On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 16:10:16 GMT, "Justin Pate" <JP51307@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"David Johnston" <rgorman@block.net> wrote in message
news:gd87d211srgfjj8g35uplpjndpkgenstnn@4ax.com...
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 15:26:52 GMT, "Justin Pate" <JP51307@yahoo.com>
wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:g0n6d21fk9npfj7j55cru1203ikclddlcm@4ax.com...
Yep, that vaunted Christian superiority.
http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20060729/lead/lead2.html
Donovan Jones, the former Dayton Avenue church deacon, who is at the
centre of the sexual molestation offence against a 14-year-old
Corporate Area schoolgirl, yesterday had his stay in jail extended
until September 8.
Eh, you liberals are inconsistent with your morality. A priest is
"immoral"
for fucking a 14-year old girl
Deacon, not priest.
but in the Province of Quebec in Canada 14 is
the legal age for sexual relations.
That's a half-truth. What Mr. Jones did would in fact be a crime
under Canadian law because he was an adult in a position of trust
and/or authority over the child in question.
Why should a regular joe in Quebec get punished less severely for committing
pedophilia than a clergyman?
He won't be. The issue is whether you were in a position of trust
and/or authority. A clergyman who happened to have a liason with a
teenage girl he encountered by chance in a bar say, would be treated
like anyone else. Whereas a non-clergyman who was a girl guide
leader, say, or a teacher, or a policeman, or just asked by her
parents to escort their girl home as happened with Jones, would be
liable under the law.
.
