Six parts god



 Religions > Atheism > Six parts god

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "mitch perkins"
Date: 15 Apr 2004 01:38:39 PM
Object: Six parts god
Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".
Of course it does seem a bit like a religion, having multiple
newsgroups devoted to it, one of them even goderated. Now I see you're
having a frickin' *Meet & Greet*!
Overheard at Atheist Meet & Greet:
"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"
You're still defining yourselves in relation to the (non)existence of
a god. Awhile back I ran across a wonderful word: tautology. There is
a god, or there isn't. Who gives a flying rat's *****? And don't call me
an agnostic; that word is *seven* parts gnostic.
Just a thought (or not),
Mitch
.

User: "Denis Loubet"

Title: Re: Six parts god 15 Apr 2004 06:58:55 PM
"mitch perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".

It's because there's at least 6 theists for every atheist, and we have to
live with them.
You moron.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
User: "Mike Painter"

Title: Re: Six parts god 15 Apr 2004 08:16:49 PM
"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message
news:oYadnR_rgrVhvOLdRVn-tw@io.com...


"mitch perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".


It's because there's at least 6 theists for every atheist, and we have to
live with them.

You moron.

It is estimated that China and Russia contain 2 billion atheists.
That would indicate that you either are not well informed, are lying or just
can't count.
.
User: "Maverick"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 12:32:42 AM
"Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net> wrote in
news:5uGfc.35352$i74.810102@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:


"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message
news:oYadnR_rgrVhvOLdRVn-tw@io.com...


"mitch perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only
one part "a".


It's because there's at least 6 theists for every atheist, and we
have to live with them.

You moron.


It is estimated that China and Russia contain 2 billion atheists.
That would indicate that you either are not well informed, are lying
or just can't count.



Highly unlikely, as the population of China is about 1.2 billion and that
of Russia 145 million.
.
User: "Denis Loubet"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 11:24:51 AM
"Maverick" <insensitive_clod@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94CD4C870E414insensitiveclodhotma@192.71.180.100...

"Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net> wrote in
news:5uGfc.35352$i74.810102@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:


"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message
news:oYadnR_rgrVhvOLdRVn-tw@io.com...


"mitch perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only
one part "a".


It's because there's at least 6 theists for every atheist, and we
have to live with them.

You moron.


It is estimated that China and Russia contain 2 billion atheists.
That would indicate that you either are not well informed, are lying
or just can't count.




Highly unlikely, as the population of China is about 1.2 billion and that
of Russia 145 million.

And the fact that the Russian and Chinese people are NOT ALL FUCKING
ATHEISTS.
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 11:11:41 PM
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:24:51 -0500, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com>
wrote:

And the fact that the Russian and Chinese people are NOT ALL FUCKING
ATHEISTS.

Definitely. Chinese have a strict one child policy, and most Russians
are too poor to afford many children.
Besides, not all atheists are fucking. Not all the time, that is. :-(
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Six parts god 17 Apr 2004 01:07:43 PM
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:11:41 +0700 in episode
<d51180173oj2tpmvkluf0nhkbuoohfjhkh@4ax.com> we saw our hero Jos Flachs
<'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>:

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:24:51 -0500, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote:

And the fact that the Russian and Chinese people are NOT ALL FUCKING
ATHEISTS.


Definitely. Chinese have a strict one child policy, and most Russians
are too poor to afford many children.

Besides, not all atheists are fucking. Not all the time, that is. :-(

Oh. Good.
(I was worried there was a quota I wasn't keeping)
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.






User: "Mike Painter"

Title: Re: Six parts god 15 Apr 2004 04:59:02 PM
"mitch perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".

So man is god?
Since you seem to be a quarter wit I'll explain. A theist is a person who
believes in one or more gods. In teh case of a christian theist it is
somebody who believes in three gods but denys it.

Of course it does seem a bit like a religion, having multiple
newsgroups devoted to it, one of them even goderated. Now I see you're
having a frickin' *Meet & Greet*!

Overheard at Atheist Meet & Greet:

"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"

You're still defining yourselves in relation to the (non)existence of
a god. Awhile back I ran across a wonderful word: tautology. There is
a god, or there isn't. Who gives a flying rat's *****? And don't call me
an agnostic; that word is *seven* parts gnostic.

Just a thought (or not),

The not part applies.
.
User: "mitch perkins"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 03:01:09 AM
"Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net> wrote in message news:<GADfc.34826$i74.791200@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...

"mitch perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".


So man is god?

So I made a shitty word joke?

Man is god or he isn't. Preventing large cults from running our
lives is an *immediate* concern. Nothing to do with god/nogod.

Since you seem to be a quarter wit I'll explain. A theist is a person who
believes in one or more gods. In teh case of a christian theist it is
somebody who believes in three gods but denys it.

Thanks for the quarter! Your words define "theist" exactly, or they
do not. Using tautology to annoy god-boy is his just desserts.
Clearly you can see how fittingly annoying Tautology is? There, I've
capitalised it, and proclaim myself a Tautologist. How annoying. Now
every statement I make will be necessarily true. Like the pope!
Try arguing with me about "the existence of god" under the
mind-crushing weight of my Tautophonic Symphony of Annoyance. You will
fail utterly, assuming you do not achieve some level of success.

Just a thought (or not),


The not part applies.

Hot apple tarts.
.

User: "mitch perkins"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 03:01:11 AM
"Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net> wrote in message news:<GADfc.34826$i74.791200@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...

"mitch perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".


So man is god?

So I made a shitty word joke?

Man is god or he isn't. Preventing large cults from running our
lives is an *immediate* concern. Nothing to do with god/nogod.

Since you seem to be a quarter wit I'll explain. A theist is a person who
believes in one or more gods. In teh case of a christian theist it is
somebody who believes in three gods but denys it.

Thanks for the quarter! Your words define "theist" exactly, or they
do not. Using tautology to annoy god-boy is his just desserts.
Clearly you can see how fittingly annoying Tautology is? There, I've
capitalised it, and proclaim myself a Tautologist. How annoying. Now
every statement I make will be necessarily true. Like the pope!
Try arguing with me about "the existence of god" under the
mind-crushing weight of my Tautophonic Symphony of Annoyance. You will
fail utterly, assuming you do not achieve some level of success.

Just a thought (or not),


The not part applies.

Hot apple tarts.
.

User: "mitch perkins"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 03:01:12 AM
"Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net> wrote in message news:<GADfc.34826$i74.791200@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...

"mitch perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".


So man is god?

So I made a shitty word joke?

Man is god or he isn't. Preventing large cults from running our
lives is an *immediate* concern. Nothing to do with god/nogod.

Since you seem to be a quarter wit I'll explain. A theist is a person who
believes in one or more gods. In teh case of a christian theist it is
somebody who believes in three gods but denys it.

Thanks for the quarter! Your words define "theist" exactly, or they
do not. Using tautology to annoy god-boy is his just desserts.
Clearly you can see how fittingly annoying Tautology is? There, I've
capitalised it, and proclaim myself a Tautologist. How annoying. Now
every statement I make will be necessarily true. Like the pope!
Try arguing with me about "the existence of god" under the
mind-crushing weight of my Tautophonic Symphony of Annoyance. You will
fail utterly, assuming you do not achieve some level of success.

Just a thought (or not),


The not part applies.

Hot apple tarts.
.

User: "mitch perkins"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 03:01:12 AM
"Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net> wrote in message news:<GADfc.34826$i74.791200@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...

"mitch perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".


So man is god?

So I made a shitty word joke?

Man is god or he isn't. Preventing large cults from running our
lives is an *immediate* concern. Nothing to do with god/nogod.

Since you seem to be a quarter wit I'll explain. A theist is a person who
believes in one or more gods. In teh case of a christian theist it is
somebody who believes in three gods but denys it.

Thanks for the quarter! Your words define "theist" exactly, or they
do not. Using tautology to annoy god-boy is his just desserts.
Clearly you can see how fittingly annoying Tautology is? There, I've
capitalised it, and proclaim myself a Tautologist. How annoying. Now
every statement I make will be necessarily true. Like the pope!
Try arguing with me about "the existence of god" under the
mind-crushing weight of my Tautophonic Symphony of Annoyance. You will
fail utterly, assuming you do not achieve some level of success.

Just a thought (or not),


The not part applies.

Hot apple tarts.
.
User: "mitch perkins"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 02:14:10 PM
Sorry about the idiotic multiple posts. Now I know that if the message
is taking too long to send and one hits "stop", the damn thing goes
through anyway. Now I know. Anyway the idea was simply to reject a
negative definition pasted on you (us) by theists. We should define
ourselves on our own new terms. Maybe not.
Cheers,
Mitch
.


