| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Stephen Stink" |
| Date: |
02 Jun 2005 11:36:03 AM |
| Object: |
Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
Sure they should.
Go to my group....
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Enronscam/
.
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 01:38:35 PM |
|
|
"Stephen Stink" <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sure they should.
We already do....this Saturday is eleven years for me and my atheist wife.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sasha" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 02:15:31 PM |
|
|
Four years for my part-time Catholic wife and I (she likes to call
herself a recovering Catholic). We even get to sleep in on Sundays and
have sex. It sure beats dry crackers and eternal guilt any day. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 02:18:35 PM |
|
|
"Sasha" <scironi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1117739731.270040.137070@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Four years for my part-time Catholic wife and I (she likes to call
herself a recovering Catholic). We even get to sleep in on Sundays and
have sex. It sure beats dry crackers and eternal guilt any day. :-)
:-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Katt" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 02:22:09 PM |
|
|
"Sasha" <scironi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1117739731.270040.137070@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Four years for my part-time Catholic wife and I (she likes to call
herself a recovering Catholic). We even get to sleep in on Sundays and
have sex. It sure beats dry crackers and eternal guilt any day. :-)
Aren't you under-selling the advantages of the Holy Roman faith? I thought
there was free *wine and cooties* as well...?
Katt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sasha" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 04:05:23 PM |
|
|
Aren't you under-selling the advantages of the Holy Roman faith? I thought
there was free *wine and cooties* as well...?
True...but if I want wine and cooties, I can either subject myself to
an hour of so-and-so begat so-and-so, or I can splurge $5 on a box of
wine, pull my pants down and bend over a shopping cart in an alley.
Which, incidentally, is more preferrable than an hour of Catholic mass.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Katt" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 04:21:05 PM |
|
|
"Sasha" <scironi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1117746323.004609.282190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Aren't you under-selling the advantages of the Holy Roman faith? I
thought
there was free *wine and cooties* as well...?
True...but if I want wine and cooties, I can either subject myself to
an hour of so-and-so begat so-and-so, or I can splurge $5 on a box of
wine, pull my pants down and bend over a shopping cart in an alley.
Wow!! Sasha *smashes* through the $6 barrier!! What courage!!
(And I'm not even gonna *mention* the old 'shopping cart' ploy...!)
Which, incidentally, is more preferrable than an hour of Catholic mass.
What about all the smelly smoke? You know, the incense? The
'look-down-here-God-we're-making-a-really-big-pong-just-for-you' stuff...?
Ain't you got *no class*, dearie...?
Katt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
13 Jun 2005 04:14:13 PM |
|
|
"Katt" <seruhshjaudn@dfhu.net> wrote in
news:5LKne.4942$hT6.2468@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net:
"Sasha" <scironi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1117746323.004609.282190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Aren't you under-selling the advantages of the Holy Roman faith? I
thought
there was free *wine and cooties* as well...?
True...but if I want wine and cooties, I can either subject myself to
an hour of so-and-so begat so-and-so, or I can splurge $5 on a box of
wine, pull my pants down and bend over a shopping cart in an alley.
Wow!! Sasha *smashes* through the $6 barrier!! What courage!!
(And I'm not even gonna *mention* the old 'shopping cart' ploy...!)
Which, incidentally, is more preferrable than an hour of Catholic
mass.
What about all the smelly smoke? You know, the incense? The
'look-down-here-God-we're-making-a-really-big-pong-just-for-you'
stuff...? Ain't you got *no class*, dearie...?
Now if they used Moses' proper incense, I might be more enthusiastic
about the practice !
http://www.cannabisculture.com/backissues/cc05/kanehb.html
http://www.cannabisculture.com/gallery/art/kanehbosm.html
:)
--
Jez, MBA.,
Country Dancing and Advanced Astrology, UBS.
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
.
|
|
|
| User: "ArWeGod" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
14 Jun 2005 04:28:52 AM |
|
|
"Jez" <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9674E238271E0hellward@216.196.109.145...
"Katt" <seruhshjaudn@dfhu.net> wrote in
news:5LKne.4942$hT6.2468@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net:
"Sasha" <scironi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1117746323.004609.282190@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Aren't you under-selling the advantages of the Holy Roman faith? I
thought
there was free *wine and cooties* as well...?
True...but if I want wine and cooties, I can either subject myself
to
an hour of so-and-so begat so-and-so, or I can splurge $5 on a box
of
wine, pull my pants down and bend over a shopping cart in an alley.
I don't have cooties, but i DO have a shopping cart (most useful thing
I've stolen in 20 years)!! We could "do it" in my garage if you need
privacy! But wear a skirt...
--
ArWeAlaCart
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sasha" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 04:38:37 PM |
|
|
Wow!! Sasha *smashes* through the $6 barrier!! What courage!!
I'm not known for being the classiest guy in the alley. :-)
What about all the smelly smoke? You know, the incense? The
'look-down-here-God-we're-maki=ADng-a-really-big-pong-just-for-=ADyou' stu=
ff...?
Ain't you got *no class*, dearie...?
I actually don't mind that as much as the forced handshakes near the
end of a mass. I can barely stand most people around me as it is - the
last thing I want to do is shake hands with strangers and pretend that
I give a *****. Them Catholics have some zany customs, that's for sure.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "nJb" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
03 Jun 2005 01:20:14 AM |
|
|
The other Donald wrote:
"Stephen Stink" <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sure they should.
We already do....this Saturday is eleven years for me and my atheist wife.
33 years today. Not sure id my wife is an atheist but she sure isn't a
religious wacko.
--
Jack
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nancy Norton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 09:16:13 PM |
|
|
The other Donald wrote:
"Stephen Stink" <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sure they should.
We already do....this Saturday is eleven years for me and my atheist wife.
Today is 26 years for me and my atheist husband!
(Gad, I can't believe it's been that long.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
03 Jun 2005 05:29:35 AM |
|
|
"Nancy Norton" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:VIKdnTQiR5vzIALfRVn-qw@comcast.com...
The other Donald wrote:
"Stephen Stink" <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sure they should.
We already do....this Saturday is eleven years for me and my atheist
wife.
Today is 26 years for me and my atheist husband!
(Gad, I can't believe it's been that long.)
Wow! Congratulations! :)
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wayne Delia" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
03 Jun 2005 08:11:16 PM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Nancy Norton" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:VIKdnTQiR5vzIALfRVn-qw@comcast.com...
The other Donald wrote:
"Stephen Stink" <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sure they should.
We already do....this Saturday is eleven years for me and my atheist
wife.
Today is 26 years for me and my atheist husband!
(Gad, I can't believe it's been that long.)
Wow! Congratulations! :)
My atheist wife hasn't thrown this atheist out for the past 15 years of
marriage.
--
Wayne Delia,
Delta Iota Chapter Advisor, Phi Kappa Sigma at Marist College
"I'm beginning to sober up, and you're scaring me!" (Tom Servo, MST3K)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Katt" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 09:38:32 PM |
|
|
"Nancy Norton" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:VIKdnTQiR5vzIALfRVn-qw@comcast.com...
The other Donald wrote:
"Stephen Stink" <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sure they should.
We already do....this Saturday is eleven years for me and my atheist
wife.
Today is 26 years for me and my atheist husband!
That's impressive!
On the other hand, though, if you're both atheists, then you must surely
have murdered at least 10 or 11 million people in that time? I mean, without
'God', you've 'no way of telling right from wrong', have you...?
Well, congratulations, anyway!
:-)
Katt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory Gadow" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
03 Jun 2005 08:22:00 AM |
|
|
Katt wrote:
"Nancy Norton" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:VIKdnTQiR5vzIALfRVn-qw@comcast.com...
The other Donald wrote:
"Stephen Stink" <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sure they should.
We already do....this Saturday is eleven years for me and my atheist
wife.
Today is 26 years for me and my atheist husband!
That's impressive!
On the other hand, though, if you're both atheists, then you must surely
have murdered at least 10 or 11 million people in that time? I mean, without
'God', you've 'no way of telling right from wrong', have you...?
Well, congratulations, anyway!
No, they engage in "unnatural" sex acts (ie they actually do it with the lights
on.)
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe
in one fewer god than you do. When you understand
why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you
will understand why I dismiss yours."
-Stephen F. Roberts
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nancy Norton" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
04 Jun 2005 04:50:29 PM |
|
|
Katt wrote:
"Nancy Norton" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:VIKdnTQiR5vzIALfRVn-qw@comcast.com...
The other Donald wrote:
"Stephen Stink" <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sure they should.
We already do....this Saturday is eleven years for me and my atheist
wife.
Today is 26 years for me and my atheist husband!
That's impressive!
I feel it's pretty good about it. We also dated for close to 5 years
before we got married. (We met in our senior year of high school, dated
all through college and got married a week after I graduated).
On the other hand, though, if you're both atheists, then you must surely
have murdered at least 10 or 11 million people in that time? I mean, without
'God', you've 'no way of telling right from wrong', have you...?
Gee, we somehow forgot to drop all our morals and ethics when we
(independently) concluded that we didn't believe in god. Odd thing that...
We've even managed to raise a nice, polite, well-behaved son with good
values. (He's 16, and no, I'm not at all biased.) He doesn't believe in
god, either.
Well, congratulations, anyway!
:-)
Katt.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu the Atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 10:05:26 PM |
|
|
Nancy Norton <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in
news:VIKdnTQiR5vzIALfRVn-qw@comcast.com:
The other Donald wrote:
"Stephen Stink" <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sure they should.
We already do....this Saturday is eleven years for me and my atheist
wife.
Today is 26 years for me and my atheist husband!
(Gad, I can't believe it's been that long.)
Twenty this July.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplin and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
Organized religion is a sham and a crutch for weak-minded people who need
strength in numbers. It tells people to go out and stick their noses in
other people's business. I live by the golden rule: Treat others as you'd
want them to treat you. The religious right wants to tell people how to
live.
-- Gov. Jesse Ventura
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woden" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 10:26:02 PM |
|
|
Enkidu the Atheist <Enkidu.the.Atheist@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns9669CC7C99944255229@130.133.1.4:
Nancy Norton <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in
news:VIKdnTQiR5vzIALfRVn-qw@comcast.com:
The other Donald wrote:
"Stephen Stink" <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sure they should.
We already do....this Saturday is eleven years for me and my atheist
wife.
Today is 26 years for me and my atheist husband!
(Gad, I can't believe it's been that long.)
Twenty this July.
What a bunch of young whippersnappers. In a couple weeks it will be 34
years for my wife & I.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political system for controlling people's thoughts,
lives and actions based on ancient myths and superstitions, perpetrated
through generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu the Atheist" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
03 Jun 2005 07:35:32 AM |
|
|
Woden <woden@charter.net> wrote in news:Xns9669EEFCD8EAwodencharternet@
69.28.186.121:
Enkidu the Atheist <Enkidu.the.Atheist@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns9669CC7C99944255229@130.133.1.4:
Nancy Norton <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in
news:VIKdnTQiR5vzIALfRVn-qw@comcast.com:
The other Donald wrote:
"Stephen Stink" <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sure they should.
We already do....this Saturday is eleven years for me and my atheist
wife.
Today is 26 years for me and my atheist husband!
(Gad, I can't believe it's been that long.)
Twenty this July.
What a bunch of young whippersnappers. In a couple weeks it will be 34
years for my wife & I.
Well, we dated for 8 years before we married. Does that count?
--
Enkidu AA#2165
EAC Chaplin and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
Organized religion is a sham and a crutch for weak-minded people who need
strength in numbers. It tells people to go out and stick their noses in
other people's business. I live by the golden rule: Treat others as you'd
want them to treat you. The religious right wants to tell people how to
live.
-- Gov. Jesse Ventura
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
03 Jun 2005 04:03:55 AM |
|
|
"Stephen Stink" <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Sure they should.
Go to my group....
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Enronscam/
I feel so much better now I have your permission
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "chibiabos" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 11:49:45 AM |
|
|
In article <1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Stephen Stink <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sure they should.
Go to my group....
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Enronscam/
Ha! I bet Stephen's not even your real name.
-chib
--
Member of SMASH
Sarcastic Middle-aged Atheists with a Sense of Humor
(email: change out to in)
.
|
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 02:05:10 PM |
|
|
chibiabos <chib@outreach.com> wrote in
news:020620050949458079%chib@outreach.com:
In article <1117730163.378530.140150@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Stephen Stink <not4udude@yahoo.com> wrote:
Sure they should.
Go to my group....
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Enronscam/
Ha! I bet Stephen's not even your real name.
Yeah, but I'll bet Stink *is*.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Martin Willett" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 03:20:36 PM |
|
|
Stephen Stink wrote:
Sure they should.
Go to my group....
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Enronscam/
What the hell has marriage got to do with religion?
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "nJb" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
03 Jun 2005 01:23:51 AM |
|
|
Martin Willett wrote:
Stephen Stink wrote:
Sure they should.
Go to my group....
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Enronscam/
What the hell has marriage got to do with religion?
Marriage is a religious thingy that somehow forced it's way into legal
status.
--
Jack
.
|
|
|
| User: "Martin Willett" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
03 Jun 2005 09:24:46 AM |
|
|
nJb wrote:
Martin Willett wrote:
What the hell has marriage got to do with religion?
Marriage is a religious thingy that somehow forced it's way into legal
status.
Marriage is a social invention that is present in virtually every human
culture, and many animal cultures. Were Adam and Eve married by God? No.
Of course not. Marriage existed well before wedding ceremonies.
Marriage is a good thing and therefore, logically, it must have been
invented by God. That's the way they think. But if you look at the Bible
you don't see a lot of evidence for religion inventing marriage. Many of
the old testament figures had multiple wives and there was little
description of weddings, they just tended to "take a wife". That's what
people do. They didn't invent marriage, it was never not there.
Societies based on laws institutionalize and formalize marriage. The
Soviet Union did it. Revolutionary France did it. Still today French
people have a church wedding and a civil wedding in front of the mayor
wrapped in a tricolour sash.
Religions insist on getting in on marriage because it is an easy way to
get themselves involved in the family and to give them first dibs on the
innocent and malleable minds of the children. They also need it to be
done in public so everybody can tell the difference between healthy and
godly procreation and evil fornication, which otherwise can look like
remarkably similar acts.
Marriage is human. Rejecting marriage, sobriety, sexual continence and
morality along with the religion and politics of your parents is
juvenile and stupid. They didn't invent it, they stole it. They don't
own it. They don't own marriage or morality, or decency or patriotism.
Don't let them get away with pretending that they do! Don't let them
make out that by not believing in their god that you somehow have to
reject every value that they have wrapped their lies and superstitions
around. Nothing follows from atheism except an absence of an enduring
belief in the existence of gods. You don't have to listen to Marilyn
Manson, take drugs or reject monogamy just because you don't want to go
to their Sunday School and be lied to any more.
--
Martin Willett
http://mwillett.org
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 03:26:38 PM |
|
|
Martin Willett wrote:
Stephen Stink wrote:
Sure they should.
Go to my group....
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Enronscam/
What the hell has marriage got to do with religion?
It has a lot to with religion, to those that want to make marriage a
religious ceremony only. However, they're going to stab themselves in
the back (figuratively speaking) with this mindset.
Due to the 1st Amendment to the Constitution, if marriage becomes a
religious ceremony only, they will lose all governmental benefits to
marriage.
They will not be allowed to visit their "spouse" in the hospital.
They will not be allowed bereavement leave if their "spouse" dies.
They will not be allowed to jointly file tax returns.
They will not be allowed to assume custody of any children acquired
during the "marriage."
They will not be allowed Social Security checks to mailed to them if
their "spouse" dies.
And so on...
However, if they want to keep these things, they must not allow religion
to dictate what "marriage" is defined as, or they shall lose all benefits.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DianaC" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 08:42:15 PM |
|
|
"DanielSan" <daniel-san@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:2YJne.36088$GN3.29772@trnddc04...
Martin Willett wrote:
Stephen Stink wrote:
Sure they should.
Go to my group....
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Enronscam/
What the hell has marriage got to do with religion?
It has a lot to with religion, to those that want to make marriage a
religious ceremony only. However, they're going to stab themselves in the
back (figuratively speaking) with this mindset.
Due to the 1st Amendment to the Constitution, if marriage becomes a
religious ceremony only, they will lose all governmental benefits to
marriage.
They will not be allowed to visit their "spouse" in the hospital.
They will not be allowed bereavement leave if their "spouse" dies.
They will not be allowed to jointly file tax returns.
They will not be allowed to assume custody of any children acquired during
the "marriage."
They will not be allowed Social Security checks to mailed to them if their
"spouse" dies.
And so on...
However, if they want to keep these things, they must not allow religion
to dictate what "marriage" is defined as, or they shall lose all benefits.
On the other hand, if you allow the government to define what marriage is
exclusive of religion, you do more than a little trampling on some
freedoms....the last time that happened, people spent time in jail, and more
than a few were killed over the matter.
Now me, I would like to see the matter divided; a TRUE church and state
separation, such as is done in England and some European nations; there is
the legal, national contract , and there is a set of religious promises. (or
private promises on a beach, whatever).
Call all the benefits one gets from marriage 'legal civil unions". ALL of
them. For EVERYBODY, heterosexual, homosexual, whatever. The whole thing is
about legal contracts anyway, yes?
Call the moral/ethical/religious part of it 'marriage', and make that
completely private, between the people involved and whatever belief/ethical
system they call 'home'. That way, gays could marry, you could marry, shoot,
if you could get one to put up with you, you could marry your poodle. It
would have no legal standing. On the other hand, no religious or ethical
system could impose IT"S standards on you, either, and force you to forgo
those legal protections that have heretofore been reserved for heterosexual
couples.
After all, when you get in front of a preacher, you do NOT promise to 'love,
honor, cherish, and sign over half my property to you as well as survival
rights and custody until death". Shoot, it's only been fairly recently that
marriage has been considered 'above all that'....and that attitude didn't
last long. Marriage USED to be hemmed about with all sorts of 'settlements',
legal documents and provisions, and nowadays who doesn't have a "prenup"???
I sure as shootin' would need one if I ever married again, to protect the
rights of my children.
So. Let everybody win. Wouldn't that be a refreshing change?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Katt" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
02 Jun 2005 09:32:06 PM |
|
|
"DianaC" <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:XzOne.7694$vK5.
Call all the benefits one gets from marriage 'legal civil unions". ALL of
them. For EVERYBODY, heterosexual, homosexual, whatever. The whole thing
is about legal contracts anyway, yes?
[snip]
So. Let everybody win. Wouldn't that be a refreshing change?
Certainly. However, everybody *wouldn't* win, psycho-dynamically speaking.
You see, the average nitwit's unreasoning, inchoate, violently intense
feelings about what should and shouldn't constitute 'marriage' stem in large
measure from the unreasoning, inchoate, violently intense feelings they had
about the 'primal scene' in which they started (and usually didn't
finish...!) growing up: mommy, daddy, me. They genuinely and passionately
love their mommy, except when they genuinely and passionately hate her; and
they genuinely and passionately hate their daddy (insofar as they are aware
of him) except when they genuinely love him, or when they genuinely pretend
to themselves and/or him that they do. Now, wanting mommy all to yourself,
and wanting daddy dead and gone and fucking buried, causes great, if
ultimately repressed, fears and guilts in the little *****-head -- and as an
adult (or semi-adult...) he or she (though it's usually 'he') finds these
unconscious fears and guilts *unaccountably re-awakened* in some shadowy
form whenever the subject arises of any kind of family unit that's *not*
like the one he's spent all these years desperately pretending to himself he
was *really perfectly happy with*: 'mommy, daddy, me'...
I'm sure you get the picture. *You* might not give a ***** about two guys
getting a 'marriage', or a 'legal civil union', or whatever. *I* might not
give a ***** about a same-sex couple even adopting a child -- hell, every
other day I seem to be reading about yet another *heterosexual* American
killing his or her family: how much worse could gays possibly do?? But in
the mind of Mister Fucking Brainless Q. Public, what's gonna happen is that
he becomes *terribly upset* at the feelings he starts to get in response to
thinking about how hundreds, thousands, millions of gay couples are all
going to be getting something which *flies in the face* of *the holy
sanctity of the family* in the form he was forced to convince himself he
'wanted' and 'revered' as a result of all the fear and guilt and fear and
guilt and fear he felt whenever he thought about how much he fucking wanted
to rip it apart and destroy it...
So he wants these other people not to have what they want. In fact, he
doesn't even want to *hear* about the subject, ever again: whenever the
thought of them 'doing it their way' crops up, he feels with all the
incoherent and uncomprehending intensity of a terrified 2-year-old that *the
sky is about to drop in* ... that the world is going to end ... that it's 'a
step too far ' ... that it's 'a slippery slope' ... that it's the 'road to
hell' ...the 'end of America', etc, etc. And if they seem to be *about to
get it*, he wants them fucking *dead*: on an unconscious level, it feels
like it's 'him or them'... It isn't of course; but then that's what you get
when you get a 2-year-old to do your thinking for you...
It's as simple, and as complicated, and as pathetically, ridiculously
*stupid*, as that.
No, I don't have a solution, mass sterilisation apart...
Katt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Liz" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
03 Jun 2005 03:44:01 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 02:32:06 GMT, "Katt" <seruhshjaudn@dfhu.net> in
news message <GiPne.4993$hT6.4970@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net> wrote:
"DianaC" <dianaiad@vernoyoudontizon.net> wrote in message
news:XzOne.7694$vK5.
Call all the benefits one gets from marriage 'legal civil unions". ALL of
them. For EVERYBODY, heterosexual, homosexual, whatever. The whole thing
is about legal contracts anyway, yes?
[snip]
So. Let everybody win. Wouldn't that be a refreshing change?
Certainly. However, everybody *wouldn't* win, psycho-dynamically speaking.
You see, the average nitwit's unreasoning, inchoate, violently intense
feelings about what should and shouldn't constitute 'marriage' stem in large
measure from the unreasoning, inchoate, violently intense feelings they had
about the 'primal scene' in which they started (and usually didn't
finish...!) growing up: mommy, daddy, me. They genuinely and passionately
love their mommy, except when they genuinely and passionately hate her; and
they genuinely and passionately hate their daddy (insofar as they are aware
of him) except when they genuinely love him, or when they genuinely pretend
to themselves and/or him that they do. Now, wanting mommy all to yourself,
and wanting daddy dead and gone and fucking buried, causes great, if
ultimately repressed, fears and guilts in the little *****-head -- and as an
adult (or semi-adult...) he or she (though it's usually 'he') finds these
unconscious fears and guilts *unaccountably re-awakened* in some shadowy
form whenever the subject arises of any kind of family unit that's *not*
like the one he's spent all these years desperately pretending to himself he
was *really perfectly happy with*: 'mommy, daddy, me'...
I'm sure you get the picture. *You* might not give a ***** about two guys
getting a 'marriage', or a 'legal civil union', or whatever. *I* might not
give a ***** about a same-sex couple even adopting a child -- hell, every
other day I seem to be reading about yet another *heterosexual* American
killing his or her family: how much worse could gays possibly do?? But in
the mind of Mister Fucking Brainless Q. Public, what's gonna happen is that
he becomes *terribly upset* at the feelings he starts to get in response to
thinking about how hundreds, thousands, millions of gay couples are all
going to be getting something which *flies in the face* of *the holy
sanctity of the family* in the form he was forced to convince himself he
'wanted' and 'revered' as a result of all the fear and guilt and fear and
guilt and fear he felt whenever he thought about how much he fucking wanted
to rip it apart and destroy it...
So he wants these other people not to have what they want. In fact, he
doesn't even want to *hear* about the subject, ever again: whenever the
thought of them 'doing it their way' crops up, he feels with all the
incoherent and uncomprehending intensity of a terrified 2-year-old that *the
sky is about to drop in* ... that the world is going to end ... that it's 'a
step too far ' ... that it's 'a slippery slope' ... that it's the 'road to
hell' ...the 'end of America', etc, etc. And if they seem to be *about to
get it*, he wants them fucking *dead*: on an unconscious level, it feels
like it's 'him or them'... It isn't of course; but then that's what you get
when you get a 2-year-old to do your thinking for you...
It's as simple, and as complicated, and as pathetically, ridiculously
*stupid*, as that.
No, I don't have a solution, mass sterilisation apart...
I'm sure that Diana would want to reserve that strictly for religious
people, too.
Liz #658 BAAWA
We may have lost our moral compass but we still have our chaste
sextant, our modest flashlight, our ethical pen knife, and our
virtuous canteen. -- jwkinraleigh
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JohnN" |
|
| Title: Re: Should atheists be allowed to marry? |
06 Jun 2005 12:37:15 PM |
|
|
DianaC wrote:
There you go again, using common sense and plain talking.
thank you.
JohnN
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|