talk.origin censorship



 Religions > Atheism > talk.origin censorship

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 14 Sep 2007 03:31:01 PM
Object: talk.origin censorship
talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.
So I won't post there anymore.
JM
.

User: "Michelle Malkin"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 06:24:57 PM
<mccoy@sunset.net> wrote in message
news:1189801861.985671.256720@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.

JM

We don't want what you're advertizing, either,
nameless. Go peddle your crap elsewhere.
MM
.
User: "Syd M."

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 15 Sep 2007 03:00:45 AM
On Sep 14, 7:24 pm, "Michelle Malkin" <hypati...@comcast.net> wrote:

<mc...@sunset.net> wrote in message

news:1189801861.985671.256720@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...> talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the

pretext of advertising.


So I won't post there anymore.


JM


We don't want what you're advertizing, either,
nameless. Go peddle your crap elsewhere.

MM

Oh, no.. Is he still around..?
PDW
.


User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 05:04:45 PM
<mccoy@sunset.net> wrote in message
news:1189801861.985671.256720@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.

Waaaaah. Go tell someone that gives a *****.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.

User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 07:23:56 PM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
mccoy@sunset.net wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.

JM

Oh, great.
Does that mean you'll be posting your drivel to alt.atheism again, all
the time?
Just fucking great.
- --
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor http://www.secularity.com/ktayloraz
A.A #1143 http://azhotops.blogspot.com/
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG6yYcyVHkPfVtX8URAoITAKDRnPoVBQkqKxlrCwhUDo9TDJvzcgCg2mEE
pVCzwit2pL+PXzN2SNTWe5o=
=Gxbm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.

User: "No 33 Secretary"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 04:05:22 PM
wrote in
news:1189801861.985671.256720@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under
the pretext of advertising.

That'd be a quite trick.


So I won't post there anymore.

I can say with confidence that they don't want you to.
We don't want you posting here, either.
--
"You weren't born prematurely, son. You just survived the abortion."
Terry Austin
.

User: "chibiabos"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 16 Sep 2007 09:36:27 PM
In article <1189801861.985671.256720@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>,
<mccoy@sunset.net> wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.

JM

Say it ain't so! You were my only source of amusement in that ng!
-chib
--
Member of S.M.A.S.H.
Sarcastic Middle-aged Atheists with a Sense of Humor
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 07:03:51 PM
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:31:01 -0700,
wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.

Good.
Now get out of alt.atheism and we'll all be happy.
.

User: "Matt Silberstein"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 03:44:19 PM
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:31:01 -0700,
wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.

How nice for them.
.

User: "raven1"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 15 Sep 2007 12:08:17 PM
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:31:01 -0700,
wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

That's a lie, John.


So I won't post there anymore.

No one will miss you.
Please feel free to not come back to alt.atheism.
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 15 Sep 2007 01:45:51 PM
"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:pa4oe3p3lja1nvuea6o0pfajneuoh33hnv@4ax.com...

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:31:01 -0700,

wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.


That's a lie, John.

Eeeeek! Speak not its name!!!!!!!
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557
.
User: "raven1"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 15 Sep 2007 03:04:55 PM
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:45:51 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:


"raven1" <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in message
news:pa4oe3p3lja1nvuea6o0pfajneuoh33hnv@4ax.com...

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:31:01 -0700,

wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.


That's a lie, John.


Eeeeek! Speak not its name!!!!!!!

We've actually given him new names over on t.o, like "McWelcher", and
"McWeasel" when he tried to get out of paying off on a bet that he
made with a regular a couple of years ago.
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.



User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 06:15:10 PM
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:31:01 -0700, mccoy wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.

So how do we get you not to post here?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Arrogance has to be earned. Tell me what you've done to earn yours."
- Dr. House
.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 11:45:22 PM
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:15:10 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote:

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:31:01 -0700, mccoy wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.


So how do we get you not to post here?

Become brainless creationists.
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 15 Sep 2007 06:46:11 AM
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:15:22 +0930, Michael Gray wrote:

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:15:10 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo>
wrote:

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:31:01 -0700, mccoy wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.


So how do we get you not to post here?


Become brainless creationists.

That high a price eh?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"You know what my favorite thing in the world is?
I'll tell you.
Each week, millions and millions of upper middle class American
citizens put on expensive dress clothes, load themselves into
suv's and drive past homeless shelters, orphanages, prisons,
missions and halfway houses on their way to a very expensive
and nice church, where someone tells them to be more like Jesus.
That is fucking awesome, let me tell you."
http://tinyurl.com/2uglqf
.



User: "Kelsey Bjarnason"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 17 Sep 2007 12:05:31 PM
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:31:01 -0700, mccoy wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.

Sounds good. Can we convince you to stop posting here, too? :)
--
You have learned to emulate the sliminess of the pulpit very well.--RC
.

User: "Richard Smol"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 03:48:46 PM
On Sep 14, 10:31 pm,
wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.

Can you quit posting in alt.atheism as well?
RS
.

User: "snex"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 03:43:01 PM
On Sep 14, 3:31 pm,
wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.

JM

i just posted there from google, so you are full of *****, as usual.
.
User: "Therion Ware"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 15 Sep 2007 01:31:53 AM
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:43:01 -0700, snex <snex@comcast.net> wrote:

On Sep 14, 3:31 pm,

wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.

JM


i just posted there from google, so you are full of *****, as usual.

It's not implimented yet, but DIG is talking about it. The other
option is to make people who use google to post to talk.origins
include a token of somekind to validate the messsage. I thought "Win
Free Sex" would be the best option.
.


User: "Chris Krolczyk"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 07:43:57 PM
On Sep 14, 3:31 pm,
wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

So I won't post there anymore.

I suppose this is an attempt by you to
burnish your reputation as a lying asshat;
if so, congratulations are in order.
This is what DIG actually wrote on the subject,
however:

From <cabal-slrnfeg3kf.2oub.dgreig@darwin.ediacara.org>:

Google can't or won't do anything about spam.
I'll probably be blocking posting from Google soon.
Or I could force everyone to put a token in their subject line or body
to pass a filter.
--D.

Note that the word "spam" is very, very prominent in that
post. *Not* "advertising". I realize that it may be a bit
of a stretch for you to realize the difference, but there
are places (the biz* hierarchy, for example) where
legitimate advertisers can post. It's just too bad
that you can't - or won't - realize the difference.
-Chris Krolczyk
.

User: "Chris Krolczyk"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 08:00:09 PM
On Sep 14, 3:31 pm,
wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints posted via Google under the
pretext of advertising.

Okay, I'm game: is this the Willful Idiot John McCoy at work
here, or the Lying Asshat John McCoy instead?
This is DIG's post on the subject at t.o.:

From <cabal-slrnfeg3kf.2oub.dgreig@darwin.ediacara.org>:

Google can't or won't do anything about spam.
I'll probably be blocking posting from Google soon.
Or I could force everyone to put a token in their subject line or body
to pass a filter.
--D.
--
david iain greig


moderator, talk.origins sp4 kox
http://www.ediacara.org/~dgreig arbor plena alouattarum

So what is the difference between the words
"spam" and "advertising" in your little world,
precisely?
Ever heard of the biz.* hierarchy, for example?

So I won't post there anymore.

They won't miss you and neither will I,
regardless of what DIG eventually does.
-Chris Krolczyk
.

User: ""

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 05:06:33 PM
On Sep 14, 4:31 pm,
wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints

Not all of them. Just the stupid ones.
-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
.
User: "Free Lunch"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 14 Sep 2007 05:22:19 PM
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:06:33 -0700, in alt.atheism
panamfloyd@hotmail.com wrote in
<1189807593.032650.27470@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>:

On Sep 14, 4:31 pm,

wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints


Not all of them. Just the stupid ones.

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!

Without the stupid ones, what would become of T.O.? DIG would never
censor stupidity. McNameless wants to equate himself to a commercial
spammer.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 15 Sep 2007 12:44:16 PM
On Sep 14, 6:22 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:06:33 -0700, in alt.atheism
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote in
<1189807593.032650.27...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>:

On Sep 14, 4:31 pm,

wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints


Not all of them. Just the stupid ones.


-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!


Without the stupid ones, what would become of T.O.? DIG would never
censor stupidity. McNameless wants to equate himself to a commercial
spammer.

Ick. Wouldn't that be like having a serial killer as a "hero"?
-PF, Atl.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!
.
User: "raven1"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 15 Sep 2007 12:58:48 PM
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:44:16 -0700,
wrote:

On Sep 14, 6:22 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:06:33 -0700, in alt.atheism
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote in
<1189807593.032650.27...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>:

On Sep 14, 4:31 pm,

wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints


Not all of them. Just the stupid ones.


-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!


Without the stupid ones, what would become of T.O.? DIG would never
censor stupidity. McNameless wants to equate himself to a commercial
spammer.


Ick. Wouldn't that be like having a serial killer as a "hero"?

Thomas Harris comes pretty close with Hannibal Lecter...
---
"Faith may not move mountains, but you should see what it does to skyscrapers..."
.
User: "Free Lunch"

Title: Re: talk.origin censorship 15 Sep 2007 03:41:40 PM
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:58:48 -0400, in alt.atheism
raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote in
<u87oe3podhdrsqsm432lvf13hnl6rg9skl@4ax.com>:

On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:44:16 -0700,

wrote:

On Sep 14, 6:22 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:06:33 -0700, in alt.atheism
panamfl...@hotmail.com wrote in
<1189807593.032650.27...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>:

On Sep 14, 4:31 pm,

wrote:

talk.origins is censoring all viewpoints


Not all of them. Just the stupid ones.


-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/KoBAAWA!


Without the stupid ones, what would become of T.O.? DIG would never
censor stupidity. McNameless wants to equate himself to a commercial
spammer.


Ick. Wouldn't that be like having a serial killer as a "hero"?


Thomas Harris comes pretty close with Hannibal Lecter...

Even closer is Dexter.
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Talk.origin censorship
another talk.origin banned subject: HIV a tool of Natural Selection.
Pope Uses Term "Intelligent Design" In Talk On Origin Of Universe, Life
Jabriol reported to the police. The end of Jabriol? Talk.Origin rejoice in glee and happiness
talk.origin banned subject: Science and the Bible
Talk Origin Banned Subject: Evolution force fed into school children... commens by Donald F. Calbreath
Re: Talk.Origin banned subject: Molecular biologist view Darwinian evolution with doubts
Talk.Origin.Banned.subject\The BudiKKKa Hole Series:\ Reptile and Bird; Hole II
Pope Uses Term "Intelligent Design" In Talk On Origin Of Universe, Life
Pope Uses Term "Intelligent Design" In Talk On Origin Of Universe, Life
Talk.Origin banned Subject: Do not textbooks present evolution as fact?
talk.origin banned subject: The Bible and Geology
Talk.Origin banned thread Re: Jabriol claims slaughter of kids normal
talk.origin banned subject:Law and Order-observations by Roger Penrose and Astrophysicist Alan Lightman
talk.origin banned subject: Four Fundamental Physical Forces
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER