THE BIG LIBERAL LIE
DemocRATs, and particularly Ted Kennedy, are becoming well practiced
in the technique of the Big Lie that was perfected by their Nazi
brethren several decades ago. The Big Lie in this case is that George
Bush lied to the American people in order to get them to go along with
deposing Saddam Hussein. Remembering that a lie is a statement that
is known to be untrue at the time it is made, can anyone point out
just what Bush's lies were?
The democRATs say that Bush lied when he said that British
intelligence had learned that Saddam Hussein had tried to buy uranium
from Niger. It wasn't a lie. British intelligence had indeed made
just such a finding. It doesn't matter whether or not Saddam had
actually tried to buy that uranium, it only matters whether or not
British intelligence thought that he had. Deal with it, Bush haters.
There's no lie there.
The democRATs are also fond of saying that Bush lied when he said that
there was an "Imminent danger" from Saddam Hussein. The problem is
that Bush never made that statement. That doesn't matter to democRATs
though. They know that the more they pull their "imminent danger"
ploy the more people
will believe it. The democRATs don't care about what the truth is.
They only care about what they can make the Americans believe.
Another lie? The democRATs endlessly repeat their assertion that Bush
tied Saddam Hussein to the attacks of 9/11. Not so. George Bush has
never said that Saddam Hussein was directly connected or had advance
knowledge of the Al Qaeda attack. When you press democRATs on this
particular lie they back down, but just a little, and use the word
"infer" instead of "lie." Bottom line --- Bush never made the
connection.
This conduct is not only outrageous, it's dangers to the safety and
security of every American. The democRATs haven't forgotten that we
are at war with Islamic terrorists. They know that as well as the
rest of us do. They're just choosing to ignore the fact. democRATs
have made a conscious decision that sabotaging the war on terror is an
acceptable tactic if the long-term goal is to return democRATs to
power in Washington. Their visceral hatred of George Bush is so
intense that it has overridden any concerns they may have for the
safety of the American people.
Here's a comparison for you. Consider a divorced husband. He didn't
want the divorce and he just can't believe that his wife kicked him to
the curb for another man. He's angry. It's a red-hot anger that
voids reason and common sense. He wants to get back, he wants to get
even. Finally his anger gains complete control and the next day's
newspaper contains a story of a triple murder-suicide. The irrational
spurned husband has murdered his wife and his two children, and has
then turned the gun on himself. His hatred for his wife was so strong
that he had no concerns for the lives of the children he had brought
into this world. If everybody had to die to assuage his anger, so be
it. His dignity and honor must be avenged, no matter who is harmed in
the process.
Do you think that's a bit over the top? Perhaps not. There has been
no change in the desires and the goals of Islamic terrorists. They
still want to kill as many Americans, men women and children, as they
possibly can. They want to kill Americans wherever they can find them,
and especially on American soil. There is one and only one reason why
these Islamogoons haven't succeeded with another bloody attack on
American soil. That reason is George Bush. The terrorist made a
mistake. They failed to see the difference between George Bush and
Bill Clinton. They thought Americans didn't have the heart for a
fight. They felt that they could attack, suffer a limited response,
regroup, and attack again. Each attack would represent three steps
forward in the drive to rid the Earth of the infidels. Each mousy
response from the weak Americans would represent one step back.
Uh oh. A bit of a miscalculation there. George Bush was not Bill
Clinton. The fight was taken to the terrorists where they live. The
Taliban was routed in Afghanistan. A huge hunk of the Al Qaeda
leadership was captured or killed. Osama bin Laden, in all
likelihood, was killed. George Bush also saw the danger of further
carnage against Americans with the help of Saddam Hussein. He knew
that if the United Nations continued to allow Hussein to ignore
resolution after resolution it would only be a matter of time before
Hussein allowed WMD technology, or the weapons themselves, to fall
into the hands of Al Qaeda or some other terrorist organization.
There was already ample evidence of Saddam's support for Al Qaeda, and
much publicized news stories of Saddam writing checks to the families
of Palestinian suicide bombers. Saddam hated George Bush, possibly as
much as democRATs do, and the rational mind would realize that it was
only a matter of time before Saddam offered the aid and support to
some terrorist group that would lead to thousands more American lives
being lost on American soil.
Thanks to the resolve of George Bush we are fighting Islamic terrorism
over there instead of here. Yes, sadly, American troops are dying.
That happens in a war, and we are damned sure in a war. It is a war
we are winning, and it is a war the democRATs will gladly sabotage
with their lies and demagoguery if it means they get to unseat George
Bush and return to power.
boortz.com
.
|
