Religions > Atheism > Should Muslims Side With The Demon-Craps And Not The Republicans?
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
02 Dec 2006 03:09:44 PM |
| Object: |
Should Muslims Side With The Demon-Craps And Not The Republicans? |
The war in Iraq has blindfolded the Muslims to
the point of celebrating the democratic
victory over the Republicans in both houses.
But when looked at closely, the democratic party agenda looks more like
that of Abu Lahab, the chieftain of the party that drove Mohammad out
of
Mecca.
Like Abu Lahab party, the Demoncratic party is opposed to God's rules
on earth.
Abu Lahab was in favor of diversity including idoles worship just
like the one on the demoncratic plateform.
Abu Lahab faught for the right of the Homosexual including the right
for man to sleep with animal as it is now with the Demoncraps.
Abu Lahab despised Monotheism, so do the demoncraps and their
allies the Evol-atheists and the Liberals.
Abu Lahab and his people did not believe in the Gospel
of resurrection of mankind and the last judgement.
Nowaday Demon-Craps are worse.
It is a shame that Some Muslims celebrated over the Republicans
loss. The Republican party is the only party
which defend God's interest
on earth, so does the Quranic Islam.
Muslims should not side with the Demon-Craps
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Should Muslims Side With The Demon-Craps And Not The Republicans? |
02 Dec 2006 03:33:19 PM |
|
|
schreef:
The war in Iraq has blindfolded the Muslims to
the point of celebrating the democratic
victory over the Republicans in both houses.
Yes muslims are better of with Bush,
who is more keen on sending muslims to kingdom come.
than the Democrats. sure the want to go there quickly!
But when looked at closely, the democratic party agenda looks more like
that of Abu Lahab, the chieftain of the party that drove Mohammad out
of
Mecca.
Yes surely the democrats have a hidden agenda,
an want to commit Idolatry!
Like Abu Lahab party, the Demoncratic party is opposed to God's rules
on earth.
You mean, they want to uphold the constitution,
and let the USA be a state where no religion is favored?
Abu Lahab was in favor of diversity including idoles worship just
like the one on the demoncratic plateform.
You are really believing that are you?
What Gods do the Democrats want to worship?
tell me!
Abu Lahab faught for the right of the Homosexual including the right
for man to sleep with animal as it is now with the Demoncraps.
Did he?
I heared that it was Muhammed who said his warriors - when away from
their wifes -
had the right to ***** goats.
(Of course the man who said it was killed by a muslim, to the dismay of
other Muslims)
Are you insisting the Democrats are urging people to violate animals?
My, my
Abu Lahab despised Monotheism, so do the demoncraps and their
allies the Evol-atheists and the Liberals.
Evol Atheists? Thats a new breed.
Or did you mispell the first word of EAC?
(you know our nonexisting organization)
Don't tell me they believe in multiple gods too!
Abu Lahab and his people did not believe in the Gospel
of resurrection of mankind and the last judgement.
Nowaday Demon-Craps are worse.
Yes I know they believe in loving your fellow man instead
Shame on them!
It is a shame that Some Muslims celebrated over the Republicans
loss. The Republican party is the only party
which defend God's interest
on earth, so does the Quranic Islam.
True and poor God can't be expected to defend his own interest can he?
Muslims should not side with the Demon-Craps
Surely they don't want to be treated as equals, do they?
they just want to see their maker as soon as possible!
(Pity for them, their mother is waring a veil:)
Peter van Velzen
December 2006
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: Should Muslims Side With The Demon-Craps And Not The Republicans? |
02 Dec 2006 03:53:33 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Muslims should not side with the Demon-Craps
They did not. In the 2004 Presidential election, terrorist group Abu
Hafs al-Masri, the group responsible for the Madrid train bombings,
endorsed Bush for re-election. Others have confirmed al-Qaeda's
beneficial relationship with the GOP, including a senior British
diplomat
"A word for the foolish Bush. We are very keen that you do not lose in
the forthcoming elections as we know very well that any big attack can
bring down your government and this is what we do not want. We cannot
get anyone who is more foolish than you, who deals with matters with
force instead of wisdom and diplomacy. Your stupidity and religious
extremism is what we want as our people will not awaken from their deep
sleep except when there is an enemy. Kerry will kill our nation while
it sleeps because he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish
blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilisation.
Because of this we desire you [Bush] to be elected." - Press
announcement, Abu Hafs al-Masri, 24 October 2004
"Six months ago, when there was the Spain Madrid train bombing and ten
days later the Al Qaeda issued a statement on that, that was six months
ago. They said, we will ask all operations to be halted in Spain,
giving the Spanish people the chance to vote and perhaps withdraw, and
they did. Now, the second part of that statement, declaration, was not
published, was not widespread in the west. I did translate it and send
it to the Toronto Star. It wasn't published there. What did it say? In
it Osama Bin Laden was hoping, was saying to Bush: 'I really wish that
you would win next November election, because you are the only one who
can convince the Muslims of the -- of the -- with your -- with your
intransigence and violent approach, it will convince the Muslims that
American military postures and foreign policy is against their
interests. Therefore I have asked all operations to be suspended from
the United States until the election. And after that, every event will
have its own discourse' Now, he said -- this is Osama Bin Laden saying
-- that if Kerry comes into -- into power, he will again ameliorate the
whole situation. He will sugar-coat it to the Muslims, thinking that
he's giving them democracy, or whatever. So that's why he was wishing
-- Osama was wishing -- Bush, that he should be winning; and that's why
he asked all of his operations to stop in the United States until the
November elections." - Imad Khadduri, 7 October 2004
"If anyone's ready to celebrate the eventual re-election of Bush, it is
none other than al-Qaeda...Bush is al-Qaeda's best recruiting
sergeant." - Sir Ivor Roberts, British ambassador to Italy, 19
September 2004
It is exceptionally clear that al-Qaeda and their allies firmly support
the Republican Party and have no intention of allying themselves with
the Democrats. That was true in 2004 and is true today.
Rich Goranson
Amherst, NY, USA
aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1
EAC Department of Cruel and Unusual Choreography
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Not Quite Barney, but Showing a Softer Side
History Is Not On Marx's Side
OT: Instead of two states side by side, why not one superimposed on the other?
OT: History is not on your side, Mr Kerry
Re: You Shall Not Be Forsaken My American Friends - Christ, and the True Red, White, and Blue - WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON? - CNN must, and WILL be tried for high treason for their demon lies broadcasting the northern alliance don't push dope, while the T
OT: ERRRRRRR Can you say not exactly on the safe side?
They're not anti-war, they're on the other side.
Believe It, or Not
| OT: Morning-After Pill in Canada: Prescription May Not Be Needed
The man in the flight-suit did not qualify then and he does not qualify now
# Reason not to vote for Bush
LIBERALS SPIT ON AMERICAN SOLDIERS ==> The man in the flight-suit did not qualify then and he does not qualify now . .
LIBERALS SPIT ON AMERICAN SOLDIERS ==> GWB did not report for duty during the key five-month period . .
Religious education is not.
3,000 Liberals Dead And They Still will not acknowledge Him
|
|
|