User: "mitch perkins"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 02:37:25 AM
"Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net> wrote in message news:<GADfc.34826$i74.791200@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...

"mitch perkins" <mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".


So man is god?

So I made a shitty word-joke?
Man is god, or he isn't. That's what I think.
Preventing large cults from running our lives is an *immediate*
concern.
Nothing to do with god.

Since you seem to be a quarter wit I'll explain. A theist is a person who
believes in one or more gods. In teh case of a christian theist it is
somebody who believes in three gods but denys it.

Since you're explaining, I'll clarify: I don't care.
I'm a Tautologist. Every statement I make is necessarily true.
How annoying. Just like the pope.
Try arguing with me about "the existence of god" under the
mind-crushing weight of my "Galloping Tautophony of Annoyance". You
will fail utterly, assuming you do not achieve some level of success.
See?

Just a thought (or not),


The not part applies.

Hot apple tarts.
.

User: "Meteorite Debris"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 07:44:18 PM
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:59:02 GMT the ET form known as Mike
Painter<mdotpainter@att.net> sent a radio signal across the vast
expanse of deep space -._.--._.--._.--._.--._.--._.

Since you seem to be a quarter wit I'll explain. A theist is a person who
believes in one or more gods. In teh case of a christian theist it is
somebody who believes in three gods but denys it.

YHWH has MPD. He even killed himself once for a couple of days and
fucked his own mother to create himself. :-)
--
epicurus1*at*optusnet*dot*com*dot*au
apatriot #1, atheist #1417,
Chief EAC prophet -
Evil Atheist Conspiracy
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~pk1956/
"Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever
conceived." - Isaac Asimov
Fingerprint for PGP Keys at key server or go to
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~pk1956/
RSA - 71 BA 7C 45 B5 4A 5F EA 72 DB EC 7F 7F A8 70 99
DSS - 9217 21A9 9C3F EB0B E302 AD0E 69C5 0F06 402E 0943
.
User: "tommyknocker"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 08:46:32 PM
Meteorite Debris wrote:

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:59:02 GMT the ET form known as Mike
Painter<mdotpainter@att.net> sent a radio signal across the vast
expanse of deep space -._.--._.--._.--._.--._.--._.


Since you seem to be a quarter wit I'll explain. A theist is a person who
believes in one or more gods. In teh case of a christian theist it is
somebody who believes in three gods but denys it.


YHWH has MPD. He even killed himself once for a couple of days and
fucked his own mother to create himself. :-)

Et tu, Oedipus? :)
.



User: "Andrew Lias"

Title: Re: Six parts god 20 Apr 2004 04:10:26 PM
(mitch perkins) wrote in message news:<64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".

That's the funny thing about those a- qualifiers. Ain't English a
hoot?

Of course it does seem a bit like a religion, having multiple
newsgroups devoted to it, one of them even goderated.

Oh, you spelled moderated as "goderated"! It's almost like you're
implying that a moderator is like a god! Hoo! That's a cleverness
beyond compare, that is.

Now I see you're
having a frickin' *Meet & Greet*!

Yeah, how dare we have any interest in meeting and even greeting one
another? We're pretty wretched, that way.

Overheard at Atheist Meet & Greet:

"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"

I've been to a couple of these things and, wouldn't you know it,
that's exactly what we do! In fact, that's *all* we do. We just keep
saying those two things over and over. It's kind of fun when you can
get a "Row, row, row your boat" cadence going. The echoing "eh's" are
really a trip.

You're still defining yourselves in relation to the (non)existence of
a god.

You sure do seem to have us pegged. Thanks for being around to
explain us to ourselves.

Awhile back I ran across a wonderful word: tautology.

Words are wonderful. Some words I like are "crank", "gadfly", and
"nuisance".

There is a god, or there isn't.

You don't say!

Who gives a flying rat's *****? And don't call me
an agnostic; that word is *seven* parts gnostic.

Seven parts? Damn! You can count, too. Are your talents without
end?

Just a thought (or not),

Hey, thought is five parts "ought"! Whee, I can do it too!
--
Andrew Lias
http://andrewlias.blogspot.com
.
User: "mitch perkins"

Title: Re: Six parts god 22 Apr 2004 02:00:25 AM
(Andrew Lias) wrote in message news:<6d60aaf8.0404201310.a73364f@posting.google.com>...

mitchsperkins@yahoo.com (mitch perkins) wrote in message news:<64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>...

