| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"|-|erc" |
| Date: |
07 Jan 2005 07:01:27 PM |
| Object: |
SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
I have made this claim perfectly clear for 3 years on sci.skeptic.
CLAIM : Anyone within hearing range of me will hear the Truman satelite
------- ------ -------- ----- - --- --- ------ -- ------ -------
The Truman satelite is targetted on me because I am supernatural.
Every day people say to me "I saw the Truman" and "I saw God".
INSTANT PROOF OF PARANORMAL to any skeptic investigator
who can come to Townsville, Queensland, Australia for 1 minute.
Herc
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dksqpv41597ofbhr16mi7tdj2qfihvoldv%404ax.com
Hey Trueman...
what up, my uncle told me you post here... he's did some audio on your
secret show and gave me some tapes. love the show.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1epmdv8iqmnckeqhctnf17537rt8hevjeh%404ax.com
You rule Truman.
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=9aqbbv85c53jobkenltkil2tbsdk7m2n3p@4ax.com
I was in Townsville over the weekend, and I heard him.
Very spooky!
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=me7hbv4snqc6gnb1cktj3cvqtiibnpm6s9@4ax.com
I'm from Townsville and YOU ARE the Truman
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3eb66422.779705967@news.ozemail.com.au
I'm in Townsville. We're sick of you
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.OSF.4.21.0309230859190.5384-100000%40marlin.jcu.edu.au
Do you know if the truman is living in Townsville?
I've been hearing stuff, yeah.
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
BTW, when I was in The Strand last weekend, I didn't hear your broadcast per
se. Well, at least I thought I didn't. I think you're the Truman too.
"Therefore 100,000 Townsville residents and 1 Melbourne tourist can't be
wrong".
****************************************************************
Les just went to Townsville, didn't come nearby but heard people there talk about me
Here is Les approaching me on usenet, calls me ADAM then tells me about
the real Truman having a crush on Laurie Holden, (he tested if I knew that).
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=s1w1c.85795%24Wa.33069%40news-server.bigpond.net.au
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: Re: Herc- please explain..
Date: 2004-03-03 17:56:44 PST
No worries, Adam.
AUSTRALIA SKEPTICS CANCELLED THE PARANORMAL CHALLENGE
BECAUSE THE CEO ASKED DETAILS ABOUT THE TEST AND I SAID
IT WORKS BECAUSE I'M ADAM.
THAT WAS PROOF TO HIM THAT MY CLAIM WAS A DELUSION
THEY MAKE PUBLIC OFFERS TO PARNORMAL CLAIMANTS
BUT YOU HAVE TO BE AN *ORDINARY* PARANORMAL PERSON.
THEN THEY LIED THAT MY CLAIMS WERE INCOHERENT, THEY
WERE VERY BASIC. THEN THEY DID A NEWS REPORT SAYING
THEY MUST BE DETAILED AND SPECIFIC, THIS IS A LIE, CHECK
THE CONDITIONS OF APPLICATION
--
what do women say about male sperm? sex cells never age? protein rich?
:-C==8 You'll never never know if you never never blow! :-C==8
.
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 03:01:30 AM |
|
|
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in
come on people, all I'm saying is the skeptic scientific
institution doesn't work.
It most certainly does. Under controlled conditions all (k)lames of
psychotic... er, psychic ability are exposed as k0oKery. If it weren't for
the skeptical scientific process, you would still be taking "eye of newt" to
remove "curses" from yourself.
that is your weakness. ALL claims are denounced, so what exactly are you doing?
There is no proof that a single claim has been tested, because you have no history
of sorting valid claims from invalid claims.
How many of you apply a scientific test to claims, and how many just read along
preconcluding it wont work?
These posts are FOR REAL, just give them a quick glance, talk
about INVESTIGATION for once not skeptic denial syndrome
A _TRVE_ scientist is _ALWAYS_ skeptical. Magical thinking makes for poor
science.
not necessary. I can believe in some effect and work out a test for it to demo it,
being negative or positive is just an opinion, it doesn't effect the experiment.
Convincing the CON crowd is not the art of science.
Why are these posts discarded instead of verified?
Because you are a k0oK. Credibility is the only currency on Usenet and you
shot your wad a LOOOONG time ago. HTH ;)
So you admit that a newbie with a claim will be ignored. Thank you come again.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chadwick Stone©" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 03:50:02 AM |
|
|
X-No-Archive: YES
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message news:34ca6vF48ft70U1@individual.net...
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in
come on people, all I'm saying is the skeptic scientific
institution doesn't work.
It most certainly does. Under controlled conditions all (k)lames of
psychotic... er, psychic ability are exposed as k0oKery. If it weren't
for
the skeptical scientific process, you would still be taking "eye of
newt" to
remove "curses" from yourself.
that is your weakness. ALL claims are denounced, so what exactly are
you doing?
h0oKin' me a bigun!
There is no proof that a single claim has been tested, because you have no
history
of sorting valid claims from invalid claims.
Thats easy; if you claim it, it's invalid. HTH ;)
How many of you apply a scientific test to claims, and how many just read
along
preconcluding it wont work?
The litmus test in your case is one that turns red in the presence of
k0oKery, and guess what, kkklo0bie! The strip is GUSHING blood!
These posts are FOR REAL, just give them a quick glance, talk
about INVESTIGATION for once not skeptic denial syndrome
A _TRVE_ scientist is _ALWAYS_ skeptical. Magical thinking makes for
poor
science.
not necessary. I can believe in some effect and work out a test for it to
demo it,
being negative or positive is just an opinion, it doesn't effect the
experiment.
Convincing the CON crowd is not the art of science.
The sort of "science" one sees in tabloids isn't science, kkklo0bie.
Why are these posts discarded instead of verified?
Because you are a k0oK. Credibility is the only currency on Usenet and
you
shot your wad a LOOOONG time ago. HTH ;)
So you admit that a newbie with a claim will be ignored. Thank you come
again.
While you are a no0bie, and a kkklo0less one at that, are you so deeply
mired in delusion that you think you're being ignore?
<PA>
}{erkkk, please report to the nurse's station for morning meds. Thank you.
</PA>
--
Chadwick Stone©
Formerly the AFA-B Sovereign Sockpuppet©
"No longer anonymous but still immune"
Usenet's most helpful netizen
SovereignSockpuppet at Yahoo dot com
Benevolent Order of the Pointy Stick
Skepticult® ID: 581-00504-208
A mean and nasty *****
I am the New World Order
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 04:14:25 AM |
|
|
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in message
X-No-Archive: YES
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message news:34ca6vF48ft70U1@individual.net...
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in
come on people, all I'm saying is the skeptic scientific
institution doesn't work.
It most certainly does. Under controlled conditions all (k)lames of
psychotic... er, psychic ability are exposed as k0oKery. If it weren't
for
the skeptical scientific process, you would still be taking "eye of
newt" to
remove "curses" from yourself.
that is your weakness. ALL claims are denounced, so what exactly are
you doing?
h0oKin' me a bigun!
There is no proof that a single claim has been tested, because you have no
history
of sorting valid claims from invalid claims.
Thats easy; if you claim it, it's invalid. HTH ;)
so the scientific skeptic institution is INvalid then?
How many of you apply a scientific test to claims, and how many just read
along
preconcluding it wont work?
The litmus test in your case is one that turns red in the presence of
k0oKery, and guess what, kkklo0bie! The strip is GUSHING blood!
These posts are FOR REAL, just give them a quick glance, talk
about INVESTIGATION for once not skeptic denial syndrome
A _TRVE_ scientist is _ALWAYS_ skeptical. Magical thinking makes for
poor
science.
not necessary. I can believe in some effect and work out a test for it to
demo it,
being negative or positive is just an opinion, it doesn't effect the
experiment.
Convincing the CON crowd is not the art of science.
The sort of "science" one sees in tabloids isn't science, kkklo0bie.
I've got no idea what kind of test tube holding lab coat wearing 4 eyes
you think is doing science on the planet.
Why are these posts discarded instead of verified?
Because you are a k0oK. Credibility is the only currency on Usenet and
you
shot your wad a LOOOONG time ago. HTH ;)
So you admit that a newbie with a claim will be ignored. Thank you come
again.
While you are a no0bie, and a kkklo0less one at that, are you so deeply
mired in delusion that you think you're being ignore?
<PA>
}{erkkk, please report to the nurse's station for morning meds. Thank you.
</PA>
--
Chadwick Stone©
Formerly the AFA-B Sovereign Sockpuppet©
"No longer anonymous but still immune"
Usenet's most helpful netizen
SovereignSockpuppet at Yahoo dot com
Benevolent Order of the Pointy Stick
Skepticult® ID: 581-00504-208
A mean and nasty *****
I am the New World Order
how come he gets away with saying " i am the new world order "
say that in a hospital and you'll get jabbed until you drool.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chadwick Stone©" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 04:51:42 AM |
|
|
X-No-Archive: YES
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message news:34cefmF49g8chU1@individual.net...
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in message
X-No-Archive: YES
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message news:34ca6vF48ft70U1@individual.net...
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in
<snip>
Thats easy; if you claim it, it's invalid. HTH ;)
so the scientific skeptic institution is INvalid then?
No, just YOUR k0oKy (k)lames.
<snip>
The sort of "science" one sees in tabloids isn't science, kkklo0bie.
I've got no idea
TrVth!
what kind of test tube holding lab coat wearing 4 eyes
you think is doing science on the planet.
Considering that I'm the one who hands down the orders concerning what is to
be deemed "accepted" by the scientific community, I know exactly who and
what they are: My obedient employees.
<snip>
I am the New World Order
how come he gets away with saying " i am the new world order "
Because I'm special.
say that in a hospital and you'll get jabbed until you drool.
As a facilitator of the NWO, I'm the one who tells the doctors who to jab.
I've contacted my subordinates in Australia, you will soon be reporting for
a "routine" examination.
--
Chadwick Stone©
Formerly the AFA-B Sovereign Sockpuppet©
"No longer anonymous but still immune"
Usenet's most helpful netizen
SovereignSockpuppet at Yahoo dot com
Benevolent Order of the Pointy Stick
Skepticult® ID: 581-00504-208
A mean and nasty *****
I am the New World Order
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 04:59:19 AM |
|
|
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in
Because I'm special.
we know chutney, we know!
Herc
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "djinn" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 09:06:19 AM |
|
|
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in message
news:218Ed.454580$2W1.41050@news.easynews.com...
X-No-Archive: YES
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message news:34cefmF49g8chU1@individual.net...
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in message
X-No-Archive: YES
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message
news:34ca6vF48ft70U1@individual.net...
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in
<snip>
Thats easy; if you claim it, it's invalid. HTH ;)
so the scientific skeptic institution is INvalid then?
No, just YOUR k0oKy (k)lames.
<snip>
The sort of "science" one sees in tabloids isn't science, kkklo0bie.
I've got no idea
TrVth!
what kind of test tube holding lab coat wearing 4 eyes
you think is doing science on the planet.
Considering that I'm the one who hands down the orders concerning what is
to
be deemed "accepted" by the scientific community, I know exactly who and
what they are: My obedient employees.
<snip>
I am the New World Order
how come he gets away with saying " i am the new world order "
Because I'm special.
say that in a hospital and you'll get jabbed until you drool.
As a facilitator of the NWO, I'm the one who tells the doctors who to jab.
I've contacted my subordinates in Australia, you will soon be reporting
for
a "routine" examination.
you just had to put him on the path to
a spinal tap addiction, didn't you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 12:31:00 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 10:06:19 -0500, "djinn" <synquon@emaill.com> wrote:
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in message
news:218Ed.454580$2W1.41050@news.easynews.com...
X-No-Archive: YES
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message news:34cefmF49g8chU1@individual.net...
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in message
X-No-Archive: YES
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message
news:34ca6vF48ft70U1@individual.net...
"Chadwick Stone©" <m0rphed@m0rphed.m0rphed> wrote in
<snip>
Thats easy; if you claim it, it's invalid. HTH ;)
so the scientific skeptic institution is INvalid then?
No, just YOUR k0oKy (k)lames.
<snip>
The sort of "science" one sees in tabloids isn't science, kkklo0bie.
I've got no idea
TrVth!
what kind of test tube holding lab coat wearing 4 eyes
you think is doing science on the planet.
Considering that I'm the one who hands down the orders concerning what is
to
be deemed "accepted" by the scientific community, I know exactly who and
what they are: My obedient employees.
<snip>
I am the New World Order
how come he gets away with saying " i am the new world order "
Because I'm special.
say that in a hospital and you'll get jabbed until you drool.
As a facilitator of the NWO, I'm the one who tells the doctors who to jab.
I've contacted my subordinates in Australia, you will soon be reporting
for
a "routine" examination.
you just had to put him on the path to
a spinal tap addiction, didn't you?
Anyone who sees the movie usually gets addicted, especially musicians.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 01:30:35 AM |
|
|
come on people, all I'm saying is the skeptic scientific institution doesn't work.
These posts are FOR REAL, just give them a quick glance, talk about INVESTIGATION for once
not skeptic denial syndrome
Why are these posts discarded instead of verified?
Herc
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dksqpv41597ofbhr16mi7tdj2qfihvoldv%404ax.com
Hey Trueman...
what up, my uncle told me you post here... he's did some audio on your
secret show and gave me some tapes. love the show.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1epmdv8iqmnckeqhctnf17537rt8hevjeh%404ax.com
You rule Truman.
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=9aqbbv85c53jobkenltkil2tbsdk7m2n3p@4ax.com
I was in Townsville over the weekend, and I heard him.
Very spooky!
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=me7hbv4snqc6gnb1cktj3cvqtiibnpm6s9@4ax.com
I'm from Townsville and YOU ARE the Truman
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3eb66422.779705967@news.ozemail.com.au
I'm in Townsville. We're sick of you
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.OSF.4.21.0309230859190.5384-100000%40marlin.jcu.edu.au
Do you know if the truman is living in Townsville?
I've been hearing stuff, yeah.
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
BTW, when I was in The Strand last weekend, I didn't hear your broadcast
per
se. Well, at least I thought I didn't. I think you're the Truman too.
"Therefore 100,000 Townsville residents and 1 Melbourne tourist can't be
wrong".
****************************************************************
Les just went to Townsville, didn't come nearby but heard people there
talk about me
Here is Les approaching me on usenet, calls me ADAM then tells me about
the real Truman having a crush on Laurie Holden, (he tested if I knew
that).
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=s1w1c.85795%24Wa.33069%40news-server.bigpond.net.au
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: Re: Herc- please explain..
Date: 2004-03-03 17:56:44 PST
No worries, Adam.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aratzio" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 01:37:50 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:30:35 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> got double secret
probation because:
come on people, all I'm saying is the skeptic scientific institution doesn't work.
These posts are FOR REAL, just give them a quick glance, talk about INVESTIGATION for once
not skeptic denial syndrome
Why are these posts discarded instead of verified?
Herc
Because you are a kook would be right at the top of the list.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chadwick Stone©" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 02:10:15 AM |
|
|
X-No-Archive: YES
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message news:34c4sfF47uoeiU1@individual.net...
come on people, all I'm saying is the skeptic scientific institution
doesn't work.
It most certainly does. Under controlled conditions all (k)lames of
psychotic... er, psychic ability are exposed as k0oKery. If it weren't for
the skeptical scientific process,
These posts are FOR REAL, just give them a quick glance, talk about
INVESTIGATION for once
not skeptic denial syndrome
Why are these posts discarded instead of verified?
Herc
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=dksqpv41597ofbhr16mi7tdj2qfihvoldv%404ax.com
Hey Trueman...
what up, my uncle told me you post here... he's did some audio on your
secret show and gave me some tapes. love the show.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1epmdv8iqmnckeqhctnf17537rt8hevjeh%404ax.com
You rule Truman.
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=9aqbbv85c53jobkenltkil2tbsdk7m2n3p@4ax.com
I was in Townsville over the weekend, and I heard him.
Very spooky!
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=me7hbv4snqc6gnb1cktj3cvqtiibnpm6s9@4ax.com
I'm from Townsville and YOU ARE the Truman
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=3eb66422.779705967@news.ozemail.com.au
I'm in Townsville. We're sick of you
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.OSF.4.21.0309230859190.5384-100000%40marlin.jcu.edu.au
Do you know if the truman is living in Townsville?
I've been hearing stuff, yeah.
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: OT: RESULTS: Herc-Truman test
BTW, when I was in The Strand last weekend, I didn't hear your
broadcast
per
se. Well, at least I thought I didn't. I think you're the Truman too.
"Therefore 100,000 Townsville residents and 1 Melbourne tourist can't
be
wrong".
****************************************************************
Les just went to Townsville, didn't come nearby but heard people there
talk about me
Here is Les approaching me on usenet, calls me ADAM then tells me
about
the real Truman having a crush on Laurie Holden, (he tested if I knew
that).
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=s1w1c.85795%24Wa.33069%40news-server.bigpond.net.au
From: Les Norton (Les.Norton@spamfree.com.au)
Subject: Re: Herc- please explain..
Date: 2004-03-03 17:56:44 PST
No worries, Adam.
--
Chadwick Stone©
Formerly the AFA-B Sovereign Sockpuppet©
"No longer anonymous but still immune"
Usenet's most helpful netizen
SovereignSockpuppet at Yahoo dot com
Benevolent Order of the Pointy Stick
Skepticult® ID: 581-00504-208
A mean and nasty *****
I am the New World Order
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chris Krolczyk" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 04:22:29 PM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
These posts are FOR REAL,
Trivially true. Your *posts* are for real; proof of
your claims and your sanity are not.
-Chris Krolczyk
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 09:44:56 PM |
|
|
any more ignorant skeptic remarks to prove my point?
Herc
LAMERS REPLY HERE
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
08 Jan 2005 03:55:47 AM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
any more ignorant skeptic remarks to prove my point?
Herc
You don't have a point Herc, you're mentally ill.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 11:19:38 PM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
any more ignorant skeptic remarks to prove my point?
Herc
LAMERS REPLY HERE
*PLONK*
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor
A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 11:41:23 PM |
|
|
-- "Rev. Karl E. Taylor" <ktayloraz@getnet.net> wrote in ...
|-|erc wrote:
any more ignorant skeptic remarks to prove my point?
Herc
LAMERS REPLY HERE
*PLONK*
Don't like being told you are ignorant? hit a nerve?
Herc
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Smol" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
10 Jan 2005 03:16:37 PM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
I have made this claim perfectly clear for 3 years on sci.skeptic.
CLAIM : Anyone within hearing range of me will hear the Truman
satelite
------- ------ -------- ----- - --- --- ------ --
------ -------
The Truman satelite is targetted on me because I am supernatural.
Every day people say to me "I saw the Truman" and "I saw God".
Paranoid schizophrenia is a funny thing.
RS
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 07:05:43 PM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
I have made this claim perfectly clear for 3 years on sci.skeptic.
CLAIM : Anyone within hearing range of me will hear the Truman satelite
------- ------ -------- ----- - --- --- ------ -- ------ -------
The Truman satelite is targetted on me because I am supernatural.
Every day people say to me "I saw the Truman" and "I saw God".
Seek medical help.....now !
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
yahoo ID: hellward2004
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 08:39:01 PM |
|
|
Every day people say to me "I saw the Truman" and "I saw God".
Seek medical help.....now !
THIS IS THE CLAIM FOOL.... THAT I'M PARANORMAL
Note the Australian Skeptic Society and James Randi act the same as these 2 simpletons.
Even though they have CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION to investigate paranormal claims,
========================================================
PUBLICLY STATED OFFERS THEY WILL INVESIGATE PARANORMAL
========================================================
they refer mentions of *deity paranormal* claims to police.
10,000 WITNESSES TO ADAM IN AUSTRALIA FOR OVER 3 YEARS NOW
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 09:21:57 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:39:01 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
THIS IS THE CLAIM FOOL.... THAT I'M PARANORMAL
You misspelled "delusional".
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
08 Jan 2005 08:37:14 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:39:01 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
Every day people say to me "I saw the Truman" and "I saw God".
Seek medical help.....now !
THIS IS THE CLAIM FOOL.... THAT I'M PARANORMAL
Note the Australian Skeptic Society and James Randi act the same as these 2 simpletons.
Even though they have CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION to investigate paranormal claims,
========================================================
PUBLICLY STATED OFFERS THEY WILL INVESIGATE PARANORMAL
========================================================
they refer mentions of *deity paranormal* claims to police.
10,000 WITNESSES TO ADAM IN AUSTRALIA FOR OVER 3 YEARS NOW
Herc
Fucking moron.
PLONK.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 08:52:18 PM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
Every day people say to me "I saw the Truman" and "I saw God".
Seek medical help.....now !
THIS IS THE CLAIM FOOL.... THAT I'M PARANORMAL
No, your not paranormal...your a fucking idiot.
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
yahoo ID: hellward2004
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
08 Jan 2005 05:56:27 AM |
|
|
"Jez" <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in message
news:z9-dnUyTBrtC10LcRVnysA@pipex.net...
|-|erc wrote:
Every day people say to me "I saw the Truman" and "I saw God".
Seek medical help.....now !
THIS IS THE CLAIM FOOL.... THAT I'M PARANORMAL
No, your not paranormal...your a fucking idiot.
--
Jez
abnormal maybe
.
|
|
|
| User: "Little Me" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
08 Jan 2005 01:56:17 PM |
|
|
THIS IS THE CLAIM FOOL.... THAT I'M PARANORMAL
Yes, I am sure you are.
Now *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 08:54:26 PM |
|
|
No, your not paranormal...your a fucking idiot.
WELL DONT OFFER $100,000 AND $1,000,000 YOU CANT CASH
IF THAT IS YOUR TEST
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 10:54:27 PM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
No, your not paranormal...your a fucking idiot.
WELL DONT OFFER $100,000 AND $1,000,000 YOU CANT CASH
IF THAT IS YOUR TEST
I never offered you anything, idiot.
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
yahoo ID: hellward2004
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 11:16:17 PM |
|
|
"Jez" <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in ...
|-|erc wrote:
No, your not paranormal...your a fucking idiot.
WELL DONT OFFER $100,000 AND $1,000,000 YOU CANT CASH
IF THAT IS YOUR TEST
I never offered you anything, idiot.
Well don't claim that lack of paranormal proof means there is none
when you DO NOTHING when people claim it.
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 11:23:30 PM |
|
|
|-|erc wrote:
"Jez" <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com> wrote in ...
|-|erc wrote:
No, your not paranormal...your a fucking idiot.
WELL DONT OFFER $100,000 AND $1,000,000 YOU CANT CASH
IF THAT IS YOUR TEST
I never offered you anything, idiot.
Well don't claim that lack of paranormal proof means there is none
when you DO NOTHING when people claim it.
You make no sense whatsoever.
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
yahoo ID: hellward2004
.
|
|
|
| User: "|-|erc" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
07 Jan 2005 11:40:01 PM |
|
|
WELL DONT OFFER $100,000 AND $1,000,000 YOU CANT CASH
IF THAT IS YOUR TEST
I never offered you anything, idiot.
Well don't claim that lack of paranormal proof means there is none
when you DO NOTHING when people claim it.
You make no sense whatsoever.
tell me where the non sequitur kicks in
1 skeptic company publicly offers $100,000 prize
2 skeptic company refuses to test Adam (obviously deluded)
3 all these groups insist there is no paranormal because there is a test for it
3 Adam says no on usenet
4 You jump in screaming
5 I say what for
6 You act big with general insults again and again and again
7 I offer my counsel
8 You start scratching your ***** again and and again and agian
Make sense so far?
Herc
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
09 Jan 2005 12:52:31 AM |
|
|
No, you don't make sense.
Get help.
Kermit
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT |
08 Jan 2005 08:25:53 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:40:01 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote:
WELL DONT OFFER $100,000 AND $1,000,000 YOU CANT CASH
IF THAT IS YOUR TEST
I never offered you anything, idiot.
Well don't claim that lack of paranormal proof means there is none
when you DO NOTHING when people claim it.
You make no sense whatsoever.
tell me where the non sequitur kicks in
1 skeptic company publicly offers $100,000 prize
2 skeptic company refuses to test Adam (obviously deluded)
3 all these groups insist there is no paranormal because there is a test for it
3 Adam says no on usenet
4 You jump in screaming
5 I say what for
6 You act big with general insults again and again and again
7 I offer my counsel
8 You start scratching your ***** again and and again and agian
Make sense so far?
Nope, not a fucking word of it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
