| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"|-|erc" |
| Date: |
07 Jan 2005 07:01:27 PM |
| Object: |
SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
I have made this claim perfectly clear for 3 years on sci.skeptic.
CLAIM : Anyone within hearing range of me will hear the Truman satelite
------- ------ -------- ----- - --- --- ------ -- ------ -------
The Truman satelite is targetted on me because I am supernatural.
Every day people say to me "I saw the Truman" and "I saw God".
INSTANT PROOF OF PARANORMAL to any skeptic investigator
who can come to Townsville, Queensland, Australia for 1 minute.
Herc
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dksqpv41597ofbhr16mi7tdj2qfihvoldv%404ax.com
Hey Trueman...
what up, my uncle told me you post here... he's did some audio on your
secret show and gave me some tapes. love the show.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1epmdv8iqmnckeqhctnf17537rt8hevjeh%404ax.com
You rule Truman.
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=9aqbbv85c53jobkenltkil2tbsdk7m2n3p@4ax.com
I was in Townsville over the weekend, and I heard him.
Very spooky!
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=me7hbv4snqc6gnb1cktj3cvqtiibnpm6s9@4ax.com
I'm from Townsville and YOU ARE the Truman
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3eb66422.779705967@news.ozemail.com.au
I'm in Townsville. We're sick of you
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.OSF.4.21.0309230859190.5384-100000%40marlin.jcu.edu.au
Do you know if the truman is living in Townsville?
I've been hearing stuff, yeah.
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
BTW, when I was in The Strand last weekend, I didn't hear your broadcast per
se. Well, at least I thought I didn't. I think you're the Truman too.
"Therefore 100,000 Townsville residents and 1 Melbourne tourist can't be
wrong".
****************************************************************
Les just went to Townsville, didn't come nearby but heard people there talk about me
Here is Les approaching me on usenet, calls me ADAM then tells me about
the real Truman having a crush on Laurie Holden, (he tested if I knew that).
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=s1w1c.85795%24Wa.33069%40news-server.bigpond.net.au
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: Re: Herc- please explain..
Date: 2004-03-03 17:56:44 PST
No worries, Adam.
AUSTRALIA SKEPTICS CANCELLED THE PARANORMAL CHALLENGE
BECAUSE THE CEO ASKED DETAILS ABOUT THE TEST AND I SAID
IT WORKS BECAUSE I'M ADAM.
THAT WAS PROOF TO HIM THAT MY CLAIM WAS A DELUSION
THEY MAKE PUBLIC OFFERS TO PARNORMAL CLAIMANTS
BUT YOU HAVE TO BE AN *ORDINARY* PARANORMAL PERSON.
THEN THEY LIED THAT MY CLAIMS WERE INCOHERENT, THEY
WERE VERY BASIC. THEN THEY DID A NEWS REPORT SAYING
THEY MUST BE DETAILED AND SPECIFIC, THIS IS A LIE, CHECK
THE CONDITIONS OF APPLICATION
--
what do women say about male sperm? sex cells never age? protein rich?
:-C==8 You'll never never know if you never never blow! :-C==8
.
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 07:51:17 PM |
|
|
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in > >> >> > wrote:
You keep on denying it, and making demented posts about
skeptics refusing to test you. I'm just presenting balance.
Deal with it, or take your meds.
they are not facts. if that was factual I would be in prison.
the prosecution was ordered to cease in supreme court.
reply ASAP or face consequences
and
ps please reply in a day or two
are the 2 sentences that got misquoted into extortion, that is
no bull.
When I have enough money I will sue Det Janes for slander,
judges in misc.legal said that's what he did.
Riiiiight. Trust those people on Usenet who say they are judges,
kook.
Valid point, actually on rereading she said I had no case,
She's right. You don't, so shut the ***** up about it.
To an ordinay dude maybe, only because its police against an
individual.
Dear Barry, thankyou for your verrrrrry slow reply ..
PS please reply in a day or two , I"m about to put crap in your
sponsors shop.
No, herc the correct words you used were "I'm about to put Ratsak in
***** Smith Foods"
You threatened to poison people if you didn't get your own obsessed
way. It was a specific threat.
all idle threats are specific you moron. it was
PLEASE REPLY IN DAY OR TWO, IM ABOUT TO...
nobody in their right mind can take that seriously
after 74 pages of email, fax, phone calls. I KNEW THE GUY,
I GAVE HIM MY NAME, MY ADDRESS, WHO I AM
He was breaking the law, I wanted police to step in, I didn't think
they would be soo fucking stupid.
What he did may or may not have been illegal. You, however, made a clear
threat to poison food in a supermarket unless you were given money. What
you did was illegal, and such threats must be taken seriously by the
police.
Where? I said
thankyou for your verrrrry slow reply
some stuff about examing the claim
Claim : i can guess peoples names ....
Graham
PS please reply in a day or two I"m about to put ratsac in your guranantee-sponsors shop
This is just conversation, he talks back to me insulting me every post.
That is NOT a demand for money.
If you lived in the U.S., I'd have pressed charges for your threat to
slit my daughters' throats in front of me. You want people to take what
you say seriously, but then you get upset when they DO take what you say
seriously.
the topic of that thread was POLICE INVESTIGATOR FOUND GUILTY OF DEFAMING
gave me immunity. You and 20 others contantly taunted and abused me that thread.
You can run to the police cutting out your half of the correspondence like A.S.S. did
and isolating meaningless quotes, but YOU WILL BE EXPOSED.
Barrys words
1 The impression that Australian Skeptics (AS) had "backed-down" CLAIMBREAKERS
3 Defining in detail precisely what it is that s/he believes PRECISE DETAIL
7 Not for our money MINE MINE MINE
8 We did not want to be seen to be hounding a deluded WE DIDN'T CALL HIM DELUDED
10 As a naked statement and was totally irrelevant MISQUOTER
11 Not make a good story OF A FOOL
12 Every question, was that "the Skeptics are backing down GET THE HINT?
13 Opportunity to confess that we have indeed backed down OH REALLY?
19 Someone can put one over the Skeptics THEY JUST DID ON NATIONAL TV
--------------------------------------------------
The fact I was just arguing with a single person, who would not take my claim to
the commitee, he was degrading and insulting and refusing me
JUST LIKE ON TV
It was a one to one conversation, give and take each way. When he couldn't face
up to what a con artist he was, he took it to a company level.
ONLY THEN he took my PERSONAL remarks as being to his COMPANY that offers $100,000.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 10:23:18 PM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in news:34e5c0F49pf7dU1@individual.net:
PS please reply in a day or two I"m about to put ratsac in your
guranantee-sponsors shop
When the sponsor runs a supermarket chain, this is a threat I'd take
seriously. How could I live with myself is I blew it off as the ravings
of an angry man, and he actually poisoned someone?
Then there's this from you, another threat:
***** Smith is the biggest fucking tight arse in history. He put me
in prison for 6 months for a sarchastic email to some fuckwit. I'm
on a restraining order from ***** Smith, watch your daughters loser.
But here's a differeent version of your "non-threat", written by you. It
sounds even more serious:
PS Please reply in a day or two, I'm about to put
Ratsac in as much ***** Smith food as I can grab.
And then there's this. The >> is me, the > is you:
Well, it's nearly 11:00pm here in San Diego, Herc. Time to
shut down the computer, take the wife upstairs, and do
the screaming orgasm thing. Go catch some sunshine, leave
the computer off for a day or two, find a reason to
smile, Herc.
I'll slit her throat in front of you for your blasphemy
Herc
And again, to one "Bob Officer:
I'll slit you too you fucking persecuting arsehole
Herc, you just don't get it. You rave, you make threats, you blame
everyone but yourself. It could be that you ran into so real assholes.
It could be that you had a valid complaint about the way they responded
to your offer. That does not give you the right to make such threats.
What you did was worse than anything done to you.
--
Enkidu AA# 2165
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then where does evil come from?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
Epicurus 341-270 B.C.E.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 11:40:16 PM |
|
|
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in >
PS please reply in a day or two I"m about to put ratsac in your
guranantee-sponsors shop
When the sponsor runs a supermarket chain, this is a threat I'd take
seriously. How could I live with myself is I blew it off as the ravings
of an angry man, and he actually poisoned someone?
Then there's this from you, another threat:
***** Smith is the biggest fucking tight arse in history. He put me
in prison for 6 months for a sarchastic email to some fuckwit. I'm
on a restraining order from ***** Smith, watch your daughters loser.
again part of a discussion about police and nature of freedom of speech.
But here's a differeent version of your "non-threat", written by you. It
sounds even more serious:
PS Please reply in a day or two, I'm about to put
Ratsac in as much ***** Smith food as I can grab.
how can PLEASE REPLY be a serious threat? ARE YOU BONKAS?
The guy lost my house, I was travelling and bumming rooms, it was
OBVIOUSLY WRITTEN ON THE SPOT...... AT MOST IDLE at 1am on the spot.
Nothing intended. "Did you hear about the guy who said I'm gonna poison you"
See I just got 20 years prison in the above sentence with you in charge.
And then there's this. The >> is me, the > is you:
Well, it's nearly 11:00pm here in San Diego, Herc. Time to
shut down the computer, take the wife upstairs, and do
the screaming orgasm thing. Go catch some sunshine, leave
the computer off for a day or two, find a reason to
smile, Herc.
I'll slit her throat in front of you for your blasphemy
Herc
And again, to one "Bob Officer:
I'll slit you too you fucking persecuting arsehole
Herc, you just don't get it. You rave, you make threats, you blame
everyone but yourself. It could be that you ran into so real assholes.
It could be that you had a valid complaint about the way they responded
to your offer. That does not give you the right to make such threats.
What you did was worse than anything done to you.
AND YOU SNIPPED YOU THREATENING ME THE POST JUST BEFORE.
YOU all taunted an taunted me that THE NEWSPAPER HEADLINE
POLICE INVESTIGATOR IS GUILTY FOR DEFAMING next to
my arrest article was not intentional juxtaposition.
ALL I said, after 20 of you blatently constantly abused me was...
WELL OK THEN, I BET YOU CAN'T GET ME ARRESTED
DIPLOPMATIC IMMUNITY
THEN I said here you go do your worst.
See in context you had nothing to worry about. What you are doing is no different
than accusing Stephen King of torturuing and murdering people, because you say
DID YOU WRITE THIS?
without context, then lure people to assumptions. I am a professional writer and you
are a simple fool who I proved could not get me arrested for FAKE charges, a second time.
Herc
dont set folllow ups on me, you obviously have to lie to get the last word.
JAB JAB JAB QUOTE IM A CRITICAL THINKER
It means you're all perveryors of injustice, you all try to frame people by abusing them into responding
then run to the police.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 08:15:56 AM |
|
|
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in news:34eipbF46uqg1U1@individual.net:
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in >
PS please reply in a day or two I"m about to put ratsac in your
guranantee-sponsors shop
When the sponsor runs a supermarket chain, this is a threat I'd take
seriously. How could I live with myself is I blew it off as the
ravings of an angry man, and he actually poisoned someone?
Then there's this from you, another threat:
***** Smith is the biggest fucking tight arse in history. He put me
in prison for 6 months for a sarchastic email to some fuckwit. I'm
on a restraining order from ***** Smith, watch your daughters loser.
again part of a discussion about police and nature of freedom of
speech.
No, it's a threat, one any parent would recognized and react to. It is
not a "free speech" issue.
But here's a differeent version of your "non-threat", written by you.
It sounds even more serious:
PS Please reply in a day or two, I'm about to put
Ratsac in as much ***** Smith food as I can grab.
how can PLEASE REPLY be a serious threat? ARE YOU BONKAS?
The guy lost my house, I was travelling and bumming rooms, it was
OBVIOUSLY WRITTEN ON THE SPOT...... AT MOST IDLE at 1am on the spot.
Nothing intended. "Did you hear about the guy who said I'm gonna
poison you"
See I just got 20 years prison in the above sentence with you in
charge.
"Did you hear about the guy who said I'm gonna poison you" is hardly the
same as "I'm about to put Ratsac in as much ***** Smith food as I can
grab."
And then there's this. The >> is me, the > is you:
Well, it's nearly 11:00pm here in San Diego, Herc. Time to
shut down the computer, take the wife upstairs, and do
the screaming orgasm thing. Go catch some sunshine, leave
the computer off for a day or two, find a reason to
smile, Herc.
I'll slit her throat in front of you for your blasphemy
Herc
And again, to one "Bob Officer:
I'll slit you too you fucking persecuting arsehole
Herc, you just don't get it. You rave, you make threats, you blame
everyone but yourself. It could be that you ran into so real
assholes. It could be that you had a valid complaint about the way
they responded to your offer. That does not give you the right to
make such threats. What you did was worse than anything done to you.
AND YOU SNIPPED YOU THREATENING ME THE POST JUST BEFORE.
Quote it. I NEVER threatened you in beyond reporting your threats to
your ISP.
YOU all taunted an taunted me that THE NEWSPAPER HEADLINE
No, quoting a respected newspaper's report of a crime in their city is
not a threat, nor a taunt.
POLICE INVESTIGATOR IS GUILTY FOR DEFAMING next to
my arrest article was not intentional juxtaposition.
Give me a link to thes "POLICE INVESTIGATOR IS GUILTY FOR DEFAMING"
story. As I recall, it had absolutely nothing to do with you or your
case.
ALL I said, after 20 of you blatently constantly abused me was...
Herc: I'll slit her throat in front of you for your blasphemy
WELL OK THEN, I BET YOU CAN'T GET ME ARRESTED
DIPLOPMATIC IMMUNITY
THEN I said here you go do your worst.
See in context you had nothing to worry about.
No, in context, I'd have had you arrested, tried, and convicted. You'd
be locked away, and I wouldn't have to worry that such threats might only
be talk. Stay clear of the United States, Herc. You will lose in court
here.
What you are doing is
no different than accusing Stephen King of torturuing and murdering
people, because you say
DID YOU WRITE THIS?
without context, then lure people to assumptions. I am a
professional writer and you are a simple fool who I proved could not
get me arrested for FAKE charges, a second time.
Herc
Stephen King is a writer of fiction, one who writes for a broad
population. Your threats come from an unknown, and are directed at
specific individuals. Not at all the same thing. And were you within
the United States, rather than poor and an ocean apart, you'd be in
prison at this moment.
dont set folllow ups on me, you obviously have to lie to get the last
word.
JAB JAB JAB QUOTE IM A CRITICAL THINKER
It means you're all perveryors of injustice, you all try to frame
people by abusing them into responding then run to the police.
What blather. Don't reply, Herc. I won't see it.
--
Enkidu AA# 2165
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then where does evil come from?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
Epicurus 341-270 B.C.E.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 08:26:42 AM |
|
|
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in news:34eipbF46uqg1U1@individual.net:
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in >
PS please reply in a day or two I"m about to put ratsac in your
guranantee-sponsors shop
When the sponsor runs a supermarket chain, this is a threat I'd take
seriously. How could I live with myself is I blew it off as the
ravings of an angry man, and he actually poisoned someone?
Then there's this from you, another threat:
***** Smith is the biggest fucking tight arse in history. He put me
in prison for 6 months for a sarchastic email to some fuckwit. I'm
on a restraining order from ***** Smith, watch your daughters loser.
again part of a discussion about police and nature of freedom of
speech.
No, it's a threat, one any parent would recognized and react to. It is
not a "free speech" issue.
But here's a differeent version of your "non-threat", written by you.
It sounds even more serious:
PS Please reply in a day or two, I'm about to put
Ratsac in as much ***** Smith food as I can grab.
how can PLEASE REPLY be a serious threat? ARE YOU BONKAS?
The guy lost my house, I was travelling and bumming rooms, it was
OBVIOUSLY WRITTEN ON THE SPOT...... AT MOST IDLE at 1am on the spot.
Nothing intended. "Did you hear about the guy who said I'm gonna
poison you"
See I just got 20 years prison in the above sentence with you in
charge.
"Did you hear about the guy who said I'm gonna poison you" is hardly the
same as "I'm about to put Ratsac in as much ***** Smith food as I can
grab."
And then there's this. The >> is me, the > is you:
Well, it's nearly 11:00pm here in San Diego, Herc. Time to
shut down the computer, take the wife upstairs, and do
the screaming orgasm thing. Go catch some sunshine, leave
the computer off for a day or two, find a reason to
smile, Herc.
I'll slit her throat in front of you for your blasphemy
Herc
And again, to one "Bob Officer:
I'll slit you too you fucking persecuting arsehole
Herc, you just don't get it. You rave, you make threats, you blame
everyone but yourself. It could be that you ran into so real
assholes. It could be that you had a valid complaint about the way
they responded to your offer. That does not give you the right to
make such threats. What you did was worse than anything done to you.
AND YOU SNIPPED YOU THREATENING ME THE POST JUST BEFORE.
Quote it. I NEVER threatened you in beyond reporting your threats to
your ISP.
YOU all taunted an taunted me that THE NEWSPAPER HEADLINE
No, quoting a respected newspaper's report of a crime in their city is
not a threat, nor a taunt.
POLICE INVESTIGATOR IS GUILTY FOR DEFAMING next to
my arrest article was not intentional juxtaposition.
Give me a link to thes "POLICE INVESTIGATOR IS GUILTY FOR DEFAMING"
story. As I recall, it had absolutely nothing to do with you or your
case.
ALL I said, after 20 of you blatently constantly abused me was...
Herc: I'll slit her throat in front of you for your blasphemy
WELL OK THEN, I BET YOU CAN'T GET ME ARRESTED
DIPLOPMATIC IMMUNITY
THEN I said here you go do your worst.
See in context you had nothing to worry about.
No, in context, I'd have had you arrested, tried, and convicted. You'd
be locked away, and I wouldn't have to worry that such threats might only
be talk. Stay clear of the United States, Herc. You will lose in court
here.
What you are doing is
no different than accusing Stephen King of torturuing and murdering
people, because you say
DID YOU WRITE THIS?
without context, then lure people to assumptions. I am a
professional writer and you are a simple fool who I proved could not
get me arrested for FAKE charges, a second time.
Herc
Stephen King is a writer of fiction, one who writes for a broad
population. Your threats come from an unknown, and are directed at
specific individuals. Not at all the same thing. And were you within
the United States, rather than poor and an ocean apart, you'd be in
prison at this moment.
dont set folllow ups on me, you obviously have to lie to get the last
word.
JAB JAB JAB QUOTE IM A CRITICAL THINKER
It means you're all perveryors of injustice, you all try to frame
people by abusing them into responding then run to the police.
What blather. Don't reply, Herc. I won't see it.
you lying crying fool. You chase me around everywhere on the internet abusing me.
I specifically said ...."Look this is not a thread, this is to prove to you that
quotes can be taken out of context".
GO TO THE POLICE.... Thats what I want, that's what I wanted.
YOU WILL LOSE because you are the criminal. PHONE THEM NOW, they
will just pass the charge onto the locals here. The locals here have seen the
news article the last time they arrested me POLICE INVESTIGATOR FOUND GUILTY.
Herc
--
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head and tormenting me
and people around me. No I am not crazy, The Truman Show made you think that
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 08:40:23 AM |
|
|
What blather. Don't reply, Herc. I won't see it.
YOU LINED UP FOR IT.
I wrote the THIS IS A MOCK THREAT to Wally to prove a point.
Then a heap of you kept replying to me saying NOW DO ME NOW DO ME.
don't listen to these gang ho terrorisers, they don't wear white hoods in alt.atheism for nothing.
Herc
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Arcturian ONE" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 09:00:33 PM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head and tormenting me
and people around me.
I'll see what I can do to get them to turn it up.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 02:35:03 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:31:41 GMT, Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote:
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in news:34e23aF489g0cU1@individual.net:
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>
wrote
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:09:13 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
"The Arcturian ONE" <Arcturian1@aol.com> wrote in
|-|erc wrote:
"The Arcturian ONE" <Arcturian1@aol.com> wrote in > |-|erc
wrote:
You keep on denying it, and making demented posts about
skeptics refusing to test you. I'm just presenting balance.
Deal with it, or take your meds.
they are not facts. if that was factual I would be in prison.
the prosecution was ordered to cease in supreme court.
reply ASAP or face consequences
and
ps please reply in a day or two
are the 2 sentences that got misquoted into extortion, that is
no bull.
When I have enough money I will sue Det Janes for slander,
judges in misc.legal said that's what he did.
Riiiiight. Trust those people on Usenet who say they are judges,
kook.
Valid point, actually on rereading she said I had no case,
She's right. You don't, so shut the ***** up about it.
To an ordinay dude maybe, only because its police against an
individual.
Dear Barry, thankyou for your verrrrrry slow reply ..
PS please reply in a day or two , I"m about to put crap in your
sponsors shop.
No, herc the correct words you used were "I'm about to put Ratsak in
***** Smith Foods"
You threatened to poison people if you didn't get your own obsessed
way. It was a specific threat.
all idle threats are specific you moron. it was
PLEASE REPLY IN DAY OR TWO, IM ABOUT TO...
nobody in their right mind can take that seriously
after 74 pages of email, fax, phone calls. I KNEW THE GUY,
I GAVE HIM MY NAME, MY ADDRESS, WHO I AM
He was breaking the law, I wanted police to step in, I didn't think
they would be soo fucking stupid.
What he did may or may not have been illegal. You, however, made a clear
threat to poison food in a supermarket unless you were given money. What
you did was illegal, and such threats must be taken seriously by the
police.
If you lived in the U.S., I'd have pressed charges for your threat to
slit my daughters' throats in front of me.
He threatened to slit the throats of ALL of my children.
You want people to take what
you say seriously, but then you get upset when they DO take what you say
seriously.
--
Maj. General, Fanatic Legions.
Commander of Southern Hemisphere Forces.
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 03:22:21 AM |
|
|
He threatened to slit the throats of ALL of my children.
The topic of the thread was what you can get away with saying on usenet DUMBASS
You've tormented me in 50 newsgroups for one out of context jokeline signature
You've replied to my posts totally out of topic abusing me 200 times for 2 years.
That's not including the mass abuse threads your stir up,that's just out fo the blue.
HAVE NO DOUBT WALLY. I'm not going to put up with you tormenting me forever.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 03:46:41 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:22:21 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
He threatened to slit the throats of ALL of my children.
The topic of the thread was what you can get away with saying on usenet DUMBASS
NO it wasn't, you sick *****.
It was part of your obsessive posting that Australian Skeptics are
frauds.
In case you forgot, here's the message:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Path: news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com>
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.paranormal,alt.atheism,alt.astrology
References: <blvof0hla3101ek3r4n9ke3h54at6pv51f@4ax.com>
<Ua%Kc.8318$K53.4394@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
<tsvof0pv8hs9uoutsgvga3nld1gp5711eg@4ax.com>
<Ld%Kc.8326$K53.3685@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
<v00pf01k48adp56drrk411mqu2chn3ine8@4ax.com>
<xg%Kc.8331$K53.4678@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
<f70pf05k51lc51gd4gsdvt7iu79a7efc53@4ax.com>
<Bi%Kc.8336$K53.835@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
<3b0pf01u6m4r6d2i7f7js82vs6u8oufct7@4ax.com>
<ol%Kc.8340$K53.4042@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
<cg0pf0p42qv1djto0sqd3fopl5eli6s80f@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Australia Skeptic Society are FRAUDS
Lines: 1220
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
Message-ID: <kp%Kc.8345$K53.1535@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:26:24 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.139.175.23
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1090290384 144.139.175.23 (Tue, 20
Jul 2004 12:26:24 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:26:24 EST
Organization: BigPond Internet Services
Xref: news-server.bigpond.net.au sci.skeptic:49454
alt.paranormal:34499 alt.atheism:465712 alt.astrology:72498
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>
Oh, but I *do* comprehend it, which is why I know you are in meltdown
mode.
take this post to the pigs,
I AM GOING TO SLIT YOUR THROAT WALLY ANGLESEA IN FRONT
OF YOUR FAMILY AND THEN DO THEM
don't forget to show the pigs this pic, they won't lift a finger
ps I'm not lying
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You've tormented me in 50 newsgroups for one out of context jokeline signature
You've replied to my posts totally out of topic abusing me 200 times for 2 years.
That's not including the mass abuse threads your stir up,that's just out fo the blue.
You make facetious claims including facetious claims of paranormal
powers, and about Australian Skeptics. Expect that I shall call you on
them.
HAVE NO DOUBT WALLY. I'm not going to put up with you tormenting me forever.
What's that, another threat? I collect them, kook.
--
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 05:27:30 AM |
|
|
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>
Oh, but I *do* comprehend it, which is why I know you are in meltdown
mode.
"YOU ARE IN MELTDOWN MODE"
Pretty clear to me you were asking for it
take this post to the pigs,
I AM GOING TO SLIT YOUR THROAT WALLY ANGLESEA IN FRONT
OF YOUR FAMILY AND THEN DO THEM
don't forget to show the pigs this pic, they won't lift a finger
In context, "this is not a real threat", its a test if the police have learnt their lesson
not to imprison people automaically because they argue with a company.
Just like Stephen King wrote "Now I will rip out your bowels and play them like instruments".
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 02:29:08 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:27:30 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>
Oh, but I *do* comprehend it, which is why I know you are in meltdown
mode.
"YOU ARE IN MELTDOWN MODE"
Pretty clear to me you were asking for it
Ahem, I didn't shout, and you lied when you said it was over a freedom
of speech thing, you sick *****.
take this post to the pigs,
I AM GOING TO SLIT YOUR THROAT WALLY ANGLESEA IN FRONT
OF YOUR FAMILY AND THEN DO THEM
don't forget to show the pigs this pic, they won't lift a finger
In context, "this is not a real threat", its a test if the police have learnt their lesson
not to imprison people automaically because they argue with a company.
*****, you are one sick little kook. Now you are backpeddaling.
Just like Stephen King wrote "Now I will rip out your bowels and play them like instruments".
Stephen King writes books that people buy. You are just a powerless
kook, who stalks people. Didn't you just get another restraining order
after stalking a girl?
--
Maj. General, Fanatic Legions.
Commander of Southern Hemisphere Forces.
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 07:20:57 PM |
|
|
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head and tormenting me
and people around me. Not a prank, I am not crazy, The Truman Show made you think that
---------------------------------------------s-o-s-----------------------------------------
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote in
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:27:30 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>
Oh, but I *do* comprehend it, which is why I know you are in meltdown
mode.
"YOU ARE IN MELTDOWN MODE"
Pretty clear to me you were asking for it
Ahem, I didn't shout, and you lied when you said it was over a freedom
of speech thing, you sick *****.
take this post to the pigs,
I AM GOING TO SLIT YOUR THROAT WALLY ANGLESEA IN FRONT
OF YOUR FAMILY AND THEN DO THEM
don't forget to show the pigs this pic, they won't lift a finger
In context, "this is not a real threat", its a test if the police have learnt their lesson
not to imprison people automaically because they argue with a company.
*****, you are one sick little kook. Now you are backpeddaling.
Just like Stephen King wrote "Now I will rip out your bowels and play them like instruments".
Stephen King writes books that people buy. You are just a powerless
kook, who stalks people. Didn't you just get another restraining order
after stalking a girl?
All I did was send a couple love letters and knock on her door. THAT WAS IT!
She went to pigs over it, drop dead gorgous hollywood model looks turning up
at the cop shop, perfect blonde with BRIGHT GREEN STUNNING EYES
so of course they *helped her*, who wouldn't. Since I was on bail for being the
PLEASE REPLY IN A DAY OR TWO EXTORTIONIST they got me for
another week in the lockup over it.
She's the Trulady, I said so in 2000 she looks like Laurie Holden..
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=laurie+holden+exac
tly+group%3Aalt.silly.little.newsgroup&btnG=Google+Search
maybe I could see Jennifer again if the receptionists would let me
ps has anyone noticed she has bright green eyes and looks exactly like
Laurie Holden of the x-files?
Then in 2002 majestic, Jim Carrey and Laurie Holden do a romance right on queue.
How did I predict this?
Here's a Melbourne guy who ACTUALLY LOOKED AROUND TOWNSVILLE WALLY...
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
View this article only
Newsgroups: aus.tv
Date: 2004-03-04 16:18:07 PST
Anyhow, on to the answers.
1) Melbourne probably has, say, 100 or so suburbs? You 'guessed' Brighton
which was spot on. Don't know how you did that one. That was amazing.
2) 21 was spot on as the number between 20 and 30. You obviously have a
thing for the number 7 so I'm a little surprised you deduced 21 rather than
27 or 28.
3) The Holden car was a 'gimme'. The Truman has a thing for Laurie Holden.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 07:28:41 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:20:57 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
Stephen King writes books that people buy. You are just a powerless
kook, who stalks people. Didn't you just get another restraining order
after stalking a girl?
All I did was send a couple love letters and knock on her door. THAT WAS IT!
She went to pigs over it, drop dead gorgous hollywood model looks turning up
at the cop shop, perfect blonde with BRIGHT GREEN STUNNING EYES
so of course they *helped her*, who wouldn't. Since I was on bail for being the
PLEASE REPLY IN A DAY OR TWO EXTORTIONIST they got me for
another week in the lockup over it.
I rest my case, you menacing,stalking kook.
TAKE YOUR MEDS.
She's the Trulady, I said so in 2000 she looks like Laurie Holden..
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=laurie+holden+exac
tly+group%3Aalt.silly.little.newsgroup&btnG=Google+Search
maybe I could see Jennifer again if the receptionists would let me
ps has anyone noticed she has bright green eyes and looks exactly like
Laurie Holden of the x-files?
Then in 2002 majestic, Jim Carrey and Laurie Holden do a romance right on queue.
How did I predict this?
Here's a Melbourne guy who ACTUALLY LOOKED AROUND TOWNSVILLE WALLY...
I was in Townsville, and the only people who knew you were the local
booby hatch, and the police.
--
Maj. General, Fanatic Legions.
Commander of Southern Hemisphere Forces.
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 08:40:17 PM |
|
|
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,940 for author:wally author:anglesea KOOK
Quiet day yesterday?
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 09:23:01 PM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,940 for author:wally author:anglesea KOOK
Quiet day yesterday?
Yeah, unlike you I work for a living.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 10:14:31 PM |
|
|
---------------------------------------------s-o-s-----------------------------------------
"Wally Anglesea" <wanglese@spammersbigpondarevermin.net.au> wrote in
|-|erc wrote:
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,940 for author:wally author:anglesea KOOK
Quiet day yesterday?
Yeah, unlike you I work for a living.
for less money
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
11 Jan 2005 01:16:30 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:14:31 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
---------------------------------------------s-o-s-----------------------------------------
"Wally Anglesea" <wanglese@spammersbigpondarevermin.net.au> wrote in
|-|erc wrote:
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,940 for author:wally author:anglesea KOOK
Quiet day yesterday?
Yeah, unlike you I work for a living.
for less money
Well, at least you have at last admitted you don't work.
And you don't get laid.
--
Maj. General, Fanatic Legions.
Commander of Southern Hemisphere Forces.
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "george" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
11 Jan 2005 01:17:39 PM |
|
|
Wally Anglesea=99 wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:14:31 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
---------------------------------------------s-o-s------------------------=
-----------------
"Wally Anglesea" <wanglese@spammersbigpondarevermin.net.au> wrote in
|-|erc wrote:
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,940 for author:wally author:anglesea
KOOK
Quiet day yesterday?
Yeah, unlike you I work for a living.
for less money
Well, at least you have at last admitted you don't work.
And you don't get laid.
=20
Well said Wally. women are quite particular.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
11 Jan 2005 03:44:14 AM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head and tormenting me
and people around me. Not a prank, I am not crazy, The Truman Show made you think that
---------------------------------------------s-o-s-----------------------------------------
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote in
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:27:30 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>
Oh, but I *do* comprehend it, which is why I know you are in meltdown
mode.
"YOU ARE IN MELTDOWN MODE"
Pretty clear to me you were asking for it
Ahem, I didn't shout, and you lied when you said it was over a freedom
of speech thing, you sick *****.
take this post to the pigs,
I AM GOING TO SLIT YOUR THROAT WALLY ANGLESEA IN FRONT
OF YOUR FAMILY AND THEN DO THEM
don't forget to show the pigs this pic, they won't lift a finger
In context, "this is not a real threat", its a test if the police have learnt their lesson
not to imprison people automaically because they argue with a company.
*****, you are one sick little kook. Now you are backpeddaling.
Just like Stephen King wrote "Now I will rip out your bowels and play them like instruments".
Stephen King writes books that people buy. You are just a powerless
kook, who stalks people. Didn't you just get another restraining order
after stalking a girl?
All I did was send a couple love letters and knock on her door. THAT WAS IT!
She went to pigs over it, drop dead gorgous hollywood model looks turning up
at the cop shop, perfect blonde with BRIGHT GREEN STUNNING EYES
so of course they *helped her*, who wouldn't. Since I was on bail for being the
PLEASE REPLY IN A DAY OR TWO EXTORTIONIST they got me for
another week in the lockup over it.
Heh, you make your stalking sound so romantic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
11 Jan 2005 04:11:10 AM |
|
|
All I did was send a couple love letters and knock on her door. THAT WAS IT!
She went to pigs over it, drop dead gorgous hollywood model looks turning up
at the cop shop, perfect blonde with BRIGHT GREEN STUNNING EYES
so of course they *helped her*, who wouldn't. Since I was on bail for being the
PLEASE REPLY IN A DAY OR TWO EXTORTIONIST they got me for
another week in the lockup over it.
Heh, you make your stalking sound so romantic.
you're talking about the truman company framing Adam over trying to see Eve.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dan Baldwin" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
11 Jan 2005 11:28:07 AM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
All I did was send a couple love letters and knock on her door. THAT WAS IT!
She went to pigs over it, drop dead gorgous hollywood model looks turning up
at the cop shop, perfect blonde with BRIGHT GREEN STUNNING EYES
so of course they *helped her*, who wouldn't. Since I was on bail for being the
PLEASE REPLY IN A DAY OR TWO EXTORTIONIST they got me for
another week in the lockup over it.
Heh, you make your stalking sound so romantic.
you're talking about the truman company framing Adam over trying to see Eve.
Down, not across, kook. The voices in your head will quite down then.
--
Dan Baldwin, unethical *by design*
I am a minion of Satan, but my powers are mainly administrative.
Hail the un-alive
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 03:26:50 AM |
|
|
Wally Anglesea™ wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:31:41 GMT, Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote:
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in news:34e23aF489g0cU1@individual.net:
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>
wrote
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:09:13 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
"The Arcturian ONE" <Arcturian1@aol.com> wrote in
|-|erc wrote:
"The Arcturian ONE" <Arcturian1@aol.com> wrote in > |-|erc
wrote:
You keep on denying it, and making demented posts about
skeptics refusing to test you. I'm just presenting balance.
Deal with it, or take your meds.
they are not facts. if that was factual I would be in prison.
the prosecution was ordered to cease in supreme court.
reply ASAP or face consequences
and
ps please reply in a day or two
are the 2 sentences that got misquoted into extortion, that is
no bull.
When I have enough money I will sue Det Janes for slander,
judges in misc.legal said that's what he did.
Riiiiight. Trust those people on Usenet who say they are judges,
kook.
Valid point, actually on rereading she said I had no case,
She's right. You don't, so shut the ***** up about it.
To an ordinay dude maybe, only because its police against an
individual.
Dear Barry, thankyou for your verrrrrry slow reply ..
PS please reply in a day or two , I"m about to put crap in your
sponsors shop.
No, herc the correct words you used were "I'm about to put Ratsak in
***** Smith Foods"
You threatened to poison people if you didn't get your own obsessed
way. It was a specific threat.
all idle threats are specific you moron. it was
PLEASE REPLY IN DAY OR TWO, IM ABOUT TO...
nobody in their right mind can take that seriously
after 74 pages of email, fax, phone calls. I KNEW THE GUY,
I GAVE HIM MY NAME, MY ADDRESS, WHO I AM
He was breaking the law, I wanted police to step in, I didn't think
they would be soo fucking stupid.
What he did may or may not have been illegal. You, however, made a clear
threat to poison food in a supermarket unless you were given money. What
you did was illegal, and such threats must be taken seriously by the
police.
If you lived in the U.S., I'd have pressed charges for your threat to
slit my daughters' throats in front of me.
He threatened to slit the throats of ALL of my children.
Wow, and he *only* threatened me with a non-specific "mark on my life"
and various other incoherence.
http://groups.google.ie/groups?selm=40675f86%240%243952%24afc38c87%40news.optusnet.com.au&output=gplain
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
11 Jan 2005 03:59:44 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:26:50 +0000, in alt.astrology, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote:
Wally Anglesea™ wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:31:41 GMT, Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote:
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in news:34e23aF489g0cU1@individual.net:
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>
wrote
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:09:13 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
"The Arcturian ONE" <Arcturian1@aol.com> wrote in
|-|erc wrote:
"The Arcturian ONE" <Arcturian1@aol.com> wrote in > |-|erc
wrote:
You keep on denying it, and making demented posts about
skeptics refusing to test you. I'm just presenting balance.
Deal with it, or take your meds.
they are not facts. if that was factual I would be in prison.
the prosecution was ordered to cease in supreme court.
reply ASAP or face consequences
and
ps please reply in a day or two
are the 2 sentences that got misquoted into extortion, that is
no bull.
When I have enough money I will sue Det Janes for slander,
judges in misc.legal said that's what he did.
Riiiiight. Trust those people on Usenet who say they are judges,
kook.
Valid point, actually on rereading she said I had no case,
She's right. You don't, so shut the ***** up about it.
To an ordinay dude maybe, only because its police against an
individual.
Dear Barry, thankyou for your verrrrrry slow reply ..
PS please reply in a day or two , I"m about to put crap in your
sponsors shop.
No, herc the correct words you used were "I'm about to put Ratsak in
***** Smith Foods"
You threatened to poison people if you didn't get your own obsessed
way. It was a specific threat.
all idle threats are specific you moron. it was
PLEASE REPLY IN DAY OR TWO, IM ABOUT TO...
nobody in their right mind can take that seriously
after 74 pages of email, fax, phone calls. I KNEW THE GUY,
I GAVE HIM MY NAME, MY ADDRESS, WHO I AM
He was breaking the law, I wanted police to step in, I didn't think
they would be soo fucking stupid.
What he did may or may not have been illegal. You, however, made a clear
threat to poison food in a supermarket unless you were given money. What
you did was illegal, and such threats must be taken seriously by the
police.
If you lived in the U.S., I'd have pressed charges for your threat to
slit my daughters' throats in front of me.
He threatened to slit the throats of ALL of my children.
Wow, and he *only* threatened me with a non-specific "mark on my life"
and various other incoherence.
http://groups.google.ie/groups?selm=40675f86%240%243952%24afc38c87%40news.optusnet.com.au&output=gplain
I forgot all about him and his threat. Oh Well I guess I am jaded...
Wally just keep track of your own Kooks please...
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 04:32:05 AM |
|
|
but you were all bad.
Herc
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 12:59:45 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:55:27 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
nobody in their right mind can take that seriously
I'll be sending you a bill for the Irony-o-meter you just exploded...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Krolczyk" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 04:31:17 PM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>
wrote
No, herc the correct words you used were "I'm about to put Ratsak
in
***** Smith Foods"
You threatened to poison people if you didn't get your own obsessed
way. It was a specific threat.
all idle threats are specific you moron. it was
PLEASE REPLY IN DAY OR TWO, IM ABOUT TO...
nobody in their right mind can take that seriously
Uh huh. Sure. "Nobody in their right mind" is going to
take a written threat like that seriously? Really?
Gee, Herc, how many familiarity *do* you have with the
idea that making a threat to commit a felony is almost
as serious as actually undertaking that threat? Especially
when that threat could conceivably lead to charges of
homicide or attempted homicide being filed?
Oh. Forgot. You *are* TH3 TR00MAN, and that makes
poisoning kids okay. My mistake.
after 74 pages of email, fax, phone calls. I KNEW THE GUY,
I GAVE HIM MY NAME, MY ADDRESS, WHO I AM
He was breaking the law, I wanted police to step in, I didn't think
they would be soo fucking stupid.
Actually, anyone who thought the *cops* were being stupid in this
situation might be missing more than a few vital brain cells
themselves,
but once again, you are TH3 TR00K00K, so I guess it's all for the
best...
-Chris Krolczyk
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 09:21:26 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:01:27 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
Every day people say to me "I saw the Truman" and "I saw God".
That's funny, every time you post on Usenet, all I see in response to
you is "you're a fucking loon".
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chadwick Stone©" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 01:13:33 AM |
|
|
X-No-Archive: YES
Forwarded to appropriate NGs.
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message news:348pmqF47ta8rU1@individual.net...
I have made this claim perfectly clear for 3 years on sci.skeptic.
CLAIM : Anyone within hearing range of me will hear the Truman satelite
------- ------ -------- ----- - --- --- ------ -- ------
-------
The Truman satelite is targetted on me because I am supernatural.
Every day people say to me "I saw the Truman" and "I saw God".
INSTANT PROOF OF PARANORMAL to any skeptic investigator
who can come to Townsville, Queensland, Australia for 1 minute.
Herc
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dksqpv41597ofbhr16mi7tdj2qfihvoldv%404ax.com
Hey Trueman...
what up, my uncle told me you post here... he's did some audio on your
secret show and gave me some tapes. love the show.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1epmdv8iqmnckeqhctnf17537rt8hevjeh%404ax.com
You rule Truman.
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=9aqbbv85c53jobkenltkil2tbsdk7m2n3p@4ax.com
I was in Townsville over the weekend, and I heard him.
Very spooky!
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=me7hbv4snqc6gnb1cktj3cvqtiibnpm6s9@4ax.com
I'm from Townsville and YOU ARE the Truman
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3eb66422.779705967@news.ozemail.com.au
I'm in Townsville. We're sick of you
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.OSF.4.21.0309230859190.5384-100000%40marlin.jcu.edu.au
Do you know if the truman is living in Townsville?
I've been hearing stuff, yeah.
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
BTW, when I was in The Strand last weekend, I didn't hear your broadcast
per
se. Well, at least I thought I didn't. I think you're the Truman too.
"Therefore 100,000 Townsville residents and 1 Melbourne tourist can't be
wrong".
****************************************************************
Les just went to Townsville, didn't come nearby but heard people there
talk about me
Here is Les approaching me on usenet, calls me ADAM then tells me about
the real Truman having a crush on Laurie Holden, (he tested if I knew
that).
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=s1w1c.85795%24Wa.33069%40news-server.bigpond.net.au
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: Re: Herc- please explain..
Date: 2004-03-03 17:56:44 PST
No worries, Adam.
AUSTRALIA SKEPTICS CANCELLED THE PARANORMAL CHALLENGE
BECAUSE THE CEO ASKED DETAILS ABOUT THE TEST AND I SAID
IT WORKS BECAUSE I'M ADAM.
THAT WAS PROOF TO HIM THAT MY CLAIM WAS A DELUSION
THEY MAKE PUBLIC OFFERS TO PARNORMAL CLAIMANTS
BUT YOU HAVE TO BE AN *ORDINARY* PARANORMAL PERSON.
THEN THEY LIED THAT MY CLAIMS WERE INCOHERENT, THEY
WERE VERY BASIC. THEN THEY DID A NEWS REPORT SAYING
THEY MUST BE DETAILED AND SPECIFIC, THIS IS A LIE, CHECK
THE CONDITIONS OF APPLICATION
--
Chadwick Stone©
Formerly the AFA-B Sovereign Sockpuppet©
"No longer anonymous but still immune"
Usenet's most helpful netizen
SovereignSockpuppet at Yahoo dot com
Benevolent Order of the Pointy Stick
Skepticult® ID: 581-00504-208
A mean and nasty *****
I am the New World Order
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chadwick Stone©" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 02:14:38 AM |
|
|
X-No-Archive: YES
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message news:34c4sfF47uoeiU1@individual.net...
come on people, all I'm saying is the skeptic scientific
institution doesn't work.
It most certainly does. Under controlled conditions all (k)lames of
psychotic... er, psychic ability are exposed as k0oKery. If it weren't for
the skeptical scientific process, you would still be taking "eye of newt" to
remove "curses" from yourself.
These posts are FOR REAL, just give them a quick glance, talk
about INVESTIGATION for once not skeptic denial syndrome
A _TRVE_ scientist is _ALWAYS_ skeptical. Magical thinking makes for poor
science.
Why are these posts discarded instead of verified?
Because you are a k0oK. Credibility is the only currency on Usenet and you
shot your wad a LOOOONG time ago. HTH ;)
Herc
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dksqpv41597ofbhr16mi7tdj2qfihvoldv%404ax.com
Hey Trueman...
what up, my uncle told me you post here... he's did some audio on your
secret show and gave me some tapes. love the show.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1epmdv8iqmnckeqhctnf17537rt8hevjeh%404ax.com
You rule Truman.
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=9aqbbv85c53jobkenltkil2tbsdk7m2n3p@4ax.com
I was in Townsville over the weekend, and I heard him.
Very spooky!
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=me7hbv4snqc6gnb1cktj3cvqtiibnpm6s9@4ax.com
I'm from Townsville and YOU ARE the Truman
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3eb66422.779705967@news.ozemail.com.au
I'm in Townsville. We're sick of you
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.OSF.4.21.0309230859190.5384-100000%40marlin.jcu.edu.au
Do you know if the truman is living in Townsville?
I've been hearing stuff, yeah.
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
BTW, when I was in The Strand last weekend, I didn't hear your
broadcast
per
se. Well, at least I thought I didn't. I think you're the Truman too.
"Therefore 100,000 Townsville residents and 1 Melbourne tourist can't
be
wrong".
****************************************************************
Les just went to Townsville, didn't come nearby but heard people there
talk about me
Here is Les approaching me on usenet, calls me ADAM then tells me
about
the real Truman having a crush on Laurie Holden, (he tested if I knew
that).
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=s1w1c.85795%24Wa.33069%40news-server.bigpond.net.au
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: Re: Herc- please explain..
Date: 2004-03-03 17:56:44 PST
No worries, Adam.
--
Chadwick Stone©
Formerly the AFA-B Sovereign Sockpuppet©
"No longer anonymous but still immune"
Usenet's most helpful netizen
SovereignSockpuppet at Yahoo dot com
Benevolent Order of the Pointy Stick
Skepticult® ID: 581-00504-208
A mean and nasty *****
I am the New World Order
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