Of course it does seem a bit like a religion, having multiple
newsgroups devoted to it, one of them even goderated.


Oh, you spelled moderated as "goderated"! It's almost like you're
implying that a moderator is like a god! Hoo! That's a cleverness
beyond compare, that is.

Overheard at Atheist Meet & Greet:

"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"


I've been to a couple of these things and, wouldn't you know it,
that's exactly what we do! In fact, that's *all* we do. We just keep
saying those two things over and over. It's kind of fun when you can
get a "Row, row, row your boat" cadence going. The echoing "eh's" are
really a trip.

There is a god, or there isn't.


You don't say!


These ^ are ^ choice!

-> It was a dumb post.
Here is a "fake confusing restaurant review extract" of which I am
rather fond, and which may not go some small way toward...patching
stuff up.
"...the duck showed exquisite attention to detail in it's
preparation. He skimped on the sauce, though..."
Maybe that second sentence could be better. Any suggestions?
.

User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Six parts god 22 Apr 2004 06:23:39 PM
On 20 Apr 2004 14:10:26 -0700,
(Andrew Lias),
Message ID: <6d60aaf8.0404201310.a73364f@posting.google.com> wrote in
alt.atheism;

mitchsperkins@yahoo.com (mitch perkins) wrote in message news:<64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".


That's the funny thing about those a- qualifiers. Ain't English a
hoot?

Of course it does seem a bit like a religion, having multiple
newsgroups devoted to it, one of them even goderated.


Oh, you spelled moderated as "goderated"! It's almost like you're
implying that a moderator is like a god! Hoo! That's a cleverness
beyond compare, that is.

Now I see you're
having a frickin' *Meet & Greet*!


Yeah, how dare we have any interest in meeting and even greeting one
another? We're pretty wretched, that way.

Overheard at Atheist Meet & Greet:

"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"


I've been to a couple of these things and, wouldn't you know it,
that's exactly what we do! In fact, that's *all* we do. We just keep
saying those two things over and over. It's kind of fun when you can
get a "Row, row, row your boat" cadence going. The echoing "eh's" are
really a trip.

You're still defining yourselves in relation to the (non)existence of
a god.


You sure do seem to have us pegged. Thanks for being around to
explain us to ourselves.

Awhile back I ran across a wonderful word: tautology.


Words are wonderful. Some words I like are "crank", "gadfly", and
"nuisance".

There is a god, or there isn't.


You don't say!

Who gives a flying rat's *****? And don't call me
an agnostic; that word is *seven* parts gnostic.


Seven parts? Damn! You can count, too. Are your talents without
end?

Just a thought (or not),


Hey, thought is five parts "ought"! Whee, I can do it too!

<SNICKER!>


Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.


User: "quibbler"

Title: Re: Six parts god 15 Apr 2004 05:04:31 PM
In article <64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>,
mitchsperkins@yahoo.com says...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".

Theist is three parts god and three parts "ist". Furthermore theists
are the ones who made up the term. In any event, four letters don't
refer to religion and three letters do.

Of course it does seem a bit like a religion,

Ah the standard, misguided, hypocritical theistic accusation that we're
<gasp> a "religion", even though from a theistic point of view there
would be nothing wrong with that.

having multiple
newsgroups devoted to it, one of them even goderated.

Get a grip. It's just limited to cut down spam as far as I've seen.
But most people don't bother with it since we can filter our own spam.

Now I see you're
having a frickin' *Meet & Greet*!

Why is that only something that theists are allowed to do?


Overheard at Atheist Meet & Greet:

"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"

I highly doubt you heard that, liar.

You're still defining yourselves in relation to the (non)existence of
a god.

We can define ourselves in positive terms, but there's nothing
inherently wrong with a negative definition. In-finity means "not
finite". It's defined in terms of what it is not. Yet it's used
extensively in mathematics and philosophy and theology.

Awhile back I ran across a wonderful word: tautology. There is
a god, or there isn't. Who gives a flying rat's *****?

Nobody asked you to care. You've obviously failed to understand that
theism and atheism have important real world implications in terms of
how one lives, thinks, practices politics, etc. Come back when you get
a clue.

And don't call me
an agnostic; that word is *seven* parts gnostic.

Enough with the bizarre numerology. Try a serious argument next time.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Six parts god 15 Apr 2004 05:57:33 PM
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:04:31 -0600 in episode
<MPG.1ae8b4c724fe7b679896da@news.individual.net> we saw our hero quibbler
<quibbler247@yahoo.com>:

In article <64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>,
mitchsperkins@yahoo.com says...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".


Theist is three parts god and three parts "ist". Furthermore theists are
the ones who made up the term. In any event, four letters don't refer to
religion and three letters do.

More like three parts definite article, three parts suffix indicating a
personal pronoun which would make them the people of the definite article!
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.

User: "mitch perkins"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 04:02:31 AM
quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.1ae8b4c724fe7b679896da@news.individual.net>...

In article <64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>,
mitchsperkins@yahoo.com says...

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".


Theist is three parts god and three parts "ist". Furthermore theists
are the ones who made up the term. In any event, four letters don't
refer to religion and three letters do.

At least you're not wasting your time taking a shitty word-joke
seriously. Whew!


Of course it does seem a bit like a religion,


Ah the standard, misguided, hypocritical theistic accusation that we're
<gasp> a "religion", even though from a theistic point of view there
would be nothing wrong with that.

I'll have to remember to qualify things a bit more. "Seems", "a
bit", and "like" are not for everyone. However, *my doctor* *feels* I
*might* be a *good* *candidate* for Rogaine.


having multiple
newsgroups devoted to it, one of them even goderated.


Get a grip. It's just limited to cut down spam as far as I've seen.
But most people don't bother with it since we can filter our own spam.

Win a trip. Filtering your own spam is no big deal; I can roll my
own sausages...but I *don't*.


Now I see you're
having a frickin' *Meet & Greet*!


Why is that only something that theists are allowed to do?

I am filled with love and sadness as I laugh. People gathering to
share a common disbelief! Sure that's not what it is, but call
yourselves something *relevant* to what you're about. The
existence/non-existence of so-called god is not relevant to anything.
Don't even allow the "debate" to distract you.


Overheard at Atheist Meet & Greet:

"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"


I highly doubt you heard that, liar.

A joke is a form of lie, I guess. I'll bet that Meet & Greet's gonna
be a laugh a minute.


You're still defining yourselves in relation to the (non)existence of
a god.


We can define ourselves in positive terms, but there's nothing
inherently wrong with a negative definition. In-finity means "not
finite". It's defined in terms of what it is not. Yet it's used
extensively in mathematics and philosophy and theology.

Not the negative part, the god part. Ignore it. Can't you define
yourselves without reference to it at all?


Awhile back I ran across a wonderful word: tautology. There is
a god, or there isn't. Who gives a flying rat's *****?


Nobody asked you to care. You've obviously failed to understand that
theism and atheism have important real world implications in terms of
how one lives, thinks, practices politics, etc. Come back when you get
a clue.

Try to be more arrogant and contradictory; I wouldn't require an
invitation to care about something having "important real world
implications" for me, now would I? You may not have noticed that the
existence or not of so-called god is *irrelevant* to *every* aspect of
life. Agendas are based on being liked and accepted, money, love,
power, etc....*never* whether silly god exists.

And don't call me
an agnostic; that word is *seven* parts gnostic.


Enough with the bizarre numerology. Try a serious argument next time.

Enough with the bizarre humourology. I was *joking*. This is the
whole point of Tautology: christers don't make sense so right back at
'em. Don't engage in or even acknowledge the "debate", but if
cornered, waste their time with nonsense. "Yes of course there is a
god unless not but I can only assume to be positive to the degree that
I can rely on certain information not coming my way too soon." This
does not fit the proper definition of tautology. Even better!
See ya,
Mitch
.


User: "Lars Eighner"

Title: Re: Six parts god 15 Apr 2004 02:22:42 PM
In our last episode,
<64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>,
the lovely and talented mitch perkins
broadcast on alt.atheism:

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".
Of course it does seem a bit like a religion, having multiple
newsgroups devoted to it, one of them even goderated. Now I see you're
having a frickin' *Meet & Greet*!
Overheard at Atheist Meet & Greet:
"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"

What? I didn't know we had a Canadian chapter.
--
Rev. Lars Eighner, ULC, Atheist #1965
http://www.io.com/~eighner
"I hope I never get so old I get religious." --Ingmar Bergman
.
User: "mitch perkins"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 12:42:25 AM
Lars Eighner <eighner@io.com> wrote in message news:<slrnc7to6i.d1i.eighner@goodwill.io.com>...

In our last episode,
<64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>,
the lovely and talented mitch perkins
broadcast on alt.atheism:

Overheard at Atheist Meet & Greet:


"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"


What? I didn't know we had a Canadian chapter.

Typical American.
.

User: "Brendan Taylor"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 09:31:20 PM
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:22:42 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:

In our last episode,
<64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>,
the lovely and talented mitch perkins
broadcast on alt.atheism:

"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"


What? I didn't know we had a Canadian chapter.


As a Canadian I'm right sick of "eh" jokes.
Would it hurt you to throw in an igloo or hockey stick or two?
.
User: "mitch perkins"

Title: Re: Six parts god 17 Apr 2004 01:20:32 AM
Brendan Taylor <temp@fungoid.dot.dyndns.dot.org> wrote in message news:<YF0gc.145128$Ig.78852@pd7tw2no>...

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:22:42 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:

In our last episode,
<64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>,
the lovely and talented mitch perkins
broadcast on alt.atheism:


"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"


What? I didn't know we had a Canadian chapter.


As a Canadian I'm right sick of "eh" jokes.
Would it hurt you to throw in an igloo or hockey stick or two?

Wierd! Last night I threw two hockey sticks into an igloo and hurt
myself pretty badly.
.
User: "Lars Eighner"

Title: Re: Six parts god 17 Apr 2004 05:04:16 AM
In our last episode,
<64dddc3d.0404162220.6fe03a56@posting.google.com>,
the lovely and talented mitch perkins
broadcast on alt.atheism:

Brendan Taylor <temp@fungoid.dot.dyndns.dot.org> wrote in message news:<YF0gc.145128$Ig.78852@pd7tw2no>...

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:22:42 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:

In our last episode,
<64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>,
the lovely and talented mitch perkins
broadcast on alt.atheism:


"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"


What? I didn't know we had a Canadian chapter.


As a Canadian I'm right sick of "eh" jokes.
Would it hurt you to throw in an igloo or hockey stick or two?

Wierd! Last night I threw two hockey sticks into an igloo and hurt
myself pretty badly.

An atheist, a Canadian, and a baby fur seal go into a bar ...
--
Rev. Lars Eighner, ULC, Atheist #1965
http://www.io.com/~eighner
"I hope I never get so old I get religious." --Ingmar Bergman
.
User: "Therion Ware"

Title: Re: Six parts god 17 Apr 2004 02:32:07 PM
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 05:04:16 -0500 in alt.atheism, Lars Eighner (Lars
Eighner <eighner@io.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism

In our last episode,
<64dddc3d.0404162220.6fe03a56@posting.google.com>,
the lovely and talented mitch perkins
broadcast on alt.atheism:

Brendan Taylor <temp@fungoid.dot.dyndns.dot.org> wrote in message news:<YF0gc.145128$Ig.78852@pd7tw2no>...

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:22:42 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:

In our last episode,
<64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>,
the lovely and talented mitch perkins
broadcast on alt.atheism:


"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"


What? I didn't know we had a Canadian chapter.


As a Canadian I'm right sick of "eh" jokes.
Would it hurt you to throw in an igloo or hockey stick or two?


Wierd! Last night I threw two hockey sticks into an igloo and hurt
myself pretty badly.


An atheist, a Canadian, and a baby fur seal go into a bar ...

A lady takes her car to the mechanic. The mechanic checks the car and
tells the lady "It looks like you blew a seal" the lady answers back
wiping her mouth "No, that just a little mayonnaise from lunch!"
-------
Did you hear about the baby seal that walked into a club?
---
Baby seal goes into a bar, the Barman says "What'll it be?".
The seal replies "Anything but Canadian Club on the rocks!".
-------
A baby harp seal was crawling around the rocky shores out in
the open. A greenpeace person ran over to it and said, "Don't
you know there are evil men out here to kill you and take your
skin? Why are you out here in the open?"
The seal replied, "Beats me!"
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion?
See: <http://www.Video2CD.com>. 35.00 gets your video on DVD.
all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read.
** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.
.

