| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Hatter" |
| Date: |
05 Aug 2007 10:56:04 AM |
| Object: |
Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies. Trying to claim
the question is a strawman(which it is not)
Hatter
.
|
|
| User: "Sanitys Little Helper" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
05 Aug 2007 01:25:43 PM |
|
|
Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in news:1186329364.253515.252560
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies. Trying to claim
the question is a strawman(which it is not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue, and then rounded
the whole presentation off by whining "there's a difference between healing
and limb-regeneration". If God existed, there wouldn't be.
--
David Silverman F.L.A.H.N.
aa #2208
"If you are informed by God, you can be misinformed by nobody" - Osama Bin
Laden
.
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Austin" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
05 Aug 2007 01:37:28 PM |
|
|
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in news:1186329364.253515.252560
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies. Trying to claim
the question is a strawman(which it is not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue, and then
rounded the whole presentation off by whining "there's a difference
between healing and limb-regeneration". If God existed, there wouldn't
be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey, trained to dance
on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer from. The old "If God exists,
He _must_ act in a certain way that I, and only I, get to define."
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a sadistic *****. At
least hate theists for what they actually believe.
--
Terry Austin
History is made at night. Character is what you are in the dark.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
05 Aug 2007 03:43:52 PM |
|
|
"Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9983763AF33F1taustingmail@216.168.3.64...
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in news:1186329364.253515.252560
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies. Trying to claim
the question is a strawman(which it is not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue, and then
rounded the whole presentation off by whining "there's a difference
between healing and limb-regeneration". If God existed, there wouldn't
be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey, trained to
dance
on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer from.
No. That's what the people who believe in the efficacy of prayer believe.
We just want them to offer an explanation as to why -- to an omnipotent
being -- the healing of a cancer is different from the healing of a lost
limb.
The old "If God exists,
He _must_ act in a certain way that I, and only I, get to define."
That's how every Christian views their interpretation of their god
character. We merely question their interpretations.
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
No. Since it's not the atheists that babble like that, but the Christians,
it's the Christians that make themselves look "stoopid".
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a sadistic *****. At
least hate theists for what they actually believe.
The same goes for atheists.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http//www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanitys Little Helper" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
06 Aug 2007 01:34:02 AM |
|
|
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:DK-dnW821vL0qyvbnZ2dnUVZ_v6rnZ2d@io.com to alt.atheism:
"Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9983763AF33F1taustingmail@216.168.3.64...
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in news:1186329364.253515.252560
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies. Trying to
claim the question is a strawman(which it is not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue, and then
rounded the whole presentation off by whining "there's a difference
between healing and limb-regeneration". If God existed, there
wouldn't be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey, trained to
dance
on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer from.
No. That's what the people who believe in the efficacy of prayer
believe.
We just want them to offer an explanation as to why -- to an
omnipotent being -- the healing of a cancer is different from the
healing of a lost limb.
The old "If God exists,
He _must_ act in a certain way that I, and only I, get to define."
That's how every Christian views their interpretation of their god
character. We merely question their interpretations.
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
No. Since it's not the atheists that babble like that, but the
Christians, it's the Christians that make themselves look "stoopid".
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a sadistic
*****. At least hate theists for what they actually believe.
The same goes for atheists.
Actually, looking at this issue again, and the replies to it, what I have
noticed with absolute consistency is that the Godists evade the question by
wantonly misinterpreting it. They know that what it means is "Why does God
choose never to grow back amputated limbs", trhey have not answer to this,
so they either rephrase the question to suit their answer. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_K_4fBcYK0&mode=related&search=
What a slimy, evasive and deceitful *****!
--
David Silverman F.L.A.H.N.
aa #2208
"If you are informed by God, you can be misinformed by nobody" - Osama Bin
Laden
.
|
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
06 Aug 2007 11:13:52 AM |
|
|
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns99844CFAA533Belvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:DK-dnW821vL0qyvbnZ2dnUVZ_v6rnZ2d@io.com to alt.atheism:
"Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9983763AF33F1taustingmail@216.168.3.64...
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1186329364.253515.252560 @k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com
to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies. Trying
to claim the question is a strawman(which it is not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue, and
then rounded the whole presentation off by whining "there's a
difference between healing and limb-regeneration". If God
existed, there wouldn't be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey,
trained to dance
on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer from.
No. That's what the people who believe in the efficacy of
prayer believe.
We just want them to offer an explanation as to why -- to an
omnipotent being -- the healing of a cancer is different from
the healing of a lost limb.
The old "If God exists,
He _must_ act in a certain way that I, and only I, get to
define."
That's how every Christian views their interpretation of their
god character. We merely question their interpretations.
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
No. Since it's not the atheists that babble like that, but the
Christians, it's the Christians that make themselves look
"stoopid".
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a sadistic
*****. At least hate theists for what they actually believe.
The same goes for atheists.
Actually, looking at this issue again, and the replies to it,
what I have noticed with absolute consistency is that the
Godists evade the question by wantonly misinterpreting it. They
know that what it means is "Why does God choose never to grow
back amputated limbs", trhey have not answer to this, so they
either rephrase the question to suit their answer. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_K_4fBcYK0&mode=related&search=
What a slimy, evasive and deceitful *****!
Actually, for the most part, they do know the answer. That you lie
about it is very telling, but not about theists.
Or perhaps you really are a fucking stupid as you look.
--
"If he does that ***** again I'm going to tie his ***** hairs together
and kick him in the shin."
Terry Austin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanitys Little Helper" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
06 Aug 2007 02:29:35 PM |
|
|
No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns99845DE7CEBEDtaustingmail@216.168.3.64 to alt.atheism:
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns99844CFAA533Belvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:DK-dnW821vL0qyvbnZ2dnUVZ_v6rnZ2d@io.com to alt.atheism:
"Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9983763AF33F1taustingmail@216.168.3.64...
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1186329364.253515.252560 @k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com
to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies. Trying
to claim the question is a strawman(which it is not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue, and
then rounded the whole presentation off by whining "there's a
difference between healing and limb-regeneration". If God
existed, there wouldn't be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey,
trained to dance
on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer from.
No. That's what the people who believe in the efficacy of
prayer believe.
We just want them to offer an explanation as to why -- to an
omnipotent being -- the healing of a cancer is different from
the healing of a lost limb.
The old "If God exists,
He _must_ act in a certain way that I, and only I, get to
define."
That's how every Christian views their interpretation of their
god character. We merely question their interpretations.
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
No. Since it's not the atheists that babble like that, but the
Christians, it's the Christians that make themselves look
"stoopid".
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a sadistic
*****. At least hate theists for what they actually believe.
The same goes for atheists.
Actually, looking at this issue again, and the replies to it,
what I have noticed with absolute consistency is that the
Godists evade the question by wantonly misinterpreting it. They
know that what it means is "Why does God choose never to grow
back amputated limbs", trhey have not answer to this, so they
either rephrase the question to suit their answer. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_K_4fBcYK0&mode=related&search=
What a slimy, evasive and deceitful *****!
Actually, for the most part, they do know the answer.
I doubt that, since the answer is: there is no God, and there never was.
That you lie
about it is very telling, but not about theists.
Or perhaps you really are a fucking stupid as you look.
Why would anybody trust _your_ judgement?
--
David Silverman F.L.A.H.N.
aa #2208
"If you are informed by God, you can be misinformed by nobody" - Osama
Bin Laden
.
|
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
06 Aug 2007 03:11:35 PM |
|
|
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9984D074CD689elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns99845DE7CEBEDtaustingmail@216.168.3.64 to alt.atheism:
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns99844CFAA533Belvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:DK-dnW821vL0qyvbnZ2dnUVZ_v6rnZ2d@io.com to alt.atheism:
"Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9983763AF33F1taustingmail@216.168.3.64...
