Religions > Atheism > So Which Non-Existent Target in Iran Did You Chickenhawks Plan to Bomb, Fred?
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c" |
| Date: |
04 Dec 2007 10:04:59 PM |
| Object: |
So Which Non-Existent Target in Iran Did You Chickenhawks Plan to Bomb, Fred? |
http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=9240
Atrios makes a good point:
It must be understood that since our intelligence agencies don’t
believe Iran has a nuclear weapons program, it also means that they
don’t know where such a program would be physically located if it did
exist. This means that any desires of ***** Cheney and his people to
bomb Iran simply involve… bombing the ***** out of Iran.
If they say there is no immediate threat, that has to sort of imply
there are no immediate TARGETS. I guess we could bomb an aspirin
factory or something.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
.
|
|
| User: "puttipoot" |
|
| Title: Re: So Which Non-Existent Target in Iran Did You Chickenhawks Plan toBomb, Fred? |
05 Dec 2007 08:27:52 AM |
|
|
On Dec 4, 9:04 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=9240
Atrios makes a good point:
It must be understood that since our intelligence agencies don't
believe Iran has a nuclear weapons program, it also means that they
don't know where such a program would be physically located if it did
exist. This means that any desires of ***** Cheney and his people to
bomb Iran simply involve... bombing the ***** out of Iran.
If they say there is no immediate threat, that has to sort of imply
there are no immediate TARGETS. I guess we could bomb an aspirin
factory or something.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
What a fuckhead you are. The Intel was right on Iraq then wrong on
Iraq. So why is this any different. Blow the diapers heads up now or
we'll all pay.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sasha" |
|
| Title: Re: So Which Non-Existent Target in Iran Did You Chickenhawks Plan toBomb, Fred? |
05 Dec 2007 08:38:23 AM |
|
|
On Dec 5, 9:27 am, puttipoot <puttip...@gmail.com> wrote:
What a fuckhead you are. The Intel was right on Iraq then wrong on
Iraq. So why is this any different. Blow the diapers heads up now or
we'll all pay.
Wow.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: So Which Non-Existent Target in Iran Did You Chickenhawks PlantoBomb, Fred? |
05 Dec 2007 09:47:18 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 06:27:52 -0800, puttipoot wrote:
On Dec 4, 9:04 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=9240
Atrios makes a good point:
It must be understood that since our intelligence agencies don't
believe Iran has a nuclear weapons program, it also means that they
don't know where such a program would be physically located if it did
exist. This means that any desires of ***** Cheney and his people to
bomb Iran simply involve... bombing the ***** out of Iran.
If they say there is no immediate threat, that has to sort of imply
there are no immediate TARGETS. I guess we could bomb an aspirin
factory or something.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
What a fuckhead you are. The Intel was right on Iraq then wrong on Iraq.
So why is this any different. Blow the diapers heads up now or we'll all
pay.
No, the intel on Iraq was fabricated by a bunch of liars.
This time, even the intelligence community wouldn't go along with the lie.
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
Surgeon General's Warning:
Quitting Religion Now Greatly Increases the Chances of World Peace.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: So Which Non-Existent Target in Iran Did You Chickenhawks Plan to Bomb, Fred? |
05 Dec 2007 09:28:07 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 06:27:52 -0800 (PST), puttipoot
<puttipoot@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 4, 9:04 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=9240
Atrios makes a good point:
It must be understood that since our intelligence agencies don't
believe Iran has a nuclear weapons program, it also means that they
don't know where such a program would be physically located if it did
exist. This means that any desires of ***** Cheney and his people to
bomb Iran simply involve... bombing the ***** out of Iran.
If they say there is no immediate threat, that has to sort of imply
there are no immediate TARGETS. I guess we could bomb an aspirin
factory or something.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
What a fuckhead you are. The Intel was right on Iraq then wrong on
Iraq. So why is this any different. Blow the diapers heads up now or
we'll all pay.
So when are you siging up for you sham war, little fucking chickenhawk
traitor? I rather see your legs get blown off by a round of RPG and
have your *****-stained entrails strewn from here to Tehran than to see
another American killed by your lies.
--
Yang
a.a.#28
"I can hardly wait for your head to explode when the Repubs hold onto
both houses of Congress this November. And Yang can quote me on that."
-Fred Stone, 6/14/2006
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: So Which Non-Existent Target in Iran Did You Chickenhawks Plan to Bomb, Fred? |
05 Dec 2007 12:52:20 PM |
|
|
puttipoot wrote:
What a fuckhead you are. The Intel was right on Iraq then wrong on
Iraq. So why is this any different. Blow the diapers heads up now or
we'll all pay.
Dubya? Is that you?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: So Which Non-Existent Target in Iran Did You Chickenhawks Planto Bomb, Fred? |
05 Dec 2007 09:46:08 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 04:04:59 +0000, Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:
http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=9240
Atrios makes a good point:
It must be understood that since our intelligence agencies donÂ’t
believe Iran has a nuclear weapons program, it also means that they
donÂ’t know where such a program would be physically located if it did
exist. This means that any desires of ***** Cheney and his people to bomb
Iran simply involveÂ… bombing the ***** out of Iran.
If they say there is no immediate threat, that has to sort of imply
there are no immediate TARGETS. I guess we could bomb an aspirin factory
or something.
Oh they have a target picked out.
Iran.
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"How come God gets credit whenever something good happens? Where was he
when her heart stopped?"
- Dr. House
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
