| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"duke" |
| Date: |
28 Jul 2004 05:47:05 PM |
| Object: |
Thank you 'rat willie |
Excess goods production causes a surplus in product which shuts down production lines and
causes people to lose their jobs It's called the simplest of economic principles - supply
v demand. It's as old as 3 days before Moses parted the Reed Sea.
Girly-boy chicken little yang doesn't understand that.
Thank you, 'rat willie clinton.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
28 Jul 2004 10:55:02 PM |
|
|
In our last thrilling episode, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> was pushed
over the cliffs of alt.atheism on Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:47:05 -0500 by
Zoog, minion of Zathar. As he fell, he screamed:
Excess goods production causes a surplus in product which shuts down production lines and
causes people to lose their jobs It's called the simplest of economic principles - supply
v demand. It's as old as 3 days before Moses parted the Reed Sea.
Girly-boy chicken little yang doesn't understand that.
Thank you, 'rat willie clinton.
It's 2004. When are you all going to accept the man is not President?
Is Bush ever going to take responsibility for anything? Ever?
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
29 Jul 2004 05:29:22 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:55:02 GMT, Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Excess goods production causes a surplus in product which shuts down production lines and
causes people to lose their jobs It's called the simplest of economic principles - supply
v demand. It's as old as 3 days before Moses parted the Reed Sea.
Girly-boy chicken little yang doesn't understand that.
Thank you, 'rat willie clinton.
It's 2004. When are you all going to accept the man is not President?
Thankfully, he no longer is. But girly boy doesn't understand economics, and he is still
trying to blame everything on Bush 2.
Is Bush ever going to take responsibility for anything? Ever?
Certainly not the stuff caused by 'rat willie.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
28 Jul 2004 06:10:20 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:47:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
Excess goods production causes a surplus in product which shuts down production lines and
causes people to lose their jobs It's called the simplest of economic principles - supply
v demand. It's as old as 3 days before Moses parted the Reed Sea.
Girly-boy chicken little yang doesn't understand that.
Thank you, 'rat willie clinton.
As you've provided no context for your remarks, what the hell are you
referring to?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
28 Jul 2004 08:49:51 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:10:20 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 17:47:05 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
Excess goods production causes a surplus in product which shuts down production lines and
causes people to lose their jobs It's called the simplest of economic principles - supply
v demand. It's as old as 3 days before Moses parted the Reed Sea.
Girly-boy chicken little yang doesn't understand that.
Thank you, 'rat willie clinton.
As you've provided no context for your remarks, what the hell are you
referring to?
Draft dodger duke is trying to argue that all the jobs losses under
Bush happened because Clinton made the factories too productive. In
the la-la land that is duke, Americans will be rich and prosperous if
everyone would churn out only 1 ewidget a month.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -911 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
29 Jul 2004 05:27:56 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:49:51 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Draft dodger duke is trying to argue that all the jobs losses under
Bush happened because Clinton made the factories too productive. In
the la-la land that is duke, Americans will be rich and prosperous if
everyone would churn out only 1 ewidget a month.
Just trying to show you how deeply 'rat willie in involved in the economic situation of
this country. The experts agree that Bush 2 inherited a recession, and we all understand
why.
but you don't, chicken little girly boy.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "W. Syme" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
29 Jul 2004 05:33:18 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:27:56 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:49:51 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Draft dodger duke is trying to argue that all the jobs losses under
Bush happened because Clinton made the factories too productive. In
the la-la land that is duke, Americans will be rich and prosperous if
everyone would churn out only 1 ewidget a month.
Just trying to show you how deeply 'rat willie in involved in the economic situation of
this country. The experts agree that Bush 2 inherited a recession, and we all understand
why.
"The experts" ....lol
"The experts" also have told me personally that Bush and you eat
little babies for breakfast. And they know what they're talking about,
they're experts after all.
--
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
W. Syme (pseudonym), European, non-native English speaker, "soft" atheist.
Email will not be read.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
30 Jul 2004 12:09:09 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:33:18 GMT, W. Syme <Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote:
Just trying to show you how deeply 'rat willie in involved in the economic situation of
this country. The experts agree that Bush 2 inherited a recession, and we all understand
why.
