Religions > Atheism > "She killed a bunch of kids, and you don't do that in Harris County,"
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
10 Nov 2005 11:08:51 PM |
| Object: |
"She killed a bunch of kids, and you don't do that in Harris County," |
This headline could have easily been about the closing of the local abortion
mill. Maybe Andrea Yates should take her cue from Planned Parenthood; have
the ACLU represent her and claim she was only exercising her "Freedom of
Choice", albeit retroactively.
http://today.reuters.com/news/NewsArticle.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyID=2005-11-09T232314Z_01_SPI960173_RTRUKOC_0_US-CRIME-YATES.xml
Texas child-killer Yates will have second trial
HOUSTON (Reuters) - Andrea Yates, the Texas mother who drowned her five
children in 2001, will face a second trial after the state's highest
criminal court refused on Wednesday to reinstate the murder convictions
against her.
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals upheld a lower appeals court's ruling
issued in January that overturned jury verdicts against Yates because of
errors in the testimony of an expert witness.
Harris County District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal said he would try Yates
again as soon as possible. "She killed a bunch of kids, and you don't do
that in Harris County," he said.
.
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:18:18 AM |
|
|
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- garbled:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- garbled:
S. Maizlich wrote:
IAAH lied:
The implied refusal. Why don't they just fucking SAY it:
"the
right to choose an abortion"? Why do they keep miles between
themselves and the word "abortion" whenever they can? The
answer
is obvious: they *know* there is something shameful, even
evil,
about their position.
You're full of *****, as usual.
Nope. *All* of this "safe, legal and rare" political rhetoric
indicates that the left *know* that the moral position they are
advocating is shameful.
And yet every time you say that, it's wrong.
Nope. If you look around at the literature, it's obvious.
I'd like cancer surgery to be safe, legal and rare as well.
The "rare" aspect of ***** Bill's admonition is that only rarely
should people choose abortion. He would prefer they choose to
prevent
conception in the first place.
Indeed, and well he should. It's a surgery. Surgery carries more
risks
than prevention.
That's not why he thinks it ought to be rare, you stupid twat, and you
know it.
Yes, it is and no, I don't.
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. Stop lying. Lying is immoral.
Yes, it is and no, I don't.
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not talking about
"surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
He wants it to be rare because he acknowledges the deep moral
trouble. He is making a MORAL prescription when he says that, not a
health care delivery system efficiency recommendation. Jumping
fucking
jesus! You didn't seriously expect to get away with that one, did
you?
No, you didn't; you were just jerking off.
No, that was
That was
....you.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
You lie. Stop lying.
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on marital rape:
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
Marriage is a contract in which everything is shared, including
bodies. What's yours is his and what's his is yours.
By withholding sex from him you violated your marriage vows. You
stole from your husband what was rightfully his.
1126802087.688528.21760@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Making your mind up is called the marriage
certificate. If you want to change it, it's called a divorce.
1414fd53.0311032335.47dd4971@posting.google.com
How would a witnesses' opinion, or a DA's opinion, or
a jurist's opinion, or a judge's opinion of the significance of force
involved be relevant?
The issue is that you think the government and it's
various judicial arms should act as people's parents and guardians,
even when it isn't there and can't possibly mediate what goes on in the
privacy of someone's bedroom without resorting to testimony--"he said,
she said".
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Maizlich" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:21:44 AM |
|
|
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- garbled:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- garbled:
S. Maizlich wrote:
IAAH lied:
The implied refusal. Why don't they just fucking SAY it:
"the
right to choose an abortion"? Why do they keep miles between
themselves and the word "abortion" whenever they can? The
answer
is obvious: they *know* there is something shameful, even
evil,
about their position.
You're full of *****, as usual.
Nope. *All* of this "safe, legal and rare" political rhetoric
indicates that the left *know* that the moral position they are
advocating is shameful.
And yet every time you say that, it's wrong.
Nope. If you look around at the literature, it's obvious.
I'd like cancer surgery to be safe, legal and rare as well.
The "rare" aspect of ***** Bill's admonition is that only rarely
should people choose abortion. He would prefer they choose to
prevent
conception in the first place.
Indeed, and well he should. It's a surgery. Surgery carries more
risks
than prevention.
That's not why he thinks it ought to be rare, you stupid twat, and
you
know it.
Yes, it is and no, I don't.
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. Stop lying. Lying is immoral.
Yes, it is and no, I don't.
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not talking about
"surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's an unconscionable violation of human rights.
***** Billy was not advocating that it be "rare"
because of its danger to the mother or because of its
effect on the consumption of medical resources.
***** Billy was advocating that it should be rare
because he recognizes it as moral minefield.
He wants it to be rare because he acknowledges the deep moral
trouble. He is making a MORAL prescription when he says that, not a
health care delivery system efficiency recommendation. Jumping
fucking
jesus! You didn't seriously expect to get away with that one, did
you?
No, you didn't; you were just jerking off.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:25:25 AM |
|
|
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- garbled:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- garbled:
S. Maizlich wrote:
IAAH lied:
The implied refusal. Why don't they just fucking SAY
it: "the
right to choose an abortion"? Why do they keep miles
between
themselves and the word "abortion" whenever they can?
The answer
is obvious: they *know* there is something shameful,
even evil,
about their position.
You're full of *****, as usual.
Nope. *All* of this "safe, legal and rare" political rhetoric
indicates that the left *know* that the moral position they
are
advocating is shameful.
And yet every time you say that, it's wrong.
Nope. If you look around at the literature, it's obvious.
I'd like cancer surgery to be safe, legal and rare as well.
The "rare" aspect of ***** Bill's admonition is that only rarely
should people choose abortion. He would prefer they choose to
prevent
conception in the first place.
Indeed, and well he should. It's a surgery. Surgery carries more
risks
than prevention.
That's not why he thinks it ought to be rare, you stupid twat,
and you
know it.
Yes, it is and no, I don't.
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. Stop lying. Lying is immoral.
Yes, it is and no, I don't.
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not talking about
"surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's
....surgery.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease,
Emphysema, and May Complicate Pregnancy
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on marital rape:
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
Marriage is a contract in which everything is shared, including
bodies. What's yours is his and what's his is yours.
By withholding sex from him you violated your marriage vows. You
stole from your husband what was rightfully his.
1126802087.688528.21760@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Making your mind up is called the marriage
certificate. If you want to change it, it's called a divorce.
1414fd53.0311032335.47dd4971@posting.google.com
How would a witnesses' opinion, or a DA's opinion, or
a jurist's opinion, or a judge's opinion of the significance of force
involved be relevant?
The issue is that you think the government and it's
various judicial arms should act as people's parents and guardians,
even when it isn't there and can't possibly mediate what goes on in the
privacy of someone's bedroom without resorting to testimony--"he said,
she said".
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Maizlich" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:28:00 AM |
|
|
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- garbled:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- garbled:
S. Maizlich wrote:
IAAH lied:
The implied refusal. Why don't they just fucking SAY
it: "the
right to choose an abortion"? Why do they keep miles
between
themselves and the word "abortion" whenever they can?
The answer
is obvious: they *know* there is something shameful,
even evil,
about their position.
You're full of *****, as usual.
Nope. *All* of this "safe, legal and rare" political
rhetoric
indicates that the left *know* that the moral position
they are
advocating is shameful.
And yet every time you say that, it's wrong.
Nope. If you look around at the literature, it's obvious.
I'd like cancer surgery to be safe, legal and rare as well.
The "rare" aspect of ***** Bill's admonition is that only
rarely
should people choose abortion. He would prefer they choose to
prevent
conception in the first place.
Indeed, and well he should. It's a surgery. Surgery carries
more risks
than prevention.
That's not why he thinks it ought to be rare, you stupid twat,
and you
know it.
Yes, it is and no, I don't.
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. Stop lying. Lying is immoral.
Yes, it is and no, I don't.
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not talking about
"surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's an unconscionable violation of human rights.
***** Billy was not advocating that it be "rare"
because of its danger to the mother or because of its
effect on the consumption of medical resources. *****
Billy was advocating that it should be rare because he
recognizes it as moral minefield.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:31:32 AM |
|
|
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- garbled:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- garbled:
S. Maizlich wrote:
IAAH lied:
The implied refusal. Why don't they just fucking SAY
it: "the
right to choose an abortion"? Why do they keep miles
between
themselves and the word "abortion" whenever they can?
The answer
is obvious: they *know* there is something shameful,
even evil,
about their position.
You're full of *****, as usual.
Nope. *All* of this "safe, legal and rare" political
rhetoric
indicates that the left *know* that the moral position
they are
advocating is shameful.
And yet every time you say that, it's wrong.
Nope. If you look around at the literature, it's obvious.
I'd like cancer surgery to be safe, legal and rare as well.
The "rare" aspect of ***** Bill's admonition is that only
rarely
should people choose abortion. He would prefer they choose
to prevent
conception in the first place.
Indeed, and well he should. It's a surgery. Surgery carries
more risks
than prevention.
That's not why he thinks it ought to be rare, you stupid twat,
and you
know it.
Yes, it is and no, I don't.
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. Stop lying. Lying is immoral.
Yes, it is and no, I don't.
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not talking about
"surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's
....still surgery.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease,
Emphysema, and May Complicate Pregnancy
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on marital rape:
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
Marriage is a contract in which everything is shared, including
bodies. What's yours is his and what's his is yours.
By withholding sex from him you violated your marriage vows. You
stole from your husband what was rightfully his.
1126802087.688528.21760@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Making your mind up is called the marriage
certificate. If you want to change it, it's called a divorce.
1414fd53.0311032335.47dd4971@posting.google.com
How would a witnesses' opinion, or a DA's opinion, or
a jurist's opinion, or a judge's opinion of the significance of force
involved be relevant?
The issue is that you think the government and it's
various judicial arms should act as people's parents and guardians,
even when it isn't there and can't possibly mediate what goes on in the
privacy of someone's bedroom without resorting to testimony--"he said,
she said".
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Maizlich" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:32:57 AM |
|
|
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- garbled:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- garbled:
S. Maizlich wrote:
IAAH lied:
The implied refusal. Why don't they just fucking SAY
it: "the
right to choose an abortion"? Why do they keep miles
between
themselves and the word "abortion" whenever they can?
The answer
is obvious: they *know* there is something shameful,
even evil,
about their position.
You're full of *****, as usual.
Nope. *All* of this "safe, legal and rare" political
rhetoric
indicates that the left *know* that the moral position
they are
advocating is shameful.
And yet every time you say that, it's wrong.
Nope. If you look around at the literature, it's obvious.
I'd like cancer surgery to be safe, legal and rare as well.
The "rare" aspect of ***** Bill's admonition is that only
rarely
should people choose abortion. He would prefer they choose
to prevent
conception in the first place.
Indeed, and well he should. It's a surgery. Surgery carries
more risks
than prevention.
That's not why he thinks it ought to be rare, you stupid twat,
and you
know it.
Yes, it is and no, I don't.
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. Stop lying. Lying is immoral.
Yes, it is and no, I don't.
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not talking
about "surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's an unconscionable violation of human rights.
***** Billy was not advocating that it be "rare"
because of its danger to the mother or because of its
effect on the consumption of medical resources. *****
Billy was advocating that it should be rare because he
recognizes it as moral minefield.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking
groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:35:48 AM |
|
|
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not talking
about "surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's
....still surgery.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking
groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease,
Emphysema, and May Complicate Pregnancy
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on marital rape:
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
Marriage is a contract in which everything is shared, including
bodies. What's yours is his and what's his is yours.
By withholding sex from him you violated your marriage vows. You
stole from your husband what was rightfully his.
1126802087.688528.21760@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Making your mind up is called the marriage
certificate. If you want to change it, it's called a divorce.
1414fd53.0311032335.47dd4971@posting.google.com
How would a witnesses' opinion, or a DA's opinion, or
a jurist's opinion, or a judge's opinion of the significance of force
involved be relevant?
The issue is that you think the government and it's
various judicial arms should act as people's parents and guardians,
even when it isn't there and can't possibly mediate what goes on in the
privacy of someone's bedroom without resorting to testimony--"he said,
she said".
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Maizlich" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:36:03 AM |
|
|
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not talking
about "surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's
...still surgery.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking
groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:38:55 AM |
|
|
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not talking
about "surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's
...still surgery.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking
groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
Glad you admit that people who have sex don't choose to give birth.
Thanks. I'm going to copy this and paste it in every post from here on out.
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on marital rape:
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
Marriage is a contract in which everything is shared, including
bodies. What's yours is his and what's his is yours.
By withholding sex from him you violated your marriage vows. You
stole from your husband what was rightfully his.
1126802087.688528.21760@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Making your mind up is called the marriage
certificate. If you want to change it, it's called a divorce.
1414fd53.0311032335.47dd4971@posting.google.com
How would a witnesses' opinion, or a DA's opinion, or
a jurist's opinion, or a judge's opinion of the significance of force
involved be relevant?
The issue is that you think the government and it's
various judicial arms should act as people's parents and guardians,
even when it isn't there and can't possibly mediate what goes on in the
privacy of someone's bedroom without resorting to testimony--"he said,
she said".
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Maizlich" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:39:24 AM |
|
|
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not talking
about "surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's
...still surgery.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking
groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
Glad you admit that people who have sex don't choose to give birth.
But sometimes, that's just the outcome.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:41:41 AM |
|
|
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not talking
about "surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's
...still surgery.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the
anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
Glad you admit that people who have sex don't choose to give birth.
Glad you admit that people who have sex don't choose to give birth.
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on marital rape:
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
Marriage is a contract in which everything is shared, including
bodies. What's yours is his and what's his is yours.
By withholding sex from him you violated your marriage vows. You
stole from your husband what was rightfully his.
1126802087.688528.21760@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Making your mind up is called the marriage
certificate. If you want to change it, it's called a divorce.
1414fd53.0311032335.47dd4971@posting.google.com
How would a witnesses' opinion, or a DA's opinion, or
a jurist's opinion, or a judge's opinion of the significance of force
involved be relevant?
The issue is that you think the government and it's
various judicial arms should act as people's parents and guardians,
even when it isn't there and can't possibly mediate what goes on in the
privacy of someone's bedroom without resorting to testimony--"he said,
she said".
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Maizlich" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:41:53 AM |
|
|
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not
talking about "surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's
...still surgery.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the
anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
Glad you admit that people who have sex don't choose to give birth.
Glad you admit that
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:46:12 AM |
|
|
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not
talking about "surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's
...still surgery.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the
anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
Glad you admit that people who have sex don't choose to give birth.
Glad you admit that
People
who have sex don't choose to give birth
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on marital rape:
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
Marriage is a contract in which everything is shared, including
bodies. What's yours is his and what's his is yours.
By withholding sex from him you violated your marriage vows. You
stole from your husband what was rightfully his.
1126802087.688528.21760@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Making your mind up is called the marriage
certificate. If you want to change it, it's called a divorce.
1414fd53.0311032335.47dd4971@posting.google.com
How would a witnesses' opinion, or a DA's opinion, or
a jurist's opinion, or a judge's opinion of the significance of force
involved be relevant?
The issue is that you think the government and it's
various judicial arms should act as people's parents and guardians,
even when it isn't there and can't possibly mediate what goes on in the
privacy of someone's bedroom without resorting to testimony--"he said,
she said".
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Maizlich" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:47:23 AM |
|
|
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not
talking about "surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's
...still surgery.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the
anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
Glad you admit that people who have sex don't choose to give birth.
Glad you admit that
People
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:52:50 AM |
|
|
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not
talking about "surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's
...still surgery.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the
anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
Glad you admit that people who have sex don't choose to give birth.
Glad you admit that
People
People who
have sex don't choose to give birth
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on marital rape:
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
Marriage is a contract in which everything is shared, including
bodies. What's yours is his and what's his is yours.
By withholding sex from him you violated your marriage vows. You
stole from your husband what was rightfully his.
1126802087.688528.21760@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Making your mind up is called the marriage
certificate. If you want to change it, it's called a divorce.
1414fd53.0311032335.47dd4971@posting.google.com
How would a witnesses' opinion, or a DA's opinion, or
a jurist's opinion, or a judge's opinion of the significance of force
involved be relevant?
The issue is that you think the government and it's
various judicial arms should act as people's parents and guardians,
even when it isn't there and can't possibly mediate what goes on in the
privacy of someone's bedroom without resorting to testimony--"he said,
she said".
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Maizlich" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 03:04:58 AM |
|
|
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
stupid ***** lied:
No, it isn't, and yes, you do. ***** Billy was not
talking about "surgery", and you know it.
Hey, guess what abortion is?
It's
...still surgery.
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the
anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
Glad you admit that people who have sex don't choose to give birth.
Glad you admit that
People who smoke don't choose to get cancer.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:22:37 AM |
|
|
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexkitten-- wrote:
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease,
Emphysema, and May Complicate Pregnancy
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on marital rape:
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
Marriage is a contract in which everything is shared, including
bodies. What's yours is his and what's his is yours.
By withholding sex from him you violated your marriage vows. You
stole from your husband what was rightfully his.
1126802087.688528.21760@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Making your mind up is called the marriage
certificate. If you want to change it, it's called a divorce.
1414fd53.0311032335.47dd4971@posting.google.com
How would a witnesses' opinion, or a DA's opinion, or
a jurist's opinion, or a judge's opinion of the significance of force
involved be relevant?
The issue is that you think the government and it's
various judicial arms should act as people's parents and guardians,
even when it isn't there and can't possibly mediate what goes on in the
privacy of someone's bedroom without resorting to testimony--"he said,
she said".
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Maizlich" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:23:28 AM |
|
|
--sexcunt-- lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexcunt-- lied:
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
Irrelevant. That doesn't show that smokers have a wish
to get cancer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:26:42 AM |
|
|
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexcunt-- lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexcunt-- lied:
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
Irrelevant.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease,
Emphysema, and May Complicate Pregnancy
--
--sexkitten--
Sneechres on marital rape:
1414fd53.0312142051.5e760545@posting.google.com
Marriage is a contract in which everything is shared, including
bodies. What's yours is his and what's his is yours.
By withholding sex from him you violated your marriage vows. You
stole from your husband what was rightfully his.
1126802087.688528.21760@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
Making your mind up is called the marriage
certificate. If you want to change it, it's called a divorce.
1414fd53.0311032335.47dd4971@posting.google.com
How would a witnesses' opinion, or a DA's opinion, or
a jurist's opinion, or a judge's opinion of the significance of force
involved be relevant?
The issue is that you think the government and it's
various judicial arms should act as people's parents and guardians,
even when it isn't there and can't possibly mediate what goes on in the
privacy of someone's bedroom without resorting to testimony--"he said,
she said".
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Maizlich" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the pro-abortion crowd: consequence-free fucking |
01 Dec 2005 02:28:53 AM |
|
|
--sexkitten-- wrote:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexcunt-- lied:
S. Maizlich wrote:
--sexcunt-- lied:
People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit.
I believe I've heard something else from the anti-smoking groups,
No, you haven't.
You haven't. You lied. Stop lying.
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
Irrelevant.
"People don't choose to get cancer, nitwit"
SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer,
People don't choose to get cancer.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lars Eighner" |
|
| Title: The *real* aim of the anti-choice crowd: miserable underclass |
30 Nov 2005 01:20:35 AM |
|
|
Why do anti-choice people call themselves "pro-life"? You don't
see them protesting executions. They aren't camping out with
Cindy Sheehan. They clearly are not "pro-life" when it comes to
living persons. And for that matter, they have no problem with
having a tumor or a wart cut off. They aren't really
"pro-life," they simple say that to obscure the fact that they
want the government to restrict people's reproductive choices.
They consistently oppose sex education. They consistently
oppose making birth control devices and information available to
young people. If they merely want to reduce the number of
abortions, why would they so limit availability of the
information and the means to avoid unwanted pregnancy? Pretty
clearly, they want people to have unwanted pregancies and they
want to make childbearing compulsory.
--
Rev. Lars Eighner, ULC http://www.larseighner.com/
The Mint Jelly of God® -- The World's Best Atheist -- Unholier Than Thou
First Church of Electro-Baptism ***Atheist #1965*** One Short Circuit to Jesus
"I thank heaven for a man like Adolf Hitler" --Frank Buchman, U.S. evangelist
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the anti-choice crowd: miserable underclass |
30 Nov 2005 08:52:07 AM |
|
|
Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com> writes:
Why do anti-choice people call themselves "pro-life"? You don't
see them protesting executions. They aren't camping out with
Cindy Sheehan. They clearly are not "pro-life" when it comes to
living persons. And for that matter, they have no problem with
having a tumor or a wart cut off. They aren't really
"pro-life," they simple say that to obscure the fact that they
want the government to restrict people's reproductive choices.
