emotions. If you do not follow reason to completion
your inconsistency will leave you open to a thousand criticisms. You
will be told you are suppressing feelings - and you will be - as you
will lack the power to utterly destroy feelings as they should be
destroyed. You will be a hypocrite, living a double life with double
standards.
Scholars cannot see beyond the emotions. To them, the emotions and
feelings are a permanent fixture that can only ever be repressed, never
extinguished. They regard those who seek the perfection of reason to be
unrealistic and egotistical idealists, and will laugh at them. These
impostors give science a bad name. Please do not take them as
representative of science, but rather see them as the parasites they
are.
Man may be the more rational of the sexes, but do not expect too much of
him: he falls on a regular basis. His falling, however, does not
necessarily mean he is on the wrong track. Let it be remembered that no
matter how good one's intentions, until one has achieved absolute
perfection, one's activity will be not be without fault. As long as
there is striving there is lacking. Man strives, therefore he lacks. He
appears cloddish, foolish, unnatural as he moves in unfamiliar ways
traversing new ground.
Woman moves differently. She is consistent, in that she does nothing.
She does not strive, so does not fail. Her lack of embarrassing slips is
not so much evidence that she is on the right path, as it is proof she
is going nowhere.
Man is substance and therefore has something to lose. Understandably he
fears woman, who threatens to deny him any higher striving. In contrast,
woman has nothing to fear from man, as she has no identity to lose. Man
fears re-engul
.
|