"The experts" ....lol
Yep, the economic specialists and experts. They say Bush 2 inherited the Clinton
recession. Remember the dotcom bust. Remember the fall of the stock market. Remember
the uncontrolled surplus that 'rat willie ignored, the one that shut down the production
lives and cost people their jobs.
"The experts" also have told me personally that Bush and you eat
little babies for breakfast. And they know what they're talking about,
they're experts after all.
And I'm sure your kind do see them as experts - of something. Maybe witch burning.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
30 Jul 2004 03:20:03 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:09:09 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:33:18 GMT, W. Syme <Winston.Syme.superstitions@fastmail.fm> wrote:
Just trying to show you how deeply 'rat willie in involved in the economic situation of
this country. The experts agree that Bush 2 inherited a recession, and we all understand
why.
"The experts" ....lol
Yep, the economic specialists and experts. They say Bush 2 inherited the Clinton
recession. Remember the dotcom bust. Remember the fall of the stock market. Remember
the uncontrolled surplus that 'rat willie ignored, the one that shut down the production
lives and cost people their jobs.
"The experts" also have told me personally that Bush and you eat
little babies for breakfast. And they know what they're talking about,
they're experts after all.
And I'm sure your kind do see them as experts - of something. Maybe witch burning.
Catholics shouldn't bring that topic up, Duke...
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
31 Jul 2004 07:40:17 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:20:03 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
And I'm sure your kind do see them as experts - of something. Maybe witch burning.
Catholics shouldn't bring that topic up, Duke...
Why not? There is no such thing as a witch.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "W. Syme" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
31 Jul 2004 07:34:22 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 07:40:17 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:20:03 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
And I'm sure your kind do see them as experts - of something. Maybe witch burning.
Catholics shouldn't bring that topic up, Duke...
Why not? There is no such thing as a witch.
Exactly.
--
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
W. Syme (pseudonym), European, non-native English speaker, "soft" atheist.
Email will not be read.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
31 Jul 2004 09:25:09 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 07:40:17 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:20:03 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
And I'm sure your kind do see them as experts - of something. Maybe witch burning.
Catholics shouldn't bring that topic up, Duke...
Why not? There is no such thing as a witch.
You have a way of absolutely *frying* Irony-o-meters, Duke...
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
01 Aug 2004 05:50:55 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 14:25:09 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
And I'm sure your kind do see them as experts - of something. Maybe witch burning.
Catholics shouldn't bring that topic up, Duke...
Why not? There is no such thing as a witch.
You have a way of absolutely *frying* Irony-o-meters, Duke...
Glad to see I keep you entertained.
But a question - why was your remark re Catholics mentioning witches?
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
01 Aug 2004 09:07:14 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 05:50:55 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 14:25:09 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
And I'm sure your kind do see them as experts - of something. Maybe witch burning.
Catholics shouldn't bring that topic up, Duke...
Why not? There is no such thing as a witch.
You have a way of absolutely *frying* Irony-o-meters, Duke...
Glad to see I keep you entertained.
But a question - why was your remark re Catholics mentioning witches?
You might want to look over the history of the Church during the
Middle Ages.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
01 Aug 2004 11:58:57 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 14:07:14 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
Why not? There is no such thing as a witch.
You have a way of absolutely *frying* Irony-o-meters, Duke...
Glad to see I keep you entertained.
But a question - why was your remark re Catholics mentioning witches?
You might want to look over the history of the Church during the
Middle Ages.
I did. The Inquisition was about heresy in the Church. As far as the burning of supposed
witches, of which there are none, that was by the English protest_ants.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
01 Aug 2004 08:05:27 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<478qg09df1bapp88qcvm03puqrbjoq7a1b@4ax.com>...
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 14:07:14 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
Why not? There is no such thing as a witch.
You have a way of absolutely *frying* Irony-o-meters, Duke...
Glad to see I keep you entertained.
But a question - why was your remark re Catholics mentioning witches?
You might want to look over the history of the Church during the
Middle Ages.
