| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Bill" |
| Date: |
30 Jan 2005 10:46:04 PM |
| Object: |
The Bible myth |
I keep seeing people quoting from the Bible as though it was proof or a
fact.
There is NO objective evidence that any of the Bibles are the word of
ANY God.
There are no originals still in existence. They are all copies with
alterations, additions and deletions to suite the transcribers. Remember the
printing press was not even invented until the 5 Th. Century and the Bibles
date back over 4,000 years.
Here is a list of ENGLISH translations of the Bible. Which are the correct
ones? And were the copies they translated from accurate translations of the
originals?
The evidence is that these Bibles, written by over forty men over a period
of some 2500 years are nothing but a combination of history, myths, folklore
and legends. There is NO
objective evidence that they are accurate history or the words of any God.
New American Standard
New International Version
Amplified Bible
New Living Translation
King James Version
Contemporary English Version
New King James Version
21 St. Century King James Version
New International Version
American Standard Version
Holman Christian Version
New Life Version
Darby Translation
Young's Literal Translation
New International Readers Version
World English Bible
--
Bill
.
|
|
| User: "Zadok" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 01:00:26 AM |
|
|
"Bill" <> wrote in message ...
I keep seeing people quoting from the Bible as though it was proof or a
fact.
There is NO objective evidence that any of the Bibles are the word of
ANY God.
Plus all the old scriptures that weren't included in the bible.
Gospel of Thomas - Excluded because Jesus tells the disciples that after his
death, they are to go to James the Righteous, as he will be their leader.
Gospel of Philip - Excluded, because it says Mary Magdalene was the
companion (mate, wife) of Jesus.
Gospel of Peter - Excluded because it tell us Mary Magdalene was a disciple.
Gospel of Mary - Excluded becasue it tells us that Jesus loved Mary
Magdalene more than the other women. Has her teaching the disciples of
things Jesus had told only her.
And on and on and on.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Clayton Based Life Form" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 02:06:37 AM |
|
|
"Zadok" <nobler@accesswave.ca> wrote in message
news:KqfLd.82397$Ob.55487@edtnps84...
"Bill" <> wrote in message ...
I keep seeing people quoting from the Bible as though it was proof or a
fact.
There is NO objective evidence that any of the Bibles are the word of
ANY God.
Plus all the old scriptures that weren't included in the bible.
Gospel of Thomas - Excluded because Jesus tells the disciples that after
his
death, they are to go to James the Righteous, as he will be their leader.
Gospel of Philip - Excluded, because it says Mary Magdalene was the
companion (mate, wife) of Jesus.
Gospel of Peter - Excluded because it tell us Mary Magdalene was a
disciple.
Gospel of Mary - Excluded becasue it tells us that Jesus loved Mary
Magdalene more than the other women. Has her teaching the disciples of
things Jesus had told only her.
And on and on and on.
I read somewhere that there could be as many as 100 gospels, most kept under
lock and key in the Vatican, all of which contradict each other in some way!
.
|
|
|
| User: "RS" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 05:13:37 AM |
|
|
"Clayton Based Life Form" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKphonymail.com> wrote in message
news:41fd9304$0$2674$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
"Zadok" <nobler@accesswave.ca> wrote in message
news:KqfLd.82397$Ob.55487@edtnps84...
"Bill" <> wrote in message ...
I keep seeing people quoting from the Bible as though it was proof or a
fact.
There is NO objective evidence that any of the Bibles are the word of
ANY God.
Plus all the old scriptures that weren't included in the bible.
Gospel of Thomas - Excluded because Jesus tells the disciples that after
his
death, they are to go to James the Righteous, as he will be their leader.
Gospel of Philip - Excluded, because it says Mary Magdalene was the
companion (mate, wife) of Jesus.
Gospel of Peter - Excluded because it tell us Mary Magdalene was a
disciple.
Gospel of Mary - Excluded becasue it tells us that Jesus loved Mary
Magdalene more than the other women. Has her teaching the disciples of
things Jesus had told only her.
And on and on and on.
I read somewhere that there could be as many as 100 gospels, most kept
under
lock and key in the Vatican, all of which contradict each other in some
way!
Yes... a comprable DaVinci code....
