| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Martin Thomas" |
| Date: |
07 Jan 2004 01:42:21 PM |
| Object: |
Skeptic reborn! |
In the thread argument _ad ignorantiam_ there is a post from
"Jaco Bandolim" <jband@sparknode.com> who says:
:Evidently you need some classes. You are still arguing _ad ignorantiam_ that
:it is necessarily true that an invisible god might exist simply because
:there is no proof your hypothesis ("There is a definite possibility that a
:god exists") is false.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?G19753EF6
Is this the end of "B. Corporeal" <bcorp392@hotmail.com>?
Note to the mystified:
Skeptic has been posting to alt.atheism for years and is the most
frustratingly illogical person imaginable. Because most people
eventually give up trying to get through to him, he keeps on
changing his name.
-
Martin Thomas
Official "Teddy Bear" Atheist
mart666t@netscape.NO.HAWKERS.net
.
|
|
| User: "Erica" |
|
| Title: Re: Skeptic reborn! |
07 Jan 2004 02:02:55 PM |
|
|
In article <rrnovv06nl2jtpe6hnivsktce2n9coif29@4ax.com>,
Martin Thomas <mart666t@netscape.NO.HAWKERS.net> wrote:
In the thread argument _ad ignorantiam_ there is a post from
"Jaco Bandolim" <jband@sparknode.com> who says:
:Evidently you need some classes. You are still arguing _ad ignorantiam_ that
:it is necessarily true that an invisible god might exist simply because
:there is no proof your hypothesis ("There is a definite possibility that a
:god exists") is false.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?G19753EF6
Is this the end of "B. Corporeal" <bcorp392@hotmail.com>?
Note to the mystified:
Skeptic has been posting to alt.atheism for years and is the most
frustratingly illogical person imaginable. Because most people
eventually give up trying to get through to him, he keeps on
changing his name.
-
Martin Thomas
Official "Teddy Bear" Atheist
mart666t@netscape.NO.HAWKERS.net
Imagine my dismay when he said he had the hots for me and wondered where
I was. I felt an immediate need to file a restraining order. But how do
you do that against someone you only know by aliases.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mekkala" |
|
| Title: Re: Skeptic reborn! |
07 Jan 2004 01:51:16 PM |
|
|
On 07 Jan 2004, Martin Thomas <mart666t@netscape.NO.HAWKERS.net> screwed
up his face, groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message
in news:rrnovv06nl2jtpe6hnivsktce2n9coif29@4ax.com:
In the thread argument _ad ignorantiam_ there is a post from
"Jaco Bandolim" <jband@sparknode.com> who says:
:Evidently you need some classes. You are still arguing _ad
:ignorantiam_ that it is necessarily true that an invisible god might
:exist simply because there is no proof your hypothesis ("There is a
:definite possibility that a god exists") is false.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?G19753EF6
Is this the end of "B. Corporeal" <bcorp392@hotmail.com>?
Note to the mystified:
Skeptic has been posting to alt.atheism for years and is the most
frustratingly illogical person imaginable. Because most people
eventually give up trying to get through to him, he keeps on
changing his name.
-
Martin Thomas
Official "Teddy Bear" Atheist
mart666t@netscape.NO.HAWKERS.net
Septic -- Killfile's Bane.
--
Mekkala, Atheist #2148
"Atheism is ... the bed-rock of sanity in a world of madness."
--Emmett F. Fields
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Skeptic reborn! |
07 Jan 2004 04:36:46 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 19:42:21 +0000, Martin Thomas
<mart666t@netscape.NO.HAWKERS.net> wrote:
In the thread argument _ad ignorantiam_ there is a post from
"Jaco Bandolim" <jband@sparknode.com> who says:
:Evidently you need some classes. You are still arguing _ad ignorantiam_ that
:it is necessarily true that an invisible god might exist simply because
:there is no proof your hypothesis ("There is a definite possibility that a
:god exists") is false.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?G19753EF6
Is this the end of "B. Corporeal" <bcorp392@hotmail.com>?
Note to the mystified:
Skeptic has been posting to alt.atheism for years and is the most
frustratingly illogical person imaginable. Because most people
eventually give up trying to get through to him, he keeps on
changing his name.
I thought it was because he was in so many killfiles?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jaco Mandolin" |
|
| Title: Re: Skeptic reborn! |
08 Jan 2004 11:25:18 AM |
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:o32pvvgfbj2t7aq6894brfflvh866557h2@4ax.com...
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 19:42:21 +0000, Martin Thomas
<mart666t@netscape.NO.HAWKERS.net> wrote:
In the thread argument _ad ignorantiam_ there is a post from
"Jaco Bandolim" <jband@sparknode.com> who says:
:Evidently you need some classes. You are still arguing _ad ignorantiam_
that
:it is necessarily true that an invisible god might exist simply because
:there is no proof your hypothesis ("There is a definite possibility that
a
:god exists") is false.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?G19753EF6
Is this the end of "B. Corporeal" <bcorp392@hotmail.com>?
Note to the mystified:
Skeptic has been posting to alt.atheism for years and is the most
frustratingly illogical person imaginable. Because most people
eventually give up trying to get through to him, he keeps on
changing his name.
I thought it was because he was in so many killfiles?
You killfile everyone who questions your belief that theists are right,
their hypothetical invisible god or gods might exist, because there is no
proof the hypothesis is false? Don't you have the courage of your
convictions? Why are you even in Usenet if you don't want to discuss these
things?
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Skeptic reborn! |
08 Jan 2004 03:03:29 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:25:18 GMT, "Jaco Mandolin"
<jmand@sparknode.com> wrote:
<snip the same old crap>
<yawn>
Hi Septic. Bye Septic.
<re-plonk>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
