Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church?



 Religions > Atheism > Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Gabriel"
Date: 25 Jul 2007 02:42:43 AM
Object: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church?
Let's think about this a minute.
He pardoned his buddy Scooter because he thought a couple years in jail
and a $250,000 fine was excessive. All Scooter did was out a supposed
CIA agent and lie about it to everybody in the United States, including
prosecutors and Congress. He lied not once, but multiple times. Any
ordinary citizen would be in the slammer already, but not a George Bush
staffer. Nope, he let old Scooter walk. Why? Because he thinks
Scooter is a good guy.
The venerable old Catholic Church, benevolent parish to billions
thoughout the centuries, discovered it had a personnel problem. They
had employees, male employees, sexually exploiting their younger,
usually below the age of 18 male parishioners. We know these types of
employees as homosexual pedophiles. Now the fags out there are trying
their best to deny that all this happened, but the tubesteak lovers
can't have it both ways. Either it did, or didn't happen. Something
like 85% of the problems the Church covered up involved homosexual
pedophiles. Anyway, the Church moved them around to discourage their
behavior, but it didn't quite work out the way they planned. All they
did was rotate the boy fuckers to fresher territory. Talk about a
homosexual paradise!
Now I ask you. If it was okay for Michael Jackson to ***** little boys
up the *****, how come it wasn't okay for a priest? I mean come on here.
You have a ugly nasty looking washed up pop star who has been fucking
little boys up the ***** and sucking their dicks for over 20 years walking
around free because he paid a little money. Wouldn't a priest count for
something? A priest has the keys to heaven for Christ's sake. He can
grant absolution with a wave of his hand, make wine appear six or seven
times during communion, hear Catholic wives confess to fucking their
husband's best friends in specific detail every day. So what if he
snagged a little stink ***** from an altar boy. The kid was probably
wearing crotchless panties under his robe or something anyway.
Then you got R. Kelly. This guy is a real perv. Fucked a teeny bopper
girl and made a tape of it. Sick *****, but he's been waiting for
trial half a decade, while producing album after album. How many of
those homosexual child molesters made tapes? Come on, how many did
that?
The only difference in all this is that the church didn't use many
outside lawyers from the start. If they had, would they be in trouble
now? Seriously now, take a good look at it. Michael Jackson used
lawyers to pay off all the victims and moved knowing employees around,
even to other countries. The Church, spending prudently in deference to
their parishers, moved the homosexual pedophiles around on their own,
thus cutting out the middle man.
Is this why everybody is so pissed? Just because the lawyers didn't get
their cut? If the Church was a public corporation, Wall Street would be
praising the hell out of them for showing the good business sense that
they did. They paid off most of the victims who wanted to be paid. Some
of the "victims" even liked getting their buttholes boned and wanted to
come back for more. But alas, a few greedy queers decided they wanted
more $$$, so they made a big stink and before you knew it, things got
out of hand and fucked it all up for everybody. Now the Church is going
to ante up a couple billion to settle things, and that probably won't be
enough because the lawyers are involved.
Did they really do something that was so bad? The Church didn't *****
those boys up the butt, employees did. The Church had good intentions,
they just didn't work out so good. How many times do you hear that sort
of thing on the news after a space shuttle failure? Lots.
So why don't we just ask George Bush to pardon the Catholic Church, hand
over some checks and be done with it all? Is that so hard? They
could even hand out a few checks to the lawyers so they could be happy
too. What would it hurt? The similarities between Scooter and the
priests are striking. Scooter buttfucked a CIA employee, while the
priests buttfucked some little boys. What's the big difference here?
So whaddaya say? Should George pardon the Church like he did Scooter?
.

User: "No One"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 09:13:08 AM
Gabriel <gabriel@gmail.com> writes:

Let's think about this a minute.

He pardoned his buddy Scooter because he thought a couple years in jail
and a $250,000 fine was excessive. All Scooter did was out a supposed
CIA agent and lie about it to everybody in the United States, including
prosecutors and Congress. He lied not once, but multiple times. Any
ordinary citizen would be in the slammer already, but not a George Bush
staffer. Nope, he let old Scooter walk. Why? Because he thinks
Scooter is a good guy.