They consistently oppose sex education. They consistently
oppose making birth control devices and information available to
young people. If they merely want to reduce the number of
abortions, why would they so limit availability of the
information and the means to avoid unwanted pregnancy? Pretty
clearly, they want people to have unwanted pregancies and they
want to make childbearing compulsory.
It's all about control, for such wingnuts - we have the freedom to obey their
hallucinations, and to do anything else is immoral, according to them. That's
a short description of their "reality".
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 0 (November 27)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, November 30 vs. Cleveland, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "S. Maizlich" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the anti-choice crowd: miserable underclass |
30 Nov 2005 11:27:57 AM |
|
|
The Chief Prevaricator lied:
Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com> writes:
Why do anti-choice people call themselves "pro-life"? You don't
see them protesting executions. They aren't camping out with
Cindy Sheehan. They clearly are not "pro-life" when it comes to
living persons. And for that matter, they have no problem with
having a tumor or a wart cut off. They aren't really
"pro-life," they simple say that to obscure the fact that they
want the government to restrict people's reproductive choices.
They consistently oppose sex education. They consistently
oppose making birth control devices and information available to
young people. If they merely want to reduce the number of
abortions, why would they so limit availability of the
information and the means to avoid unwanted pregnancy? Pretty
clearly, they want people to have unwanted pregancies and they
want to make childbearing compulsory.
It's all about control,
No. It's about not letting people escape the
consequences of their freely chosen actions by killing
humans.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the anti-choice crowd: miserable underclass |
30 Nov 2005 01:05:46 PM |
|
|
"S. Maizlich" <s.e.maizlich@hertzburgh.eduu> writes:
The Chief Prevaricator lied:
Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com> writes:
Why do anti-choice people call themselves "pro-life"? You don't
see them protesting executions. They aren't camping out with
Cindy Sheehan. They clearly are not "pro-life" when it comes to
living persons. And for that matter, they have no problem with
having a tumor or a wart cut off. They aren't really
"pro-life," they simple say that to obscure the fact that they
want the government to restrict people's reproductive choices. They
consistently oppose sex education. They consistently
oppose making birth control devices and information available to
young people. If they merely want to reduce the number of
abortions, why would they so limit availability of the
information and the means to avoid unwanted pregnancy? Pretty
clearly, they want people to have unwanted pregancies and they
want to make childbearing compulsory.
It's all about control,
No. It's about not letting people escape the consequences of their freely
chosen actions by killing humans.
....it's about giving in to the inability of one crackhead in California to
keep from trying to mind others' business.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 3, Houston 0 (November 27)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, November 30 vs. Cleveland, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mimi Cohen" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the anti-choice crowd: miserable underclass |
30 Nov 2005 01:58:33 PM |
|
|
The Chief Instigator wrote:
"S. Maizlich" <s.e.maizlich@hertzburgh.eduu> writes:
The Chief Prevaricator lied:
Lars Eighner <usenet@larseighner.com> writes:
Why do anti-choice people call themselves "pro-life"? You don't
see them protesting executions. They aren't camping out with
Cindy Sheehan. They clearly are not "pro-life" when it comes to
living persons. And for that matter, they have no problem with
having a tumor or a wart cut off. They aren't really
"pro-life," they simple say that to obscure the fact that they
want the government to restrict people's reproductive choices. They
consistently oppose sex education. They consistently
oppose making birth control devices and information available to
young people. If they merely want to reduce the number of
abortions, why would they so limit availability of the
information and the means to avoid unwanted pregnancy? Pretty
clearly, they want people to have unwanted pregancies and they
want to make childbearing compulsory.
It's all about control,
No. It's about not letting people escape the consequences of their freely
chosen actions by killing humans.
...it's about giving in to the inability of one crackhead in California to
keep from trying to mind others' business.
Not *JUST* California, specifically LA!
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: The *real* aim of the anti-choice crowd: miserable underclass |
| | | | | | | |
