Shattering the Christ-Myth



 Religions > Atheism > Shattering the Christ-Myth

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 21 May 2004 02:23:28 PM
Object: Shattering the Christ-Myth
Jesus
Shattering the Christ-Myth
The Reliability of the Secular References to Jesus
J. P. Holding
During a discussion of William Shakespeare, a student asked the old professor about the en vogue theory that Shakespeare did not write the plays ascribed to him.
The professor growled, "Young man, if Shakespeare did not write those plays,then they were written by someone who lived at the same time and had the same name!"
It is a sure sign of desperation: In disbelieving circles, one of the most popular ideas to come to the fore recently is the "Jesus-myth" - the idea that Jesus did not even exist, much less conduct a ministry as described in the New Testament. It is an idea that one would suppose would be relegated to the pages of the Weekly World News - and it might even be funny, were it not for the fact that there are so many who take it seriously and are extremely vocal in their seriousness.
At first glance, the "Jesus-myth" seems to be a stroke of genius: To eliminate Christianity and any possibility of it being true, just eliminate the founder! The idea was first significantly publicized by a 19th-century German scholar named Bruno Bauer. Following Bauer, there were a few other supporters: Couchoud, Gurev, Augstein [Chars.JesJud 97-8]. Today the active believer is most likely to have waved in their faces one of four supporters of this thesis: The turn-of-the-century writer Arthur Drews; the myth-thesis' most prominent and prolific supporter, G. A. Wells, who has published five books on the subject; Earl Doherty, or Acharya S. Each of these writers takes slightly different approaches, but they all agree that a person named Jesus did not exist (or, Wells seems to have taken a view now that Jesus may have existed, but may as well not have).
Does the "Jesus-myth" have any scholarly support? In this case, to simply say "no" would be an exaggeration! Support for the "Jesus-myth" comes not from historians, but usually from writers operating far out of their field. G. A. Wells, for example, is a professor of German; Drews was a professor of mathematics; Acharya only has a lower degree in classics; Doherty has some qualifications, but clearly lacks the discipline of a true scholar. The greatest support for the "Jesus-myth" comes not from people who know the subject, but from popularizers and those who accept their work uncritically. It is this latter group that we are most likely to encounter - and sadly, arguments and evidence seldom faze them. In spite of the fact that relevant scholarly consenus is unanimous that the "Jesus-myth" is incorrect, it continues to be promulgated on a popular level as though it were absolutely proven.
.

User: "Goodness Godless"

Title: Re: Shattering the Christ-Myth 21 May 2004 08:02:41 PM
<WhoDat@nym.alias.net> wrote in message
news:20040521192328.23523.qmail@nym.alias.net...


Jesus
Shattering the Christ-Myth


The Reliability of the Secular References to Jesus

J. P. Holding


During a discussion of William Shakespeare, a student asked the old

professor about the en vogue theory that Shakespeare did not write the plays
ascribed to him.

The professor growled, "Young man, if Shakespeare did not write those

plays,then they were written by someone who lived at the same time and had
the same name!"


Now, what professor, would come out with such an obvious circular
argument.
I suspect this has been made up by someone who never really listened to
their qualified
teachers, but prefered to listen to Disneyland/Witch Doctors who like to
dress
in dog collars and other funny clothes.
Oh by the way! please do not compare Shakespeare with the fairy tales
about Jesus or Mohamad.
--
Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it.
Niels Bohr
Goodness Godless
.

User: "bogie"

Title: Re: Shattering the Christ-Myth 21 May 2004 02:55:37 PM
<WhoDat@nym.alias.net> wrote in message
news:20040521192328.23523.qmail@nym.alias.net...