The "excessive" part was obviously just palp for public consumption.
What Bush or Cheney probably thought is that a good deal for Scooter
would keep Scooter from spilling the beans. I bet someone else paid
Scooter's fine too, and will arrange for him to land in a high-paying
job. As they said during Watergate, "Follow the money." For all we
know, Scooter may have told them exactly what beans he'd spill if he
spent any time in prison, just to get someone's attention.
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 10:22:13 AM
On 25 Jul 2007 07:13:08 -0700, No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:

The "excessive" part was obviously just palp for public consumption.
What Bush or Cheney probably thought is that a good deal for Scooter
would keep Scooter from spilling the beans.

Or there were no beans to spill.

I bet someone else paid
Scooter's fine too, and will arrange for him to land in a high-paying
job.

You're on.

As they said during Watergate, "Follow the money." For all we
know, Scooter may have told them exactly what beans he'd spill if he
spent any time in prison, just to get someone's attention.

Right, for all you idiots know.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "Paul Duca"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 29 Jul 2007 07:52:05 AM
On Jul 25, 11:22 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

On 25 Jul 2007 07:13:08 -0700, No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:

The "excessive" part was obviously just palp for public consumption.
What Bush or Cheney probably thought is that a good deal for Scooter
would keep Scooter from spilling the beans.


Or there were no beans to spill.

I bet someone else paid
Scooter's fine too, and will arrange for him to land in a high-paying
job.


You're on.

Since Duke certainly doesn't deserve one...
Paul
Thank God his church has a soup kitchen...
.
User: "Brian E. Clark"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 29 Jul 2007 04:41:28 PM
In article <1185713525.704460.107860
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, Paul Duca
(tomservo56954@comcast.net) said...

Duke wrote:

I bet someone else paid Scooter's fine too,
and will arrange for him to land in a high-paying
job.


You're on.


Since Duke certainly doesn't deserve one...

Regardless, it's no good betting with Duke: he's
a proven welcher.
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.


User: "No One"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 11:43:36 AM
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:

On 25 Jul 2007 07:13:08 -0700, No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:

The "excessive" part was obviously just palp for public consumption.
What Bush or Cheney probably thought is that a good deal for Scooter
would keep Scooter from spilling the beans.


Or there were no beans to spill.

I bet you believe in the tooth fairy too.
<rest snipped>
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 12:13:39 PM
On 25 Jul 2007 09:43:36 -0700, No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:

The "excessive" part was obviously just palp for public consumption.
What Bush or Cheney probably thought is that a good deal for Scooter
would keep Scooter from spilling the beans.

Or there were no beans to spill.

I bet you believe in the tooth fairy too.

No, but I think you might be a fairy.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "No One"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 06:24:17 PM
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:

On 25 Jul 2007 09:43:36 -0700, No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:

The "excessive" part was obviously just palp for public consumption.
What Bush or Cheney probably thought is that a good deal for Scooter
would keep Scooter from spilling the beans.


Or there were no beans to spill.

I bet you believe in the tooth fairy too.


No, but I think you might be a fairy.

Using the computer during recess?
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 29 Jul 2007 08:43:46 AM
On 25 Jul 2007 16:24:17 -0700, No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:

duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:

On 25 Jul 2007 09:43:36 -0700, No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:

The "excessive" part was obviously just palp for public consumption.
What Bush or Cheney probably thought is that a good deal for Scooter
would keep Scooter from spilling the beans.


Or there were no beans to spill.

I bet you believe in the tooth fairy too.


No, but I think you might be a fairy.


Using the computer during recess?

Who knows what you do during recess!!
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.






User: "Mike"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 09:02:31 AM
Like ANYONE cares what some cross posting idiot thinks about anything.
Remember Gabriel, Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one, and most
people will think yours sticks!
"Gabriel" <gabriel@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns997873DA2F03036MI@4ax.com...


Let's think about this a minute.

He pardoned his buddy Scooter because he thought a couple years in jail
and a $250,000 fine was excessive. All Scooter did was out a supposed
CIA agent and lie about it to everybody in the United States, including
prosecutors and Congress. He lied not once, but multiple times. Any
ordinary citizen would be in the slammer already, but not a George Bush
staffer. Nope, he let old Scooter walk. Why? Because he thinks
Scooter is a good guy.

The venerable old Catholic Church, benevolent parish to billions
thoughout the centuries, discovered it had a personnel problem. They
had employees, male employees, sexually exploiting their younger,
usually below the age of 18 male parishioners. We know these types of
employees as homosexual pedophiles. Now the fags out there are trying
their best to deny that all this happened, but the tubesteak lovers
can't have it both ways. Either it did, or didn't happen. Something
like 85% of the problems the Church covered up involved homosexual
pedophiles. Anyway, the Church moved them around to discourage their
behavior, but it didn't quite work out the way they planned. All they
did was rotate the boy fuckers to fresher territory. Talk about a
homosexual paradise!

