Religions > Atheism > Someone please confirm that the MD5 checksum requested was received
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Son of man" |
| Date: |
22 Aug 2004 10:56:48 AM |
| Object: |
Someone please confirm that the MD5 checksum requested was received |
Respond to the thread "Prediction for 8/23/2004 MD5 checksum request" where
I provided the checksum and just say something like "MD5 checksum received
on Sunday. Confirmed."
The more conformations, the better.
--
"The blindingly obvious is never immediately apparent." Brad Rogers
http://bellsouthpwp.net/c/h/Christ-Son-of-Buddha/TheWordOfGod_1.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" |
|
| Title: Re: Someone please confirm that the MD5 checksum requested was received |
22 Aug 2004 12:18:49 PM |
|
|
"Son of man" <thepuppetmaster@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:jm3Wc.4447$0o5.2727@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
Respond to the thread "Prediction for 8/23/2004 MD5 checksum request"
where
I provided the checksum and just say something like "MD5 checksum received
on Sunday. Confirmed."
The more conformations, the better.
I saw the following in the other thread.
"Son of man" <thepuppetmaster@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:mg3Wc.4423$0o5.1944@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
"Maximus" <clouds@rivermouths.com> wrote in message
news:cg6php$sum$1@newsflood.tokyo.att.ne.jp...
Iwonderif theTestisAbletoProveThat,
MemorymightbeStoredOutsideOfthePhysicalBrain
f21be0fdf19969b522812d9fb28fbc34
I used the two lines Maximus provided above, followed by my prediction
sentence, then I generated an MD5 checksum. I placed that checksum as the
final line and generated a new MD5 checksum which I posted above. That
way,
two MD5 checksums could be verified, the first one included in generating
the other posted above.
As I said in the other thread, I don't think there
is any point to the second checksum step, but
we can handle it.
But hey! That's not the prefix text I gave you.
How do we know this 'Maximus' (if that is indeed
his real name!) isn't your coconspirator?....
Just joking. I don't think the prefix matters as
long as it is ascii English.
(But I do like my "The laws of probability
and thermodynamics are inviolate" better.
And 'memory' has nothing to do with this test.)
I look forward to the drawing then your clear
text prediction.
--
RB
aa#2187
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Nutter" |
|
| Title: Re: Someone please confirm that the MD5 checksum requested was received |
22 Aug 2004 11:52:26 AM |
|
|
In article <jm3Wc.4447$0o5.2727@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
"Son of man" <thepuppetmaster@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Respond to the thread "Prediction for 8/23/2004 MD5 checksum request" where
I provided the checksum and just say something like "MD5 checksum received
on Sunday. Confirmed."
The more conformations, the better.
Confirmed. There were ">" characters at the start of the 2 lines of
text--did you include these in the checksum too?
m
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Son of man" |
|
| Title: Re: Someone please confirm that the MD5 checksum requested was received |
22 Aug 2004 03:13:51 PM |
|
|
"Mark Nutter" <manutter51@alethian.org> wrote in message
news:manutter51-059FBA.12522622082004@corp.newsfeeds.com...
In article <jm3Wc.4447$0o5.2727@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
"Son of man" <thepuppetmaster@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Respond to the thread "Prediction for 8/23/2004 MD5 checksum request"
where
I provided the checksum and just say something like "MD5 checksum
received
on Sunday. Confirmed."
The more conformations, the better.
Confirmed. There were ">" characters at the start of the 2 lines of
text--did you include these in the checksum too?
Forget it, see new washingtonpost.com thread.
m
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Nutter" |
|
| Title: Re: Someone please confirm that the MD5 checksum requested was received |
22 Aug 2004 03:49:43 PM |
|
|
In article <i77Wc.5042$0o5.1730@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
"Son of man" <thepuppetmaster@bellsouth.net> wrote:
"Mark Nutter" <manutter51@alethian.org> wrote in message
news:manutter51-059FBA.12522622082004@corp.newsfeeds.com...
In article <jm3Wc.4447$0o5.2727@bignews1.bellsouth.net>,
"Son of man" <thepuppetmaster@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Respond to the thread "Prediction for 8/23/2004 MD5 checksum request"
where
I provided the checksum and just say something like "MD5 checksum
received
on Sunday. Confirmed."
The more conformations, the better.
Confirmed. There were ">" characters at the start of the 2 lines of
text--did you include these in the checksum too?
Forget it, see new washingtonpost.com thread.
Got it, thanks.
m
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Barry OGrady" |
|
| Title: Re: Someone please confirm that the MD5 checksum requested was received |
22 Aug 2004 09:21:24 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 11:56:48 -0400, "Son of man" <thepuppetmaster@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Respond to the thread "Prediction for 8/23/2004 MD5 checksum request" where
I provided the checksum and just say something like "MD5 checksum received
on Sunday. Confirmed."
The date is invalid. There is no 23rd month in 2004 or any year.
Please limit the month number to no greater than 12.
The more conformations, the better.
--
"The blindingly obvious is never immediately apparent." Brad Rogers
http://bellsouthpwp.net/c/h/Christ-Son-of-Buddha/TheWordOfGod_1.htm
-Barry
========
Web page: http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
Atheist, radio scanner, LIPD information.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Son of man" |
|
| Title: Re: Someone please confirm that the MD5 checksum requested was received |
23 Aug 2004 07:32:56 AM |
|
|
"Barry OGrady" <god_freee_jones@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:v2lii0luge0hgn3p1jtlbrsnqghth0k8vo@4ax.com...
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 11:56:48 -0400, "Son of man"
<thepuppetmaster@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Respond to the thread "Prediction for 8/23/2004 MD5 checksum request"
where
I provided the checksum and just say something like "MD5 checksum received
on Sunday. Confirmed."
The date is invalid. There is no 23rd month in 2004 or any year.
Please limit the month number to no greater than 12.
You're in a different country than the USA? In the USA we specify the month
first, then day, then year.
Or if it's unclear to you, Monday August 23rd, 2004 at 8pm EST.
The more conformations, the better.
--
"The blindingly obvious is never immediately apparent." Brad Rogers
http://bellsouthpwp.net/c/h/Christ-Son-of-Buddha/TheWordOfGod_1.htm
-Barry
========
Web page: http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og
Atheist, radio scanner, LIPD information.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