User: "mitch perkins"

Title: Re: Six parts god 17 Apr 2004 02:21:48 PM
Lars Eighner <eighner@io.com> wrote in message news:<slrnc82073.5p0.eighner@goodwill.io.com>...


An atheist, a Canadian, and a baby fur seal go into a bar ...

^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Typical American.
...and get really drunk. The Canadian blurts out that he wants to
sleep with the atheist. She agrees. The magically cognizant "baby fur
seal" lying thoughtlessly discarded on a nearby barstool can't help
but complain loudly that we do not know whether the atheist agrees to
*sleep* with the Canadian, or just to the (glaringly obvious to her)
fact that he wants to. The magically cognizant "baby fur seal" feels
cheated. But hey, that's life.
Oldest joke in the book, eh?
.



User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: Six parts god 17 Apr 2004 01:08:52 PM
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 02:31:20 +0000 in episode
<YF0gc.145128$Ig.78852@pd7tw2no> we saw our hero Brendan Taylor
<temp@fungoid.dot.dyndns.dot.org>:

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:22:42 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:

In our last episode,
<64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>, the lovely and
talented mitch perkins broadcast on alt.atheism:


"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"


What? I didn't know we had a Canadian chapter.


As a Canadian I'm right sick of "eh" jokes. Would it hurt you to throw in
an igloo or hockey stick or two?

You want we should throw hockey sticks?
Okay but remember, you asked...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.

User: "stoney"

Title: Re: Six parts god 20 Apr 2004 09:58:54 PM
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 02:31:20 GMT, Brendan Taylor
<temp@fungoid.dot.dyndns.dot.org>, Message ID:
<YF0gc.145128$Ig.78852@pd7tw2no> wrote in alt.atheism;

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:22:42 -0500, Lars Eighner wrote:

In our last episode,
<64dddc3d.0404151038.64edbb6d@posting.google.com>,
the lovely and talented mitch perkins
broadcast on alt.atheism:


"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"


What? I didn't know we had a Canadian chapter.


As a Canadian I'm right sick of "eh" jokes.
Would it hurt you to throw in an igloo or hockey stick or two?

How about a bottle of "Black Horse Ale?"


Stoney
"Designated Rascal and Rapscallion
and
SCAMPERMEISTER!"
When in doubt, SCAMPER about!
When things are fair, SCAMPER everywhere!
When things are rough, can't SCAMPER enough!
/end humour alert
alt.atheism military veteran #11
{so much for the 'no atheists in foxholes' rubbish}
.



User: "Meteorite Debris"

Title: Re: Six parts god 16 Apr 2004 02:30:08 AM
On 15 Apr 2004 11:38:39 -0700 the ET form known as mitch
perkins<mitchsperkins@yahoo.com> sent a radio signal across the vast
expanse of deep space -._.--._.--._.--._.--._.--._.

Problem with the word "atheist" is it's six parts "god" and only one
part "a".
Of course it does seem a bit like a religion, having multiple
newsgroups devoted to it, one of them even goderated. Now I see you're
having a frickin' *Meet & Greet*!

Overheard at Atheist Meet & Greet:

"God sure doesn't exist, eh?"
"Yeah, eh?"

You're still defining yourselves in relation to the (non)existence of
a god. Awhile back I ran across a wonderful word: tautology. There is
a god, or there isn't. Who gives a flying rat's *****?

The as what does a belief in fairies matter. Normally it does not. But
when groups of fairy worshippers think the laws should reflect what
they are so certain of regarding what a fairy wants of everyone else,
even if they are not believers, when a group wants to make their
beliefs your beliefs, when these same groups imagine they are superior
human beings, and when such groups can consolidate political power to
match their delusions, then for a nonbeliever this can be scary.
That is why it is worth giving a flying rat's arse.
--
epicurus1*at*optusnet*dot*com*dot*au
apatriot #1, atheist #1417,
Chief EAC prophet -
Evil Atheist Conspiracy
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~pk1956/
"Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever
conceived." - Isaac Asimov
Fingerprint for PGP Keys at key server or go to
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~pk1956/
RSA - 71 BA 7C 45 B5 4A 5F EA 72 DB EC 7F 7F A8 70 99
DSS - 9217 21A9 9C3F EB0B E302 AD0E 69C5 0F06 402E 0943
.


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER