In article
<c538db87-a5f0-423e-9c2d-09c1bfb0b3ac@j20g2000hsi.googlegroups.com>,
Lord Calvert <CalvertdeGrey@msn.com> wrote:
On Jan 21, 12:52 am, johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote:
In article <Xns9A2B587A88A7Efreddyb...@216.151.153.41>,
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-8A46EC.23463619012008@news.giganews.com:
In article <Xns9A2A53367A0B9freddyb...@216.151.153.34>,
Fred Stone <fston...@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachm...@remove.sbcglobal.net> wrote in
news:jhachmann-202992.01010219012008@news.giganews.com:
In article <85ydnThq8aUyggzanZ2dnUVZ_sWdn...@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypati...@comcast.net> wrote:
It wasn't my imagination, was it?
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2008/01/study_john_edw
a.p hp
I've noticed the same thing and I'm getting angry. Here's another
article on the topic:
http://www.alternet.org/election08/74277/
There's an informative video too. (The one on the right.)
The corporate controlled media are picking our candidates.
It took you this long to notice?
It was obvious from the start. Whatever happened to Ron Paul?
People noticed that he's a nutcase.
I wouldn't vote for him myself, but he is on the ballot in many states,
so I think he should be entitled to have a voice too.
The fact that he is indeed on the ballot in many states and should
indeed be entitled to have a voice is irrelevant to the fact that he's
a nutcase. I mean, what's one more anti-American Christianized commie
pretending to be a conservative when there is a whole host of anti-
American Christianized commies pretending to be conservatives already
in the GOP race.
I wasn't disputing the fact that he was a nutcase but candidates on the
ballot should be represented. It shouldn't be up to the TV stations to
decided who is a candidate and who is not. I see that CNN has excluded
Kucinich from the SC debate again. He should be on the stage too.
--
John #1782
.
