Students Given Graphic Instruction In Homosexual Sex
This is a reprint of a story which broke the Fistgate scandal in the
May issue of Massachusetts News. We advise caution. Even though this is
what the state is teaching to children as young as 12-years of age, it
is extremely offensive. Over 1,000,000 citizens have now seen this
story which was written by two of the outraged parents.
By Brian Camenker and Scott Whiteman
"Fisting [forcing one's entire hand into another person's rectum or
vagina] often gets a bad rap....[It's] an experience of letting
somebody into your body that you want to be that close and intimate
with...[and] to put you into an exploratory mode."
The above quotation comes from Massachusetts Department of Education
employees describing the pleasures of homosexual sex to a group of high
school students at a state-sponsored workshop on March 25, 2000.
On March 25, a statewide conference, called "Teach-Out," was sponsored
by the Massachusetts Department of Education, the Governor's Commission
on Gay and Lesbian Youth, and the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education
Network.
Among the goals were to build more Gay/Straight Alliances in
Massachusetts and expand homosexual teaching into the lower grades.
Scores of gay-friendly teachers and administrators attended. They
received state "professional development credits."
Teenagers and children as young as 12 were encouraged to come from
around the state, and many were bussed in from their home districts.
Homosexual activists from across the country were also there.
To say that the descriptions below of workshops and presentations of
this state-sponsored event for educators and children are "every
parent's nightmare," does not do them justice. It is beyond belief that
this could be happening at all. One music teacher who attended out of
curiosity said that she could not sleep for several nights afterwards
and had nightmares about it.
"Queer sex for youth, 14-21"
In one well-attended workshop, "What They Didn't Tell You About Queer
Sex & Sexuality In Health Class: A Workshop For Youth Only, Ages
14-21," the three homosexual presenters acting in their professional
capacities coaxed about 20 children into talking openly and graphically
about homosexual sex. The three presenters, who described themselves as
homosexual, were:
Margot E. Abels, Coordinator, HIV/AIDS Program, Massachusetts Dept. of
Education
Julie Netherland, Coordinator, HIV/AIDS Program, Massachusetts Dept. of
Education
Michael Gaucher, Consultant, HIV/AIDS Program, Massachusetts Dept. of
Public Health
The workshop syllabus included:
"What's it like to be young, queer and beginning to date?
"Are lesbians at risk for HIV?
"We will address the information you want about queer sexuality and
some of the politics that prevent us from getting our needs met."
The workshop opened with the three public employees asking the children
"how they knew, as gay people, whether or not they've had sex."
Questions were thrown around the room about whether oral sex was "sex,"
to which the Department of Public Health employee stated, "If that's
not sex, then the number of times I've had sex has dramatically
decreased, from a mountain to a valley, baby." Eventually the answer
presented itself, and it was determined that whenever an orifice was
filled with genitalia, then sex had occurred. The Department of Public
Health employee, Michael Gaucher, had the following exchange with one
student, who appeared to be about 16 years old:
Michael Gaucher: "What orifices are we talking about?"
Student: [hesitation]
Michael Gaucher: "Don't be shy, honey; you can do it."
Student: "Your mouth."
Michael Gaucher: "Okay."
Student: "Your *****."
Michael Gaucher: "There you go."
Student: "Your *****. That kind of place."
But since sex occurred "when an orifice was filled," the next question
was how lesbians could "have sex." Margot Abels discussed whether a
***** had to be involved; when it was too big or too small; and what
homosexual resources students could consult to get similar questions
answered.
Role playing and "carpet munching"
Then the children were asked to role-play. One student was to act the
part of "a young lesbian who's really enraptured with another woman,
and it's really coming down to the wire and you're thinking about
having sex." The other student played the "hip GSA (gay, straight
alliance) lesbian advisor, who you feel you can talk to." The
"counseling" included discussions of lesbian sex, oral-vaginal contact,
or "carpet munching," as one student put it. The student asked whether
it would smell like fish. At that point the session turned to another
subject.
"A lesson in fisting?"
There was a five minute pause so that all of the teenagers could write
down questions for the homosexual presenters. The first question was
read by Julie Netherland, "What's fisting?"
A student answered this question by informing the class that "fisting"
is when you put your "whole hand into the ***** or *****" of another.
When a few of the students winced, the Department of Public Health
employee offered, "A little known fact about fisting: you don't make a
fist like this. It's like this." He formed his hand into the shape of a
tear drop rather than a balled fist. He informed the children that it
was much easier.
Margot Abels told the students that "fisting" is not about forcing your
hand into somebody's "hole, opening or orifice" if they don't want it
there. She said that "usually" the person was very relaxed and opened
him or herself up to the other. She informed the class that it is a
very emotional and intense experience.
At this point, a youngster of about 16 asked why someone would want to
do that. He stated that if the hand were pulled out quickly, the whole
thing didn't sound very appealing to him. Margot Abels was quick to
point out that although fisting "often gets a really bad rap," it
usually isn't about the pain, "not that we're putting that down."
Margot Abels informed him and the class that "fisting" was "an
experience of letting somebody into your body that you want to be that
close and intimate with." When a child asked the question, "Why would
someone do this?" Margot Abels provided a comfortable response to the
children, in order to "put them into an exploratory mode."
"Rubbing each others' clits..."
Michael Gaucher presented the next question, "Do lesbians rub their
clits together?"
Michael Gaucher and Margot Abels asked the kids if they thought it was
possible and whether someone would do a "hand-diagram" for the class.
No one volunteered, but a girl who looked about 15 or 16 then stepped
up to the board and drew a three foot high vagina and labeled each of
the labia, the clitoris, and "put up inside the 'G'-spot." While
drawing, Michael Gaucher told her to use the "pink" chalk, to which
Margot Abels responded, "Not everyone is pink, honey." All of the
children laughed.
After the chalk vagina was complete, the children remarked on the size
of the "*****," and the presenters stated that that was a gifted woman.
Then Margot Abels informed all of the young girls that, indeed, you can
rub your "clitori" together, either with or without clothes and "you
can definitely orgasm from it." Michael Gaucher told the kids that
"there is a name for this: tribadism," which he wrote on the board and
told one girl who looked about 14 to "bring that vocabulary word back
to Bedford." Julie Netherland informed the children that it wasn't too
difficult because, "When you are sexually aroused, your ***** gets
bigger."
"Should you spit after you suck another boy (or a man)?"
Michael Gaucher read the following from a card: "***** and calories: Spit
versus swallow and the health concerns." Gaucher informed the children
that although he didn't know the calorie count of male ejaculation, he
has "heard that it's sweeter if people eat celery." He then asked the
boys, "Is it rude not to swallow?" Many of the high school boys mumbled
"No," but one about the age of 16 said emphatically, "Oh no!" One boy,
again about the age of 16, offered his advice on avoiding HIV/AIDS
transmission while giving oral sex by not brushing your teeth or eating
course food for four hours before you "go down on a guy," "because then
you probably don't want to be swallowing *****."
Another question asked was whether oral sex was better with tongue
rings. A 16-year-old student murmured, "Yes," to which all of the
children laughed. Michael Gaucher said, "There you have it" and stated
something to the effect that the debate has ended.
Use a condom? It's your decision, really.
One often hears that there is an aggressive HIV/AIDS prevention
campaign, but the session ran 55 minutes before the first mention of
"protection" and safer sex came. In the context of the "safer sex"
discussion, however, it was pointed out that these children could make
an "informed decision" not to use a condom. Outside in the conference
hall, the children could easily obtain as many condoms, vaginal condoms
and other contraceptive devices as they wished from various
organizations which distribute such.
Well, yes...it really is about sex!
Another popular session was presented by the same three public
employees in their professional capacity and was called, "Putting the
'Sex' Back Into Sexual Orientation: Classroom Strategies for Health &
Sexuality Educators."
The workshop included:
What does it mean to say "being gay, lesbian and bisexual isn't about
sex?...How can we deny that sexuality is central for all of us? How do
we learn to address the unique concerns of queer youth?...This workshop
is for educators to examine strategies for integrating sexuality
education and HIV prevention content specific to gay, lesbian and
bisexual students into the classroom and GSA's....additional strategies
will be discussed."
The three presenters now assumed the task of teaching teachers how to
facilitate discussions about "queer sex" with their students.
Tired of denying it
Margot Abels opened by telling the room full of teachers (and two high
school students), "We always feel like we are fighting against people
who deny publicly, who say privately, that being queer is not at all
about sex... We believe otherwise. We think that sex is central to
every single one of us and particularly queer youth."
Margot Abels, Julie Netherland and Michael Gaucher reviewed a few
"campaigns" that have been used to demonstrate to queer youth how to
best "be safe" while still enjoying homosexual sex.
The campaign, "Respect yourself, protect yourself," was thought to be
good in getting the message to kids that they should use protection,
but since it made children who didn't protect themselves feel bad, it
ultimately was a poor message. Michael Gaucher pointed out that
children "with an older partner that they are not feeling they can
discuss things with, does that mean that they don't respect
themselves?"
The campaign, "No sex, no problem," was ridiculed, as the campaign
assumed that children could opt not to have sex. Additionally, the
campaign made those children who had already had sex feel bad or think
they had a problem, since they had had sex.
After reviewing a few of the campaigns, Margot Abels described the
project she works on. The "Gay/Straight Alliance HIV Education Project"
goes to five different schools each year conducting up to eight "HIV
prevention sessions" in that school's gay club. These same presenters
who just told a group of children how to properly position their hands
for "fisting" were now telling a room full of educators that they would
visit their schools and conduct the same workshops for their students.
An enormous amount of very disturbing material was distributed at the
conference. Much of it encourages young children to become actively
engaged in homosexual activities. The Sidney Borum Community Health
Center table was giving out a cassette sized "pocket sex" kit, which
included two condoms, two antiseptic "moist" towelettes, and six
bandages, which were for "when the sex got really rough," according to
the high school volunteer behind the desk. There was a supply of
condoms supplied by both Sidney Borum and Planned Parenthood, all of
which were for the taking. Children as young as 12 or 13 participating
and receiving "information" and materials.
But most shocking of all was that there was an eerie sense of
solidarity in the air, against "those bigots who would stop our
progress."
Fistgate Scandal In A Nutshell
Since most citizens still do not understand the significance of the
Fistgate scandal, here it is in a nutshell.
Should the schools be encouraging teenagers to be sexually active as
they did at Fistgate?
Has the homosexual community violated our trust? Do they take money
that is supposed to be for violence and HIV prevention and use it
instead to promote sexual activity by teenagers?
Is the teacher, Margot E. Abels (who was terminated by the state as a
result of the scandal) correct when she told the Boston Globe that she
was only a scapegoat? She said that what was done at Fistgate (by her
and other homosexual activists) is "absolutely sanctioned by the
department [of education]." She said, "It's standard....The department
has always given us its full support - until now."
.
|