I did. The Inquisition was about heresy in the Church. As far as the burning of supposed
witches, of which there are none, that was by the English protest_ants.
You should explain why the bible lied about the existence of witches.
We'd love to hear it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
01 Aug 2004 12:26:42 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 14:07:14 GMT, raven1
<quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
Why not? There is no such thing as a witch.
You have a way of absolutely *frying* Irony-o-meters, Duke...
Glad to see I keep you entertained.
But a question - why was your remark re Catholics mentioning
witches?
You might want to look over the history of the Church during the
Middle Ages.
I did. The Inquisition was about heresy in the Church. As far as
the burning of supposed witches, of which there are none, that was by
the English protest_ants.
"But the all-time grand champion exterminator of witches was Ferdinand von
Wittelsbach, Catholic prince-archbishop of Cologne, Germany, who burned
2,000 members of his flock during the 1630s."
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
01 Aug 2004 05:01:05 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:26:42 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 14:07:14 GMT, raven1
<quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
Why not? There is no such thing as a witch.
You have a way of absolutely *frying* Irony-o-meters, Duke...
Glad to see I keep you entertained.
But a question - why was your remark re Catholics mentioning
witches?
You might want to look over the history of the Church during the
Middle Ages.
I did. The Inquisition was about heresy in the Church. As far as
the burning of supposed witches, of which there are none, that was by
the English protest_ants.
"But the all-time grand champion exterminator of witches was Ferdinand von
Wittelsbach, Catholic prince-archbishop of Cologne, Germany, who burned
2,000 members of his flock during the 1630s."
30,000 by the protest_ants in England.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
01 Aug 2004 07:04:39 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:26:42 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
duke wrote:
On Sun, 01 Aug 2004 14:07:14 GMT, raven1
<quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
Why not? There is no such thing as a witch.
You have a way of absolutely *frying* Irony-o-meters, Duke...
Glad to see I keep you entertained.
But a question - why was your remark re Catholics mentioning
witches?
You might want to look over the history of the Church during the
Middle Ages.
I did. The Inquisition was about heresy in the Church. As far as
the burning of supposed witches, of which there are none, that was
by the English protest_ants.
"But the all-time grand champion exterminator of witches was
Ferdinand von Wittelsbach, Catholic prince-archbishop of Cologne,
Germany, who burned 2,000 members of his flock during the 1630s."
30,000 by the protest_ants in England.
Both Catholic and Protestants did a lot of it, the catholics did more.
But of course you ignore the fact that above you said it was the prodestants
who did it.
Earl has committed what the RCC says is a lie of ommision.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
31 Jul 2004 07:54:04 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<nn4ng0hoskc8890jpsnb4rrnloichb31ou@4ax.com>...
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:20:03 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
And I'm sure your kind do see them as experts - of something. Maybe witch burning.
Catholics shouldn't bring that topic up, Duke...
Why not? There is no such thing as a witch.
Ah, so your bible was lying again. Or maybe "witch" is some sort of
metaphore.
Exodus 22:18 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
Deuteronomy 18:10 Let no one be found among you who sacrifices his son
or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery,
interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, 11 or casts spells, or who is
a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead.
1 Samuel 15:23 For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and
stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected
the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee from being king.
2 Kings 9:22 When Joram saw Jehu he asked, "Have you come in peace,
Jehu?" "How can there be peace," Jehu replied, "as long as all the
idolatry and witchcraft of your mother Jezebel abound?"
2 Chronicles 33:6 And he caused his children to pass through the fire
in the valley of the son of Hinnom: also he observed times, and used
enchantments, and used witchcraft, and dealt with a familiar spirit,
and with wizards: he wrought much evil in the sight of the LORD, to
provoke him to anger.
Micah 5:12 I will destroy your witchcraft and you will no longer cast
spells.
Nahum 3:4 all because of the wanton lust of a harlot, alluring, the
mistress of sorceries, who enslaved nations by her prostitution and
peoples by her witchcraft.
Acts 8:9 But there was a certain man, called Simon, which beforetime
in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria,
giving out that himself was some great one:
Galatians 3:1 You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? Before
your very eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed as crucified.
Galatians 5:19 The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual
immorality, impurity and debauchery; 20 idolatry and witchcraft;
hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition,
dissensions, factions 21 and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like.
I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not
inherit the kingdom of God.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
31 Jul 2004 03:08:17 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:27:56 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:49:51 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Draft dodger duke is trying to argue that all the jobs losses under
Bush happened because Clinton made the factories too productive. In
the la-la land that is duke, Americans will be rich and prosperous if
everyone would churn out only 1 ewidget a month.
Just trying to show you how deeply 'rat willie in involved in the economic situation of
this country. The experts agree that Bush 2 inherited a recession, and we all understand
why.
You mean those experts at FAUX news. Too bad NBER says that you are
full of *****.
Oh, and let's see what REAL economists say shall we?
''The tax cut proposed by President Bush is not the answer''
-George Akerlof, Nobel 2001
-Kenneth J. Arrow, Nobel 1972
-Lawrence R. Klein, Nobel 1980
-Daniel L. McFadden, Nobel 2000
-Franco Modigliani, Nobel 1985
-Douglass C. North, Nobel 1993
-Paul A. Samuelson, Nobel 1970
-William F. Sharpe, Nobel 1990
-Robert M. Solow, Nobel 1987
-Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel 2001
-And 450 other senior economists
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -911 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
31 Jul 2004 07:43:25 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 01:08:17 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Draft dodger duke is trying to argue that all the jobs losses under
Bush happened because Clinton made the factories too productive. In
the la-la land that is duke, Americans will be rich and prosperous if
everyone would churn out only 1 ewidget a month.
Just trying to show you how deeply 'rat willie in involved in the economic situation of
this country. The experts agree that Bush 2 inherited a recession, and we all understand
why.
You mean those experts at FAUX news. Too bad NBER says that you are
full of *****.
Why no, girly boy. I'm referring to the economic experts in this country. These are the
ones that are guests on Fox News. I gather CNN says clear of them and the truth.
Oh, and let's see what REAL economists say shall we?
ok
''The tax cut proposed by President Bush is not the answer''
-George Akerlof, Nobel 2001
-Kenneth J. Arrow, Nobel 1972
-Lawrence R. Klein, Nobel 1980
-Daniel L. McFadden, Nobel 2000
-Franco Modigliani, Nobel 1985
-Douglass C. North, Nobel 1993
-Paul A. Samuelson, Nobel 1970
-William F. Sharpe, Nobel 1990
-Robert M. Solow, Nobel 1987
-Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel 2001
-And 450 other senior economists
Not the answer to what?
And why did you duck the issue of 'rat willie's recession that Bush2 inherited. My, oh
my, how you duck the issues.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
31 Jul 2004 09:26:38 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 07:43:25 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
Why no, girly boy. I'm referring to the economic experts in this country. These are the
ones that are guests on Fox News.
You are clearly hallucinating.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
01 Aug 2004 05:52:38 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 14:26:38 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 07:43:25 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
Why no, girly boy. I'm referring to the economic experts in this country. These are the
ones that are guests on Fox News.
You are clearly hallucinating.
Can't be - I see whereas you stick your head in the dirt and hide.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
01 Aug 2004 11:08:04 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<lpipg0dvojteucti8gf8a862dlrc84n53v@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 14:26:38 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 07:43:25 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
Why no, girly boy. I'm referring to the economic experts in this country. These are the
ones that are guests on Fox News.
You are clearly hallucinating.
Can't be - I see whereas you stick your head in the dirt and hide.
For what reason should anyone trust a proven liar to accurately and
honestly communicate anything? Even if you managed, for one breif
moment, to stop hallucinating, you've already given ample reason to
question any claim you make. And by that example, you inevitably
drive people away from The Lord.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
29 Jul 2004 05:26:20 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:10:20 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
Excess goods production causes a surplus in product which shuts down production lines and
causes people to lose their jobs It's called the simplest of economic principles - supply
v demand. It's as old as 3 days before Moses parted the Reed Sea.
Girly-boy chicken little yang doesn't understand that.
Thank you, 'rat willie clinton.
As you've provided no context for your remarks, what the hell are you
referring to?
It's called ECON101. Something neither you nor chicken little girly boy knows.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jura Koch-Sacher" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
30 Jul 2004 03:32:13 AM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
<bauig0p8eqbjrpjur80ub60nbq3srfnhna@4ax.com>:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 23:10:20 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com> wrote:
[-- 8< --]
As you've provided no context for your remarks, what the hell are you
referring to?
It's called ECON101. Something neither you nor chicken little girly boy knows.
I got a Distinction when I did ECON 101 a few years ago. So, Earl -
what's the formula for price elasticity of demand?
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
30 Jul 2004 12:13:21 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:32:13 +1000, Jura Koch-Sacher <jura@koch-sacher.com> wrote:
It's called ECON101. Something neither you nor chicken little girly boy knows.
I got a Distinction
Distinctively poor?
when I did ECON 101 a few years ago. So, Earl -
what's the formula for price elasticity of demand?
You did it a few years ago. I did it 43 years ago. Guess what - I don't remember, but I
do remember supply v demand (do you?), and I do understand elasticity, so applying it to
demand, I know it a temporary over or under run, based on simple common sense of course..
Too bad girly boy yang doesn't understand.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
31 Jul 2004 03:10:23 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:13:21 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:32:13 +1000, Jura Koch-Sacher <jura@koch-sacher.com> wrote:
It's called ECON101. Something neither you nor chicken little girly boy knows.
I got a Distinction
Distinctively poor?
when I did ECON 101 a few years ago. So, Earl -
what's the formula for price elasticity of demand?
You did it a few years ago. I did it 43 years ago. Guess what - I don't remember, but I
do remember supply v demand (do you?)
I have a PhD in economics, I have on good authority that economists
think you're full of ***** (but then chickenhawk draftdodgers like you
and AWOL are like that):
''The tax cut proposed by President Bush is not the answer''
-George Akerlof, Nobel 2001
-Kenneth J. Arrow, Nobel 1972
-Lawrence R. Klein, Nobel 1980
-Daniel L. McFadden, Nobel 2000
-Franco Modigliani, Nobel 1985
-Douglass C. North, Nobel 1993
-Paul A. Samuelson, Nobel 1970
-William F. Sharpe, Nobel 1990
-Robert M. Solow, Nobel 1987
-Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel 2001
-And 450 other senior economists
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -911 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
31 Jul 2004 07:51:59 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 01:10:23 -0700, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
You did it a few years ago. I did it 43 years ago. Guess what - I don't remember, but I
do remember supply v demand (do you?)
I have a PhD in economics, I have on good authority that economists
think you're full of ***** (but then chickenhawk draftdodgers like you
and AWOL are like that):
Then you agree with the guest experts on Fox that President Bush inherited a recession
from 'rat willie. Which was then followed by a Islamic terrorist attack on the United
States of America (also something 'rat willie is ankle deep in failing to prevent) which
is the root cause of the economic picture in this country, my country, today.
Btw, you have never said which is your country - Iraq, Iran, Syria, Afghanistan?
''The tax cut proposed by President Bush is not the answer''
-George Akerlof, Nobel 2001
-Kenneth J. Arrow, Nobel 1972
-Lawrence R. Klein, Nobel 1980
-Daniel L. McFadden, Nobel 2000
-Franco Modigliani, Nobel 1985
-Douglass C. North, Nobel 1993
-Paul A. Samuelson, Nobel 1970
-William F. Sharpe, Nobel 1990
-Robert M. Solow, Nobel 1987
-Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel 2001
-And 450 other senior economists
But the question at hand is in regards to the recession caused by 'rat willie.
duke
*****
Matthew 11
28"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened,
and I will give you rest. 29Take my yoke upon you
and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in
heart, and you will find rest for your souls.
30For my yoke is easy and my burden is light."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: Thank you 'rat willie |
31 Jul 2004 09:25:48 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 07:51:59 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
Then you agree with the guest experts on Fox
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