Jesus
Shattering the Christ-Myth


The Reliability of the Secular References to Jesus

J. P. Holding

You mean Robert Turkel?
Great....now we're going to get crap from the Turk-tonics website.
As I think about it, though, the good news in trolls posting this crap is
that it encourages people to check stuff out for themselves. That's what it
did for me; especially when somebody posted a link which took an opposite
view. I went from fundy xian to agnostic fairly quickly because of what I
learned in this ng. The trolls were part of the process.
bogie
.
User: "Spooked "

Title: Re: Shattering the Christ-Myth 21 May 2004 03:17:11 PM
"bogie" <neverassumeyouknow@yahoo.com> wrote:


<WhoDat@nym.alias.net> wrote in message
news:20040521192328.23523.qmail@nym.alias.net...

Jesus
Shattering the Christ-Myth


The Reliability of the Secular References to Jesus

J. P. Holding


You mean Robert Turkel?

Great....now we're going to get crap from the Turk-tonics website.

As I think about it, though, the good news in trolls posting this crap is
that it encourages people to check stuff out for themselves. That's what it
did for me; especially when somebody posted a link which took an opposite
view. I went from fundy xian to agnostic fairly quickly because of what I
learned in this ng. The trolls were part of the process.

The group success rate is towering!
.


User: "Adam Marczyk"

Title: Re: Shattering the Christ-Myth 21 May 2004 10:01:44 PM
<
> wrote in message
news:20040521192328.23523.qmail@nym.alias.net...

Jesus
Shattering the Christ-Myth


The Reliability of the Secular References to Jesus

J. P. Holding

An ever-reliable source of ad hominem attacks and arguments from authority,
as this cut-and-pasted article so nicely demonstrates...
--
"I'm materialist | a.a. #2001
Call me a humanist | http://www.ebonmusings.org
I guess I'm full of doubt | e-mail: ebonmuse!hotmail.com
So I'll gladly have it out with you..." | ICQ: 8777843
--Bad Religion, "Materialist" | PGP Key ID: 0x5C66F737
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.

User: "LP"

Title: Re: Shattering the Christ-Myth 21 May 2004 05:45:07 PM
On 21 May 2004 19:23:28 -0000,
wrote:

Jesus
Shattering the Christ-Myth


The Reliability of the Secular References to Jesus

J. P. Holding


During a discussion of William Shakespeare, a student asked the old professor about the en vogue theory that Shakespeare did not write the plays ascribed to him.
The professor growled, "Young man, if Shakespeare did not write those plays,then they were written by someone who lived at the same time and had the same name!"


It is a sure sign of desperation: In disbelieving circles, one of the most popular ideas to come to the fore recently is the "Jesus-myth" - the idea that Jesus did not even exist, much less conduct a ministry as described in the New Testament. It is an idea that one would suppose would be relegated to the pages of the Weekly World News - and it might even be funny, were it not for the fact that there are so many who take it seriously and are extremely vocal in their seriousness.

At first glance, the "Jesus-myth" seems to be a stroke of genius: To eliminate Christianity and any possibility of it being true, just eliminate the founder! The idea was first significantly publicized by a 19th-century German scholar named Bruno Bauer. Following Bauer, there were a few other supporters: Couchoud, Gurev, Augstein [Chars.JesJud 97-8]. Today the active believer is most likely to have waved in their faces one of four supporters of this thesis: The turn-of-the-century writer Arthur Drews; the myth-thesis' most prominent and prolific supporter, G. A. Wells, who has published five books on the subject; Earl Doherty, or Acharya S. Each of these writers takes slightly different approaches, but they all agree that a person named Jesus did not exist (or, Wells seems to have taken a view now that Jesus may have existed, but may as well not have).

Does the "Jesus-myth" have any scholarly support? In this case, to simply say "no" would be an exaggeration! Support for the "Jesus-myth" comes not from historians, but usually from writers operating far out of their field. G. A. Wells, for example, is a professor of German; Drews was a professor of mathematics; Acharya only has a lower degree in classics; Doherty has some qualifications, but clearly lacks the discipline of a true scholar. The greatest support for the "Jesus-myth" comes not from people who know the subject, but from popularizers and those who accept their work uncritically. It is this latter group that we are most likely to encounter - and sadly, arguments and evidence seldom faze them. In spite of the fact that relevant scholarly consenus is unanimous that the "Jesus-myth" is incorrect, it continues to be promulgated on a popular level as though it were absolutely proven.

Oddly, there is no mention of these books in the pathetic article
posted above.
I wonder why?
Full reviews can be read at this link.
http://www.prometheusbooks.com/groups/group_2.html
(The) Incredible Shrinking Son of Man
A Church Divided
Against the Faith
Biblical Errancy
Biblical vs. Secular Ethics
Blind Faith
Deadly Blessings
Deconstructing Jesus
Gospel Fictions
Jesus After 2000 Years
Jesus in History and Myth
Jesus Outside the Gospels
Modern Spiritualities
More Steve Allen on the Bible, Religion, and Morality
Mythology's Last Gods
Out of the Desert?
Paul
Phantoms of Divinity
Physician, Heal Thyself
Porphyry's Against The Christians
Self-Contradictions of the Bible
Steve Allen on the Bible, Religion, and Morality
The Bad News Bible
The Christ
The Christ Myth
The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Christian Myth
The Encyclopedia of Biblical Errancy
The Gospel and the Church
The Gospel Time Bomb
The Great Deception
The Jesus Idea
The Mind of the Bible-Believer
The Mystery of the Kingdom of God
The Old Faith & The New
The Origins of Christianity
The Secret Gospels
The Supernatural, The Occult, and The Bible
The Test of Love
What is the Bible?
What the Bible Really Says
http://www.prometheusbooks.com/groups/group_2.html
No mention of this author?
The first one on the list.
Robert M. Price, Ph.D. (Selma, NC), is professor of biblical criticism
for the Center for Inquiry Institute, Johnnie Colemon Theological
Seminary, and Johnston Community College. He is also the author of
Deconstructing Jesus. Previously, Price taught New Testament courses
at Drew University and mythology at Montclair State University.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Deconstructing Jesus
Robert M. Price
http://www.prometheusbooks.com/catalog/book_20.html
.....
"... provocative and compelling ...." - Journal of Church and State
After more than a century of New Testament scholarship, it has become
clear that the Jesus of the gospels is a fictive amalgam, reflecting
the hopes and beliefs of the early Christian community and revealing
very little about the historical Jesus. Over the millennia since the
beginning of Christianity various congregations, from fundamentalist
to liberal, have tended to produce a Jesus figurehead that functions
as a symbolic cloak for their specific theological agendas.
Through extensive research and fresh textual insights Robert M. Price
paves the way for a new reconstruction of Christian origins. Moving
beyond the work of Burton L. Mack and John Dominic Crossan on Jesus
movements and Christ cults, which shows how the various Jesus figures
may have amalgamated into the patchwork savior of Christian faith,
Price takes an innovative approach. He links the work of F.C. Baur,
Walter Bauer, Helmut Koester, and James M. Robinson with that of early
Christ-myth theorists-two camps of biblical analysis that have never
communicated.
Arguing that perhaps Jesus never existed as a historical figure, Price
maintains an agnostic stance, while putting many puzzles and scholarly
debates in a new light.
He also incorporates neglected parallels from Islam, the Baha'i Faith,
and Buddhism. Deconstructing Jesus provides a valuable bridge between
New Testament scholarship and early freethinkers in a refreshing
cross-fertilization of perspectives.
---------------------------------------------------------
(The) Incredible Shrinking Son of Man
How Reliable Is the Gospel Tradition?
Robert M. Price
.....
For more than a century scholars have been examining the Gospels and
other traditions about the life of Jesus to determine their historical
accuracy. Although the results of these scholarly efforts are
sometimes controversial, the consensus among researchers today is that
the four Evangelists’ accounts cannot be taken at face value. In fact,
a team of more than 100 scholars called the Jesus Seminar has come to
the conclusion that on average only about 18 percent of the four
Gospels is historically accurate.
An active member of the Jesus Seminar, Dr. Robert M. Price presents
the fruits of this important historical research in this fascinating
discussion of early Christianity. As the title suggests, Price is none
too optimistic about the reliability of the Gospel tradition as a
source of accurate historical information about the life of Jesus.
Indeed, he feels that his colleagues in the Jesus Seminar are much too
optimistic in their estimate of authentic material in the Gospels.
After an introduction to the historical-critical method for
nonspecialists and a critique of the methods used by the Jesus
Seminar, Price systematically discusses the narrative and teaching
materials in the Gospel, clearly presenting what is known and not
known about all of the major episodes of Jesus’ life. He also examines
the parables for authenticity as well as Jesus’ teachings about the
Kingdom of God, repentance, prayer, possessions and poverty, the
Atonement, and many other features of the Gospels.
Written for the general reading public in a lively and accessible
style, Dr. Price’s highly informative discussion will be of interest
to anyone who has wondered about the origins of Christianity.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And on the subject of the one author that was mentioned.
Did Jesus Exist?
G.A. Wells
.....
Professor Wells argues that there was no historical Jesus, and in thus
arguing he deals with the many recent writers who have interpreted the
historical Jesus as some kind of political figure in the struggle
against Rome, and calls in evidence the many contemporary theologians
who agree with some of his arguments about early Christianity. The
question at issue is what all the evidence adds up to. Does it
establish that Jesus did or did not exist? Professor Wells concludes
that the latter is the more likely hypothesis.
This challenge to received thinking by both Christians and
non-Christians is supported by much documentary evidence, and
Professor Wells carefully examines all the relevant problems and
answers all the relevant questions. He deliberately avoids polemic and
speculation, and sticks so far as possible to the known facts and to
rational inferences from the facts.
-------
The Historical Evidence for Jesus
G.A. Wells
.....
In this thoroughly researched study, G.A. Wells has squarely faced the
question of whether a man named Jesus lived, preached, healed, and
died in Palestine during the early years of the first century of the
Christian era - or indeed, at any time.
Building on the biblical studies of Christian theologians, Dr. Wells
soberly demonstrates that we have no reliable eyewitnesses to the
events depicted in the New Testament. He publicizes a fact known to
theological scholars but little-known in the average Christian
congregation: that the order of books of the New Testament is not an
accurate chronological arrangement. Indeed, Paul, who never saw Jesus,
wrote his epistles to early Christian congregations before the Gospels
of Matthew, Mark, and John were written.
It may come as a great surprise to Christians and other monotheists,
to agnostics, atheists, and humanists alike, that "the earliest
references to the historical Jesus are so vague that it is not
necessary to hold that he ever existed; the rise of Christianity can,
from the undoubtedly historical antecedents, be explained quite well
without him; and reasons can be given to show why, from about A.D. 80
or 90, Christians began to suppose that he had lived in Palestine
about fifty years earlier."
The Historical Evidence for Jesus is not a frontal attack on
Christians per se; rather it is an easily understood but scholarly
examination of the evidence for many long-accepted notions about the
"biography" of the man called Jesus. This book takes up and quotes
extensively from the Epistles and the Gospels of the New Testament,
thus letting the evidence speak for itself in words familiar to every
Bible reader. For example, Wells closely compares what Paul said about
Jesus with what the author of Matthew, who lived later, wrote of him.
Then he explains why these discrepancies apparently exist. Startling
indeed is his proof that "earlier writers sometimes make statements
which positively exclude the idea that Jesus worked miracles,
delivered certain teachings, or suffered under Pilate."
There is also interesting material on the topics of Jesus' supposed
family, the so-called Shroud of Turin, and the myth-making that even
today surrounds the figure of Jesus. Dr. Wells does not, however,
attempt to demolish belief in God or the ethical precepts held by
Christians. His presentation is always fair and couched in moderate
tones.
.
User: "Bill Mechlenburg"