Now I ask you. If it was okay for Michael Jackson to ***** little boys
up the *****, how come it wasn't okay for a priest? I mean come on here.
You have a ugly nasty looking washed up pop star who has been fucking
little boys up the ***** and sucking their dicks for over 20 years walking
around free because he paid a little money. Wouldn't a priest count for
something? A priest has the keys to heaven for Christ's sake. He can
grant absolution with a wave of his hand, make wine appear six or seven
times during communion, hear Catholic wives confess to fucking their
husband's best friends in specific detail every day. So what if he
snagged a little stink ***** from an altar boy. The kid was probably
wearing crotchless panties under his robe or something anyway.

Then you got R. Kelly. This guy is a real perv. Fucked a teeny bopper
girl and made a tape of it. Sick *****, but he's been waiting for
trial half a decade, while producing album after album. How many of
those homosexual child molesters made tapes? Come on, how many did
that?

The only difference in all this is that the church didn't use many
outside lawyers from the start. If they had, would they be in trouble
now? Seriously now, take a good look at it. Michael Jackson used
lawyers to pay off all the victims and moved knowing employees around,
even to other countries. The Church, spending prudently in deference to
their parishers, moved the homosexual pedophiles around on their own,
thus cutting out the middle man.

Is this why everybody is so pissed? Just because the lawyers didn't get
their cut? If the Church was a public corporation, Wall Street would be
praising the hell out of them for showing the good business sense that
they did. They paid off most of the victims who wanted to be paid. Some
of the "victims" even liked getting their buttholes boned and wanted to
come back for more. But alas, a few greedy queers decided they wanted
more $$$, so they made a big stink and before you knew it, things got
out of hand and fucked it all up for everybody. Now the Church is going
to ante up a couple billion to settle things, and that probably won't be
enough because the lawyers are involved.

Did they really do something that was so bad? The Church didn't *****
those boys up the butt, employees did. The Church had good intentions,
they just didn't work out so good. How many times do you hear that sort
of thing on the news after a space shuttle failure? Lots.

So why don't we just ask George Bush to pardon the Catholic Church, hand
over some checks and be done with it all? Is that so hard? They
could even hand out a few checks to the lawyers so they could be happy
too. What would it hurt? The similarities between Scooter and the
priests are striking. Scooter buttfucked a CIA employee, while the
priests buttfucked some little boys. What's the big difference here?

So whaddaya say? Should George pardon the Church like he did Scooter?



.

User: "David Schwartz"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 03:01:13 AM
On Jul 25, 12:42 am, Gabriel <gabr...@gmail.com> wrote:

So whaddaya say? Should George pardon the Church like he did Scooter?

Do you have any clue what you are talking about? Do you understand
what the pardon power actually is and under what circumstances it is
even logically possible for it to be invoked?
DS
.

User: "jcon"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 09:47:53 AM
On Jul 25, 2:42 am, Gabriel <gabr...@gmail.com> wrote:

Let's think about this a minute.

He pardoned his buddy Scooter because he thought a couple years in jail
and a $250,000 fine was excessive. All Scooter did was out a supposed
CIA agent and lie about it to everybody in the United States, including
prosecutors and Congress. He lied not once, but multiple times. Any
ordinary citizen would be in the slammer already, but not a George Bush
staffer. Nope, he let old Scooter walk. Why? Because he thinks
Scooter is a good guy.

The venerable old Catholic Church, benevolent parish to billions
thoughout the centuries, discovered it had a personnel problem.

The State Department has already declared that Reichspope Ratzinger
is immune from prosecution because they consider him a "Head of
State", even though he wasn't yet Pope when he allegedly sanctioned
the global cover-up of sexual abuse in his previous capacity as
Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (aka
"The Inquisition").
This logic should also have protected Saddam Hussein from
any consequences for his actions. Go figure.

They
had employees, male employees, sexually exploiting their younger,
usually below the age of 18 male parishioners. We know these types of
employees as homosexual pedophiles. Now the fags out there are trying
their best to deny that all this happened, but the tubesteak lovers
can't have it both ways. Either it did, or didn't happen. Something
like 85% of the problems the Church covered up involved homosexual
pedophiles.

If true, I take it you consider 15% heterosexual pedophiles an
acceptable number?
-jc
.

User: "duke"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 05:14:22 AM
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:42:43 +0200 (CEST), Gabriel <gabriel@gmail.com> wrote:

Let's think about this a minute.
He pardoned his buddy Scooter because he thought a couple years in jail
and a $250,000 fine was excessive.

Oops, sorry dummy, no pardon. He only commuted his sentence. He's still
guilty.

The venerable old Catholic Church discovered it had a personnel problem. They
had employees, male employees, sexually exploiting their younger,
usually below the age of 18 male parishioners.
Now I ask you. If it was okay for Michael Jackson to ***** little boys
up the *****, how come it wasn't okay for a priest?

It's not. It's also indicative that the priests involves received relatively
light **CIVIL** penalties. Why? Because the **CIVIL** courts found their true
actions not so severe.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "•R L Measures"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 07:48:01 AM
In article <u98ea3lcvgqs7c2lg6pcn2i6mmas5n0pqe@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:42:43 +0200 (CEST), Gabriel <gabriel@gmail.com> wrote:

Let's think about this a minute.
He pardoned his buddy Scooter because he thought a couple years in jail
and a $250,000 fine was excessive.


Oops, sorry dummy, no pardon. He only commuted his sentence. He's still
guilty.

The venerable old Catholic Church discovered it had a personnel

problem. They

had employees, male employees, sexually exploiting their younger,
usually below the age of 18 male parishioners.


Now I ask you. If it was okay for Michael Jackson to ***** little boys
up the *****, how come it wasn't okay for a priest?


It's not.

** Did God/Jesus tell you that ?

It's also indicative that the priests involves received relatively
light **CIVIL** penalties. Why? Because the **CIVIL** courts found

their true

actions not so severe.

** Imprisoning a guy who's into anal intercourse in a mens prison is like
tossing Paris Hilton into one.
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 10:20:09 AM
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:48:01 -0700,
(•R L Measures) wrote:

Now I ask you. If it was okay for Michael Jackson to ***** little boys
up the *****, how come it wasn't okay for a priest?

It's not.

** Did God/Jesus tell you that ?

Yes.

It's also indicative that the priests involves received relatively
light **CIVIL** penalties. Why? Because the **CIVIL** courts found

their true actions not so severe.


** Imprisoning a guy who's into anal intercourse in a mens prison is like
tossing Paris Hilton into one.

Yet they were not into anal intercourse, but indecent touching and other
homosexual activities.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "•R L Measures"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 12:16:08 PM
In article <ceqea3tvs8onmjgbkbn1cbsbposb3e3gd0@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:48:01 -0700,

(•R L Measures) wrote:

Now I ask you. If it was okay for Michael Jackson to ***** little boys
up the *****, how come it wasn't okay for a priest?

It's not.

** Did God/Jesus tell you that ?


Yes.

It's also indicative that the priests involves received relatively
light **CIVIL** penalties. Why? Because the **CIVIL** courts found

their true actions not so severe.


** Imprisoning a guy who's into anal intercourse in a mens prison is like
tossing Paris Hilton into one.


Yet they were not into anal intercourse, but indecent touching and other
homosexual activities.

• I have heard to the testimony of altar-boys who said they were anally
penetrated by a priest or priests. Hello, Duke ! -- butt-ramming is
the entree of what homosexual males do.
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 04:18:50 PM
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:16:08 -0700,
(•R L Measures) wrote:

Yet they were not into anal intercourse, but indecent touching and other
homosexual activities.


• I have heard to the testimony of altar-boys who said they were anally
penetrated by a priest or priests. Hello, Duke ! -- butt-ramming is
the entree of what homosexual males do.

Not unless both parties are interested.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "•R L Measures"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 06:14:06 PM
In article <gdffa39bforqjpsjqavgt6ieou4k7st3s6@4ax.com>, duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:16:08 -0700,

(•R L Measures) wrote:

Yet they were not into anal intercourse, but indecent touching and other
homosexual activities.


• I have heard to the testimony of altar-boys who said they were anally
penetrated by a priest or priests. Hello, Duke ! -- butt-ramming is
the entree of what homosexual males do.


Not unless both parties are interested.

• So the boy who is being anally penetrated is not being butt-rammed
unless he enjoys this activity?
.
User: "Syd M."

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 26 Jul 2007 02:36:15 PM
On Jul 25, 7:14 pm,
(=B7R L Measures) wrote:

In article <gdffa39bforqjpsjqavgt6ieou4k7st...@4ax.com>, duke

<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:16:08 -0700,

(=B7R L Measures) wr=

ote:


Yet they were not into anal intercourse, but indecent touching and o=

ther

homosexual activities.


=B7 I have heard to the testimony of altar-boys who said they were an=

ally

penetrated by a priest or priests. Hello, Duke ! -- butt-ramming =

is

the entree of what homosexual males do.


Not unless both parties are interested.


=B7 So the boy who is being anally penetrated is not being butt-rammed
unless he enjoys this activity?

That's gotta be the stupidest thing Dork has said (Or implied).. And
that's saying something..
PDW
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 29 Jul 2007 08:44:45 AM
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:36:15 -0700, "Syd M." <pdwright42@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Jul 25, 7:14 pm,

(·R L Measures) wrote:

In article <gdffa39bforqjpsjqavgt6ieou4k7st...@4ax.com>, duke

<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:16:08 -0700,

(·R L Measures) wrote:


Yet they were not into anal intercourse, but indecent touching and other
homosexual activities.


· I have heard to the testimony of altar-boys who said they were anally
penetrated by a priest or priests. Hello, Duke ! -- butt-ramming is
the entree of what homosexual males do.


Not unless both parties are interested.


· So the boy who is being anally penetrated is not being butt-rammed
unless he enjoys this activity?


That's gotta be the stupidest thing Dork has said (Or implied).. And
that's saying something..

Are you speaking from experience, sid?
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "Syd M."

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 29 Jul 2007 02:12:57 PM
On Jul 29, 9:44 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:36:15 -0700, "Syd M." <pdwrigh...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Jul 25, 7:14 pm,

(=B7R L Measures) wrote:

In article <gdffa39bforqjpsjqavgt6ieou4k7st...@4ax.com>, duke


<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:16:08 -0700,

(=B7R L Measures)=

wrote:


Yet they were not into anal intercourse, but indecent touching an=

d other

homosexual activities.


=B7 I have heard to the testimony of altar-boys who said they were=

anally

penetrated by a priest or priests. Hello, Duke ! -- butt-rammi=

ng is

the entree of what homosexual males do.


Not unless both parties are interested.


=B7 So the boy who is being anally penetrated is not being butt-rammed
unless he enjoys this activity?


That's gotta be the stupidest thing Dork has said (Or implied).. And
that's saying something..


Are you speaking from experience, sid?

yeah, from reading your post, that is one of the stupidest things
you've ever said.
PDW
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 29 Jul 2007 03:39:04 PM
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:12:57 -0700, "Syd M." <pdwright42@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Jul 29, 9:44 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:36:15 -0700, "Syd M." <pdwrigh...@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Jul 25, 7:14 pm,

(·R L Measures) wrote:

In article <gdffa39bforqjpsjqavgt6ieou4k7st...@4ax.com>, duke


<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:16:08 -0700,

(·R L Measures) wrote:


Yet they were not into anal intercourse, but indecent touching and other
homosexual activities.


· I have heard to the testimony of altar-boys who said they were anally
penetrated by a priest or priests. Hello, Duke ! -- butt-ramming is
the entree of what homosexual males do.


Not unless both parties are interested.


· So the boy who is being anally penetrated is not being butt-rammed
unless he enjoys this activity?


That's gotta be the stupidest thing Dork has said (Or implied).. And
that's saying something..


Are you speaking from experience, sid?

yeah,

Ok.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.




User: "duke"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 26 Jul 2007 01:32:03 PM
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:14:06 -0700,
(•R L Measures) wrote:

• I have heard to the testimony of altar-boys who said they were anally
penetrated by a priest or priests. Hello, Duke ! -- butt-ramming is
the entree of what homosexual males do.

Not unless both parties are interested.


• So the boy who is being anally penetrated is not being butt-rammed
unless he enjoys this activity?

Quite probable. Or at least interested.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
User: "Paul Duca"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 29 Jul 2007 07:49:51 AM
On Jul 26, 2:32 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:14:06 -0700,

(=B7R L Measures) wrot=

e:


=B7 I have heard to the testimony of altar-boys who said they were a=

nally

penetrated by a priest or priests. Hello, Duke ! -- butt-ramming=

is

the entree of what homosexual males do.

Not unless both parties are interested.

=B7 So the boy who is being anally penetrated is not being butt-rammed
unless he enjoys this activity?


Quite probable. Or at least interested.

Which, of course, makes the other party--Father Shitdontstink--totally
blameless.
Paul
.







User: "Mike"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 02:25:14 PM
On Jul 25, 6:14 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:42:43 +0200 (CEST), Gabriel <gabr...@gmail.com> wrote:

The venerable old Catholic Church discovered it had a personnel problem. They
had employees, male employees, sexually exploiting their younger,
usually below the age of 18 male parishioners.
Now I ask you. If it was okay for Michael Jackson to ***** little boys
up the *****, how come it wasn't okay for a priest?


It's not. It's also indicative that the priests involves received relatively
light **CIVIL** penalties. Why? Because the **CIVIL** courts found their true
actions not so severe.

Duke, I always knew you'd come around to appreciate the libural
point of view. So what's the big deal if some priests diddled some
alter boys? You are agreeing with NAMBLA'S position on the matter.
Though NAMBLA deplores the hypocracy of the RC church on the subject,
they have publically opined that the priests are not doing anything
wrong in most cases (at least not "severely" wrong). Short of
violently forced intercourse, NAMBLA (and apparently YOU) reject the
concept that sexual activity between men and boys (particularly men of
the cloth!) is wrong. Way to go Dukey!!! We'll have you voting for
Hillary yet!! Come join the commie pinko fag conspiracy!!
"The Mass is the most sincere form of Horseshit!"
.
User: "duke"

Title: Re: Should George Bush pardon the Catholic Church? 25 Jul 2007 04:32:00 PM
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:25:14 -0700, Mike <matmzc@hofstra.edu> wrote:

It's not. It's also indicative that the priests involves received relatively
light **CIVIL** penalties. Why? Because the **CIVIL** courts found their true
actions not so severe.

Duke, I always knew you'd come around to appreciate the libural
point of view. So what's the big deal if some priests diddled some
alter boys?

Yet the problem is pedophilia. And the significant number of minor civil
penalties suggests that the activities were not significantly terrible, such as
rape by anal intercourse, which would entail long prison terms.
Main Entry:pe£do£phil£ia
: sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object
We know another word involving older teens, ep______, but I can't recall the
spelling of the term.
So whether rl met one or more anal rape victims, he refuses to also address
indecent touching to blow jobs. These are much more likely in the pre teen
kids. After that, many teens are ready to experiment, possibly questioning
their own sexuality. Nobody, including rl, knows the full truth.

NAMBLA (and apparently YOU) reject the
concept that sexual activity between men and boys (particularly men of
the cloth!) is wrong. Way to go Dukey!!!

Well, I **DO** consider the sexual activity of these priests as wrong. People
like rl are too quick to see butt ramming everywhere's.

We'll have you voting for
Hillary yet!! Come join the commie pinko fag conspiracy!!

Not a chance on that.

"The Mass is the most sincere form of Horseshit!"

Thanks, but I'll stick with God here.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Catholic Nuns Calls for IMPEACHMENT of AWOL Bush (Rightfully So)
You Can Be Catholic or You Can Support Bush
National Catholic Reporter: The latest Bush threat to democracy
Bush Calls for Pro-Life Culture at Catholic Prayer
Jeb Bush says his Catholic faith won't influence what's taught in public-school science classes.
Bush Puts Catholic High Schhol Group as "Terror Watch" List
OT: Bush Administration Lowers Iraq Expectations; also confirms Pope is Catholic
Re: BOMBSHELL 'How Bush Misled the World' - Catholic Bishop: 9-11 wasinside job - LOOK, BUSH DOCTORED THE NIE TO CON AMERICA TO DIE AS TRAITORS -Christ praises all men who bill the bushite thieving terrorists who war Godand country to criminally esca
Re: The Great Numbers of One - BOMBSHELL 'How Bush Misled the World' - Catholic Bishop: 9-11 was inside job - TO CON AMERICA TO DIE AS TRAITORS - Bush gave US zero evidence to form our free thoughts on the 911 issue - Justice Christ praises all men w
Is George W. Bush a Catholic Saint?
BOMBSHELL 'How Bush Misled the World' - Catholic Bishop: 9-11 wasinside job - LOOK, BUSH DOCTORED THE NIE TO CON AMERICA TO DIE AS TRAITORS -Christ praises all men who bill the bushite thieving terrorists who war Godand country to criminally escape t
BUSH LIED AGAIN: Miers has never been a Catholic
Catholic pedophiles, the Bush regime et al.
Bush Talks to an Appreciative Catholic Crowd
You Can be a Good Catholic, Or You Can Support Bush's Iraq Invasion...
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER