| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Peter Sima" |
| Date: |
28 May 2004 05:43:49 PM |
| Object: |
The Dating of Mark |
Can someone explain in detail the wide consensus that Mark was written
sometime between A.D. 68-73? As far as I can tell, these are the main
arguments for:
1. Allusions to the Jewish war, and consequent destruction of the
Temple are made (and weren't necessarily made in detail, since
knowledge of the destruction of the Temple wasn't generally known
outside of Palestine)
2. It would take at least that long for such a developed Greek
tradition to come into existence
3. Papias' comments would seem to indicate that it was written shortly
before or after Peter's death
4. The use of kuliein (to roll), suggesting a circular or cylindrical
tombstone like those common after the Jewish War
And the arguments against:
1. The allusions made to the destruction of the Temple might actually
be true prophecy, or might have been an informed prediction (i.e., it
was realized beforehand that the Jews and Romans were heading
inevitably towards a conflict, c.f. Joseph Smith's Civil War
predictions)
2. Mark contains no specific, detailed accounts of the Jewish War.
Even if Mark had been written outside of Palestine, a Christian Jew
(if Mark was one) would probably have some knowledge of the
destruction of the Temple
Am I missing anything? Why are the arguments against considered
unconvincing?
.
|
|
| User: "Clayton of Sunnybrook Farm" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
28 May 2004 06:54:50 PM |
|
|
"Peter Sima" <ni_hao_maomi@hellokitty.com> wrote in message
news:3bd67b92.0405281443.502943df@posting.google.com...
Can someone explain in detail the wide consensus that Mark was written
sometime between A.D. 68-73? As far as I can tell, these are the main
arguments for:
<snip>
For a minute I thought you were going to say you were going out with Bilbo.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "pan" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
28 May 2004 10:12:18 PM |
|
|
On 28 May 2004 15:43:49 -0700, (Peter
Sima) wrote:
Can someone explain in detail the wide consensus that Mark was written
sometime between A.D. 68-73? As far as I can tell, these are the main
arguments for:
1. Allusions to the Jewish war, and consequent destruction of the
Temple are made (and weren't necessarily made in detail, since
knowledge of the destruction of the Temple wasn't generally known
outside of Palestine)
2. It would take at least that long for such a developed Greek
tradition to come into existence
3. Papias' comments would seem to indicate that it was written shortly
before or after Peter's death
4. The use of kuliein (to roll), suggesting a circular or cylindrical
tombstone like those common after the Jewish War
And the arguments against:
1. The allusions made to the destruction of the Temple might actually
be true prophecy,
Objectively, does this seem likely?
Why not assume all the supernatural activities described in Hindu and
Buddhist texts actually happened?
(Why should scholars treat Christian writings differently than other
religious text?)
(Hint: Do the other Gospels show signs that the writers were
'stretching the truth' to make it look like Jesus was fulfilling
prophesies? Was that type of thing a common practice back then?)
or might have been an informed prediction (i.e., it
was realized beforehand that the Jews and Romans were heading
inevitably towards a conflict, c.f. Joseph Smith's Civil War
predictions)
So you're saying that 'Jesus' (?) not only predicted that "the Jews
and Romans were heading inevitably towards a conflict" but that he
*specifically* made the pessimistic prediction that the temple would
be destroyed?
This type of specific prediction is possible, but is it very likely?
Also,
Was Jesus in the habit of making *predictions*, and stating them as
fact?
2. Mark contains no specific, detailed accounts of the Jewish War.
Even if Mark had been written outside of Palestine, a Christian Jew
(if Mark was one) would probably have some knowledge of the
destruction of the Temple
Claiming too much detail to a prophecy might raise suspicion
(Suspicion that the story of the prophecy is an exaggeration, or a
lie).
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Also,
If this gospel was written for those who were already believers then
how much detail to the 'prophecy' was *necessary* to convince them it
really was a prophecy?
pan
Am I missing anything? Why are the arguments against considered
unconvincing?
.
|
|
|
| User: "pan" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 02:40:38 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 28 May 2004 20:12:18 -0700, pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
(snip)
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
pan
.
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 07:22:48 AM |
|
|
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Schneider" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 11:23:32 AM |
|
|
"Elroy Willis" <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:htvgb0hd38pdol5vvc50r75ol3e069to8s@4ax.com...
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
Yes, a similar theme was made into an episode of "The Simpsons". They saw
visions standing next to Maude's statue which were caused by a leaking
natural gas pipe.
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 09:41:11 PM |
|
|
Robert Schneider wrote in alt.atheism
Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy
were of supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
Yes, a similar theme was made into an episode of "The Simpsons". They
saw visions standing next to Maude's statue which were caused by a
leaking natural gas pipe.
Haven't seen that one yet, but I suspect I will soon enough. I just
got Tivo and subscribed to a season pass of the Simpsons. I'm gonna
make a DVD of all of the slams at religion that occur on the show, and
pass it around.
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Schneider" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
30 May 2004 01:40:19 AM |
|
|
"Elroy Willis" <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:91iib0t39j65id20uvae0d493ejv09uj55@4ax.com...
Robert Schneider wrote in alt.atheism
Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy
were of supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
Yes, a similar theme was made into an episode of "The Simpsons". They
saw visions standing next to Maude's statue which were caused by a
leaking natural gas pipe.
Haven't seen that one yet, but I suspect I will soon enough. I just
got Tivo and subscribed to a season pass of the Simpsons. I'm gonna
make a DVD of all of the slams at religion that occur on the show, and
pass it around.
This episode:
http://www.snpp.com/episodes/CABF15
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 09:11:14 PM |
|
|
In article <htvgb0hd38pdol5vvc50r75ol3e069to8s@4ax.com>, Elroy Willis says...
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
I dunno, but I've been to Delphi and where the oracle was supposed to have given
her predictions (a sort of cave - very cool). Don't recall any gas :)
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew Lias" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
30 May 2004 01:09:10 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 May 2004 02:11:14 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:
I dunno, but I've been to Delphi and where the oracle was supposed to have given
her predictions (a sort of cave - very cool). Don't recall any gas :)
Obviously that's because you were so wonked out on gas that you can't
remember.
Ad hocs, getcher ad hocs here!
--
Andrew Lias
http://andrewlias.blogspot.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "SkArcher" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 09:30:06 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 May 2004 02:11:14 GMT, Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com>
wrote:
In article <htvgb0hd38pdol5vvc50r75ol3e069to8s@4ax.com>, Elroy Willis
says...
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
I dunno, but I've been to Delphi and where the oracle was supposed to
have given
her predictions (a sort of cave - very cool). Don't recall any gas :)
There was an earthquake, indicating the displeasure of the god)s), and the
oracle stopped giving predictions and the temple was abandonned (trans:
the earthquake disturbed the way the gas leaked to the surface and stopped
the hallucinations)
--
SkArcher - A.A#590
Passion is inversely proportional to the amount of real information
available. - Benford's law of controversy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 10:28:52 PM |
|
|
SkArcher <SkArcher@Viking.Breakfast.Spam> wrote in alt.atheism
Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
Elroy Willis says...
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
I dunno, but I've been to Delphi and where the oracle was supposed to
have given her predictions (a sort of cave - very cool). Don't recall any gas :)
There was an earthquake, indicating the displeasure of the god)s), and the
oracle stopped giving predictions and the temple was abandonned (trans:
the earthquake disturbed the way the gas leaked to the surface and stopped
the hallucinations)
Makes perfect sense to me. A nice neat explanation without any
magical "hocus pocus" by some invisible space pixie or because of
the "mysterious whim" of some pretended god.
The same thing happened to the meteorite worshippers who built temples
around certain "fallen rocks from the sky." When an earthquake would
strike in the area, the temples and their pillars would often fall
down and crumble, and it was seen as a bad sign to many people.
Others, though, tried to rebuild the temples, trying to keep them
going after such an earthquake, but quite often they were just
abandoned because people thought it was a bad sign from heaven.
Jerusalem and the surrounding areas are quite prone to earthquakes,
and the history of the area is filled with stories of temples falling
down one after the other, because of earthquakes.
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 09:58:30 PM |
|
|
Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in alt.atheism
Elroy Willis says...
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
I dunno, but I've been to Delphi and where the oracle was supposed to
have given her predictions (a sort of cave - very cool). Don't recall any
gas :)
On the same show I watched, it talked about the gas companies
adding some chemical or other gas to natural gas so people could
actually smell it when there was a leak. Interestingly, the odor they
added seems to be detectable by turkey buzzards way up in the sky,
and when the gas company people look for gas leaks, they look for
buzzards circling overhead of some area, at least if the gas leak is
suspected to be somewhere where turkey vultures fly around.
If it isn't an actual dead carcass they circle over, it quite often
turns out to be a break in the gas pipeline, and whatever smell they
added attracts buzzards just like the smell of some dead rotting
animal on the ground or roadway...
Interesting, eh?
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
30 May 2004 06:45:47 AM |
|
|
In article <4fiib0tqbg765laadi27fkm1qt4eg8li1c@4ax.com>, Elroy Willis says...
Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in alt.atheism
Elroy Willis says...
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
I dunno, but I've been to Delphi and where the oracle was supposed to
have given her predictions (a sort of cave - very cool). Don't recall any
gas :)
On the same show I watched, it talked about the gas companies
adding some chemical or other gas to natural gas so people could
actually smell it when there was a leak. Interestingly, the odor they
added seems to be detectable by turkey buzzards way up in the sky,
and when the gas company people look for gas leaks, they look for
buzzards circling overhead of some area, at least if the gas leak is
suspected to be somewhere where turkey vultures fly around.
If it isn't an actual dead carcass they circle over, it quite often
turns out to be a break in the gas pipeline, and whatever smell they
added attracts buzzards just like the smell of some dead rotting
animal on the ground or roadway...
Interesting, eh?
Very. Makes me wonder why there were three turkey vultures circling over my car
in the office parking lot the other day though ;/
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
30 May 2004 07:23:22 AM |
|
|
Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in
news:LPjuc.4681$H4.263@www.newsranger.com:
In article <4fiib0tqbg765laadi27fkm1qt4eg8li1c@4ax.com>, Elroy Willis
says...
Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in alt.atheism
Elroy Willis says...
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy
were of supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily
accept the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea
before?
I dunno, but I've been to Delphi and where the oracle was supposed
to have given her predictions (a sort of cave - very cool). Don't
recall any gas :)
On the same show I watched, it talked about the gas companies
adding some chemical or other gas to natural gas so people could
actually smell it when there was a leak. Interestingly, the odor they
added seems to be detectable by turkey buzzards way up in the sky,
and when the gas company people look for gas leaks, they look for
buzzards circling overhead of some area, at least if the gas leak is
suspected to be somewhere where turkey vultures fly around.
If it isn't an actual dead carcass they circle over, it quite often
turns out to be a break in the gas pipeline, and whatever smell they
added attracts buzzards just like the smell of some dead rotting
animal on the ground or roadway...
Interesting, eh?
Very. Makes me wonder why there were three turkey vultures circling
over my car in the office parking lot the other day though ;/
That was the running shoes in the trunk. :-)
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
30 May 2004 07:42:45 AM |
|
|
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in alt.atheism
Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in
Elroy Willis says...
On the same show I watched, it talked about the gas companies
adding some chemical or other gas to natural gas so people could
actually smell it when there was a leak. Interestingly, the odor they
added seems to be detectable by turkey buzzards way up in the sky,
and when the gas company people look for gas leaks, they look for
buzzards circling overhead of some area, at least if the gas leak is
suspected to be somewhere where turkey vultures fly around.
If it isn't an actual dead carcass they circle over, it quite often
turns out to be a break in the gas pipeline, and whatever smell they
added attracts buzzards just like the smell of some dead rotting
animal on the ground or roadway...
Interesting, eh?
Very. Makes me wonder why there were three turkey vultures circling
over my car in the office parking lot the other day though ;/
That was the running shoes in the trunk. :-)
Robyn was dead tired after jogging and the buzzards knew it. :)
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew Lias" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
30 May 2004 01:10:34 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 May 2004 02:58:30 GMT, Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net>
wrote:
[...]
On the same show I watched, it talked about the gas companies
adding some chemical or other gas to natural gas so people could
actually smell it when there was a leak. Interestingly, the odor they
added seems to be detectable by turkey buzzards way up in the sky,
and when the gas company people look for gas leaks, they look for
buzzards circling overhead of some area, at least if the gas leak is
suspected to be somewhere where turkey vultures fly around.
If it isn't an actual dead carcass they circle over, it quite often
turns out to be a break in the gas pipeline, and whatever smell they
added attracts buzzards just like the smell of some dead rotting
animal on the ground or roadway...
[...]
That must be a job with a lot of nauseating disappointments.
--
Andrew Lias
http://andrewlias.blogspot.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
31 May 2004 06:06:09 AM |
|
|
Andrew Lias <anrwlias@gmail.com.spamkill> wrote in alt.atheism
Eroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote:
[...]
On the same show I watched, it talked about the gas companies
adding some chemical or other gas to natural gas so people could
actually smell it when there was a leak. Interestingly, the odor they
added seems to be detectable by turkey buzzards way up in the sky,
and when the gas company people look for gas leaks, they look for
buzzards circling overhead of some area, at least if the gas leak is
suspected to be somewhere where turkey vultures fly around.
If it isn't an actual dead carcass they circle over, it quite often
turns out to be a break in the gas pipeline, and whatever smell they
added attracts buzzards just like the smell of some dead rotting
animal on the ground or roadway...
[...]
That must be a job with a lot of nauseating disappointments.
"Another road kill, dang it... And it's ripe, really ripe..."
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "pan" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 07:58:05 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 May 2004 12:22:48 GMT, Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net>
wrote:
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
See:
http://www.nature.com/nsu/010719/010719-10.html
From article:
Ethylene, a sweet-smelling gas, stimulates the central nervous system
- it was once used as an anaesthetic. Although fatal in large
quantities, small doses produce a floating sensation and euphoria. In
other words, just what an oracle needs to start having visions.
pan
.
|
|
|
| User: "John M Price PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 11:46:39 AM |
|
|
In alt.atheism article <8v1hb0loc3r3pgkvuhde87hqa8f21dbhlb@4ax.com> pan <pan@psnwremv.com> wrote:
: On Sat, 29 May 2004 12:22:48 GMT, Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net>
: wrote:
: >pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
: >
: >> pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
: >
: >>> As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
: >>> notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
: >>> supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
: >
: >> Opps!
: >> That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
: >> the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
: >
: >I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
: >and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
: >in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
: >some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
: >of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
: See:
: http://www.nature.com/nsu/010719/010719-10.html
: From article:
: Ethylene, a sweet-smelling gas, stimulates the central nervous system
: - it was once used as an anaesthetic. Although fatal in large
: quantities, small doses produce a floating sensation and euphoria. In
: other words, just what an oracle needs to start having visions.
Another excellent two carbon molecule!
Interesting little fact: Needs monospaced font.
Ethylene is a two carbon organic gas, CH3 - CH3
H H
| |
H- C -- C -H
| |
H H
Ethanol, aka drinking alcohol, is the respective two carbon alcohol:
CH3CH2OH
H H
| |
H- C -- C - OH
| |
H H
Ether, actually Diethyl ether, is the famous anesthetic, again based on
the two carbon ethylene:
CH3CH2OCH2CH3
H H H H
| | | |
H- C -- C - O - C -- C -H
| | | |
H H H H
Nice effect, too, having in my youth been to a couple of 'lab parties'.
Like a 'clean' drunk, as it were.
However we can only get so lucky. Heavier than air, it can pile up on a
lab counter, and it burns with an invisible flame. Watch the bunsons. It
can also, after being around for a while, form a peroxide which is plainly
expolsive:
CH3CH2OOCH2CH3
H H H H
| | | |
H- C -- C - O - O -C -- C -H
| | | |
H H H H
For these last two reasons, when it was the only anesthetic, hospitals
built the operating rooms on the top floor to minimize damage from the
expected explosions.
(c) 2004. Copyright, John M. Price, PhD. All Rights Reserved.
Contents may not be republished in any form or medium without prior
written consent of the author with the express and only exception of
followup postings limited to and within usenet.
--
John M. Price, PhD
Life: Chemistry, but with feeling! | PGP Key on request or FTP!
Email responses to my Usenet articles will be posted at my discretion.
Comoderator: sci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated Atheist# 683
Honest folk do not wear masks when they enter a bank.
- Unspiek, Baron Bodissey
.
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 09:33:36 PM |
|
|
John M Price PhD <jmprice@calweb.com> wrote in alt.atheism
In alt.atheism pan <pan@psnwremv.com> wrote:
: Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote:
: > pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
: >> pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
: >>> As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
: >>> notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
: >>> supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
: >> Opps!
: >> That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
: >> the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
: > I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
: > and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
: > in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
: > some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
: > of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
: See:
: http://www.nature.com/nsu/010719/010719-10.html
: From article:
: Ethylene, a sweet-smelling gas, stimulates the central nervous system
: - it was once used as an anaesthetic. Although fatal in large
: quantities, small doses produce a floating sensation and euphoria. In
: other words, just what an oracle needs to start having visions.
Another excellent two carbon molecule!
Interesting little fact: Needs monospaced font.
Ethylene is a two carbon organic gas, CH3 - CH3
H H
| |
H- C -- C -H
| |
H H
Ethanol, aka drinking alcohol, is the respective two carbon alcohol:
CH3CH2OH
<snip>
For these last two reasons, when it was the only anesthetic, hospitals
built the operating rooms on the top floor to minimize damage from the
expected explosions.
Does all that actually support the idea that the delphi oracle worship
is related to ethylene gas coming up from the rocks at the temple?
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
| User: "John M Price PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
30 May 2004 08:37:43 AM |
|
|
In alt.atheism article <tmhib0th5vo9jjhd1h73p6lth9a8utqre7@4ax.com> Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote:
: John M Price PhD <> wrote in alt.atheism
: > In alt.atheism pan <pan@psnwremv.com> wrote:
: >: Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote:
: >: > pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
: >: >> pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
: >: >>> As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
: >: >>> notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
: >: >>> supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
: >: >> Opps!
: >: >> That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
: >: >> the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
: >: > I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
: >: > and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
: >: > in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
: >: > some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
: >: > of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
: >: See:
: >: http://www.nature.com/nsu/010719/010719-10.html
: >: From article:
: >: Ethylene, a sweet-smelling gas, stimulates the central nervous system
: >: - it was once used as an anaesthetic. Although fatal in large
: >: quantities, small doses produce a floating sensation and euphoria. In
: >: other words, just what an oracle needs to start having visions.
: > Another excellent two carbon molecule!
: > Interesting little fact: Needs monospaced font.
: > Ethylene is a two carbon organic gas, CH3 - CH3
: > H H
: > | |
: > H- C -- C -H
: > | |
: > H H
: > Ethanol, aka drinking alcohol, is the respective two carbon alcohol:
: > CH3CH2OH
: <snip>
: > For these last two reasons, when it was the only anesthetic, hospitals
: > built the operating rooms on the top floor to minimize damage from the
: > expected explosions.
: Does all that actually support the idea that the delphi oracle worship
: is related to ethylene gas coming up from the rocks at the temple?
Insofar as most of the two carbon chains are apparently very intoxicating
to humans, yes it can lend support. They also have a truly toxic dose
that is considerably higher than that which causes these effects, so those
folk would have survived, but as with ether anesthesia and high alcohol
consumption would not reliably remember the events.
(c) 2004. Copyright, John M. Price, PhD. All Rights Reserved.
Contents may not be republished in any form or medium without prior
written consent of the author with the express and only exception of
followup postings limited to and within usenet.
--
John M. Price, PhD
Life: Chemistry, but with feeling! | PGP Key on request or FTP!
Email responses to my Usenet articles will be posted at my discretion.
Comoderator: sci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated Atheist# 683
Now of course psychoanalysts will assert that, in the course of their
analyses, they have confirmed over and over again the existence of
unconscious phantasies of the kind postulated by Freud. The problem is,
however, that there is no consistency among psychoanalysts on the question
of the content of these phantasies! The findings of, for instance,
orthodox Freudians, Kleinians and followers of Kohut are widely disparate
- though they are fortunate that these different findings almost
invariably confirm their own respective theories. And there are no
criteria by which the conflicting claims can be judged. Robert Fliess (see
my Addendum) asserted that other analysts did not arrive at his clinical
findings because of their own resistances. By what criteria can this
assertion be judged inadmissible and Fliess's clinical claims be
disregarded? The proliferation of differing accounts of the contents of
the Unconscious is clear evidence that the psychoanalytic technique for
determining the unconscious ideas of patients is fundamentally unsound.
- Allen Esterson
http://human-nature.com/esterson/esterson2.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ed. Stoebenau" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
30 May 2004 09:15:27 PM |
|
|
On 29 May 2004 16:46:39 GMT, John M Price PhD
<jmprice@calweb.com> wrote:
Interesting little fact: Needs monospaced font.
Ethylene is a two carbon organic gas, CH3 - CH3
H H
| |
H- C -- C -H
| |
H H
Minor correction, ethylene is C2H2, as below. C2H6 as above is
ethane.
H H
\ /
C==C
/ \
H H
However we can only get so lucky. Heavier than air, it can pile up on a
lab counter, and it burns with an invisible flame. Watch the bunsons. It
can also, after being around for a while, form a peroxide which is plainly
expolsive:
CH3CH2OOCH2CH3
H H H H
| | | |
H- C -- C - O - O -C -- C -H
| | | |
H H H H
My understanding is that the peroxide formed is H5C2-O-CH(OOH)CH3
rather than above.
H H H H
| | | |
H- C -- C - O -C -- C -H
| | | |
H H OOH H
--
Ed. Stoebenau
a #143
.
|
|
|
| User: "John M Price PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
30 May 2004 11:13:14 PM |
|
|
In alt.atheism article <003lb0hdslf0vei3fjj2mpakqfthdvje9v@4ax.com> Ed. Stoebenau <rot13-rwfgbror@zvqjnl.hpuvpntb.rqh> wrote:
: On 29 May 2004 16:46:39 GMT, John M Price PhD
: <> wrote:
: Minor correction, ethylene is C2H2, as below. C2H6 as above is
: ethane.
ACK! Yes, thanks.
: H H
: \ /
: C==C
: / \
: H H
: >However we can only get so lucky. Heavier than air, it can pile up on a
: >lab counter, and it burns with an invisible flame. Watch the bunsons. It
: >can also, after being around for a while, form a peroxide which is plainly
: >expolsive:
: >CH3CH2OOCH2CH3
: >
: > H H H H
: > | | | |
: >H- C -- C - O - O -C -- C -H
: > | | | |
: > H H H H
: My understanding is that the peroxide formed is H5C2-O-CH(OOH)CH3
: rather than above.
That, below, looks like a carboxylic acid. Peroxides usually have an
R -O-O- R
arrangement, oxygen joined to oxygen, from my memory.
: H H H H
: | | | |
: H- C -- C - O -C -- C -H
: | | | |
: H H OOH H
: --
: Ed. Stoebenau
: a #143
(c) 2004. Copyright, John M. Price, PhD. All Rights Reserved.
Contents may not be republished in any form or medium without prior
written consent of the author with the express and only exception of
followup postings limited to and within usenet.
--
John M. Price, PhD
Life: Chemistry, but with feeling! | PGP Key on request or FTP!
Email responses to my Usenet articles will be posted at my discretion.
Comoderator: sci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated Atheist# 683
We're going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is
necessarily--given the political realities--going to be very modest...
So then we'll have to start working again to strengthen the law, and
then again to strengthen the next law, and maybe again and again.
Right now, though, we'd be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a
slice. Our ultimate goal--total control of handguns in the United
States--is going to take time... The first problem is to slow down the
increasing number of guns being produced and sold in this country. The
second problem is to get handguns registered. And the final problem is
to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition
except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed
sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors totally illegal.
- Pete Shields, Chairman Emeritus, Handgun Control, Inc.,
founded the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence, as
quoted in The New Yorker Magazine 1976
.
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
31 May 2004 01:44:21 PM |
|
|
John M Price PhD <jmprice@calweb.com> wrote in alt.atheism
In alt.atheism article Ed Stoebenau wrote:
: On 29 May 2004 16:46:39 GMT, John M Price PhD
: <jmprice@calweb.com> wrote:
: Minor correction, ethylene is C2H2, as below. C2H6 as above is
: ethane.
ACK! Yes, thanks.
: H H
: \ /
: C==C
: / \
: H H
: > However we can only get so lucky. Heavier than air, it can pile up on a
: > lab counter, and it burns with an invisible flame. Watch the bunsons. It
: > can also, after being around for a while, form a peroxide which is plainly
: > expolsive:
: > CH3CH2OOCH2CH3
: > H H H H
: > | | | |
: >H- C -- C - O - O -C -- C -H
: > | | | |
: > H H H H
: My understanding is that the peroxide formed is H5C2-O-CH(OOH)CH3
: rather than above.
That, below, looks like a carboxylic acid. Peroxides usually have an
R -O-O- R arrangement, oxygen joined to oxygen, from my memory.
: H H H H
: | | | |
: H- C -- C - O -C -- C -H
: | | | |
: H H OOH H
Would those smell different?
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ed. Stoebenau" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
05 Aug 2004 12:06:14 AM |
|
|
On 31 May 2004 04:13:14 GMT, John M Price PhD
<jmprice@calweb.com> wrote:
In alt.atheism article <003lb0hdslf0vei3fjj2mpakqfthdvje9v@4ax.com> Ed. Stoebenau <rot13-rwfgbror@zvqjnl.hpuvpntb.rqh> wrote:
: >However we can only get so lucky. Heavier than air, it can pile up on a
: >lab counter, and it burns with an invisible flame. Watch the bunsons. It
: >can also, after being around for a while, form a peroxide which is plainly
: >expolsive:
: >CH3CH2OOCH2CH3
: >
: > H H H H
: > | | | |
: >H- C -- C - O - O -C -- C -H
: > | | | |
: > H H H H
: My understanding is that the peroxide formed is H5C2-O-CH(OOH)CH3
: rather than above.
That, below, looks like a carboxylic acid. Peroxides usually have an
R -O-O- R
arrangement, oxygen joined to oxygen, from my memory.
: H H H H
: | | | |
: H- C -- C - O -C -- C -H
: | | | |
: H H OOH H
I looked it up in an organic text (finally) to check. Oxidation
of ethers can give both the peroxide you gave and the
hydroperoxide I gave. Neither are fun to have around.
--
Ed. Stoebenau
a #143
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elroy Willis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 09:32:01 AM |
|
|
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote:
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote in alt.atheism
pan <pan@psnwREMV.com> wrote:
As it was, Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept the
notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer that this Temple prophecy were of
supernatural origin (e.g. The Delphi Oracle).
Opps!
That should read: "Mediterranean cultures seemed to readily accept
the notion that 'prophecies' much vaguer **than** this..."
I watched a show about the Oracle of Delphi a couple weeks ago,
and it mentioned that some kind of gas leaking up from the rocks
in the temple was what caused people to think they'd contacted
some oracle when they went in there. I can't remember what kind
of gas it was supposed to be, though. Anyone heard the idea before?
See:
http://www.nature.com/nsu/010719/010719-10.html
From article:
Ethylene, a sweet-smelling gas, stimulates the central nervous system
- it was once used as an anaesthetic. Although fatal in large
quantities, small doses produce a floating sensation and euphoria. In
other words, just what an oracle needs to start having visions.
High as a kite, iow... :)
--
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
29 May 2004 07:03:47 AM |
|
|
On 28 May 2004 15:43:49 -0700, (Peter Sima) wrote:
Can someone explain in detail the wide consensus that Mark was written
sometime between A.D. 68-73? As far as I can tell, these are the main
arguments for:
1. Allusions to the Jewish war, and consequent destruction of the
Temple are made (and weren't necessarily made in detail, since
knowledge of the destruction of the Temple wasn't generally known
outside of Palestine)
2. It would take at least that long for such a developed Greek
tradition to come into existence
3. Papias' comments would seem to indicate that it was written shortly
before or after Peter's death
4. The use of kuliein (to roll), suggesting a circular or cylindrical
tombstone like those common after the Jewish War
And the arguments against:
1. The allusions made to the destruction of the Temple might actually
be true prophecy, or might have been an informed prediction (i.e., it
was realized beforehand that the Jews and Romans were heading
inevitably towards a conflict, c.f. Joseph Smith's Civil War
predictions)
2. Mark contains no specific, detailed accounts of the Jewish War.
Even if Mark had been written outside of Palestine, a Christian Jew
(if Mark was one) would probably have some knowledge of the
destruction of the Temple
Am I missing anything? Why are the arguments against considered
unconvincing?
The references to other historical events is indicative of the experience knowledge of the
author. As it goes now, I suspect an approximate date is all there is to lean on.
duke
*****
John 6
53Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, unless
you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his
blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats my
flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I
will raise him up at the last day.
*****
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
28 May 2004 07:58:06 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 28 May 2004 15:43:49 -0700 in episode
<3bd67b92.0405281443.502943df@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
ni_hao_maomi@hellokitty.com (Peter Sima):
Oh... *that kind of dating.
Never mind. Carry on...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: The Dating of Mark |
28 May 2004 10:12:24 PM |
|
|
"Mark K. Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.05.29.00.58.06.338913@hoo.com-amikchi...
On Fri, 28 May 2004 15:43:49 -0700 in episode
<3bd67b92.0405281443.502943df@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
ni_hao_maomi@hellokitty.com (Peter Sima):
Oh... *that kind of dating.
Never mind. Carry on...
Exactly my thoughts.
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|