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1186329364.253515.252560 @k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com
to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies.
Trying to claim the question is a strawman(which it is
not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue,
and then rounded the whole presentation off by whining
"there's a difference between healing and
limb-regeneration". If God existed, there wouldn't be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey,
trained to dance
on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer from.
No. That's what the people who believe in the efficacy of
prayer believe.
We just want them to offer an explanation as to why -- to an
omnipotent being -- the healing of a cancer is different from
the healing of a lost limb.
The old "If God exists,
He _must_ act in a certain way that I, and only I, get to
define."
That's how every Christian views their interpretation of
their god character. We merely question their
interpretations.
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
No. Since it's not the atheists that babble like that, but
the Christians, it's the Christians that make themselves look
"stoopid".
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a
sadistic *****. At least hate theists for what they
actually believe.
The same goes for atheists.
Actually, looking at this issue again, and the replies to it,
what I have noticed with absolute consistency is that the
Godists evade the question by wantonly misinterpreting it.
They know that what it means is "Why does God choose never to
grow back amputated limbs", trhey have not answer to this, so
they either rephrase the question to suit their answer. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_K_4fBcYK0&mode=related&search=
What a slimy, evasive and deceitful *****!
Actually, for the most part, they do know the answer.
I doubt that, since the answer is: there is no God, and there
never was.
Prove it. Or admit you're exactly as irrational as the theists.
That you lie
about it is very telling, but not about theists.
Or perhaps you really are a fucking stupid as you look.
Why would anybody trust _your_ judgement?
Why would anyone care what you believe?
--
"If he does that ***** again I'm going to tie his ***** hairs together
and kick him in the shin."
Terry Austin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanitys Little Helper" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
07 Aug 2007 02:14:40 AM |
|
|
No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns998486358205Ftaustingmail@216.168.3.64 to alt.atheism:
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9984D074CD689elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns99845DE7CEBEDtaustingmail@216.168.3.64 to alt.atheism:
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns99844CFAA533Belvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:DK-dnW821vL0qyvbnZ2dnUVZ_v6rnZ2d@io.com to alt.atheism:
"Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9983763AF33F1taustingmail@216.168.3.64...
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1186329364.253515.252560 @k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com
to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies.
Trying to claim the question is a strawman(which it is
not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue,
and then rounded the whole presentation off by whining
"there's a difference between healing and
limb-regeneration". If God existed, there wouldn't be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey,
trained to dance
on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer from.
No. That's what the people who believe in the efficacy of
prayer believe.
We just want them to offer an explanation as to why -- to an
omnipotent being -- the healing of a cancer is different from
the healing of a lost limb.
The old "If God exists,
He _must_ act in a certain way that I, and only I, get to
define."
That's how every Christian views their interpretation of
their god character. We merely question their
interpretations.
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
No. Since it's not the atheists that babble like that, but
the Christians, it's the Christians that make themselves look
"stoopid".
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a
sadistic *****. At least hate theists for what they
actually believe.
The same goes for atheists.
Actually, looking at this issue again, and the replies to it,
what I have noticed with absolute consistency is that the
Godists evade the question by wantonly misinterpreting it.
They know that what it means is "Why does God choose never to
grow back amputated limbs", trhey have not answer to this, so
they either rephrase the question to suit their answer. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_K_4fBcYK0&mode=related&search=
What a slimy, evasive and deceitful *****!
Actually, for the most part, they do know the answer.
I doubt that, since the answer is: there is no God, and there
never was.
Prove it. Or admit you're exactly as irrational as the theists.
Why is your intellectual vacuity my problem?
That you lie
about it is very telling, but not about theists.
Or perhaps you really are a fucking stupid as you look.
Why would anybody trust _your_ judgement?
Why would anyone care what you believe?
Why do you?
--
David Silverman F.L.A.H.N.
aa #2208
"If you are informed by God, you can be misinformed by nobody" - Osama
Bin Laden
.
|
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
07 Aug 2007 10:58:20 AM |
|
|
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns998553DEF803Celvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns998486358205Ftaustingmail@216.168.3.64 to alt.atheism:
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9984D074CD689elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns99845DE7CEBEDtaustingmail@216.168.3.64 to alt.atheism:
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns99844CFAA533Belvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in
news:DK-dnW821vL0qyvbnZ2dnUVZ_v6rnZ2d@io.com to alt.atheism:
"Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9983763AF33F1taustingmail@216.168.3.64...
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatter23@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1186329364.253515.252560
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies.
Trying to claim the question is a strawman(which it is
not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue,
and then rounded the whole presentation off by whining
"there's a difference between healing and
limb-regeneration". If God existed, there wouldn't be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey,
trained to dance
on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer from.
No. That's what the people who believe in the efficacy of
prayer believe.
We just want them to offer an explanation as to why -- to
an omnipotent being -- the healing of a cancer is different
from the healing of a lost limb.
The old "If God exists,
He _must_ act in a certain way that I, and only I, get to
define."
That's how every Christian views their interpretation of
their god character. We merely question their
interpretations.
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
No. Since it's not the atheists that babble like that, but
the Christians, it's the Christians that make themselves
look "stoopid".
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a
sadistic *****. At least hate theists for what they
actually believe.
The same goes for atheists.
Actually, looking at this issue again, and the replies to
it, what I have noticed with absolute consistency is that
the Godists evade the question by wantonly misinterpreting
it. They know that what it means is "Why does God choose
never to grow back amputated limbs", trhey have not answer
to this, so they either rephrase the question to suit their
answer. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_K_4fBcYK0&mode=related&searc
h=
What a slimy, evasive and deceitful *****!
Actually, for the most part, they do know the answer.
I doubt that, since the answer is: there is no God, and there
never was.
Prove it. Or admit you're exactly as irrational as the theists.
Why is your intellectual vacuity my problem?
Your admission is accepted.
That you lie
about it is very telling, but not about theists.
Or perhaps you really are a fucking stupid as you look.
Why would anybody trust _your_ judgement?
Why would anyone care what you believe?
Why do you?
What makes you think I do? You've admitted you're insane.
--
"If he does that ***** again I'm going to tie his ***** hairs
together and kick him in the shin."
Terry Austin
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
07 Aug 2007 05:07:30 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 09:14:40 +0200 (CEST), "Sanity's Little Helper"
<elvish@noshpam.org> wrote:
No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns998486358205Ftaustingmail@216.168.3.64 to alt.atheism:
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elvish@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9984D074CD689elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
:
I doubt that, since the answer is: there is no God, and there
never was.
Prove it. Or admit you're exactly as irrational as the theists.
Why is your intellectual vacuity my problem?
Alas, It is the world's problem, as Dubya so amply proves.
:
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
06 Aug 2007 05:55:59 PM |
|
|
On Aug 6, 1:34 am, "Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org>
wrote:
"Denis Loubet" <dlou...@io.com> wrote innews:DK-dnW821vL0qyvbnZ2dnUVZ_v6rnZ2d@io.comto alt.atheism:
"Terry Austin" <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9983763AF33F1taustingmail@216.168.3.64...
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in news:1186329364.253515.252560
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies. Trying to
claim the question is a strawman(which it is not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue, and then
rounded the whole presentation off by whining "there's a difference
between healing and limb-regeneration". If God existed, there
wouldn't be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey, trained to
dance
on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer from.
No. That's what the people who believe in the efficacy of prayer
believe.
We just want them to offer an explanation as to why -- to an
omnipotent being -- the healing of a cancer is different from the
healing of a lost limb.
The old "If God exists,
He _must_ act in a certain way that I, and only I, get to define."
That's how every Christian views their interpretation of their god
character. We merely question their interpretations.
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
No. Since it's not the atheists that babble like that, but the
Christians, it's the Christians that make themselves look "stoopid".
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a sadistic
*****. At least hate theists for what they actually believe.
The same goes for atheists.
Actually, looking at this issue again, and the replies to it, what I have
noticed with absolute consistency is that the Godists evade the question by
wantonly misinterpreting it. They know that what it means is "Why does God
choose never to grow back amputated limbs", trhey have not answer to this,
so they either rephrase the question to suit their answer. See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_K_4fBcYK0&mode=related&search=
What a slimy, evasive and deceitful *****!
--
David Silverman F.L.A.H.N.
aa #2208
"If you are informed by God, you can be misinformed by nobody" - Osama Bin
Laden
You sound surprised at what slimy little weasels theists can be!
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Ejercito" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
06 Aug 2007 11:22:02 AM |
|
|
On Aug 5, 11:37 am, Terry Austin <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com>
wrote:
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote innews:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in news:1186329364.253515.252560
@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies. Trying to claim
the question is a strawman(which it is not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue, and then
rounded the whole presentation off by whining "there's a difference
between healing and limb-regeneration". If God existed, there wouldn't
be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey, trained to dance
on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer from. The old "If God exists,
He _must_ act in a certain way that I, and only I, get to define."
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a sadistic *****. At
least hate theists for what they actually believe.
How does refusing to heal amputees on demand make God a sadistic
*****?
Michael
.
|
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
06 Aug 2007 11:39:00 AM |
|
|
Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1186417322.367084.76220@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com:
On Aug 5, 11:37 am, Terry Austin
<terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote:
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote
innews:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1186329364.253515.252560 @k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com
to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies. Trying
to claim the question is a strawman(which it is not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue, and
then rounded the whole presentation off by whining "there's a
difference between healing and limb-regeneration". If God
existed, there wouldn't be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey,
trained to dance on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer
from. The old "If God exists, He _must_ act in a certain way
that I, and only I, get to define."
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a sadistic
*****. At least hate theists for what they actually believe.
How does refusing to heal amputees on demand make God a
sadistic
*****?
Are you really that fucking stupid?
--
"If he does that ***** again I'm going to tie his ***** hairs together
and kick him in the shin."
Terry Austin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Ejercito" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
06 Aug 2007 11:43:16 AM |
|
|
On Aug 6, 9:39 am, No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:1186417322.367084.76220@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com:
On Aug 5, 11:37 am, Terry Austin
<terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote:
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote
innews:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorg@194.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1186329364.253515.252560 @k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com
to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies. Trying
to claim the question is a strawman(which it is not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue, and
then rounded the whole presentation off by whining "there's a
difference between healing and limb-regeneration". If God
existed, there wouldn't be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey,
trained to dance on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer
from. The old "If God exists, He _must_ act in a certain way
that I, and only I, get to define."
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a sadistic
*****. At least hate theists for what they actually believe.
How does refusing to heal amputees on demand make God a
sadistic
*****?
Are you really that fucking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to heal amputees on
demand.
Michael
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian E. Clark" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
17 Nov 2007 09:49:35 PM |
|
|
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Austin" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
17 Nov 2007 10:23:35 PM |
|
|
Brian E. Clark <reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote in
news:MPG.21a9805b76a8a06998ac74@216.196.97.136:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Yes, presupposing a duty for God to heal amputees on demand is, in fact, a
dodge. Glad you agree.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
Explain why He should. Or why He should answer to some retarded little
***** like you. Or why I, or anyone else with the IQ of a toaster should
give a ***** whether or not you've lit yourself on fire.
--
Terry Austin
Beware the other head of science. It bites.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
18 Nov 2007 12:14:01 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 04:23:35 -0000, Terry Austin
<terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote:
Brian E. Clark <reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote in
news:MPG.21a9805b76a8a06998ac74@216.196.97.136:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Yes, presupposing a duty for God to heal amputees on demand is, in fact, a
dodge. Glad you agree.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
Explain why He should. Or why He should answer to some retarded little
***** like you. Or why I, or anyone else with the IQ of a toaster should
give a ***** whether or not you've lit yourself on fire.
Because if your god won't do anything that science says will happen
naturally, then there is no reason to suppose he has any power at all.
Apparently your god is too much of a wuss to demonstrate any evidence
that he exists.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Austin" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
18 Nov 2007 01:52:16 PM |
|
|
(Kate ) wrote in
news:4772d6b9.1624371765@news-west.newscene.com:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 04:23:35 -0000, Terry Austin
<terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote:
Brian E. Clark <reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote in
news:MPG.21a9805b76a8a06998ac74@216.196.97.136:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Yes, presupposing a duty for God to heal amputees on demand is, in
fact, a dodge. Glad you agree.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
Explain why He should. Or why He should answer to some retarded little
***** like you. Or why I, or anyone else with the IQ of a toaster
should give a ***** whether or not you've lit yourself on fire.
Because if your god won't do anything that science says will happen
naturally, then there is no reason to suppose he has any power at all.
So, because you won't give me everything you own as a gift, there's no
reason to suppose you're anything but a 12 year old living in his
parent's basement, with nothing to your name.
Apparently your god
Never claimed to believe.
is too much of a wuss to demonstrate any evidence
that he exists.
You hate a God nobody claims exists. Makes you look stoopid. Seriously.
--
Terry Austin
Beware the other head of science. It bites.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
18 Nov 2007 04:00:02 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:52:16 -0000, Terry Austin
<terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote:
cobalt@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote in
news:4772d6b9.1624371765@news-west.newscene.com:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 04:23:35 -0000, Terry Austin
<terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote:
Brian E. Clark <reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote in
news:MPG.21a9805b76a8a06998ac74@216.196.97.136:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Yes, presupposing a duty for God to heal amputees on demand is, in
fact, a dodge. Glad you agree.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
Explain why He should. Or why He should answer to some retarded little
***** like you. Or why I, or anyone else with the IQ of a toaster
should give a ***** whether or not you've lit yourself on fire.
Because if your god won't do anything that science says will happen
naturally, then there is no reason to suppose he has any power at all.
So, because you won't give me everything you own as a gift, there's no
reason to suppose you're anything but a 12 year old living in his
parent's basement, with nothing to your name.
LOL, you apparently think once god does something, he can't do it
anymore? That doing it once is like giving it away?
Didn't think real hard on that analogy, did you?
Apparently your god
Never claimed to believe.
If you are defining him, he's your construct.
is too much of a wuss to demonstrate any evidence
that he exists.
You hate a God nobody claims exists. Makes you look stoopid. Seriously.
Make up something, claim I said it and you think that makes me look
stupid?
Lets, see, didn't you already prove you ain't got a brain repeatedly
already?
Oh yeah, you did.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Austin" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
18 Nov 2007 04:25:51 PM |
|
|
(Kate ) wrote in
news:477db465.1681120515@news-west.newscene.com:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:52:16 -0000, Terry Austin
<terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote:
(Kate ) wrote in
news:4772d6b9.1624371765@news-west.newscene.com:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 04:23:35 -0000, Terry Austin
<terry.notaniceperson@gmail.com> wrote:
Brian E. Clark <reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote in
news:MPG.21a9805b76a8a06998ac74@216.196.97.136:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Yes, presupposing a duty for God to heal amputees on demand is, in
fact, a dodge. Glad you agree.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
Explain why He should. Or why He should answer to some retarded
little ***** like you. Or why I, or anyone else with the IQ of a
toaster should give a ***** whether or not you've lit yourself on
fire.
Because if your god won't do anything that science says will happen
naturally, then there is no reason to suppose he has any power at
all.
So, because you won't give me everything you own as a gift, there's no
reason to suppose you're anything but a 12 year old living in his
parent's basement, with nothing to your name.
LOL, you apparently think once god does something, he can't do it
anymore?
Where did I say that? Typical atheist idiocy: can't answer what was
actually said, so you make up what you *wish* I'd said, and lie about
it.
That doing it once is like giving it away?
Didn't think real hard on that analogy, did you?
I didn't *make* that analogy, retard-boy.
Apparently your god
Never claimed to believe.
If you are defining him, he's your construct.
I'm not defining Him, either, 'tard-boy. I just choose to understand why
I am not a part of the religion. Unlike you, who are too fucking
*stupid* to understand what it is.
is too much of a wuss to demonstrate any evidence
that he exists.
You hate a God nobody claims exists. Makes you look stoopid.
Seriously.
Make up something, claim I said it and you think that makes me look
stupid?
That's exactly what you do, yes: make up what you *wish* I'd said, and
lie about it. Makes you look double extra special stoopid.
Lets, see, didn't you already prove you ain't got a brain repeatedly
already?
Oh yeah, you did.
I know you are, but what am I?
--
Terry Austin
Beware the other head of science. It bites.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Ejercito" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
18 Nov 2007 09:39:24 AM |
|
|
On Nov 17, 7:49 pm, Brian E. Clark <re...@newsgroup.only.please>
wrote:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
He chooses not to heal missing limbs.
He chooses not to heal scarring from severe burns.
Michael
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steve O" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
18 Nov 2007 02:48:46 PM |
|
|
"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:28182afd-7a12-417e-abb0-7ef117d5fb40@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 17, 7:49 pm, Brian E. Clark <re...@newsgroup.only.please>
wrote:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
He chooses not to heal missing limbs.
He chooses not to heal scarring from severe burns.
Why?
Too hard for him, is it?
--
Steve O
a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter)
B.A.A.W.A.
Convicted by Earthquack
"Believe the Bible! - Because all the works of modern science cannot equal
the wisdom of goat - sacrificing primitives who thought that all the animal
species in the world lived within walking distance of Noah's house."
Michael
.
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Austin" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
18 Nov 2007 04:23:33 PM |
|
|
"Steve O" <hooray@nospamhere.thanks> wrote in news:5qbmpfFuq1a2U1
@mid.individual.net:
"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:28182afd-7a12-417e-abb0-7ef117d5fb40@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 17, 7:49 pm, Brian E. Clark <re...@newsgroup.only.please>
wrote:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
He chooses not to heal missing limbs.
He chooses not to heal scarring from severe burns.
Why?
Why should He choose otherwise?
Too hard for him, is it?
Claiming to know the mind of God, eh? Typical atheist arrogance. And
stoopidity.
--
Terry Austin
Beware the other head of science. It bites.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
18 Nov 2007 05:04:23 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:48:46 -0000, "Steve O"
<hooray@nospamhere.thanks> wrote:
"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:28182afd-7a12-417e-abb0-7ef117d5fb40@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 17, 7:49 pm, Brian E. Clark <re...@newsgroup.only.please>
wrote:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
He chooses not to heal missing limbs.
He chooses not to heal scarring from severe burns.
Why?
Too hard for him, is it?
It is for the same reason that Harry Potter cannot regenerate severed
limbs in the real world.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
18 Nov 2007 12:40:46 PM |
|
|
Michael Ejercito wrote:
On Nov 17, 7:49 pm, Brian E. Clark <re...@newsgroup.only.please>
wrote:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
He chooses not to heal missing limbs.
No choice about it. It can't, because it isn't.
He chooses not to heal scarring from severe burns.
No choice about it. It can't, because it isn't.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor http://www.secularity.com/ktayloraz
A.A #1143 http://azhotops.blogspot.com/
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "Terry Austin" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
18 Nov 2007 01:53:17 PM |
|
|
"Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in news:eid615-2ul1.ln1
@dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
On Nov 17, 7:49 pm, Brian E. Clark <re...@newsgroup.only.please>
wrote:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
He chooses not to heal missing limbs.
No choice about it. It can't, because it isn't.
He chooses not to heal scarring from severe burns.
No choice about it. It can't, because it isn't.
Believing there is not God (you'll deny it, of course, atheists always do)
is exactly as irrational and exactly as religious as believing there is.
--
Terry Austin
Beware the other head of science. It bites.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Ejercito" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
18 Nov 2007 09:27:31 PM |
|
|
On Nov 18, 10:40 am, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktaylo...@getnet.net>
wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
On Nov 17, 7:49 pm, Brian E. Clark <re...@newsgroup.only.please>
wrote:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
He chooses not to heal missing limbs.
No choice about it. It can't, because it isn't.
How do starfish regrow missing limbs?
It seems as if regeneration of limbs does not violate any
fundamental theories of physics.
Michael
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
19 Nov 2007 05:58:28 AM |
|
|
Michael Ejercito wrote:
On Nov 18, 10:40 am, "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktaylo...@getnet.net>
wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
On Nov 17, 7:49 pm, Brian E. Clark <re...@newsgroup.only.please>
wrote:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
He chooses not to heal missing limbs.
No choice about it. It can't, because it isn't.
How do starfish regrow missing limbs?
It seems as if regeneration of limbs does not violate any
fundamental theories of physics.
Starfish are not humans you fucking moron.
When a human spontaneously grows back a missing limb, then you can talk
to me about gods. Not before.
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor http://www.secularity.com/ktayloraz
A.A #1143 http://azhotops.blogspot.com/
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
18 Nov 2007 12:38:07 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:49:35 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <1186418596.856218.254860
@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Michael Ejercito
said...
Are you really that f*cking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to
heal amputees on demand.
That's a dodge.
Again: Explain why God (allegedly) heals problems such
as cancer and athlete's foot, but not missing limbs or
scarring from severe burns.
Don't hold your breath waiting for a coherent response from this
delusional genocidal blood-lusting crackpot.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Silly retort to Why won't god Heal amputees |
06 Aug 2007 03:50:41 PM |
|
|
In article <1186418596.856218.254860@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com> Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> writes:
On Aug 6, 9:39 am, No 33 Secretary <terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:1186417322.367084.76220@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com:
On Aug 5, 11:37 am, Terry Austin
<terry.notaniceper...@gmail.com> wrote:
"Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote
innews:Xns9983C5A2FDFA9elvishnoshpamorgŒ.177.96.26:
Hatter <Hatte...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1186329364.253515.252560 @k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com
to alt.atheism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYo2ezLZ_t4
A few good points, amist a sea of logical fallacies. Trying
to claim the question is a strawman(which it is not)
Hatter
he used an awful lot of strawmen dealing with the issue, and
then rounded the whole presentation off by whining "there's a
difference between healing and limb-regeneration". If God
existed, there wouldn't be.
There's the standard "God _must_ be no more than a monkey,
trained to dance on command" fallacy that most atheists suffer
from. The old "If God exists, He _must_ act in a certain way
that I, and only I, get to define."
You make atheists looks stoopid when you babble like that.
The reason God doesn't heal amputees is that God is a sadistic
*****. At least hate theists for what they actually believe.
How does refusing to heal amputees on demand make God a
sadistic
*****?
Are you really that fucking stupid?
You seem to be presupposing a duty for God to heal amputees on
demand.
Because miracles-on-demand is the way your god set things up,
isn't it?
And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do,
that the Father may be glorified in the Son.
Jesus answered and said unto them, Verily I say unto you, If ye
have faith, and doubt not, ye shall not only do this which is done
to the fig tree, but also if ye shall say unto this mountain,
Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; it shall be done.
Of course, with your might-makes-right view of god, you can
always say that god can break his word whenever he wants to.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
