On Jan 18, 8:39=A0pm, "vivapadre...@aol.com"
<faggotfuck...@budweiser.com> wrote:
On Jan 18, 8:26 pm, ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> wrote:
On Jan 18, 7:51 pm, RedDog <craigchil...@budweiser.com> wrote:
On Jan 18, 4:04 pm, No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:
Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@hotmail.com> writes:
On Jan 18, 10:36 am, DanielSan <peterson...@comcast.net> wrote:
No One wrote:
Is that all you have? =A0Is that really how you're going to resp=
ond to my
post? =A0With a poke at the spelling of one word? =A0Ad hominem =
attacks are
a sign of a weak debater.
That's all No One has.
Well... ad homs and lying and red herrings...
"Emerson Wainwright" is the new name used by the troll ScottyFLL, wh=
o
is simply recycling his old material. =A0He has a grudge - a very lo=
ng
one and when his feelings are hurt, he acts out, regessing to the
point where he has the maturity of a 12 year old boy. =A0He is a
pathological liar.
He also just made a fool of himself, as he confused me with his arch=
enemy (the one he calls "Blob"), who just started using "No One" as =
a
user name (which will probably go on for a few more days).
Curiously, ScottyFLL (now Emerson Wainwright) put me on his enemies
list merely for disagreeing with him over the level of proof needed
to make a credible case over the alleged sexcapades of an otherwise
obscure Idaho senator.
You're such a filthy miserable little liar, No One.
1. ScottyFLL is *not* a "troll", he just bested you in argument is
all, and you're too small of a "man" to admit it. You are the one
having the maturity of a 12 year old, and *you* are the pathological
liar, not Scotty.
2. I'm not Bob, you fucking idiot, and Scotty never had me confused
with you. ...... Moron.
3. Nobody rational would object to you simply "disagreeing", No One,
but you're so small of a person that whenever we best you in an
argument, you immediately lie, alter the subject, and spew insults,
which in your insecure little mind evidently serves to prevent your
defeat. You're just a laughing stock to any of us who have ever tried
to engage you in rational argument, No One.
In other words, you're a ludicrous little loser, No One. :-)- Hide quo=
ted text -
- Show quoted text -
He simply can't stand to be wrong.
I mean, he has to KNOW that sometimes he's wrong.
But he just will never admit to it.
It's a sickness, as I said before.
Exactly. I'd given up on him years ago, and simply for that reason. If
it weren't for his insecurity and dishonesty, No One would have a lot
more to offer this group.
I agree.
You, on the other hand, are quite the opposite, Scotty. I have in the
past had rational discussions with you and you've proven yourself to
be very honest (as well as very intelligent).
Why, THANK you, RedDog! :-)
.