-RS
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
01 Feb 2005 08:06:37 PM |
|
|
There is a reason that these "gospels" are not part of the Cannon. If
you don't know what that word means you shouldn't be posting about what
should or should not be in the Bible.
The so called gospels that are under lock and key in the Vatican are
not consistent with the other books of the Bible. That is why they are
not inculded. Yes, they contain signifigant contradictions, any other
document that wasn't the Bible, people would praise a group for keeping
something contradictory out of the grouping. Look at it this way, the
Gospels in the Bible all line up, so why would we question them. If you
had 10 eye witnesses... and all but 4 had signifigantly different
stories, but 4 of them got all the details the same, why wouldn't you
say the other 6 are wrong and the 4 who line up are probably correct.
Why do people always throw logic out the window when they are talking
about the Bible?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Gamelson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 01:25:50 AM |
|
|
Gospel of Peter - Excluded because it tell us Mary Magdalene was a disciple.
There is a 1st Peter and 2nd Peter in the Bible.
--
Luk 17:3 Take heed to yourselves: if thy brother sin, rebuke him; and if he
repent, forgive him.
Luk 17:4 And if he sin against thee seven times in the day, and seven times
turn again to thee, saying, I repent; thou shalt forgive him.
www.live365.com/stations/bgamelson?play
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 10:22:30 PM |
|
|
Bill Gamelson wrote:
Gospel of Peter - Excluded because it tell us Mary Magdalene was a disciple.
There is a 1st Peter and 2nd Peter in the Bible.
Those are epistles, not gospels.
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Gamelson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 10:47:41 PM |
|
|
There is a 1st Peter and 2nd Peter in the Bible.
Those are epistles, not gospels.
So what's your point?
--
Luk 17:3 Take heed to yourselves: if thy brother sin, rebuke him; and if he
repent, forgive him.
Luk 17:4 And if he sin against thee seven times in the day, and seven times
turn again to thee, saying, I repent; thou shalt forgive him.
www.live365.com/stations/bgamelson?play
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
02 Feb 2005 03:08:37 PM |
|
|
Bill Gamelson wrote:
There is a 1st Peter and 2nd Peter in the Bible.
Those are epistles, not gospels.
So what's your point?
My point is that your response was a non seqitur.
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Ings" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 11:36:03 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:47:41 -0600, "Bill Gamelson"
<bgamelson@cox.net> wrote:
There is a 1st Peter and 2nd Peter in the Bible.
Those are epistles, not gospels.
So what's your point?
There's a big difference between a letter (epistle) and a Gospel (the
story of Christ's life and teachings)
An epistle was intended by the writer to be a message to an individual
or group some distance away. It was not intended to be scripture at
the time it was written. A Gospel was intended to recount Christ's
life and teachings. It was intended as scripture when it was written,
at least for the sect for whom it was inscribed, so that they could
keep their theology straight.
## Scrutamini scriptura. These two words have undone the world.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "skyeyes" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 11:33:56 PM |
|
|
Bill Gamelson wrote:
There is a 1st Peter and 2nd Peter in the Bible.
Those are EPISTLES ("letters"), dummy, not gospels.
You're really not very up on this stuff, are you?
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herder
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
30 Jan 2005 11:57:43 PM |
|
|
"Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:MsdLd.43720$8u5.4961@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
I keep seeing people quoting from the Bible as though it was proof or a
fact.
There is NO objective evidence that any of the Bibles are the word of
ANY God.
There are no originals still in existence. They are all copies with
alterations, additions and deletions to suite the transcribers. Remember
the
printing press was not even invented until the 5 Th. Century and the
Bibles
date back over 4,000 years.
Here is a list of ENGLISH translations of the Bible. Which are the correct
ones? And were the copies they translated from accurate translations of
the
originals?
The evidence is that these Bibles, written by over forty men over a
period
of some 2500 years are nothing but a combination of history, myths,
folklore
and legends. There is NO
objective evidence that they are accurate history or the words of any God.
New American Standard
New International Version
Amplified Bible
New Living Translation
King James Version
Contemporary English Version
New King James Version
21 St. Century King James Version
New International Version
American Standard Version
Holman Christian Version
New Life Version
Darby Translation
Young's Literal Translation
New International Readers Version
World English Bible
You left out the New Revised Standard Version and the Jerusalem Bible.
