also represent their "heresy" as
their explicit belief? It seems to me that their belief set flew in the
face of the Catholic hierarchy, and no doubt, had it spread, would have
put a major crimp in the flow of goodies to the Church. I don't think
it's a "territory" issue, unless you mean in the organized crime sense.
Is there any other sense? Of course they wanted the goodies - it's a rich
region; but mostly they wanted political control (= "souls"). In the end all
religious organisations are about power over people's lives.
The Cathars certainly made it clear they were opposed to Catholic doctrine.
But the records are largely only via the inquisitions by the Catholics. As far
as we know they were Manicheans, or Christian gnostics, via the Bogomils and
earlier the Paulicians.
They had a leader of some kind, I think his name was Peter, who tried to get
the Catholic church to engage in negotations. They didn't.
Since I am myself in the way of a mystic (I'm a Quaker), I've been
interested in heresy pretty much from the get-go.
A useful and, as far as I know, accurate, page on the Albigensian heresy
is here:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01267e.htm
No, I think it is too apologetic to be reliable.
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com
"Darwin's theory has no more to do with philosophy than any other
hypothesis in natural science." Tractatus 4.1122
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Cathars (was Re: Shaping China's Future Power) |
14 Jun 2005 02:17:02 AM |
|
|
test
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul J Gans" |
|
| Title: Re: Cathars (was Re: Shaping China's Future Power) |
14 Jun 2005 08:10:18 AM |
|
|
In talk.origins wrote:
test
Failed.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Popelish" |
|
| Title: Re: Cathars (was Re: Shaping China's Future Power) |
14 Jun 2005 02:17:50 AM |
|
|
Josh Hayes wrote:
John Wilkins <j.wilkins1@uq.edu.au> wrote in
news:d8lf69$2aem$1@bunyip2.cc.uq.edu.au:
My favorite case of Catholic/Christian barbarity is the extermination
of the Albigensians (Cathars) in southern France. They didn't threaten
anyone militarily - they just wanted to live a pure life in peace. But
the Church wanted that territory for themselves.
I'm not so sure about this; didn't they also represent their "heresy" as
their explicit belief? It seems to me that their belief set flew in the
face of the Catholic hierarchy, and no doubt, had it spread, would have
put a major crimp in the flow of goodies to the Church. I don't think
it's a "territory" issue, unless you mean in the organized crime sense.
Since I am myself in the way of a mystic (I'm a Quaker), I've been
interested in heresy pretty much from the get-go.
A useful and, as far as I know, accurate, page on the Albigensian heresy
is here:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01267e.htm
I sometimes wonder if the Catholic church is so fanatical about
procreation and so anti contraception because of their past war with
the Cathars.
from:
http://www.languedoc-france.info/120102_implications.htm
"The Cathars: Cathar Beliefs: Implications
The idea that human beings were sparks of light trapped in tunics
of material flesh had a number of logical consequences:
(1) Procreative sex was bad, since conception would result in
another soul being trapped. For this reason, normal sex
between man and wife was as bad as any other procreative sex.
Marriage was worthless, while contraception was regarded
with approval. Also, there was no reason to condemn
any form of non-procreative sex."
Have you ever seen anything so antithetical to the church's position
on the subject. They can't lighten up on recreational sex, or
homosexual sex without admitting that they exterminated the Cathars
for invalid reasons.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Cathars (was Re: Shaping China's Future Power) |
14 Jun 2005 02:13:24 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 03:17:50 -0400, John Popelish <jpopelish@rica.net>
wrote:
Josh Hayes wrote:
John Wilkins <j.wilkins1@uq.edu.au> wrote in
news:d8lf69$2aem$1@bunyip2.cc.uq.edu.au:
My favorite case of Catholic/Christian barbarity is the extermination
of the Albigensians (Cathars) in southern France. They didn't threaten
anyone militarily - they just wanted to live a pure life in peace. But
the Church wanted that territory for themselves.
I'm not so sure about this; didn't they also represent their "heresy" as
their explicit belief? It seems to me that their belief set flew in the
face of the Catholic hierarchy, and no doubt, had it spread, would have
put a major crimp in the flow of goodies to the Church. I don't think
it's a "territory" issue, unless you mean in the organized crime sense.
Since I am myself in the way of a mystic (I'm a Quaker), I've been
interested in heresy pretty much from the get-go.
A useful and, as far as I know, accurate, page on the Albigensian heresy
is here:
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01267e.htm
I sometimes wonder if the Catholic church is so fanatical about
procreation and so anti contraception because of their past war with
the Cathars.
Its followers throw a hissy over Hitler but are selectively blind to
his earlier equivalents. This is a good one to throw at them because
the perpetrator was canonised.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Shaping China's Future Power |
13 Jun 2005 11:53:02 PM |
|
|
John Wilkins wrote:
bob young wrote:
"vivapadrepio@aol.com" wrote:
maff wrote:
Shaping China's Future Power
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/12/weekinreview/12cohen.html
http://forums.delphiforums.com/atheistrefuge/messages?msg=1786.8493
By ROGER COHEN
It seems unlikely that China can be dissuaded from the notion that its
future involves a great-power destiny.
Prayer For Peace In The World:
Lord Jesus Christ, Prince of Peace, grant us peace throughout the
world, that all nations may work together and that there might be an
end to war. I ask this, Lord, in your name. Amen.
Reminds me of when I was a kid in W.W.II. In Britain we all went to church
to pray for the victory of our glorious soldiers and the Germans were doing
exactly the same thing!
We can all hope for world peace, but no gods are going to be involved,
unless they were responsible for these monstrosities:
The silence of Pope Pius XII during the Nazi holocaust.
Monsignor Tiso, head of the Slovak State who (per the
website below), "delivered the first trainload of Jews to
Auschwitz."
Hundreds of thousands of women burned alive as Witches
in the late Middle Ages and Renaissance.
Saint Cyril and some monks who burned the great Library
at Alexandria, destroying 600,000 volumes of knowledge
of the ancient world -- the greatest property crime of all
time."
The so-called "Crusades."
The spurring of the Protestant Reformation and the "wars
that followed wherein Germany lost half its population in a
generation."
The "destruction, plunder, rape, and papal pillage of the
people of the Americas and the eradication of their
culture..."
The extermination of the Huguenots in France.
The issuing of Vatican passports to Nazi leaders after World
War II so that they could escape prosecution for war crimes.
The castration of boy singers in the church so that they
could continue to sing in high pitch into adulthood.
[With acknowledgements to 'zadadu']
To be fair, the castrati were banned by the church (eventually); and it was a
cultural thing, not a religious thing.
My favorite case of Catholic/Christian barbarity is the extermination of the
Albigensians (Cathars) in southern France. They didn't threaten anyone
militarily - they just wanted to live a pure life in peace. But the Church
wanted that territory for themselves.
Reminds me of:
"To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim
that Jesus was not born of a virgin."
[Cardinal Bellarmine 1615, during the trial of Galileo]
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Biohumanities Project
University of Queensland - Blog: evolvethought.blogspot.com
"Darwin's theory has no more to do with philosophy than any other
hypothesis in natural science." Tractatus 4.1122
.
|
|
|
| User: "TomS" |
|
| Title: Re: Shaping China's Future Power |
14 Jun 2005 06:17:59 AM |
|
|
"On 13 Jun 2005 23:53:02 -0500, in article <42AE6233.796EC551@netvigator.com>,
bob young stated..."
[...snip...]
"To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim
that Jesus was not born of a virgin."
[Cardinal Bellarmine 1615, during the trial of Galileo]
Do you have a reference for that quotation?
--
---Tom S. <http://talkreason.org/articles/chickegg.cfm>
"...if...we can demonstrate that...everything...could have sprung forth as if
from certain seeds, even if we know that things did not happen that way; we
shall in that way explain their nature better than...as we believe them to be
created..." Descartes, Principles of Philosophy (1644) Part III section 45
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Komin" |
|
| Title: Re: Shaping China's Future Power |
13 Jun 2005 11:29:08 PM |
|
|
the US can always print more paper cash money ,
and the world would still accept these paper s.
China's problems are the unskilled labors who make 60US$ / month.
China 's future power lies in her training of skilled labor forces
for the productions of jet planes ,
subs,
oil tankers,
motor-cars,
miisles ,
navy fragates ,
marine motors ,
radars,
computers,
etc...
all these at cheap prices,
these are the Chinese power ,
Not the military power projections like the Americans,
because the Chinese still are not capable of running an air-craft
carrier,
the Thai can do that , even without gasoline for their Thai Harrier
fighter .
.
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Shaping China's Future Power |
13 Jun 2005 11:56:02 PM |
|
|
Komin wrote:
the US can always print more paper cash money ,
and the world would still accept these paper s.
China's problems are the unskilled labors who make 60US$ / month.
China 's future power lies in her training of skilled labor forces
for the productions of jet planes ,
subs,
oil tankers,
motor-cars,
miisles ,
navy fragates ,
marine motors ,
radars,
computers,
etc...
all these at cheap prices,
these are the Chinese power ,
Not the military power projections like the Americans,
because the Chinese still are not capable of running an air-craft
carrier,
the Thai can do that , even without gasoline for their Thai Harrier
fighter .
'The Thais can run an aircraft carrier without gasolene' just about
sums up the rest of your silly post.
I guess u r still at school, come back here after you graduate, or 'if'
you graduate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "PaPaPeng" |
|
| Title: Re: Shaping China's Future Power |
14 Jun 2005 05:38:50 AM |
|
|
On 13 Jun 2005 23:56:02 -0500, bob young <alaspectrum@netvigator.com>
wrote:
'The Thais can run an aircraft carrier without gasolene' just about
sums up the rest of your silly post.
Its more like by the time the Thai Navy put in the onboard stateroom
and facilities for the Thai king (its in the original design specs)
there wasn't any room left for naval operations.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Shaping China's Future Power |
14 Jun 2005 01:43:44 AM |
|
|
Komin wrote:
[snip]
these are the Chinese power ,
Not the military power projections like the Americans,
America can project military power because she has a damn good economic
infrastructure to support such powerful armed forces.
It's economy first, THEN military. You can't have the second without
the first...and the latter usually follows fairly quickly as the former
gets better and better.
because the Chinese still are not capable of running an air-craft
carrier,
Neither can the British (ducks from flames) just what the f_ck is your
point?
the Thai can do that , even without gasoline for their Thai Harrier
fighter .
You are aware that even the US military doesn't have gasoline for their
Harriers, right?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Shaping China's Future Power |
14 Jun 2005 02:13:09 AM |
|
|
请热衷于讨论中国问题的老外们先学习一些中文,否则就去找些黄色图片来打发时间吧。
西方(主要是英美两国)对于中国大陆的发展充满着复杂的心情,他们对大陆的敌意主要来源于1949年失去大陆的耿耿于怀以及50年代的朝鲜战争和70年代的越南战争的差强人意的结局。这种心情传染给了整个社会,包括那些“无辜”的人们。
.
|
|
|
| User: "Boikat" |
|
| Title: Re: Shaping China's Future Power |
14 Jun 2005 09:50:07 AM |
|
|
<lijunxu2008@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1118733189.549085.275540@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
请f衷Z讨论中>-~s"?-们.^学
?>中-?O否^T就Z?>"?>??来?"'--吧?,
西-(主要~<Z两>)对Z中>大T?s"'...满?复,s"
ff.O-们对大T?s".O"主要来源Z1949年失Z大T?s"??
Z??以S50年代s"oo^~?'O70年代s"S-^~?s"差强人"s
""??,T种ff. Y"T?.个社sOO.<,>?o-
o?s"人们?,
Why do I have a feeling this translates into "You have insulted a ancient
and proud people and civilization. Surrender now or all your base are become
ours", or something like that?
Boikat
--
<42><
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul J Gans" |
|
| Title: Re: Shaping China's Future Power |
13 Jun 2005 07:34:10 PM |
|
|
In talk.origins <> wrote:
maff wrote:
Shaping China's Future Power
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/12/weekinreview/12cohen.html
http://forums.delphiforums.com/atheistrefuge/messages?msg=1786.8493
By ROGER COHEN
It seems unlikely that China can be dissuaded from the notion that its
future involves a great-power destiny.
Prayer For Peace In The World:
Lord Jesus Christ, Prince of Peace, grant us peace throughout the
world, that all nations may work together and that there might be an
end to war. I ask this, Lord, in your name. Amen.
He's not listening.
----- Paul J. Gans
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "AC" |
|
| Title: Re: Shaping China's Future Power |
13 Jun 2005 08:03:18 PM |
|
|
On 13 Jun 2005 14:32:34 -0700,
vivapadrepio@aol.com <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote:
maff wrote:
Shaping China's Future Power
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/12/weekinreview/12cohen.html
http://forums.delphiforums.com/atheistrefuge/messages?msg=1786.8493
By ROGER COHEN
It seems unlikely that China can be dissuaded from the notion that its
future involves a great-power destiny.
Prayer For Peace In The World:
Lord Jesus Christ, Prince of Peace, grant us peace throughout the
world, that all nations may work together and that there might be an
end to war. I ask this, Lord, in your name. Amen.
You know, people have been asking this for two thousand years. Some of them
have immediately turned around to make wars of their own. If Jesus Christ
is still around somewhere, he ain't gonna help you, me or anyone else to
prevent wars. It's on our *****.
--
mightymartianca@hotmail.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: Shaping China's Future Power |
13 Jun 2005 09:17:02 PM |
|
|
AC wrote:
On 13 Jun 2005 14:32:34 -0700,
vivapadrepio@aol.com <vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote:
maff wrote:
Shaping China's Future Power
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/12/weekinreview/12cohen.html
http://forums.delphiforums.com/atheistrefuge/messages?msg=1786.8493
By ROGER COHEN
It seems unlikely that China can be dissuaded from the notion that its
future involves a great-power destiny.
Prayer For Peace In The World:
Lord Jesus Christ, Prince of Peace, grant us peace throughout the
world, that all nations may work together and that there might be an
end to war. I ask this, Lord, in your name. Amen.
You know, people have been asking this for two thousand years. Some of them
have immediately turned around to make wars of their own. If Jesus Christ
is still around somewhere, he ain't gonna help you, me or anyone else to
prevent wars. It's on our *****.
We do the warring, we create our imaginary gods
It's ALL on our *****
--
mightymartianca@hotmail.com
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|