| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Diagoras" |
| Date: |
07 Jan 2008 02:59:56 AM |
| Object: |
The Creation of Adam |
I know this sounds strange, but has anyone looked at the <Creation of Adam>
painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo? He had a tiny
*****! I'm having a lot of trouble accepting that this whole world's
population came from there! Eve must have been a very frustrated, hysterical
woman. No wonder she had an affair with a snake!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
Theists looking at that picture wouldn't see anything wrong with it, of
course, that's why they believe it!
.
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
07 Jan 2008 09:28:18 AM |
|
|
Diagoras wrote:
I know this sounds strange, but has anyone looked at the <Creation of
Adam> painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo?
He had a tiny *****!
He was in the pool! There was shrinkage!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lars Eighner" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
07 Jan 2008 05:36:45 AM |
|
|
In our last episode, <13o3qgamhrc4b39@corp.supernews.com>, the lovely and
talented Diagoras broadcast on alt.atheism:
I know this sounds strange, but has anyone looked at the <Creation of Adam>
painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo? He had a tiny
*****! I'm having a lot of trouble accepting that this whole world's
population came from there! Eve must have been a very frustrated, hysterical
woman. No wonder she had an affair with a snake!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
Theists looking at that picture wouldn't see anything wrong with it, of
course, that's why they believe it!
Ha, ha.
In reality, you can blame the Greeks. Greek artists seemed to think that
large units were not very tasteful and so depicted tiny ones, even in erotic
art, unless the subject was supposed to be grotesque. Romans tended to
defer to the Greeks in matters such as artistic standards, so if
Michelangelo had used more typical or realistic proportions there would have
been no end to the criticism. Of course Italian models and the Greek models
before them are not removed from the present by evolutionarily significant
periods of time, and neither modern day Italians nor modern day Greeks are
particularly deficient as European men go --- if anything it is contrary.
And you have to consider shrinkage. Although both Italy and Greece are warm
by European standards, you are not likely to mistake the Sistine Chapel,
even today, for a sauna. (Although probably if a model was used for this
particular work, he posed for a cartoon in a studio that would not
necessarily be the warmest and most comfortable place.) Evidently
Michaelangelo was not especially concerned about that particular area since
his David was uncircumcised.
--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/>
Countdown: 379 days to go.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nosterill" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
07 Jan 2008 07:53:22 AM |
|
|
On Jan 7, 12:36 pm, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
In our last episode, <13o3qgamhrc4...@corp.supernews.com>, the lovely and
talented Diagoras broadcast on alt.atheism:
I know this sounds strange, but has anyone looked at the <Creation of Adam>
painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo? He had a tiny
*****! I'm having a lot of trouble accepting that this whole world's
population came from there! Eve must have been a very frustrated, hysterical
woman. No wonder she had an affair with a snake!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
Theists looking at that picture wouldn't see anything wrong with it, of
course, that's why they believe it!
Ha, ha.
In reality, you can blame the Greeks. Greek artists seemed to think that
large units were not very tasteful and so depicted tiny ones, even in erotic
art, unless the subject was supposed to be grotesque. Romans tended to
defer to the Greeks in matters such as artistic standards, so if
Michelangelo had used more typical or realistic proportions there would have
been no end to the criticism. Of course Italian models and the Greek models
before them are not removed from the present by evolutionarily significant
periods of time, and neither modern day Italians nor modern day Greeks are
particularly deficient as European men go --- if anything it is contrary.
And you have to consider shrinkage. Although both Italy and Greece are warm
by European standards, you are not likely to mistake the Sistine Chapel,
even today, for a sauna. (Although probably if a model was used for this
particular work, he posed for a cartoon in a studio that would not
necessarily be the warmest and most comfortable place.)
If the model had to pose up on the, presumably unguarded, scaffolding
where Michelangelo was working then one might expect some considerable
fear and vertigo induced shrinkage :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Martin" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
07 Jan 2008 08:07:36 AM |
|
|
On Jan 7, 8:53 am, Nosterill <fladg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 7, 12:36 pm, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
In our last episode, <13o3qgamhrc4...@corp.supernews.com>, the lovely and
talented Diagoras broadcast on alt.atheism:
I know this sounds strange, but has anyone looked at the <Creation of Adam>
painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo? He had a tiny
*****! I'm having a lot of trouble accepting that this whole world's
population came from there! Eve must have been a very frustrated, hysterical
woman. No wonder she had an affair with a snake!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
Theists looking at that picture wouldn't see anything wrong with it, of
course, that's why they believe it!
Ha, ha.
In reality, you can blame the Greeks. Greek artists seemed to think that
large units were not very tasteful and so depicted tiny ones, even in erotic
art, unless the subject was supposed to be grotesque. Romans tended to
defer to the Greeks in matters such as artistic standards, so if
Michelangelo had used more typical or realistic proportions there would have
been no end to the criticism. Of course Italian models and the Greek models
before them are not removed from the present by evolutionarily significant
periods of time, and neither modern day Italians nor modern day Greeks are
particularly deficient as European men go --- if anything it is contrary.
And you have to consider shrinkage. Although both Italy and Greece are warm
by European standards, you are not likely to mistake the Sistine Chapel,
even today, for a sauna. (Although probably if a model was used for this
particular work, he posed for a cartoon in a studio that would not
necessarily be the warmest and most comfortable place.)
If the model had to pose up on the, presumably unguarded, scaffolding
where Michelangelo was working then one might expect some considerable
fear and vertigo induced shrinkage :-)
It is not easy for an artist, lying flat on his back with paint
dripping into his eye, to get a good look at a model on the adjacent
part of the scaffolding out of the corner of his other eye. Tends to
skew the proportions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
07 Jan 2008 02:50:49 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:07:36 -0800 (PST), Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:53 am, Nosterill <fladg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 7, 12:36 pm, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
In our last episode, <13o3qgamhrc4...@corp.supernews.com>, the lovely and
talented Diagoras broadcast on alt.atheism:
I know this sounds strange, but has anyone looked at the <Creation of Adam>
painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo? He had a tiny
*****! I'm having a lot of trouble accepting that this whole world's
population came from there! Eve must have been a very frustrated, hysterical
woman. No wonder she had an affair with a snake!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
Theists looking at that picture wouldn't see anything wrong with it, of
course, that's why they believe it!
Ha, ha.
In reality, you can blame the Greeks. Greek artists seemed to think that
large units were not very tasteful and so depicted tiny ones, even in erotic
art, unless the subject was supposed to be grotesque. Romans tended to
defer to the Greeks in matters such as artistic standards, so if
Michelangelo had used more typical or realistic proportions there would have
been no end to the criticism. Of course Italian models and the Greek models
before them are not removed from the present by evolutionarily significant
periods of time, and neither modern day Italians nor modern day Greeks are
particularly deficient as European men go --- if anything it is contrary.
And you have to consider shrinkage. Although both Italy and Greece are warm
by European standards, you are not likely to mistake the Sistine Chapel,
even today, for a sauna. (Although probably if a model was used for this
particular work, he posed for a cartoon in a studio that would not
necessarily be the warmest and most comfortable place.)
If the model had to pose up on the, presumably unguarded, scaffolding
where Michelangelo was working then one might expect some considerable
fear and vertigo induced shrinkage :-)
It is not easy for an artist, lying flat on his back with paint
dripping into his eye, to get a good look at a model on the adjacent
part of the scaffolding out of the corner of his other eye. Tends to
skew the proportions.
Then again, perhaps Buonarotti didn't care to advertise around town the actual gifts a pet
model brought to the party.
--
Apostate a.a. #1931
..sig currently undergoing maintenance
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
07 Jan 2008 05:39:57 PM |
|
|
reposting after apparent dropout; apologies if duplicated
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:07:36 -0800 (PST), Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:53 am, Nosterill <fladg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 7, 12:36 pm, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
In our last episode, <13o3qgamhrc4...@corp.supernews.com>, the lovely and
talented Diagoras broadcast on alt.atheism:
I know this sounds strange, but has anyone looked at the <Creation of Adam>
painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo? He had a tiny
*****! I'm having a lot of trouble accepting that this whole world's
population came from there! Eve must have been a very frustrated, hysterical
woman. No wonder she had an affair with a snake!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
Theists looking at that picture wouldn't see anything wrong with it, of
course, that's why they believe it!
Ha, ha.
In reality, you can blame the Greeks. Greek artists seemed to think that
large units were not very tasteful and so depicted tiny ones, even in erotic
art, unless the subject was supposed to be grotesque. Romans tended to
defer to the Greeks in matters such as artistic standards, so if
Michelangelo had used more typical or realistic proportions there would have
been no end to the criticism. Of course Italian models and the Greek models
before them are not removed from the present by evolutionarily significant
periods of time, and neither modern day Italians nor modern day Greeks are
particularly deficient as European men go --- if anything it is contrary.
And you have to consider shrinkage. Although both Italy and Greece are warm
by European standards, you are not likely to mistake the Sistine Chapel,
even today, for a sauna. (Although probably if a model was used for this
particular work, he posed for a cartoon in a studio that would not
necessarily be the warmest and most comfortable place.)
If the model had to pose up on the, presumably unguarded, scaffolding
where Michelangelo was working then one might expect some considerable
fear and vertigo induced shrinkage :-)
It is not easy for an artist, lying flat on his back with paint
dripping into his eye, to get a good look at a model on the adjacent
part of the scaffolding out of the corner of his other eye. Tends to
skew the proportions.
Then again, perhaps Buonarotti didn't care to advertise around town the actual gifts a pet
model brought to the party.
--
Apostate a.a. #1931
..sig currently undergoing maintenance
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Electric Elvis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
11 Jan 2008 06:29:53 AM |
|
|
On Jan 7, 3:59=A0am, "Diagoras" <1...@1.1> wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
And I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a
much bigger paunch that that, judging from my own size. <sigh>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Diagoras" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
11 Jan 2008 03:16:50 PM |
|
|
"Electric Elvis" <issomethingavailable@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:36f37d2a-3163-420f-b089-44eefbc90a0c@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 7, 3:59 am, "Diagoras" <1...@1.1> wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
And I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a
much bigger paunch that that, judging from my own size. <sigh>
It's probably the downside of evolution, our ancestors did not have cable
TV, beer and hot dogs, and they exercised a lot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Electric Elvis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
11 Jan 2008 04:48:15 PM |
|
|
On Jan 11, 4:16=A0pm, "Diagoras" <1...@1.1> wrote:
"Electric Elvis" <issomethingavaila...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:36f37d2a-3163-420f-b089-44eefbc90a0c@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 7, 3:59 am, "Diagoras" <1...@1.1> wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
And I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a
much bigger paunch that that, judging from my own size. =A0<sigh>
It's probably the downside of evolution, our ancestors did not have cable
TV, beer and hot dogs, and they exercised a lot.
Maybe I should get a cheetah in the backyard, just to maintain the
genes (mine, not the cheetah's).
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
10 Jan 2008 07:26:18 PM |
|
|
On Jan 7, 6:59 pm, "Diagoras" <1...@1.1> wrote:
I know this sounds strange, but has anyone looked at the <Creation of Adam>
painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo? He had a tiny
*****! I'm having a lot of trouble accepting that this whole world's
population came from there! Eve must have been a very frustrated, hysterical
woman. No wonder she had an affair with a snake!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
Theists looking at that picture wouldn't see anything wrong with it, of
course, that's why they believe it!
Well clearly Michelangelo had already worked out some basic
evolutionary theory, and based on humans have larger penises than
other apes, has construed that Adam must have had a smaller todger
too.
It's obvious!
I also note he's not standing, being pre-bipedal.
PS: I couldn't remember which painting this was until I followed the
link, so it was a bit of a shock to find it's a rip-off of one of the
great works of the only true religion.
http://www.venganza.org/images/wallpapers/noodledoodle1024_768.jpg
Al
.
|
|
|
| User: "Diagoras" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
10 Jan 2008 08:42:00 PM |
|
|
"Al" <alwhipp@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b4c90883-7e07-4887-ba00-444ae3b16a00@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 7, 6:59 pm, "Diagoras" <1...@1.1> wrote:
I know this sounds strange, but has anyone looked at the <Creation of
Adam>
painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo? He had a
tiny
*****! I'm having a lot of trouble accepting that this whole world's
population came from there! Eve must have been a very frustrated,
hysterical
woman. No wonder she had an affair with a
snake!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
Theists looking at that picture wouldn't see anything wrong with it, of
course, that's why they believe it!
Well clearly Michelangelo had already worked out some basic
evolutionary theory, and based on humans have larger penises than
other apes, has construed that Adam must have had a smaller todger
too.
It's obvious!
I also note he's not standing, being pre-bipedal.
PS: I couldn't remember which painting this was until I followed the
link, so it was a bit of a shock to find it's a rip-off of one of the
great works of the only true religion.
http://www.venganza.org/images/wallpapers/noodledoodle1024_768.jpg
Al
This is a much better picture, considering the fact that it shows the true
image of the Creator.
I'll print it, post it on my bedroom wall and pray to it every day!
Thanks for your valuable contribution!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
10 Jan 2008 09:56:51 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:42:00 -0800, "Diagoras" <1@1.1> wrote:
"Al" <alwhipp@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b4c90883-7e07-4887-ba00-444ae3b16a00@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 7, 6:59 pm, "Diagoras" <1...@1.1> wrote:
I know this sounds strange, but has anyone looked at the <Creation of
Adam>
painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo? He had a
tiny
*****! I'm having a lot of trouble accepting that this whole world's
population came from there! Eve must have been a very frustrated,
hysterical
woman. No wonder she had an affair with a
snake!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
Theists looking at that picture wouldn't see anything wrong with it, of
course, that's why they believe it!
Well clearly Michelangelo had already worked out some basic
evolutionary theory, and based on humans have larger penises than
other apes, has construed that Adam must have had a smaller todger
too.
It's obvious!
I also note he's not standing, being pre-bipedal.
PS: I couldn't remember which painting this was until I followed the
link, so it was a bit of a shock to find it's a rip-off of one of the
great works of the only true religion.
http://www.venganza.org/images/wallpapers/noodledoodle1024_768.jpg
Al
This is a much better picture, considering the fact that it shows the true
image of the Creator.
I'll print it, post it on my bedroom wall and pray to it every day!
Thanks for your valuable contribution!
Blasphemers!
That's the Flying Spaghetti with Crabs Monster!
Nothing at all like the true Flying Spaghetti Monster Marinara.
Bloody heathens.
--
Apostate a.a. #1931
..sig currently undergoing maintenance
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist AKA Al" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
10 Jan 2008 10:05:41 PM |
|
|
On Jan 11, 1:56 pm, Apostate <godless.bast...@yeehaw.org.invalid>
wrote:
This is a much better picture, considering the fact that it shows the true
image of the Creator.
I'll print it, post it on my bedroom wall and pray to it every day!
Thanks for your valuable contribution!
Blasphemers!
That's the Flying Spaghetti with Crabs Monster!
Nothing at all like the true Flying Spaghetti Monster Marinara.
Bloody heathens.
Marinara? Pffttt... You guys have missed the core tenants of the
faith totally! You might as well be pagans. Or evil atheists.
And PS; that's the low res version, go to veganza and chase it down
for the higher res version if you're going to print it.
Al
.
|
|
|
| User: "Diagoras" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
11 Jan 2008 04:54:19 AM |
|
|
"Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" <alwhipp@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:c5734637-4a6d-4156-be27-c07c5610b77e@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 11, 1:56 pm, Apostate <godless.bast...@yeehaw.org.invalid>
wrote:
This is a much better picture, considering the fact that it shows the
true
image of the Creator.
I'll print it, post it on my bedroom wall and pray to it every day!
Thanks for your valuable contribution!
Blasphemers!
That's the Flying Spaghetti with Crabs Monster!
Nothing at all like the true Flying Spaghetti Monster Marinara.
Bloody heathens.
Marinara? Pffttt... You guys have missed the core tenants of the
faith totally! You might as well be pagans. Or evil atheists.
And PS; that's the low res version, go to veganza and chase it down
for the higher res version if you're going to print it.
Al
I recant all my sins, and I'll drink ten Bloody Mary's to wash them down.
With clam juice and horseradish, just like the Messiah would have it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
10 Jan 2008 10:15:13 PM |
|
|
"Al" <alwhipp@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b4c90883-7e07-4887-ba00-444ae3b16a00@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 7, 6:59 pm, "Diagoras" <1...@1.1> wrote:
I know this sounds strange, but has anyone looked at the <Creation of
Adam>
painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo? He had a
tiny
*****! I'm having a lot of trouble accepting that this whole world's
population came from there! Eve must have been a very frustrated,
hysterical
woman. No wonder she had an affair with a
snake!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
Theists looking at that picture wouldn't see anything wrong with it, of
course, that's why they believe it!
Well clearly Michelangelo had already worked out some basic
evolutionary theory, and based on humans have larger penises than
other apes, has construed that Adam must have had a smaller todger
too.
It's obvious!
I also note he's not standing, being pre-bipedal.
PS: I couldn't remember which painting this was until I followed the
link, so it was a bit of a shock to find it's a rip-off of one of the
great works of the only true religion.
http://www.venganza.org/images/wallpapers/noodledoodle1024_768.jpg
Al
Wow! The Flying Spaghetti Monster is female!
Look at those two hooters on her! And, there
is a definite lack of lower package. (Let the
death threats begin.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Diagoras" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
10 Jan 2008 11:17:16 PM |
|
|
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:e76dncnggYrZcBvanZ2dnUVZ_ualnZ2d@comcast.com...
"Al" <alwhipp@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b4c90883-7e07-4887-ba00-444ae3b16a00@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 7, 6:59 pm, "Diagoras" <1...@1.1> wrote:
I know this sounds strange, but has anyone looked at the <Creation of
Adam>
painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo? He had a
tiny
*****! I'm having a lot of trouble accepting that this whole world's
population came from there! Eve must have been a very frustrated,
hysterical
woman. No wonder she had an affair with a
snake!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Creation_of_Adam
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that, judging from my own size.
Theists looking at that picture wouldn't see anything wrong with it, of
course, that's why they believe it!
Well clearly Michelangelo had already worked out some basic
evolutionary theory, and based on humans have larger penises than
other apes, has construed that Adam must have had a smaller todger
too.
It's obvious!
I also note he's not standing, being pre-bipedal.
PS: I couldn't remember which painting this was until I followed the
link, so it was a bit of a shock to find it's a rip-off of one of the
great works of the only true religion.
http://www.venganza.org/images/wallpapers/noodledoodle1024_768.jpg
Al
Wow! The Flying Spaghetti Monster is female!
Look at those two hooters on her! And, there
is a definite lack of lower package. (Let the
death threats begin.)
He may have hooters, but the two meatballs are definitely a male trait. As
far as the rest of the lower package, I'd say He has plenty of decent-sized
noodles, enough to keep a harem of angels happy.
I can't say that about Adam, he'd leave a ten year old altar boy craving for
more.
Oops, I don't think Adam was catholic, never mind that last comment!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
07 Jan 2008 01:32:04 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****"; which was
at one time a fairly common man's first or given name.
So far as it is known to religion OR science, humans do not descend from
apes. Humans are said to be more closely related to chimpanzee but not
descended from them, either; rather having forked from a no-longer
existing common ancestor to all primates.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
09 Jan 2008 06:20:05 PM |
|
|
"Michael" <newsuser2@orneveien.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.01.07.19.32.04.229001@orneveien.org...
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****";
It refers to *your* head but another part of the anatomy in male mammals.
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
09 Jan 2008 06:26:03 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:20:05 GMT, "Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com>
wrote:
"Michael" <newsuser2@orneveien.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.01.07.19.32.04.229001@orneveien.org...
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****";
It refers to *your* head but another part of the anatomy in male mammals.
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
Jenny: Hey, Johnny, what's a penis?
Johnny: Duuno, I'll ask my Dad.
<next day>
Jenny: Hey, Johnny, did you ask your Dad?
Johnny: Yes.
<unzips himself and pulls it out?
Johnny: See that? It's called a *****. A penis is like it but smaller.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
09 Jan 2008 09:58:18 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:20:05 GMT, "Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com> wrote:
"Michael" <newsuser2@orneveien.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.01.07.19.32.04.229001@orneveien.org...
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****";
It refers to *your* head but another part of the anatomy in male mammals.
Wouldn't you expect that someone who came to the atheist thugs' backyard to find street-savvy
conversants about Life, the Universe, and Everything would be prepared to drop the Ned Flanders
church-lady rules of French or Latin only, no Anglo-Saxon body terms allowed?
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
--
Apostate a.a. #1931
..sig currently undergoing maintenance
.
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
10 Jan 2008 07:11:00 PM |
|
|
"Apostate" <godless.*****@yeehaw.org.invalid> wrote in message
news:el5bo3luk40ps0chsmh42986qjm4r1pfef@4ax.com...
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:20:05 GMT, "Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com> wrote:
"Michael" <newsuser2@orneveien.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.01.07.19.32.04.229001@orneveien.org...
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****";
It refers to *your* head but another part of the anatomy in male mammals.
Wouldn't you expect that someone who came to the atheist thugs' backyard
to find street-savvy
conversants about Life, the Universe, and Everything would be prepared to
drop the Ned Flanders
church-lady rules of French or Latin only, no Anglo-Saxon body terms
allowed?
It's one of the effects of the religion mind virus.
They can read into bible passages whatever suits them, they can use any
English word however it suits them (A La Humpty Dumpty) but using a
colloquialism is a complete no-no. Born again, but never grew up!
Smiler,
The godless one
a.a.# 2279
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Diagoras" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
08 Jan 2008 05:03:43 PM |
|
|
"Michael" <newsuser2@orneveien.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.01.07.19.32.04.229001@orneveien.org...
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****"; which was
at one time a fairly common man's first or given name.
So far as it is known to religion OR science, humans do not descend from
apes. Humans are said to be more closely related to chimpanzee but not
descended from them, either; rather having forked from a no-longer
existing common ancestor to all primates.
Here's a little research I did for you, it took me less time than it took
you to type that nonsense:
<Apes are the members of the Hominoidea superfamily of primates, which
includes humans. >
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apes#Behaviour_and_cognition
<This is a list of apes of encyclopedic interest. It includes individual
non-human apes (chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans and gibbons) who are in
some way famous or notable.>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_apes
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Diagoras" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
07 Jan 2008 07:53:14 PM |
|
|
"Michael" <newsuser2@orneveien.org> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.01.07.19.32.04.229001@orneveien.org...
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****"; which was
at one time a fairly common man's first or given name.
You seem to be the only one unfamiliar with it. When you grow one, you'll
know what it is.
So far as it is known to religion OR science, humans do not descend from
apes. Humans are said to be more closely related to chimpanzee but not
descended from them, either; rather having forked from a no-longer
existing common ancestor to all primates.
Nothing is KNOWN to religion, it is all belief! However, science KNOWS that
I come from a primate with a big *****. Maybe that term more closely
resembles what you're used to.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
08 Jan 2008 07:22:41 AM |
|
|
Michael wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a
much bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****"; which
was at one time a fairly common man's first or given name.
So far as it is known to religion OR science, humans do not descend
from apes. Humans are said to be more closely related to chimpanzee
but not descended from them, either; rather having forked from a
no-longer existing common ancestor to all primates.
Seeing as we are apes, chimpanzees are apes and even more distantly related
gorillas, orangs, and gibbons are all apes, then IMHO the common ancestor
would probably be considered an ape as well, though no longer extant.
Lesser and great apes split ~8 mya while gorillas split from our line ~7 mya
and chimps ~4 mya.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lisbeth Andersson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
09 Jan 2008 10:25:11 PM |
|
|
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:tKqdnUSaHem55B7anZ2dnUVZ_t-3nZ2d@giganews.com:
Michael wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape
with a much bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****";
which was at one time a fairly common man's first or given name.
So far as it is known to religion OR science, humans do not
descend from apes. Humans are said to be more closely related
to chimpanzee but not descended from them, either; rather having
forked from a no-longer existing common ancestor to all
primates.
Seeing as we are apes, chimpanzees are apes and even more
distantly related gorillas, orangs, and gibbons are all apes,
then IMHO the common ancestor would probably be considered an ape
as well, though no longer extant.
Lesser and great apes split ~8 mya while gorillas split from our
line ~7 mya and chimps ~4 mya.
Where did you get those numbers? They seem a bit low, The numbers I
recall are orangs split about 20 mya and chimps 7 - 10 mya. (Gorillas
somewhere in between.)
Lisbeth.
----
The day I don't learn anything new is the day I die.
*What we know is not nearly as interesting as *how we know it.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
10 Jan 2008 05:45:15 AM |
|
|
Lisbeth Andersson wrote:
"Geoff" <gebobs@yahoo.nospam.com> wrote in
news:tKqdnUSaHem55B7anZ2dnUVZ_t-3nZ2d@giganews.com:
Michael wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape
with a much bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****";
which was at one time a fairly common man's first or given name.
So far as it is known to religion OR science, humans do not
descend from apes. Humans are said to be more closely related
to chimpanzee but not descended from them, either; rather having
forked from a no-longer existing common ancestor to all
primates.
Seeing as we are apes, chimpanzees are apes and even more
distantly related gorillas, orangs, and gibbons are all apes,
then IMHO the common ancestor would probably be considered an ape
as well, though no longer extant.
Lesser and great apes split ~8 mya while gorillas split from our
line ~7 mya and chimps ~4 mya.
Where did you get those numbers? They seem a bit low, The numbers I
recall are orangs split about 20 mya and chimps 7 - 10 mya. (Gorillas
somewhere in between.)
Typo...s/b 18 mya not 8 mya.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
11 Jan 2008 06:24:39 AM |
|
|
On 7 jan, 20:32, Michael <newsus...@orneveien.org> wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****"; which was
at one time a fairly common man's first or given name.
So far as it is known to religion OR science, humans do not descend from
apes. =A0Humans are said to be more closely related to chimpanzee but not
descended from them, either; rather having forked from a no-longer
existing common ancestor to all primates.
Sorry but the common ancestor of humans and chimpansees would already
be a primate and therefore an "ape". Humans do not descent from any
"ape" that still exists, but logically we do not only descent from
apes, we ARE bald apes walking on two legs and with a greater ability
to talk than any other ape.
Hopefully we will evolve into a species that can also listen better.
Peter van Velzen
January 2008
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
PS
You are unfamiliary with your *****?
Poor man!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
11 Jan 2008 11:51:41 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:24:39 -0800 (PST), "pbamvv@worldonline.nl" <pbamvv@worldonline.nl>
wrote:
On 7 jan, 20:32, Michael <newsus...@orneveien.org> wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****"; which was
at one time a fairly common man's first or given name.
So far as it is known to religion OR science, humans do not descend from
apes. Humans are said to be more closely related to chimpanzee but not
descended from them, either; rather having forked from a no-longer
existing common ancestor to all primates.
Sorry but the common ancestor of humans and chimpansees would already
be a primate and therefore an "ape". Humans do not descent from any
"ape" that still exists, but logically we do not only descent from
apes, we ARE bald apes walking on two legs and with a greater ability
to talk than any other ape.
Hopefully we will evolve into a species that can also listen better.
Peter van Velzen
January 2008
Amstelveen
The Netherlands
PS
You are unfamiliary with your *****?
Poor man!
It's probably all for the best.
--
Apostate a.a. #1931
..sig currently undergoing maintenance
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "SkyEyes" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
07 Jan 2008 04:58:58 PM |
|
|
On Jan 7, 12:32=A0pm, Michael <newsus...@orneveien.org> wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:59:56 -0800, Diagoras wrote:
I am inclined to believe that I am the descendant of an ape with a much
bigger ***** than that
I am unfamiliar with any part of human anatomy called "*****"; which was
at one time a fairly common man's first or given name.
So far as it is known to religion OR science, humans do not descend from
apes. =A0Humans are said to be more closely related to chimpanzee but not
descended from them, either; rather having forked from a no-longer
existing common ancestor to all primates.
You are incorrect, as usual. Science is *quite* clear on the fact
that humans *are* apes. We are not descended from chimps, but we have
a close common ancestor. Not only do we share an extremely large
amount of ape (and particularly chimp) DNA, but there are traces of a
virus that attacks only apes in both our DNA and chimp DNA, proving
that we came from a common ancestor.
You know, a *little* actual science education wouldn't hurt your one
little bit. Why don't you try cracking a science book, or reading a
science blog in your copious free time, instead of posting to
alt.atheism where you're not wanted and where you continually prove
what a pathetic prat you are?
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: The Creation of Adam |
07 Jan 2008 09:04:50 PM |
|
|
One fine day in alt.atheism, SkyEyes <skyeyes9@cox.net> bloodied us up with
this:
You know, a *little* actual science education wouldn't hurt your one
little bit.
Now *that's* a Freudian typo. :-)
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Convicted by Earthquack.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