The Jerusalem Bible seems to be the one most serious Bible scholars use
nowadays. By serious scholars I mean the ones who are seeking information,
not just trying to make whatever they find fit their personal beliefs.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list name collector
BAAWA Knight & EAC Bible thumper thumper
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
--
Bill
.
|
|
|
| User: "Clayton Based Life Form" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 02:01:42 AM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:YZGdnWhBtI7u6WDcRVn-iA@comcast.com...
"Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:MsdLd.43720$8u5.4961@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
I keep seeing people quoting from the Bible as though it was proof or a
fact.
There is NO objective evidence that any of the Bibles are the word of
ANY God.
There are no originals still in existence. They are all copies with
alterations, additions and deletions to suite the transcribers. Remember
the
printing press was not even invented until the 5 Th. Century and the
Bibles
date back over 4,000 years.
Here is a list of ENGLISH translations of the Bible. Which are the
correct
ones? And were the copies they translated from accurate translations of
the
originals?
The evidence is that these Bibles, written by over forty men over a
period
of some 2500 years are nothing but a combination of history, myths,
folklore
and legends. There is NO
objective evidence that they are accurate history or the words of any
God.
New American Standard
New International Version
Amplified Bible
New Living Translation
King James Version
Contemporary English Version
New King James Version
21 St. Century King James Version
New International Version
American Standard Version
Holman Christian Version
New Life Version
Darby Translation
Young's Literal Translation
New International Readers Version
World English Bible
You left out the New Revised Standard Version and the Jerusalem Bible.
The Jerusalem Bible seems to be the one most serious Bible scholars use
nowadays. By serious scholars I mean the ones who are seeking information,
not just trying to make whatever they find fit their personal beliefs.
I think there are pidgin and Klingon translations too!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Walter Bushell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
03 Feb 2005 05:13:14 PM |
|
|
In article <41fd91ce$0$14096$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>,
"Clayton Based Life Form" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKphonymail.com> wrote:
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:YZGdnWhBtI7u6WDcRVn-iA@comcast.com...
"Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:MsdLd.43720$8u5.4961@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
I keep seeing people quoting from the Bible as though it was proof or a
fact.
There is NO objective evidence that any of the Bibles are the word of
ANY God.
There are no originals still in existence. They are all copies with
alterations, additions and deletions to suite the transcribers. Remember
the
printing press was not even invented until the 5 Th. Century and the
Bibles
date back over 4,000 years.
Here is a list of ENGLISH translations of the Bible. Which are the
correct
ones? And were the copies they translated from accurate translations of
the
originals?
The evidence is that these Bibles, written by over forty men over a
period
of some 2500 years are nothing but a combination of history, myths,
folklore
and legends. There is NO
objective evidence that they are accurate history or the words of any
God.
New American Standard
New International Version
Amplified Bible
New Living Translation
King James Version
Contemporary English Version
New King James Version
21 St. Century King James Version
New International Version
American Standard Version
Holman Christian Version
New Life Version
Darby Translation
Young's Literal Translation
New International Readers Version
World English Bible
You left out the New Revised Standard Version and the Jerusalem Bible.
The Jerusalem Bible seems to be the one most serious Bible scholars use
nowadays. By serious scholars I mean the ones who are seeking information,
not just trying to make whatever they find fit their personal beliefs.
I think there are pidgin and Klingon translations too!
"Big papa number one on top . . ."
Actually much of the Tenack would do better in Klingon.
--
Guns don't kill people; automobiles kill people.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Gamelson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 12:25:22 AM |
|
|
The evidence is that these Bibles, written by over forty men over a
period of some 2500 years are nothing but a combination of history, myths,
folklore and legends. There is NO
objective evidence that they are accurate history or the words of any God.
Really? Go to the library and check out some books that cover old world
history from 300 BC to 300 AD. You may be surprised to find that a man
named Jesus was born in Bethlehem and lived for 33 years on this earth and
preached the word of God and had a number of followers and performed several
"feats of magic" such as changing water to wine and mysteriously healing
lepors and he was finally crucified on a cross for his "sin" of blasphemy
and buried in a cave.
Go find the info, it's there.
--
Luk 17:3 Take heed to yourselves: if thy brother sin, rebuke him; and if he
repent, forgive him.
Luk 17:4 And if he sin against thee seven times in the day, and seven times
turn again to thee, saying, I repent; thou shalt forgive him.
www.live365.com/stations/bgamelson?play
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gary Bohn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 02:36:18 AM |
|
|
"Bill Gamelson" <bgamelson@cox.net> wrote in
news:dWeLd.14433$8Q.1690@okepread06:
The evidence is that these Bibles, written by over forty men over a
period of some 2500 years are nothing but a combination of history,
myths, folklore and legends. There is NO
objective evidence that they are accurate history or the words of any
God.
Really? Go to the library and check out some books that cover old
world history from 300 BC to 300 AD. You may be surprised to find
that a man named Jesus was born in Bethlehem and lived for 33 years on
this earth and preached the word of God and had a number of followers
and performed several "feats of magic" such as changing water to wine
and mysteriously healing lepors and he was finally crucified on a
cross for his "sin" of blasphemy and buried in a cave.
Go find the info, it's there.
The story of Jesus was taken from a number of older cultures than
Israel/Jewish culture. Even the story as told in the KJV states that
Jesus missed the census so would not be in Roman records. There are many
questions about the supposed time of his birth because of the errors in
the bible's records of the time.
The Romans kept very good records yet the stories of this particular
jesus come from christians/jews 70 years after his death.
--
apatriot #23, aa #1779, Grand Poobah, EAC Department of Oxygen
Deprivation
Responsible for brain damage everywhere!
Gary Bohn
Science rationally modifies a theory to fit evidence, creationism
emotionally modifies evidence to fit the bible.
.
|
|
|
| User: "xego" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 10:27:17 AM |
|
|
the exsistance of Jesus or his execution isnt really contested by
scholars that i have seen, Professor Elaine Pagels of Princeton doesnt
and that is good enough for me. What is odd is the bibles treatment of
Pilate. He is portrayed as trying to be fair but having his hands tied
by the Jews. This does not jive with the historical record as Pilate
was returned to Rome for being to unnecessarily hard on the Jews and
causing problems.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Walter Bushell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
03 Feb 2005 05:45:32 PM |
|
|
In article <1107167237.764428.75620@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"xego" <xego@37.com> wrote:
the exsistance of Jesus or his execution isnt really contested by
scholars that i have seen, Professor Elaine Pagels of Princeton doesnt
and that is good enough for me. What is odd is the bibles treatment of
Pilate. He is portrayed as trying to be fair but having his hands tied
by the Jews. This does not jive with the historical record as Pilate
was returned to Rome for being to unnecessarily hard on the Jews and
causing problems.
Which by Roman standards was _really_ over the top. Being recalled for
being lenient was easy, for being tough, no so easy.
--
Guns don't kill people; automobiles kill people.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "pensul" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
01 Feb 2005 12:59:07 AM |
|
|
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.atheism.]
the exsistance of Jesus or his execution isnt really contested by
scholars that i have seen, Professor Elaine Pagels of Princeton doesnt
and that is good enough for me.
What scholars say never is good enough. Theists do not have the burden of
proving that they are theists, neither do they cease being theists if their
statements are not understood. They do have the burden, like everyone else, of
backing up their statements with evidence, and if the evidence is lacking, it
means that the theist lacks the evidence, not that those he is addressing lack
evidence of or belief in theism. Thus atheism is really only applicable to a
theist, because only one who knows and believes the claims of theism can tell
what a-theism or non-theism is. The same could be said of agnostics in relation
to gnosis. Atheists are really disaffected gnostics, but because they can't
come up with a catchy phrase like agnosis, ( which is ridiculous ), they've
thought up atheism, which sounds like a belief but really isn't; this describes
accurately what they resent about gnosis. Briefly, they wish to be organized
like a religion in order to fight religion, but lack the vocabulary to do so.
Therefore, the word "atheist" really only describes a particular point of view
of theists which indicates their ignorance of the evidence of theism, not
theists themselves.
--
"The world of existence is an emanation of the merciful attribute of God."
Abdul-Baha
http://www.costarricense.cr/pagina/ernobe
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woden" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 12:49:28 AM |
|
|
"Bill Gamelson" <bgamelson@cox.net> wrote in
news:dWeLd.14433$8Q.1690@okepread06:
The evidence is that these Bibles, written by over forty men over a
period of some 2500 years are nothing but a combination of history,
myths, folklore and legends. There is NO
objective evidence that they are accurate history or the words of any
God.
Really? Go to the library and check out some books that cover old
world history from 300 BC to 300 AD. You may be surprised to find
that a man named Jesus was born in Bethlehem and lived for 33 years on
this earth and preached the word of God and had a number of followers
and performed several "feats of magic" such as changing water to wine
and mysteriously healing lepors and he was finally crucified on a
cross for his "sin" of blasphemy and buried in a cave.
Go find the info, it's there.
And then go find the original sources that those books used to verify the
existence of this Jesus character. The rest of us would be interested if
you can find such nonexistent souces
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political system for controlling people's thoughts,
lives and actions based on ancient myths and superstitions, perpetrated
through generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Gamelson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 01:23:22 AM |
|
|
And then go find the original sources that those books used to verify the
existence of this Jesus character. The rest of us would be interested if
you can find such nonexistent souces
How do you know that these sources do not exist?
--
Luk 17:3 Take heed to yourselves: if thy brother sin, rebuke him; and if he
repent, forgive him.
Luk 17:4 And if he sin against thee seven times in the day, and seven times
turn again to thee, saying, I repent; thou shalt forgive him.
www.live365.com/stations/bgamelson?play
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woden" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 01:54:24 AM |
|
|
"Bill Gamelson" <bgamelson@cox.net> wrote in
news:FMfLd.14437$8Q.10553@okepread06:
And then go find the original sources that those books used to verify
the existence of this Jesus character. The rest of us would be
interested if you can find such nonexistent souces
How do you know that these sources do not exist?
Well, if you can find, I guess that would mean I'm wrong.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political system for controlling people's thoughts,
lives and actions based on ancient myths and superstitions, perpetrated
through generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jesshc" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 03:52:53 PM |
|
|
Bill Gamelson wrote:
And then go find the original sources that those books used to
verify the
existence of this Jesus character. The rest of us would be
interested if
you can find such nonexistent souces
How do you know that these sources do not exist?
Because nobody has seen them; they don't exist. If you've got them
stored in your attic, let us know.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 03:01:16 AM |
|
|
Bill Gamelson wrote:
And then go find the original sources that those books used to
verify the existence of this Jesus character. The rest of us would
be interested if you can find such nonexistent souces
How do you know that these sources do not exist?
We don't. However no one has produced them.
Oddly enough people *have* produced records of other Messiahs from the era.
Rome killed them and all their followers, yet the bible only says Jesus was
killed.
If he existed he was not important enough as a messiah to warrant killing
the followers, something Rome always did.
This has led to the idea that his bit of lunacy in the temple foreground was
the reason he was executed.
But again, there is no evidence he did exist outside the four gospels.
I'd suggest "The Jesus Puzzle" as your nest step.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Walter Bushell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
03 Feb 2005 05:48:57 PM |
|
|
In article <0chLd.18261$wZ2.1230@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
"Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Bill Gamelson wrote:
And then go find the original sources that those books used to
verify the existence of this Jesus character. The rest of us would
be interested if you can find such nonexistent souces
How do you know that these sources do not exist?
We don't. However no one has produced them.
Oddly enough people *have* produced records of other Messiahs from the era.
Rome killed them and all their followers, yet the bible only says Jesus was
killed.
If he existed he was not important enough as a messiah to warrant killing
the followers, something Rome always did.
As the comic, of Jesus being crucified and two bystanders commenting,
"He couldn't have been important, they didn't kill any of his
followers." How sharp would it be to teach that the two thieves
crucified next to him were members of his organization.
This has led to the idea that his bit of lunacy in the temple foreground was
the reason he was executed.
But again, there is no evidence he did exist outside the four gospels.
I'd suggest "The Jesus Puzzle" as your nest step.
--
Guns don't kill people; automobiles kill people.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 06:15:15 AM |
|
|
In article <FMfLd.14437$8Q.10553@okepread06>,
"Bill Gamelson" <bgamelson@cox.net> wrote:
And then go find the original sources that those books used to verify the
existence of this Jesus character. The rest of us would be interested if
you can find such nonexistent souces
How do you know that these sources do not exist?
