| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
17 Dec 2006 09:20:31 PM |
| Object: |
The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
"If a young fellow has an option of having a decent career or joining
the army to
fight in Iraq, you can bet your life that he would not be in Iraq." -
Charles Rangel
.
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
23 Dec 2006 12:45:28 AM |
|
|
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:44:15 -0800, Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:26:17 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:58:17 GMT, Sam "Chickenhawk" Brown
<xxx@nospam.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
[...]
I'm not the one disenfranchising YOU from speaking against the war, now
am I?
No, you just threaten them with violence when they point out your
*****.
Not to mention the boy doesn't know what "disenfranchise" means. He seems
to think calling him an idiot is the same thing as "censorship."
You see people like Sam think free speech means that they are free to
say whatever they want, but no one else is free to voice their
differing opinion.
Yet you seek to chill free speech by saying only those who serve can
express a pro Iraq war position.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
22 Dec 2006 04:23:45 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:58:17 GMT, Sam "Scared Shitless" Brown
<xxx@nospam.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
[...]
Care to try me in person, coward?
Such a tough guy... {snicker}
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
22 Dec 2006 07:17:48 PM |
|
|
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:58:17 GMT, Sam "Scared Shitless" Brown
<xxx@nospam.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
[...]
Care to try me in person, coward?
Such a tough guy... {snicker}
I'll take that as a no, Remora...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
23 Dec 2006 12:33:53 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:17:48 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:58:17 GMT, Sam "Scared Shitless" Brown
<xxx@nospam.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
[...]
Care to try me in person, coward?
Such a tough guy... {snicker}
I'll take that as a no, Remora...
Spammy, if it ever came to that it damn sure wouldn't be a tame boxing
match.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
23 Dec 2006 12:41:26 AM |
|
|
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:17:48 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:58:17 GMT, Sam "Scared Shitless" Brown
<xxx@nospam.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
[...]
Care to try me in person, coward?
Such a tough guy... {snicker}
I'll take that as a no, Remora...
Spammy, if it ever came to that it damn sure wouldn't be a tame boxing
match.
UFC style is fine by me.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
22 Dec 2006 04:21:32 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:38:29 -0800, Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:33:56 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Carl Wilson wrote:
Come on Frank! Sam's idea of fighting is a boxing match.
After Frank lost this debate what else was there?
Debate? Lost?
Child, I think you're laboring under some false impressions, here. All I
see is you jabbering away repeating the usual ***** all the
chickenhawks spew. And you're too much of a coward not only to admit when
you're wrong but to even stand behind your own words.
The only way Sam "Shitstain" Brown can "win" an argument is to clip
someone's post to make it look like he said something that he didn't.
But what else should we expect from an absolute coward like Shitstain
Sam?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
22 Dec 2006 07:17:10 PM |
|
|
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:38:29 -0800, Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:33:56 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Carl Wilson wrote:
Come on Frank! Sam's idea of fighting is a boxing match.
After Frank lost this debate what else was there?
Debate? Lost?
Child, I think you're laboring under some false impressions, here. All I
see is you jabbering away repeating the usual ***** all the
chickenhawks spew. And you're too much of a coward not only to admit when
you're wrong but to even stand behind your own words.
The only way Sam "Shitstain" Brown can "win" an argument is to clip
someone's post to make it look like he said something that he didn't.
Wrong again, liar.
But what else should we expect from an absolute coward like Shitstain
Sam?
Kinda obsessed with me aren't ya?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
23 Dec 2006 12:37:27 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:17:10 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:38:29 -0800, Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:33:56 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Carl Wilson wrote:
Come on Frank! Sam's idea of fighting is a boxing match.
After Frank lost this debate what else was there?
Debate? Lost?
Child, I think you're laboring under some false impressions, here. All I
see is you jabbering away repeating the usual ***** all the
chickenhawks spew. And you're too much of a coward not only to admit when
you're wrong but to even stand behind your own words.
The only way Sam "Shitstain" Brown can "win" an argument is to clip
someone's post to make it look like he said something that he didn't.
Wrong again, liar.
Keep repeating that lie and just maybe someone besides yourself will
believe it.
But what else should we expect from an absolute coward like Shitstain
Sam?
Kinda obsessed with me aren't ya?
Nah, just having fun with a wannbe tough guy.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
20 Dec 2006 11:08:16 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:33:56 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:29:55 -0800, Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com>
wrote the following in alt.atheism:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 00:07:00 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:19:05 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:16:34 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
(Pssst! There's a Moslem behind you! He's gonna getcha, better look out!)
Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders
World Islamic Front Statement
[more drivel elided]
Ooh, I'm soooo scaaaared!
No reason the WTC being dropped and the Pentagon crashed into should
bother a tough guy like you, eh?
And I suppose you really think that Iraq had something to do with that,
don't you? Sorry, coward, it just ain't so.
Not directly, no.
"Not directly?" Not indirectly, either.
And no, it _didn't_ bother me,
Telling...
Yeah, it tells me that I'm not an idiot. Nor a coward.
not past mourning the dead and looking for
ways to prevent such things in the future. I'm not about to give up
essential liberty for temporary (and entirely illusory) safety. Unlike,
say, _you_.
WW2 rationing, blackout curtains, and censored mail ring a bell?
All employed, all ended.
Show me the end of the "war on terrorism." What constitutes "victory?"
Who do we fight? Where do we fight them?
To my knowledge, mail was only censored to and from people in the military.
Now we have habeas corpus suspended, which _didn't happen_ during WWII.
We have the so-called "USA PATRIOT" Act. We have illegal NSA wiretaps.
We have people being arrested for taking pictures outside.
Just because bad stuff happened in WWII doesn't make it right, and the
stuff that's happening now is worse and has less reason.
But cowards like you just lie right down for it and beg for more.
Or, um, not, actually. I'm far more concerned, as it happens, about the
real wannabe fascists who've been actually taking our rights away.
You're a fucking traitorous smug little *****,
Not stopping at "fucking raghead apologist" he zooms straight on to
"fucking traitorous smug little *****." What's the matter, coward, does
the truth hurt?
I've not seen one iota of said from you.
If you would read something besides Little Green Fascists you might learn
something about what's really going on in this formerly-free country.
***** and DIE!
No
Please?
Not even if you begged me.
Not
that I'm afraid of them, either, but I _am_ angry.
You're fighting phantoms that do not exist, seek help.
I'm not the one insulting vets
Nor am I, liar.
"Skerry Monster." You said it, he's a vet, it's an insult. Al, too, is a
vet; seems you insulted him as well.
So who's the one lying here? 'Tain't me, I'm afraid.
and shitting myself in fear of some brown
person blowing up my toy collection.
Always with the hyperbole, your trademark in fact.
So you're _not_ shitting yourself in fear of some brown person blowing up
your toy collection? Then why _are_ you shitting yourself in fear?
Oh, and there are a lot of people
who agree with me, or did you fail to notice the result of the last
election, there?
You mean that Dems can tote guns and get elected when they become
pseudo-pubs?
I don't know what the hell you're trying to say but whatever it is, I mean
that the Republicans dropped like flies. It'll be a Democratic Congress
in January and that's no accident.
LOl.
That's a one act play.
We'll see, won't we? I'm confident, though, that given his record, Dubya
has the ability to ***** things up so badly that the Repubs won't regain
power for a generation. Just ask Lincoln Chafee.
You, though. You're just a little coward, aren't you? Afraid of your own
shadow because there might be a Brown Person with a bomb there.
How long have you fronted for Al Qaeda?
I think you bear examination.
Okay, _that's_ funny.
No, that's meaningful.
No, that's an vain attempt at bullying and about as "meaningful" as a fart
in a hurricane.
Listen, little one, in case it has still eluded
you, I'm _not_ a coward, so vague threats don't affect me at all.
Nor do real world ones like terrorism apparently.
When was the last time you were directly threatened by a terrorist attack?
When was the last time you were even _peripherally involved_ in a
terrorist attack? And no, knowing someone who died in the towers does not
qualify. Lots of us know someone who died there.
And of
course, since you _are_ a coward, that's all you have.
Step in a ring, we'll see if you have any guts.
I refer you to my previous posts on that particular subject. Just because
you can beat someone up in a safe environment does _not_ mean that you're
not a coward. It just means that you're a bully. And as we all know, all
bullies are, in fact, cowards.
So, what _is_ your real name, "Sam?"
So what difference to this "discussion" would it make?
It might go a little way toward proving that you're not a coward, is what.
Not likely, though.
You impotent old fart.
Ah. I'm "old," am I? So what's stopping you from signing up, Junior?
If I'm "old" to you, that would make you young enough to serve, wouldn't
it? What's stopping you?
Cowardice, maybe?
Come on Frank! Sam's idea of fighting is a boxing match.
After Frank lost this debate what else was there?
Only in your dreams, boy. Only in your dreams.
X-box?
Probably playing online games is a close as you ever got to a real
fight, chickenhawk.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Mayhar" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
20 Dec 2006 08:55:42 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:41:20 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
Come on Frank! Sam's idea of fighting is a boxing match. Asking him to
risk combat means he would have to also risk his life itself, and we
all know chickenhawks never do that!
Because if they did, they wouldn't be chickenhawks.
Hell, I'm not asking him to risk combat, I'm just asking him to put his
***** in Iraq, even if in a support position. If he is, as he claims, over
41 then he should be able to do that just fine and the Army would be glad
to have him.
Of course, while he's a coward he's no fool and he knows how dangerous it
is just to _be_ in Iraq.
But he's perfectly happy sending someone _else_ to take the risk!
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
20 Dec 2006 10:39:56 PM |
|
|
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:41:20 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
Come on Frank! Sam's idea of fighting is a boxing match. Asking him to
risk combat means he would have to also risk his life itself, and we
all know chickenhawks never do that!
Because if they did, they wouldn't be chickenhawks.
Are handicapped voters "chickenhawks" if they support the war?
How about working women who are in favor?
Explain.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Mayhar" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
21 Dec 2006 12:50:33 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:39:56 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:41:20 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
Come on Frank! Sam's idea of fighting is a boxing match. Asking him to
risk combat means he would have to also risk his life itself, and we
all know chickenhawks never do that!
Because if they did, they wouldn't be chickenhawks.
Are handicapped voters "chickenhawks" if they support the war?
No, just healthy people like you who refuse to put their own asses on the
line while encouraging others to do so.
You're also commonly known as "yellow elephants."
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
21 Dec 2006 01:11:33 AM |
|
|
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:39:56 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:41:20 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
Come on Frank! Sam's idea of fighting is a boxing match. Asking him to
risk combat means he would have to also risk his life itself, and we
all know chickenhawks never do that!
Because if they did, they wouldn't be chickenhawks.
Are handicapped voters "chickenhawks" if they support the war?
No, just healthy people like yo
OK, we need to see who _Frank decides_ get to be in favor of it, just
asking....
Anyone else?
Forest rangers?
Housewives?
Elderly folks?
EMTs?
Coast Guard folk?
Cops?
The elderly?
What say you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Mayhar" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
21 Dec 2006 11:15:02 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:11:33 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:39:56 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:41:20 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
Come on Frank! Sam's idea of fighting is a boxing match. Asking him to
risk combat means he would have to also risk his life itself, and we
all know chickenhawks never do that!
Because if they did, they wouldn't be chickenhawks.
Are handicapped voters "chickenhawks" if they support the war?
No, just healthy people like yo
OK, we need to see who _Frank decides_ get to be in favor of it, just
asking....
Anyone else?
Forest rangers?
Housewives?
Elderly folks?
EMTs?
Coast Guard folk?
Cops?
The elderly?
Lose track there, coward?
What say you?
No, just healthy but cowardly pricks like you who hide behind said forest
rangers, housewives, elderly, EMTs, Coast Guard servicemen, cops, et al.
Oh, and let's not forget the soldiers whom you're happily watching die so
that you don't have to risk your _own_ ***** to fight the war in which you
so strongly believe.
None of them are cowards. You, though, are.
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
21 Dec 2006 12:51:27 PM |
|
|
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:11:33 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:39:56 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:41:20 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
Come on Frank! Sam's idea of fighting is a boxing match. Asking him to
risk combat means he would have to also risk his life itself, and we
all know chickenhawks never do that!
Because if they did, they wouldn't be chickenhawks.
Are handicapped voters "chickenhawks" if they support the war?
No, just healthy people like yo
OK, we need to see who _Frank decides_ get to be in favor of it, just
asking....
Anyone else?
Forest rangers?
Housewives?
Elderly folks?
EMTs?
Coast Guard folk?
Cops?
The elderly?
Lose track there, coward?
Just wondering how many other folks you will deprive of the right to
speak in favor of the war.
What say you?
No,
No what?
They get rights I don't, that it?
Why?
just healthy but cowardly pricks like you
Oh I see, they're all unhealthy like you so they get to voice an
opinion, that it?
who hide behind said forest
rangers, housewives, elderly, EMTs, Coast Guard servicemen, cops, et al.
"Hide behind"?
You mean we can't apply the rule of censorship to ALL Americans?
Oh, and let's not forget the soldiers whom you're happily watching die
Wow, another lying accusation, you vile *****!
so that you don't have to risk your _own_ ***** to fight the war in which you
so strongly believe.
I see an enemy far closer to home...be glad we have laws to prevent
dealing with vermin like you.
None of them are cowards. You, though, are.
This from the unhealthy cowardly 46 year old who tosses out insults like
a teenager than runs to hid behind his prematurely prevalent health
maladies?
You're a joke for all to deride.
And at the rate you're going your miserable life will swiftly extinguish
- thank GOD!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Mayhar" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
21 Dec 2006 01:12:11 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:51:27 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Oh, and let's not forget the soldiers whom you're happily watching die
Wow, another lying accusation, you vile *****!
Truth hurts, doesn't it, chickenhawk?
so that you don't have to risk your _own_ ***** to fight the war in which you
so strongly believe.
I see an enemy far closer to home...be glad we have laws to prevent
dealing with vermin like you.
Yep, Little Green Snotballs. Full of threat and bluster and scared to
death of actually doing anything about it.
None of them are cowards. You, though, are.
This from the unhealthy cowardly 46 year old who tosses out insults like
a teenager than runs to hid behind his prematurely prevalent health
maladies?
I'm right here, coward. Right out here in public view. You know my name,
you know where I live. Yet you're the one who is hiding behind a
pseudonym and calling _me_ a "coward."
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatt" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
21 Dec 2006 03:41:11 PM |
|
|
"Frank Mayhar" <frank@exit.com> wrote in message
news:bt2r54-bu03.ln1@tinker.exit.com...
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:51:27 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
I'm right here, coward. Right out here in public view. You know my name,
you know where I live. Yet you're the one who is hiding behind a
pseudonym and calling _me_ a "coward."
LOL! Spammy? Naaaaaawww...
Imagine that.
-c
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
21 Dec 2006 03:59:38 PM |
|
|
gatt wrote:
"Frank Mayhar" <frank@exit.com> wrote in message
news:bt2r54-bu03.ln1@tinker.exit.com...
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:51:27 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
I'm right here, coward. Right out here in public view. You know my name,
you know where I live. Yet you're the one who is hiding behind a
pseudonym and calling _me_ a "coward."
LOL! Spammy? Naaaaaawww...
Imagine that.
Bbbbbbbut...I thought you had me on ignore????
Hypocrite.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
21 Dec 2006 01:26:59 PM |
|
|
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:51:27 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Oh, and let's not forget the soldiers whom you're happily watching die
Wow, another lying accusation, you vile *****!
Truth hurts, doesn't it, chickenhawk?
You're incapable of truth, coward.
so that you don't have to risk your _own_ ***** to fight the war in which you
so strongly believe.
I see an enemy far closer to home...be glad we have laws to prevent
dealing with vermin like you.
Yep, Little Green Snotballs. Full of threat and bluster and scared to
death of actually doing anything about it.
I'd be glad to if you want to get in the ring.
None of them are cowards. You, though, are.
This from the unhealthy cowardly 46 year old who tosses out insults like
a teenager than runs to hid behind his prematurely prevalent health
maladies?
I'm right here, coward. Right out here in public view. You know my name,
you know where I live.
Is that an invitation for me to come over and kick your *****?
Why won't you just climb in a neutral ring with a ref and settle up coward?
Yet you're the one who is hiding behind a
pseudonym and calling _me_ a "coward."
Indeed, you gutless puke coward!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Mayhar" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
21 Dec 2006 02:36:45 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:26:59 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:51:27 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Oh, and let's not forget the soldiers whom you're happily watching die
Wow, another lying accusation, you vile *****!
Truth hurts, doesn't it, chickenhawk?
You're incapable of truth, coward.
You're trying so hard to pretend it's not true that you threaten to
assault anyone who contradicts you. Pretty much speaks for itself, there.
Yep, Little Green Snotballs. Full of threat and bluster and scared to
death of actually doing anything about it.
I'd be glad to if you want to get in the ring.
Yep, in a boxing ring where you can be all the bully you want to be and no
one will ever call you on it. In real life, on the other hand, you're just
a sad little chickenhawk.
I'm right here, coward. Right out here in public view. You know my name,
you know where I live.
Is that an invitation for me to come over and kick your *****?
Not unless you enjoy spending time in jail. See, vague threats don't work
on me. I won't be bullied and I won't play your game.
(Now cue the "I've got you dancing on my string!" babble.)
Why won't you just climb in a neutral ring with a ref and settle up coward?
Why should I satisfy your sexual fantasies, chickenhawk?
Yet you're the one who is hiding behind a
pseudonym and calling _me_ a "coward."
Indeed, you gutless puke coward!
Sure, "Sam Brown." Chickenhawk. Who hides behind an alias and isn't a
man unless he's beating someone up in a boxing ring.
You're pathetic.
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
21 Dec 2006 03:06:14 PM |
|
|
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:26:59 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:51:27 +0000, Sam Brown wrote:
Frank Mayhar wrote:
Oh, and let's not forget the soldiers whom you're happily watching die
Wow, another lying accusation, you vile *****!
Truth hurts, doesn't it, chickenhawk?
You're incapable of truth, coward.
You're trying so hard to pretend it's not true that you threaten to
assault anyone who contradicts you. Pretty much speaks for itself, there.
You use fighting words and then wuss out when called on it, coward...
Yep, Little Green Snotballs. Full of threat and bluster and scared to
death of actually doing anything about it.
I'd be glad to if you want to get in the ring.
Yep, in a boxing ring where you can be all the bully you want to be and no
one will ever call you on it.
Only with a ref and rules, duh...
In real life, on the other hand, you're just
a sad little chickenhawk.
Why darn me for having an opinion on war and not serving.
I also have opinions of coal mining, but have never mined.
Does that make me a canary?
ROTFLMAO!
I'm right here, coward. Right out here in public view. You know my name,
you know where I live.
Is that an invitation for me to come over and kick your *****?
Not unless you enjoy spending time in jail.
Oh, just a taunt then, ok.
See, vague threats don't work
on me.
Yet you use them on others routinely, go figure...
I won't be bullied and I won't play your game.
You already have, pavlovian fool.
ding...ding..ding...
(Now cue the "I've got you dancing on my string!" babble.)
Yer a beat late.
Why won't you just climb in a neutral ring with a ref and settle up coward?
Why should I satisfy your sexual fantasies, chickenhawk?
No sex involved, projecting again?
Yet you're the one who is hiding behind a
pseudonym and calling _me_ a "coward."
Indeed, you gutless puke coward!
Sure, "Sam Brown." Chickenhawk.
And canary, don't forget canary!
Who hides behind an alias and isn't a
man unless he's beating someone up in a boxing ring.
Lol, I so totally own you it's sublime!
You're pathetic.
I win again!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
22 Dec 2006 04:14:03 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:06:14 GMT, Sam "Chickenhawk" Brown
<xxx@nospam.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
[...]
Why darn me for having an opinion on war and not serving.
When that opinion is "go fight em' boys" while never wearing the
uniform yourself and sharing in the risk, then yes.
I also have opinions of coal mining, but have never mined.
They are probably just as uninformed and useless as your opinions on
war are.
Does that make me a canary?
Close. It makes you a chickenhawk.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
22 Dec 2006 04:22:14 PM |
|
|
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:06:14 GMT, Sam "Chickenhawk" Brown
<xxx@nospam.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
[...]
Why darn me for having an opinion on war and not serving.
When that opinion is "go fight em' boys" while never wearing the
uniform yourself and sharing in the risk, then yes.
I see.
So only those who have served or will serve can express an opinion in
favor of the war, is that it?
You do realize that's a totalitarian fascist stance, don't you?
I also have opinions of coal mining, but have never mined.
They are probably just as uninformed and useless as your opinions on
war are.
So if I'm in favor of better safe rooms and communication equipment I
must also be silenced to suit your spite?
Does that make me a canary?
Close. It makes you a chickenhawk.
So again, only those who are in or will be in the military can express
an opinion in favor of the war?
Do I read you loud and clear on that?
You ***** fascist twat.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
22 Dec 2006 06:03:28 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:22:14 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:06:14 GMT, Sam "Chickenhawk" Brown
<xxx@nospam.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
[...]
Why darn me for having an opinion on war and not serving.
When that opinion is "go fight em' boys" while never wearing the
uniform yourself and sharing in the risk, then yes.
I see.
So only those who have served or will serve can express an opinion in
favor of the war, is that it?
If you are so much in favor, then why didn't you serve?
You do realize that's a totalitarian fascist stance, don't you?
In your opinion. But yours is a cowardly stance.
I also have opinions of coal mining, but have never mined.
They are probably just as uninformed and useless as your opinions on
war are.
So if I'm in favor of better safe rooms and communication equipment I
must also be silenced to suit your spite?
Who has silenced you Sam? Your posts seem to be showing up on a
regular basis.
Does that make me a canary?
Close. It makes you a chickenhawk.
So again, only those who are in or will be in the military can express
an opinion in favor of the war?
Do I read you loud and clear on that?
You ***** fascist twat.
Still making excuses for your cowardice Sam?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
22 Dec 2006 07:03:17 PM |
|
|
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:22:14 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:06:14 GMT, Sam "Chickenhawk" Brown
<xxx@nospam.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
[...]
Why darn me for having an opinion on war and not serving.
When that opinion is "go fight em' boys" while never wearing the
uniform yourself and sharing in the risk, then yes.
I see.
So only those who have served or will serve can express an opinion in
favor of the war, is that it?
If you are so much in favor, then why didn't you serve?
It's bad form to answer a question with another question you know.
You do realize that's a totalitarian fascist stance, don't you?
In your opinion. But yours is a cowardly stance.
So depriving people of having an opinion unless they serve is not
cowardly and fascist?
I also have opinions of coal mining, but have never mined.
They are probably just as uninformed and useless as your opinions on
war are.
So if I'm in favor of better safe rooms and communication equipment I
must also be silenced to suit your spite?
Who has silenced you Sam?
You seek to do so.
Your posts seem to be showing up on a regular basis.
And your also, regardless of who serves...get it now?
Does that make me a canary?
Close. It makes you a chickenhawk.
So again, only those who are in or will be in the military can express
an opinion in favor of the war?
Do I read you loud and clear on that?
You ***** fascist twat.
Still making excuses for your cowardice Sam?
Still trying to keep those who haven't served from voicing their support?
Very un-American of you btw.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Wilson" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
23 Dec 2006 12:10:58 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:03:17 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:22:14 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:06:14 GMT, Sam "Chickenhawk" Brown
<xxx@nospam.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
[...]
Why darn me for having an opinion on war and not serving.
When that opinion is "go fight em' boys" while never wearing the
uniform yourself and sharing in the risk, then yes.
I see.
So only those who have served or will serve can express an opinion in
favor of the war, is that it?
If you are so much in favor, then why didn't you serve?
It's bad form to answer a question with another question you know.
Perhaps you've answered that question before, but not that I've read.
You do realize that's a totalitarian fascist stance, don't you?
In your opinion. But yours is a cowardly stance.
So depriving people of having an opinion unless they serve is not
cowardly and fascist?
Who is depriving you of your opinion?
I also have opinions of coal mining, but have never mined.
They are probably just as uninformed and useless as your opinions on
war are.
So if I'm in favor of better safe rooms and communication equipment I
must also be silenced to suit your spite?
Who has silenced you Sam?
You seek to do so.
Disagreeing with you and your ***** isn't silencing you Sammy. It's
simply disagreeing with you. I have the right to free speech too you
know, even if you don't like what I have to say.
Your posts seem to be showing up on a regular basis.
And your also, regardless of who serves...get it now?
So why are you crying about being silenced when clearly you aren't?
Does that make me a canary?
Close. It makes you a chickenhawk.
So again, only those who are in or will be in the military can express
an opinion in favor of the war?
Do I read you loud and clear on that?
You ***** fascist twat.
Still making excuses for your cowardice Sam?
Still trying to keep those who haven't served from voicing their support?
You can and have voiced your opinion without restriction. I plan on
doing the same.
Very un-American of you btw.
Voicing my opinion is un-American?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
23 Dec 2006 12:38:13 AM |
|
|
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:03:17 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:22:14 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:06:14 GMT, Sam "Chickenhawk" Brown
<xxx@nospam.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
[...]
Why darn me for having an opinion on war and not serving.
When that opinion is "go fight em' boys" while never wearing the
uniform yourself and sharing in the risk, then yes.
I see.
So only those who have served or will serve can express an opinion in
favor of the war, is that it?
If you are so much in favor, then why didn't you serve?
It's bad form to answer a question with another question you know.
Perhaps you've answered that question before, but not that I've read.
Perhaps you'd take the time to answer mine, it preceded yours.
You do realize that's a totalitarian fascist stance, don't you?
In your opinion. But yours is a cowardly stance.
So depriving people of having an opinion unless they serve is not
cowardly and fascist?
Who is depriving you of your opinion?
You do if you seek to chill it by criticizing me for not serving.
I also have opinions of coal mining, but have never mined.
They are probably just as uninformed and useless as your opinions on
war are.
So if I'm in favor of better safe rooms and communication equipment I
must also be silenced to suit your spite?
Who has silenced you Sam?
You seek to do so.
Disagreeing with you and your ***** isn't silencing you Sammy.
Nope, when insults are used it has a chilling effect on free speech,
that's what you're doing.
Stop lying.
Your posts seem to be showing up on a regular basis.
And your also, regardless of who serves...get it now?
So why are you crying about being silenced when clearly you aren't?
Because you are employing cheap insults to chill free speech.
Does that make me a canary?
Close. It makes you a chickenhawk.
So again, only those who are in or will be in the military can express
an opinion in favor of the war?
Do I read you loud and clear on that?
You ***** fascist twat.
Still making excuses for your cowardice Sam?
Still trying to keep those who haven't served from voicing their support?
You can and have voiced your opinion without restriction. I plan on
doing the same.
And you should stop demanding that I serve in order to be in favor.
Very un-American of you btw.
Voicing my opinion is un-American?
Chilling free speech is.
You've been caught red-handed.
Be a man, admit it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
23 Dec 2006 02:35:59 AM |
|
|
Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> writes:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:03:17 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:22:14 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
Carl Wilson wrote:
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 21:06:14 GMT, Sam "Chickenhawk" Brown
<xxx@nospam.net> wrote the following in alt.atheism:
[...]
Why darn me for having an opinion on war and not serving.
When that opinion is "go fight em' boys" while never wearing the
uniform yourself and sharing in the risk, then yes.
I see.
So only those who have served or will serve can express an opinion in
favor of the war, is that it?
If you are so much in favor, then why didn't you serve?
It's bad form to answer a question with another question you know.
Perhaps you've answered that question before, but not that I've read.
Perhaps you'd take the time to answer mine, it preceded yours.
You do realize that's a totalitarian fascist stance, don't you?
In your opinion. But yours is a cowardly stance.
So depriving people of having an opinion unless they serve is not cowardly
and fascist?
Who is depriving you of your opinion?
You do if you seek to chill it by criticizing me for not serving.
Pull what's left of your head out of your lame *****, "Sam", and act like a
man. I have no idea if you actually served or not. Given your attitude, you
don't automatically deserve respect, with your history in Usenet. (If you
actually served, you're showing very little respect for the foundations of
this country - the ones that every elected official swears to defend.)
I also have opinions of coal mining, but have never mined.
They are probably just as uninformed and useless as your opinions on
war are.
So if I'm in favor of better safe rooms and communication equipment I
must also be silenced to suit your spite?
Who has silenced you Sam?
You seek to do so.
Disagreeing with you and your ***** isn't silencing you Sammy.
Nope, when insults are used it has a chilling effect on free speech, that's
what you're doing.
Stop lying.
Why don't you live up to your own demands? You're afraid of *insults*?!? If
you had the backbone of a tapeworm, you'd laugh at insults and actually show a
belief in free speech.
Your posts seem to be showing up on a regular basis.
And your also, regardless of who serves...get it now?
So why are you crying about being silenced when clearly you aren't?
Because you are employing cheap insults to chill free speech.
If you actually believe that insults can "chill" free speech, be glad you
don't get the derision you deserve.
Does that make me a canary?
Close. It makes you a chickenhawk.
So again, only those who are in or will be in the military can express an
opinion in favor of the war?
Do I read you loud and clear on that?
You ***** fascist twat.
Still making excuses for your cowardice Sam?
Still trying to keep those who haven't served from voicing their support?
You can and have voiced your opinion without restriction. I plan on
doing the same.
And you should stop demanding that I serve in order to be in favor.
You should stop demanding that we agree with you.
Very un-American of you btw.
Voicing my opinion is un-American?
Chilling free speech is.
You've been caught red-handed.
Be a man, admit it.
Only in your less than respectable opinion, which you want everyone else to
respect without question.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Chicago 7, Houston 5 (December 22)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, December 26 vs. San Antonio, 7:05
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Mayhar" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
22 Dec 2006 10:35:20 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:03:28 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:22:14 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
You ***** fascist twat.
Still making excuses for your cowardice Sam?
Always.
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: The Despicable Liberal Quote Of The Week |
22 Dec 2006 10:58:03 PM |
|
|
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:03:28 +0000, Carl Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:22:14 GMT, Sam Brown <xxx@nospam.net> wrote the
following in alt.atheism:
You ***** fascist twat.
Still making excuses for your cowardice Sam?
Always.
Still obsessing Frank?
Here's a morsel to sit on and deny:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=1309
Saddam Pays Palestinian Terrorists While Iraqis "Suffer From Sanctions"
By John Perazzo
FrontPageMagazine.com | May 15, 2002
THIS PAST MARCH 25 in the packed Palestine Chamber of Commerce hall,
those in attendance emitted a collective, audible gasp in response to
this very special announcement: Iraqi president Saddam Hussein will
henceforth pay $25,000 apiece to the families of Palestinian suicide
bombers. This represents a significant increase over the traditional
"going rate" of $10,000 designed to help entice the rest of Yasser
Arafat’s legendary "million martyrs" to volunteer for their own glorious
suicidemurders. After the announcement was made, the men at the head
table proceeded to call out the names of fortyseven recent "martyrs,"
whose surviving relatives then proudly stepped forward to sign for their
checks. With these payments, Saddam’s cumulative intifadaera
contributions to the families of Palestinian terrorists eclipsed the $10
million mark.
In the weeks since Iraq upped its payments for suicide bombings, a dozen
additional Palestinian "martyrs" have successfully struck civilian
targets in Israel including one who killed twentyfive Israelis, many of
them elderly, as they shared a Passover meal at a hotel. The parents of
these bombers, of course, are now scheduled to receive their ample
stipends from Saddam a reward for having done such a masterful job of
raising the coldeyed, remorseless, savages who were once their children.
When reading the words of these parents, one is struck by the
conspicuous absence of grief they express in the wake of their
children’s deaths. Most commonly they convey only happiness that their
offspring were fortunate enough to end their lives in the glorious
pursuit of murdering as many Jews as possible. Their glee is not at all
surprising, given that Yasser Arafat himself who is immensely popular
among his followers regularly urges Palestinians to procreate abundantly
so as to be able to donate more offspring to his intifada martyr
brigade. As he stated to the residents of a West Bank refugee camp, "I
call upon each and every one of you to bring into this world at least
twelve children and give me ten of them in order to continue the [jihad]."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|