| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
17 Dec 2006 09:20:31 PM |
| Object: |
The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
"If a young fellow has an option of having a decent career or joining
the army to
fight in Iraq, you can bet your life that he would not be in Iraq." -
Charles Rangel
.
|
|
| User: "Frank Mayhar" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 12:51:12 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:26:38 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:50:26 -0800, Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:43:34 -0600, Carl Wilson wrote:
On 22 Dec 2006 00:15:39 -0800, "Merovingian" <BellaCasa_321@msn.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
Larry (Scratch) wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:01:16 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Oh, poor pitiful you, being "oppressed" by the mean, nasty liberal.
Hey no problem, I've really come to expect it from you lot over the years!
Of _course_ you do. And you'll be really upset to learn that Santa Claus
isn't real, either.
You're just another pipsqueak who demonizes "liberals"
LOL :) No one needs to demonize the left. They are very capable of doing
that all on their own.
Capable of doing so?....The things that Liberals are willing to admit
advocacy to in public, makes me truly terrified to imagine the things
they advocate secretly.
For a bunch of "tough" conservatives, you sure get terrified very
easily...
Freedom scares the ***** out of them. Literally. They would much rather
be led by the nose and fed comforting lies. Probably the most effective
liberal tactic would be to feed them exactly what they want to hear and
then go do what we damned well please; it has certainly worked for the
Republicans lately. Republicans have been filling these peoples ears with
***** while stealing them blind at the same time. And they just come
back begging for more.
Fortunately, most liberals have more self-respect than that.
I used to consider myself a conservative not so long ago. But after
hearing so many of them talk the talk but never walked the walk I
realized they were full of crap and became completely disgusted with
the lot.
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism. I never gave
a dime to the ACLU until those idiots starting fucking things up. I
thought it was a conservative value for the government not to spend more
than it takes in (remember all the hysteria about "balancing the budget"
back in the Gingrich days?), but Dubya and his crew have spent us into a
hole that we may never dig ourselves out of. And let's not even start on
the whole "religion in government" *****.
And then there's Iraq.
I know lots of former Republicans, these days. The party just got up and
walked away from them. Highjacked with the help of idiots like "Sam,"
there, among many others.
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 02:03:47 AM |
|
|
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:26:38 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:50:26 -0800, Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:43:34 -0600, Carl Wilson wrote:
On 22 Dec 2006 00:15:39 -0800, "Merovingian" <BellaCasa_321@msn.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
Larry (Scratch) wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:01:16 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Oh, poor pitiful you, being "oppressed" by the mean, nasty liberal.
Hey no problem, I've really come to expect it from you lot over the years!
Of _course_ you do. And you'll be really upset to learn that Santa Claus
isn't real, either.
You're just another pipsqueak who demonizes "liberals"
LOL :) No one needs to demonize the left. They are very capable of doing
that all on their own.
Capable of doing so?....The things that Liberals are willing to admit
advocacy to in public, makes me truly terrified to imagine the things
they advocate secretly.
For a bunch of "tough" conservatives, you sure get terrified very
easily...
Freedom scares the ***** out of them. Literally. They would much rather
be led by the nose and fed comforting lies. Probably the most effective
liberal tactic would be to feed them exactly what they want to hear and
then go do what we damned well please; it has certainly worked for the
Republicans lately. Republicans have been filling these peoples ears with
***** while stealing them blind at the same time. And they just come
back begging for more.
Fortunately, most liberals have more self-respect than that.
I used to consider myself a conservative not so long ago. But after
hearing so many of them talk the talk but never walked the walk I
realized they were full of crap and became completely disgusted with
the lot.
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 01:33:04 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:26:38 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:50:26 -0800, Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:43:34 -0600, Carl Wilson wrote:
On 22 Dec 2006 00:15:39 -0800, "Merovingian" <BellaCasa_321@msn.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
Larry (Scratch) wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:01:16 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Oh, poor pitiful you, being "oppressed" by the mean, nasty liberal.
Hey no problem, I've really come to expect it from you lot over the years!
Of _course_ you do. And you'll be really upset to learn that Santa Claus
isn't real, either.
You're just another pipsqueak who demonizes "liberals"
LOL :) No one needs to demonize the left. They are very capable of doing
that all on their own.
Capable of doing so?....The things that Liberals are willing to admit
advocacy to in public, makes me truly terrified to imagine the things
they advocate secretly.
For a bunch of "tough" conservatives, you sure get terrified very
easily...
Freedom scares the ***** out of them. Literally. They would much rather
be led by the nose and fed comforting lies. Probably the most effective
liberal tactic would be to feed them exactly what they want to hear and
then go do what we damned well please; it has certainly worked for the
Republicans lately. Republicans have been filling these peoples ears with
***** while stealing them blind at the same time. And they just come
back begging for more.
Fortunately, most liberals have more self-respect than that.
I used to consider myself a conservative not so long ago. But after
hearing so many of them talk the talk but never walked the walk I
realized they were full of crap and became completely disgusted with
the lot.
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Mayhar" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 02:10:11 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:33:04 +0000, Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what "*plonk*"
means.
Don't forget, though, that the only "fascist" he understands is spelled
"islamofascist" and is something of which to be utterly terrified.
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 03:00:15 PM |
|
|
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:33:04 +0000, Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what "*plonk*"
means.
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis me with
the other netkooks in here.
Cowardice defined.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 03:25:51 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what "*plonk*"
means.
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis me with
the other netkooks in here.
Fascists hate liberalism. You hate liberalism.
Fascists love strong militaries. You love strong militaries.
Fascists hate freedom. You hate freedom.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 03:32:28 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what "*plonk*"
means.
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis me with
the other netkooks in here.
Fascists hate liberalism.
Nah, they love it.
You hate liberalism.
Mostly.
Fascists love strong militaries.
So?
You love strong militaries.
Beats weak ones.
Fascists hate freedom.
So do liberals.
You hate freedom.
Wrong again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 04:39:29 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what "*plonk*"
means.
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis me with
the other netkooks in here.
Fascists hate liberalism.
Nah, they love it.
Now you're reduced to stupid lying.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 04:54:41 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what "*plonk*"
means.
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis me with
the other netkooks in here.
Fascists hate liberalism.
Nah, they love it.
Now you're reduced to stupid lying.
No, that's your province.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 06:10:14 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social
liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal
liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what
"*plonk*"
means.
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis me
with the other netkooks in here.
Fascists hate liberalism.
Nah, they love it.
Now you're reduced to stupid lying.
No, that's your province.
No, it's yours.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 08:19:54 PM |
|
|
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
Sam Brown wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social
liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal
liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what
"*plonk*"
means.
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis me
with the other netkooks in here.
Fascists hate liberalism.
Nah, they love it.
Now you're reduced to stupid lying.
No, that's your province.
No, it's yours.
Bucky - STFU!@
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 11:17:39 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
Sam Brown wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social
liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal
liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what
"*plonk*"
means.
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis me
with the other netkooks in here.
Fascists hate liberalism.
Nah, they love it.
Now you're reduced to stupid lying.
No, that's your province.
No, it's yours.
Bucky - STFU!@
Trying to prove to everybody how you hate free speech, fascist?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 11:23:29 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
Sam Brown wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social
liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal
liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what
"*plonk*"
means.
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis me
with the other netkooks in here.
Fascists hate liberalism.
Nah, they love it.
Now you're reduced to stupid lying.
No, that's your province.
No, it's yours.
Bucky - STFU!@
Trying to prove to everybody
No, just blowing the carbon out of a known racist troll.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 11:40:40 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
Sam Brown wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social
liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal
liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what
"*plonk*"
means.
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis me
with the other netkooks in here.
Fascists hate liberalism.
Nah, they love it.
Now you're reduced to stupid lying.
No, that's your province.
No, it's yours.
Bucky - STFU!@
Trying to prove to everybody
No, just blowing the carbon out of a known racist troll.
Referring to yourself, fascist?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 11:56:31 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
Sam Brown wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social
liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal
liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what
"*plonk*"
means.
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis me
with the other netkooks in here.
Fascists hate liberalism.
Nah, they love it.
Now you're reduced to stupid lying.
No, that's your province.
No, it's yours.
Bucky - STFU!@
Trying to prove to everybody
No, just blowing the carbon out of a known racist troll.
More accurately, showing that the only free speech you're interested in is
yours.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 7, Houston 5 (December 22)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, December 26 vs. San Antonio, 7:05
.
|
|
|
| User: "Curt" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
24 Dec 2006 01:50:09 AM |
|
|
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkfyb5bzw0.fsf@eris.io.com...
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis
me
with the other netkooks in here.
Fascists hate liberalism.
Nah, they love it.
Now you're reduced to stupid lying.
No, that's your province.
No, it's yours.
Bucky - STFU!@
Trying to prove to everybody
No, just blowing the carbon out of a known racist troll.
More accurately, showing that the only free speech you're interested in is
yours.
Nobody's particularly interested in Spammy's speech, free or otherwise.
Curt
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 05:53:09 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:33:04 +0000, Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No, because you're a fascist. You're a big-government,
big-business, anti-liberal fascist. Just like the rest of the
republican party.
Not to mention the fact that he's an idiot who doesn't know what "*plonk*"
means.
It means you lose debate with me, retreat, then petulantly dis me with the
other netkooks in here.
Cowardice defined.
....is one chattering chimp calling itself "Sam Brown".
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 7, Houston 5 (December 22)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, December 26 vs. San Antonio, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 01:43:44 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:26:38 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:50:26 -0800, Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:43:34 -0600, Carl Wilson wrote:
On 22 Dec 2006 00:15:39 -0800, "Merovingian" <BellaCasa_321@msn.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
Larry (Scratch) wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:01:16 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Oh, poor pitiful you, being "oppressed" by the mean, nasty liberal.
Hey no problem, I've really come to expect it from you lot over the years!
Of _course_ you do. And you'll be really upset to learn that Santa Claus
isn't real, either.
You're just another pipsqueak who demonizes "liberals"
LOL :) No one needs to demonize the left. They are very capable of doing
that all on their own.
Capable of doing so?....The things that Liberals are willing to admit
advocacy to in public, makes me truly terrified to imagine the things
they advocate secretly.
For a bunch of "tough" conservatives, you sure get terrified very
easily...
Freedom scares the ***** out of them. Literally. They would much rather
be led by the nose and fed comforting lies. Probably the most effective
liberal tactic would be to feed them exactly what they want to hear and
then go do what we damned well please; it has certainly worked for the
Republicans lately. Republicans have been filling these peoples ears with
***** while stealing them blind at the same time. And they just come
back begging for more.
Fortunately, most liberals have more self-respect than that.
I used to consider myself a conservative not so long ago. But after
hearing so many of them talk the talk but never walked the walk I
realized they were full of crap and became completely disgusted with
the lot.
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No,
Yes.
You're a big-government, big-business, anti-liberal
2 out of 3 ain't bad.
I prefer a smaller government.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 01:56:41 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 06:26:38 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:50:26 -0800, Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:43:34 -0600, Carl Wilson wrote:
On 22 Dec 2006 00:15:39 -0800, "Merovingian" <BellaCasa_321@msn.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
Larry (Scratch) wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:01:16 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Oh, poor pitiful you, being "oppressed" by the mean, nasty liberal.
Hey no problem, I've really come to expect it from you lot over the years!
Of _course_ you do. And you'll be really upset to learn that Santa Claus
isn't real, either.
You're just another pipsqueak who demonizes "liberals"
LOL :) No one needs to demonize the left. They are very capable of doing
that all on their own.
Capable of doing so?....The things that Liberals are willing to admit
advocacy to in public, makes me truly terrified to imagine the things
they advocate secretly.
For a bunch of "tough" conservatives, you sure get terrified very
easily...
Freedom scares the ***** out of them. Literally. They would much rather
be led by the nose and fed comforting lies. Probably the most effective
liberal tactic would be to feed them exactly what they want to hear and
then go do what we damned well please; it has certainly worked for the
Republicans lately. Republicans have been filling these peoples ears with
***** while stealing them blind at the same time. And they just come
back begging for more.
Fortunately, most liberals have more self-respect than that.
I used to consider myself a conservative not so long ago. But after
hearing so many of them talk the talk but never walked the walk I
realized they were full of crap and became completely disgusted with
the lot.
Yeah, until some time in 2001 I considered myself a social liberal and
fiscal conservative. The social conservatives and fiscal liberals that
took over ended up pushing me into full-scale liberalism.
Because you are inherently weak-minded and reactionary.
No,
Yes.
You're a big-government, big-business, anti-liberal
2 out of 3 ain't bad.
I prefer a smaller government.
No, fascist, you prefer a police state with more police, more
military, and less freedom.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 02:58:58 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
You're a big-government, big-business, anti-liberal
2 out of 3 ain't bad.
I prefer a smaller government.
No, fascist, you prefer a police state
If I did I'd say so, stop lying.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 03:24:25 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
You're a big-government, big-business, anti-liberal
2 out of 3 ain't bad.
I prefer a smaller government.
No, fascist, you prefer a police state
If I did I'd say so, stop lying.
Have you decided that you want the US to pull its troops out of Iraq
and reduce the size of the military?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 03:31:09 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
You're a big-government, big-business, anti-liberal
2 out of 3 ain't bad.
I prefer a smaller government.
No, fascist, you prefer a police state
If I did I'd say so, stop lying.
Have you decided that you want the US to pull its troops out of Iraq
and reduce the size of the military?
Not yet, but I'd like to see us prune back some of the domestic presence
of government.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 04:39:08 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
You're a big-government, big-business, anti-liberal
2 out of 3 ain't bad.
I prefer a smaller government.
No, fascist, you prefer a police state
If I did I'd say so, stop lying.
Have you decided that you want the US to pull its troops out of Iraq
and reduce the size of the military?
Not yet, but I'd like to see us prune back some of the domestic presence
of government.
So you want a big militaristic government instead of a government that
helps people.
You _are_ a fascist.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 04:54:17 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
You're a big-government, big-business, anti-liberal
2 out of 3 ain't bad.
I prefer a smaller government.
No, fascist, you prefer a police state
If I did I'd say so, stop lying.
Have you decided that you want the US to pull its troops out of Iraq
and reduce the size of the military?
Not yet, but I'd like to see us prune back some of the domestic presence
of government.
So you want a big militaristic government
Nah, just a decent sized military, which we seem to have now.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 05:48:54 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
You're a big-government, big-business, anti-liberal
2 out of 3 ain't bad.
I prefer a smaller government.
No, fascist, you prefer a police state
If I did I'd say so, stop lying.
Have you decided that you want the US to pull its troops out of Iraq
and reduce the size of the military?
Not yet, but I'd like to see us prune back some of the domestic presence
of government.
So you want a big militaristic government
Nah, just a decent sized military, which we seem to have now.
The US spends as much on its military as the rest of the world
combined. But it's not big enough for you because we can't kill
enough Iraqis to suit you.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 06:10:49 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Nah, just a decent sized military, which we seem to have now.
The US spends as much on its military as the rest of the world
combined. But it's not big enough for you because we can't kill
enough Iraqis to suit you.
He thinks he can get something for nothing.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 08:19:53 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
You're a big-government, big-business, anti-liberal
2 out of 3 ain't bad.
I prefer a smaller government.
No, fascist, you prefer a police state
If I did I'd say so, stop lying.
Have you decided that you want the US to pull its troops out of Iraq
and reduce the size of the military?
Not yet, but I'd like to see us prune back some of the domestic presence
of government.
So you want a big militaristic government
Nah, just a decent sized military, which we seem to have now.
The US spends as much on its military as the rest of the world
combined.
So?
Works for us.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 11:17:05 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
You're a big-government, big-business, anti-liberal
2 out of 3 ain't bad.
I prefer a smaller government.
No, fascist, you prefer a police state
If I did I'd say so, stop lying.
Have you decided that you want the US to pull its troops out of Iraq
and reduce the size of the military?
Not yet, but I'd like to see us prune back some of the domestic presence
of government.
So you want a big militaristic government
Nah, just a decent sized military, which we seem to have now.
The US spends as much on its military as the rest of the world
combined.
So?
So you're a big government, big military, fascist.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 11:22:55 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
You're a big-government, big-business, anti-liberal
2 out of 3 ain't bad.
I prefer a smaller government.
No, fascist, you prefer a police state
If I did I'd say so, stop lying.
Have you decided that you want the US to pull its troops out of Iraq
and reduce the size of the military?
Not yet, but I'd like to see us prune back some of the domestic presence
of government.
So you want a big militaristic government
Nah, just a decent sized military, which we seem to have now.
The US spends as much on its military as the rest of the world
combined.
So?
So you're a big government, big military,
We're a big nation with big needs to fill, would you run a Caddy on a 4
banger?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: ! |
23 Dec 2006 11:39:51 PM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
You're a big-government, big-business, anti-liberal
2 out of 3 ain't bad.
I prefer a smaller government.
No, fascist, you prefer a police state
If I did I'd say so, stop lying.
Have you decided that you want the US to pull its troops out of Iraq
and reduce the size of the military?
Not yet, but I'd like to see us prune back some of the domestic presence
of government.
So you want a big militaristic government
Nah, just a decent sized military, which we seem to have now.
The US spends as much on its military as the rest of the world
combined.
So?
So you're a big government, big military,
We're a big nation with big needs to fill,
Fascists need a big military in order to invade other countries, kill
people, and install "friendly" governments.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