You are the one who made the assertion. You should be the one who
provides the evidence.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
Intelligent Design has as much to do with science as reality
television has to do with reality. - Barry Lynn on CNN 12/25/04
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "GlennGlenn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 01:38:47 AM |
|
|
In article <FMfLd.14437$8Q.10553@okepread06>, Bill Gamelson
<bgamelson@cox.net> wrote:
And then go find the original sources that those books used to verify the
existence of this Jesus character. The rest of us would be interested if
you can find such nonexistent souces
How do you know that these sources do not exist?
The sources *do* exist... to those who believe. When you close your
eyes real tight at night and pray real hard, God enters your heart and
shows them to you. In fact, he takes you on a virtual tour of his
secret library.
He can even show you the *fifteenth* Harry Potter novel.
*Sigh*
--
GlennGlenn -- aa#825 --
I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have taken
my wages in people.
‹ Quentin Crisp
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 11:52:55 AM |
|
|
"GlennGlenn" <dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com> wrote in message
news:300120051738239893%dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com...
In article <FMfLd.14437$8Q.10553@okepread06>, Bill Gamelson
<bgamelson@cox.net> wrote:
And then go find the original sources that those books used to verify
the
existence of this Jesus character. The rest of us would be interested
if
you can find such nonexistent souces
How do you know that these sources do not exist?
The sources *do* exist... to those who believe. When you close your
eyes real tight at night and pray real hard, God enters your heart and
shows them to you. In fact, he takes you on a virtual tour of his
secret library.
He can even show you the *fifteenth* Harry Potter novel.
*Sigh*
Whew! Almost had me going there for a sec :)
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
31 Jan 2005 10:05:28 PM |
|
|
GlennGlenn wrote:
In article <FMfLd.14437$8Q.10553@okepread06>, Bill Gamelson
<bgamelson@cox.net> wrote:
And then go find the original sources that those books used to verify the
existence of this Jesus character. The rest of us would be interested if
you can find such nonexistent souces
How do you know that these sources do not exist?
The sources *do* exist... to those who believe. When you close your
eyes real tight at night and pray real hard, God enters your heart and
shows them to you. In fact, he takes you on a virtual tour of his
secret library.
Hey! Most of these books are just hollowed-out hiding places for
whiskey flasks!
God does have a complete set of Penthouse Magazine, though.
He can even show you the *fifteenth* Harry Potter novel.
*Sigh*
"Harry Potter and the Middle-Age Beer Gut"
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Walter Bushell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
03 Feb 2005 05:51:34 PM |
|
|
In article <300120051738239893%dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com>,
GlennGlenn <dipthotdipthot@yahoo.yahoo.com.com> wrote:
In article <FMfLd.14437$8Q.10553@okepread06>, Bill Gamelson
<bgamelson@cox.net> wrote:
And then go find the original sources that those books used to verify the
existence of this Jesus character. The rest of us would be interested if
you can find such nonexistent souces
How do you know that these sources do not exist?
The sources *do* exist... to those who believe. When you close your
eyes real tight at night and pray real hard, God enters your heart and
shows them to you. In fact, he takes you on a virtual tour of his
secret library.
He can even show you the *fifteenth* Harry Potter novel.
*Sigh*
Don't you have to lub up and bend over for the priest first?
--
Guns don't kill people; automobiles kill people.
.
|
|
|
| User: "GlennGlenn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Bible myth |
04 Feb 2005 02:57:02 AM |
|
|
In article <proto-81A8BB.12513403022005@reader2.panix.com>, Walter
Bushell <proto@panix.com> wrote:
In article <300120051738239893% >,
GlennGlenn <> wrote:
In article <FMfLd.14437$8Q.10553@okepread06>, Bill Gamelson
<bgamelson@cox.net> wrote:
And then go find the original sources that those books used to verify
the
existence of this Jesus character. The rest of us would be interested
if
you can find such nonexistent souces
How do you know that these sources do not exist?
The sources *do* exist... to those who believe. When you close your
eyes real tight at night and pray real hard, God enters your heart and
shows them to you. In fact, he takes you on a virtual tour of his
secret library.
He can even show you the *fifteenth* Harry Potter novel.
*Sigh*
Don't you have to lub up and bend over for the priest first?
I've never "lubbed up" before. I've *been* in lub, though. Does that
count?
--
GlennGlenn -- aa#825 --
I am not famous, I am notorious. And if I am rich, it is because I have taken
my wages in people.
‹ Quentin Crisp
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