Title: Re: Shattering the Christ-Myth 21 May 2004 07:06:01 PM
Most people that believe in the "Jesus myth" believe that putting up Jesus
as "God" is the myth.
There is NO OBJECTIVE evidence that Jesus was God and lot's of objective
evidence that he was not.
There is much archelogical evidence that man existed on this earth
approximately 500,000 years.
Why would God wait almost 500,000 years to send his son to earth to preach
his religion?
If Jesus was God why would he have to die painfully and inhumanly on a Cross
to atone for mans
sins which God himself created?
Why did he let and still permit hundreds of other religions and religious
beliefs to be promulgated
by errant believers?
Jesus left NO documents written and authored by himself. He quite apparently
was illiterate.
Why wouldn't a real God directly announce to the whole world his existence
and what he expected of humans
500,000 years ago? Why would he wait 500,000 years to communicate with only
a small fraction of humankind
via vague, contradictory and unproven documents written over a period of
several thousands years?
Why did he not take steps to be sure ALL of mankind received his message in
a clear easily understood manner?
And received it in a more timely fashion?
Man has developed communications equipment and methods (phones, TV and
radio) that permits
man to communicate directly and clearly with 90% of the world. Why can't God
do this or do even
better by communicating directly with 100% of the world? Why all this
confusion and contradictory
beliefs?
Why can't he tell us directly and clearly which of the hundreds of Gods is
the REAL God?
Could it be that all of the God stories are pure myth?
"LP" <whirl_pool@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:r00ta01l5csfseueue4ru9vc8br09vhq73@4ax.com...

On 21 May 2004 19:23:28 -0000,

wrote:

Jesus
Shattering the Christ-Myth


The Reliability of the Secular References to Jesus

J. P. Holding


During a discussion of William Shakespeare, a student asked the old

professor about the en vogue theory that Shakespeare did not write the plays
ascribed to him.

The professor growled, "Young man, if Shakespeare did not write those

plays,then they were written by someone who lived at the same time and had
the same name!"



It is a sure sign of desperation: In disbelieving circles, one of the

most popular ideas to come to the fore recently is the "Jesus-myth" - the
idea that Jesus did not even exist, much less conduct a ministry as
described in the New Testament. It is an idea that one would suppose would
be relegated to the pages of the Weekly World News - and it might even be
funny, were it not for the fact that there are so many who take it seriously
and are extremely vocal in their seriousness.


At first glance, the "Jesus-myth" seems to be a stroke of genius: To

eliminate Christianity and any possibility of it being true, just eliminate
the founder! The idea was first significantly publicized by a 19th-century
German scholar named Bruno Bauer. Following Bauer, there were a few other
supporters: Couched, Gurev, Augstein [Chars.JesJud 97-8]. Today the active
believer is most likely to have waved in their faces one of four supporters
of this thesis: The turn-of-the-century writer Arthur Drews; the
myth-thesis' most prominent and prolific supporter, G. A. Wells, who has
published five books on the subject; Earl Doherty, or Acharya S. Each of
these writers takes slightly different approaches, but they all agree that a
person named Jesus did not exist (or, Wells seems to have taken a view now
that Jesus may have existed, but may as well not have).


Does the "Jesus-myth" have any scholarly support? In this case, to simply

say "no" would be an exaggeration! Support for the "Jesus-myth" comes not
from historians, but usually from writers operating far out of their field.
G. A. Wells, for example, is a professor of German; Drews was a professor of
mathematics; Acharya only has a lower degree in classics; Doherty has some
qualifications, but clearly lacks the discipline of a true scholar. The
greatest support for the "Jesus-myth" comes not from people who know the
subject, but from popularizers and those who accept their work uncritically.
It is this latter group that we are most likely to encounter - and sadly,
arguments and evidence seldom faze them. In spite of the fact that relevant
scholarly consenus is unanimous that the "Jesus-myth" is incorrect, it
continues to be promulgated on a popular level as though it were absolutely
proven.



Oddly, there is no mention of these books in the pathetic article
posted above.

I wonder why?

Full reviews can be read at this link.
http://www.prometheusbooks.com/groups/group_2.html

(The) Incredible Shrinking Son of Man
A Church Divided
Against the Faith
Biblical Errancy
Biblical vs. Secular Ethics
Blind Faith
Deadly Blessings
Deconstructing Jesus
Gospel Fictions
Jesus After 2000 Years
Jesus in History and Myth
Jesus Outside the Gospels
Modern Spiritualities
More Steve Allen on the Bible, Religion, and Morality
Mythology's Last Gods
Out of the Desert?
Paul
Phantoms of Divinity
Physician, Heal Thyself
Porphyry's Against The Christians
Self-Contradictions of the Bible
Steve Allen on the Bible, Religion, and Morality
The Bad News Bible
The Christ
The Christ Myth
The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Christian Myth
The Encyclopedia of Biblical Errancy
The Gospel and the Church
The Gospel Time Bomb
The Great Deception
The Jesus Idea
The Mind of the Bible-Believer
The Mystery of the Kingdom of God
The Old Faith & The New
The Origins of Christianity
The Secret Gospels
The Supernatural, The Occult, and The Bible
The Test of Love
What is the Bible?
What the Bible Really Says

http://www.prometheusbooks.com/groups/group_2.html


No mention of this author?
The first one on the list.

Robert M. Price, Ph.D. (Selma, NC), is professor of biblical criticism
for the Center for Inquiry Institute, Johnnie Colemon Theological
Seminary, and Johnston Community College. He is also the author of
Deconstructing Jesus. Previously, Price taught New Testament courses
at Drew University and mythology at Montclair State University.


-------------------------------------------------------------------

Deconstructing Jesus
Robert M. Price
http://www.prometheusbooks.com/catalog/book_20.html
....
"... provocative and compelling ...." - Journal of Church and State

After more than a century of New Testament scholarship, it has become
clear that the Jesus of the gospels is a fictive amalgam, reflecting
the hopes and beliefs of the early Christian community and revealing
very little about the historical Jesus. Over the millennia since the
beginning of Christianity various congregations, from fundamentalist
to liberal, have tended to produce a Jesus figurehead that functions
as a symbolic cloak for their specific theological agendas.

Through extensive research and fresh textual insights Robert M. Price
paves the way for a new reconstruction of Christian origins. Moving
beyond the work of Burton L. Mack and John Dominic Crossan on Jesus
movements and Christ cults, which shows how the various Jesus figures
may have amalgamated into the patchwork savior of Christian faith,
Price takes an innovative approach. He links the work of F.C. Baur,
Walter Bauer, Helmut Koester, and James M. Robinson with that of early
Christ-myth theorists-two camps of biblical analysis that have never
communicated.

Arguing that perhaps Jesus never existed as a historical figure, Price
maintains an agnostic stance, while putting many puzzles and scholarly
debates in a new light.
He also incorporates neglected parallels from Islam, the Baha'i Faith,
and Buddhism. Deconstructing Jesus provides a valuable bridge between
New Testament scholarship and early freethinkers in a refreshing
cross-fertilization of perspectives.


---------------------------------------------------------

(The) Incredible Shrinking Son of Man
How Reliable Is the Gospel Tradition?
Robert M. Price
....
For more than a century scholars have been examining the Gospels and
other traditions about the life of Jesus to determine their historical
accuracy. Although the results of these scholarly efforts are
sometimes controversial, the consensus among researchers today is that
the four Evangelists' accounts cannot be taken at face value. In fact,
a team of more than 100 scholars called the Jesus Seminar has come to
the conclusion that on average only about 18 percent of the four
Gospels is historically accurate.

An active member of the Jesus Seminar, Dr. Robert M. Price presents
the fruits of this important historical research in this fascinating
discussion of early Christianity. As the title suggests, Price is none
too optimistic about the reliability of the Gospel tradition as a
source of accurate historical information about the life of Jesus.
Indeed, he feels that his colleagues in the Jesus Seminar are much too
optimistic in their estimate of authentic material in the Gospels.
After an introduction to the historical-critical method for
nonspecialists and a critique of the methods used by the Jesus
Seminar, Price systematically discusses the narrative and teaching
materials in the Gospel, clearly presenting what is known and not
known about all of the major episodes of Jesus' life. He also examines
the parables for authenticity as well as Jesus' teachings about the
Kingdom of God, repentance, prayer, possessions and poverty, the
Atonement, and many other features of the Gospels.

Written for the general reading public in a lively and accessible
style, Dr. Price's highly informative discussion will be of interest
to anyone who has wondered about the origins of Christianity.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----


And on the subject of the one author that was mentioned.


Did Jesus Exist?
G.A. Wells
....
Professor Wells argues that there was no historical Jesus, and in thus
arguing he deals with the many recent writers who have interpreted the
historical Jesus as some kind of political figure in the struggle
against Rome, and calls in evidence the many contemporary theologians
who agree with some of his arguments about early Christianity. The
question at issue is what all the evidence adds up to. Does it
establish that Jesus did or did not exist? Professor Wells concludes
that the latter is the more likely hypothesis.

This challenge to received thinking by both Christians and
non-Christians is supported by much documentary evidence, and
Professor Wells carefully examines all the relevant problems and
answers all the relevant questions. He deliberately avoids polemic and
speculation, and sticks so far as possible to the known facts and to
rational inferences from the facts.

-------

The Historical Evidence for Jesus
G.A. Wells
....
In this thoroughly researched study, G.A. Wells has squarely faced the
question of whether a man named Jesus lived, preached, healed, and
died in Palestine during the early years of the first century of the
Christian era - or indeed, at any time.

Building on the biblical studies of Christian theologians, Dr. Wells
soberly demonstrates that we have no reliable eyewitnesses to the
events depicted in the New Testament. He publicizes a fact known to
theological scholars but little-known in the average Christian
congregation: that the order of books of the New Testament is not an
accurate chronological arrangement. Indeed, Paul, who never saw Jesus,
wrote his epistles to early Christian congregations before the Gospels
of Matthew, Mark, and John were written.

It may come as a great surprise to Christians and other monotheists,
to agnostics, atheists, and humanists alike, that "the earliest
references to the historical Jesus are so vague that it is not
necessary to hold that he ever existed; the rise of Christianity can,
from the undoubtedly historical antecedents, be explained quite well
without him; and reasons can be given to show why, from about A.D. 80
or 90, Christians began to suppose that he had lived in Palestine
about fifty years earlier."

The Historical Evidence for Jesus is not a frontal attack on
Christians per se; rather it is an easily understood but scholarly
examination of the evidence for many long-accepted notions about the
"biography" of the man called Jesus. This book takes up and quotes
extensively from the Epistles and the Gospels of the New Testament,
thus letting the evidence speak for itself in words familiar to every
Bible reader. For example, Wells closely compares what Paul said about
Jesus with what the author of Matthew, who lived later, wrote of him.
Then he explains why these discrepancies apparently exist. Startling
indeed is his proof that "earlier writers sometimes make statements
which positively exclude the idea that Jesus worked miracles,
delivered certain teachings, or suffered under Pilate."

There is also interesting material on the topics of Jesus' supposed
family, the so-called Shroud of Turin, and the myth-making that even
today surrounds the figure of Jesus. Dr. Wells does not, however,
attempt to demolish belief in God or the ethical precepts held by
Christians. His presentation is always fair and couched in moderate
tones.



.


User: "raven1"

Title: Re: Shattering the Christ-Myth 21 May 2004 04:36:15 PM
On 21 May 2004 19:23:28 -0000,
wrote:

Jesus
Shattering the Christ-Myth


The Reliability of the Secular References to Jesus

What secular references to Jesus were you referring to?
.

User: "Carol Lee Smith"

Title: Re: Shattering the Christ-Myth 21 May 2004 02:33:14 PM
On 21 May 2004
wrote:

Jesus
Shattering the Christ-Myth
The Reliability of the Secular References to Jesus
J. P. Holding

What secular references would those be?
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER